View Full Version : The Congress
MisterVeritis
08-18-2018, 03:36 PM
"Congress should be a part time job with minimum wage and term limits."
I agree it should be a part time job. I also agree with term limits. I believe it should be well funded so anyone with the desire could become a politician for some very brief period of time.
DGUtley
08-18-2018, 03:38 PM
I don’t know about part time but I adamantly agree on term limits.
Peter1469
08-18-2018, 10:46 PM
They already are part time.
donttread
08-19-2018, 07:01 AM
No more career politicians
Sergeant Gleed
08-22-2018, 11:57 PM
"Congress should be a part time job with minimum wage and term limits."
I agree it should be a part time job. I also agree with term limits. I believe it should be well funded so anyone with the desire could become a politician for some very brief period of time.
California shows that term limits don't work when the population is mostly traitors, morons, moronic traitors, and illegal aliens being pandered to by moronic traitors.
A mandatory bi-annual audit of their entire finances would work.
A mandatory exit-audit of their finances would work.
A requirement that they leave Congress no richer than the expansion of the national GDP during their term in office. And if they make the GDP go down, they get fined appropriately. They'd have to learn REAL economics, then, not this socialist malarkey.
Requiring that their salary be no more than twice the median income of their district, as determined by the IRS, would give them incentive to REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS.
Making them subject to all laws passed upon We the People, but with double the penalties, including hanging them twice, if called for, would help.
Tar and feathers would help.
Term limits will not, as California has shown.
MisterVeritis
08-23-2018, 07:19 AM
California shows that term limits don't work when the population is mostly traitors, morons, moronic traitors, and illegal aliens being pandered to by moronic traitors.
A mandatory bi-annual audit of their entire finances would work.
A mandatory exit-audit of their finances would work.
A requirement that they leave Congress no richer than the expansion of the national GDP during their term in office. And if they make the GDP go down, they get fined appropriately. They'd have to learn REAL economics, then, not this socialist malarkey.
Requiring that their salary be no more than twice the median income of their district, as determined by the IRS, would give them incentive to REPRESENT THEIR CONSTITUENTS.
Making them subject to all laws passed upon We the People, but with double the penalties, including hanging them twice, if called for, would help.
Tar and feathers would help.
Term limits will not, as California has shown.
You don't know what you are talking about.
Captdon
08-23-2018, 06:14 PM
Term limits is all we need. Like it or not, we have to pay enough to live in Washington above their costs living in their state or district. If not, only the rich can serve.
Beevee
08-23-2018, 06:43 PM
You don't know what you are talking about.
I'm sure you think you do.
It's time for the owner of this forum to consider a change of name to reflect the brilliance that eminates from here on a daily basis.
My suggestion:
The One Dimentional Political Forum.
MisterVeritis
08-23-2018, 06:55 PM
I'm sure you think you do.
When I don't know I don't speak. It is an approach you should consider.
Beevee
08-23-2018, 09:47 PM
When I don't know I don't speak. It is an approach you should consider.
Then why are you the most prolific poster here?
Because you tend to write a lot of what you don't know as facts.
MisterVeritis
08-23-2018, 09:57 PM
Then why are you the most prolific poster here?
Because you tend to write a lot of what you don't know as facts.
It is because I write about things I know.
Things are facts even when you are blissfully unaware of them.
Beevee
08-23-2018, 10:14 PM
It is because I write about things I know.
Things are facts even when you are blissfully unaware of them.
Is that a Donald Trump quote?
Or did he infer the opposite?
Only you would know. Or wouldn't.
MisterVeritis
08-24-2018, 10:12 AM
It is because I write about things I know.
Things are facts even when you are blissfully unaware of them.
Is that a Donald Trump quote?
Or did he infer the opposite?
Only you would know. Or wouldn't.
This is an example of left-goofiness.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.8 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.