PDA

View Full Version : Sure Obama's the worst President ever, for Blacks, but Clarence Thomas is the worst h



Raffishragabash
11-13-2018, 12:31 AM
Human being, ever, for Blacks who try to be free.

Lets look at more examples, of Clarence 'Uncle' Thomas anti-Black mindset, which Obama could never stoop to:




https://rewire.news/ablc/2018/06/04/clarence-thomas-manages-wrong-right-side/


Clarence Thomas Manages to Be Wrong Even When He’s on the Right Side

Jun 4, 2018, 5:58pm


by Imani Gandy (https://rewire.news/author/imani-gandy/)


Justice Thomas' concurring opinion in Collins v. Virginia makes clear that he is living in a fantasy of his own creation—not the reality where Black people are routinely stripped of their Fourth Amendment rights.

https://rewire.news/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/GettyImages-80231665-740x525.jpgIf Thomas thinks that the right of “self-help” exists across the board in this country, then he has a deep misunderstanding of policing in the 21st century.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images (https://www.gettyimages.com/license/80231665)


In an 8-1 decision last week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in Collins v. Virginia, (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1027_7lio.pdf) which strengthens what relatively anemic Fourth Amendment rights we still have left. Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the majority opinion, ruling that the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment’s search warrant requirement does not extend to a vehicle on the “curtilage” of a person’s home. (“Curtilage” is a fancy—and rather unpleasant sounding—word that describes the area of land immediately surrounding a house, including closely associated buildings or structures like woodsheds and garages.) In other words, if a vehicle is in that region, the police can’t enter it without a warrant.


Collins is an important decision that curtails the further chipping away of our Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure. Justice Samuel Alito was the only justice to rule in the minority. Even Justice Clarence Thomas got onboard—but his concurring opinion makes clear that he would actually roll those rights back further if he could.

Generally, the Fourth Amendment requires police to obtain a search warrant before they can search you or search through your shit. If the cops violate your Fourth Amendment rights, then any evidence obtained as a result of those violations may be suppressed or excluded in criminal court. This is known as the exclusionary rule...

Captain Obvious
11-13-2018, 12:44 AM
Did Clarence get a free phone?

Tahuyaman
11-13-2018, 12:48 AM
Human being, ever, for Blacks who try to be free.

Lets look at more examples, of Clarence 'Uncle' Thomas anti-Black mindset, which Obama could never stoop to:
Again?

Raffishragabash
11-13-2018, 12:48 AM
Check out this fleecing of Equality re Educational Affirmative Action in 2013. This is sickening:



https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/06/24/195182864/justice-thomas-says-court-should-have-gutted-affirmative-action



...Thomas argued a very basic premise: The government should consider race only when there is a "pressing public necessity."


In Thomas' view, that means the state can only consider race "to provide a bulwark against anarchy, or to prevent violence."



Affirmative action, he argued, hardly meets those standards.



What's more, he said, just as the court decided that discrimination was unconstitutional when the country set up "separate-but-equal" schools, it should also conclude that it is wrong when universities include race in their admissions decisions...

Captain Obvious
11-13-2018, 12:51 AM
Check out this fleecing of Equality. This is sickening:


[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR]

He must have texted that in from his free O'bama phone.

I'm sure of that, just look at the font.

Tahuyaman
11-13-2018, 12:54 AM
...Thomas argued a very basic premise: The government should consider race only when there is a "pressing public necessity." In Thomas' view, that means the state can only consider race "to provide a bulwark against anarchy, or to prevent violence."Affirmative action, he argued, hardly meets those standards. What's more, he said, just as the court decided that discrimination was unconstitutional when the country set up "separate-but-equal" schools, it should also conclude that it is wrong when universities include race in their admissions decisions...

OK. What's the problem with that?

Raffishragabash
11-13-2018, 12:59 AM
Again?


Please contribute to the topic, or else post proofs which you feel invalidate the topic.

Raffishragabash
11-13-2018, 01:04 AM
the problem with that?

The Eternal Legacy Of Slavery is always a "pressing public necessity" when you love Black people and hate the racism which subjugates them. Always. It does not take a day off, thereby Affirmative Action should not take a day off either.

Even White Supremacist Ann Coulter understood that fact much, much better than Uncle Thomas.

Tahuyaman
11-13-2018, 01:19 AM
The Eternal Legacy Of Slavery is always a "pressing public necessity" when you love Black people and hate the racism which subjugates them. Always. It does not take a day off, thereby Affirmative Action should not take a day off either.

Even White Supremacist Ann Coulter understood that fact much, much better than Uncle Thomas.


How did you connect opposing affirmative action to an "eternal legacy of slavery"?


Now, maybe you could try to explain specifically how Thomas' position is flawed?

roadmaster
11-13-2018, 01:21 AM
It depends on how far left you are. Obama lifted the ban on contagious diseases and HIV and then allowed the immigrant society to flood African American cities with ones in Africa during the worst HIV crises. Obama told black men and others they had no right to shield their daughters from men coming into showers or bathrooms. So I see it is he put them in danger both ways. It depends on what your priorities are.

Raffishragabash
11-13-2018, 10:14 AM
How did you connect opposing affirmative action to an "eternal legacy of slavery"?



Same way it is done, right here:




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwyvLrq-8mc





Now, maybe you could try to explain specifically how Thomas' position is flawed?


Because he agreed that institutional racism exists so AA gives opportunity to those equally- and higher-qualified brilliant Black workers, previously shut out, but then...

our Uncle Thomas sought to get rid of this social imperative without first, I repeat, without first purging the illegal racial-discrimination which AA fights off. THAT is illogical.


Thomas is strategically, flawed, by thinking White people's ILLEGAL racial-discrimination should be left alone to just go away whenever it feels like it. That is essentially the stance he's taking, by being against AA.

Don29palms
11-13-2018, 10:36 AM
Same way it is done, right here:




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwyvLrq-8mc







Because he agreed that institutional racism exists so AA gives opportunity to those equally- and higher-qualified brilliant Black workers, previously shut out, but then...

our Uncle Thomas sought to get rid of this social imperative without first, I repeat, without first purging the illegal racial-discrimination which AA fights off. THAT is illogical.


Thomas is strategically, flawed, by thinking White people's ILLEGAL racial-discrimination should be left alone to just go away whenever it feels like it. That is essentially the stance he's taking, by being against AA.

You are truly a racist mental midget.

Captdon
11-13-2018, 10:42 AM
Check out this fleecing of Equality re Educational Affirmative Action in 2013. This is sickening:



...Thomas argued a very basic premise: The government should consider race only when there is a "pressing public necessity."


In Thomas' view, that means the state can only consider race "to provide a bulwark against anarchy, or to prevent violence."



Affirmative action, he argued, hardly meets those standards.



What's more, he said, just as the court decided that discrimination was unconstitutional when the country set up "separate-but-equal" schools, it should also conclude that it is wrong when universities include race in their admissions decisions..


He is correct. Discrimination is either wrong or it isn't. There's no middle ground. I don't know what a pressing public necessary reason could be.

Captdon
11-13-2018, 10:50 AM
The Eternal Legacy Of Slavery is always a "pressing public necessity" when you love Black people and hate the racism which subjugates them. Always. It does not take a day off, thereby Affirmative Action should not take a day off either.

Even White Supremacist Ann Coulter understood that fact much, much better than Uncle Thomas.

Affirmative Action is only discrimination by another name. Sugar coating something doesn't change what it is. Affirmative Action is racist by it's very nature.

Captain Obvious
11-13-2018, 10:56 AM
Rugrashhashass needs to discover a new video, he's only posted this one like a hundred times now.

Wonder if anyone a tually watched it.

MisterVeritis
11-13-2018, 11:15 AM
Check out this fleecing of Equality re Educational Affirmative Action in 2013. This is sickening:
It is time to end the Federal government's institutionalized racism. I agree with Thomas.

Captain Obvious
11-13-2018, 12:29 PM
Affirmative Action is only discrimination by another name. Sugar coating something doesn't change what it is. Affirmative Action is racist by it's very nature.

Agreed, and racialists know this and they're not letting go. AA is an advantage, that it is unfai doesn't matter.

Captain Obvious
11-13-2018, 12:32 PM
It is time to end the Federal government's institutionalized racism. I agree with Thomas.

Agreed but racialists much like the rest of the left want activist courts and government. Its empowering to them.

Tahuyaman
11-13-2018, 12:34 PM
He is correct. Discrimination is either wrong or it isn't. There's no middle ground. I don't know what a pressing public necessary reason could be.


Correct. There is nothing wrong with Thomas' comments. How anyone can criticize his view is odd.

Chris
11-13-2018, 12:45 PM
Not only is AA discriminatory but it does more harm than good.

Walter Williams, Cruelty to Black Students (https://www.creators.com/read/walter-williams/09/16/cruelty-to-black-students)


...The most pervasive form of racial discrimination at most colleges is affirmative action. In the name of helping people from groups that have suffered past discrimination, colleges admit black students whose academic preparation differs significantly with that of their white peers. Those differences are not subtle. It should not come as a surprise that the intended beneficiaries of that "benign" discrimination feel themselves ridiculed, isolated and treated differently. As a result, students who might be successes in a less competitive environment are turned into failures. One faculty member at a historically black college put it this way: "The way we see it, the majority schools are wasting large numbers of good students. They have black students with admissions statistics (that are) very high, tops. But these students wind up majoring in sociology or recreation or get wiped out altogether."

...The academic elite feel righteous seeing blacks on campus, even if they are severely mismatched. Black people must ask: Are we going to sacrifice our youngsters so that white liberals can feel good about themselves?

Captdon
11-13-2018, 12:57 PM
Rugrashhashass needs to discover a new video, he's only posted this one like a hundred times now.

Wonder if anyone a tually watched it.

He's trying to wear us down. Either that, or bore us to death.

Mini Me
11-13-2018, 05:46 PM
It depends on how far left you are. Obama lifted the ban on contagious diseases and HIV and then allowed the immigrant society to flood African American cities with ones in Africa during the worst HIV crises. Obama told black men and others they had no right to shield their daughters from men coming into showers or bathrooms. So I see it is he put them in danger both ways. It depends on what your priorities are.
Such COMPLETE NONSENSE! You should be ashamed! But we know you have no shame.

Raffishragabash
11-13-2018, 11:17 PM
... discover a new video, he's only posted this one like a hundred times now...

That's right. For when the truth is, undefeated, then it must be constantly repeated!

Raffishragabash
11-13-2018, 11:25 PM
It is a fact, that only satanic/demonic citizens do not want laws like AA yes because only satanic demonic people feel that White people's ILLEGAL racial discrimination should be left alone to just go away whenever it feels like it.

Ethereal
11-13-2018, 11:26 PM
It is a fact, that only satanic/demonic citizens do not want laws like AA yes because only satanic demonic people feel that White people's ILLEGAL racial discrimination should be left alone to just go away whenever it feels like it.
With this asinine post, you have just gone from ignore list candidate to ignore list member. Welcome to the most prestigious club on the internet.

Captain Obvious
11-13-2018, 11:31 PM
With this asinine post, you have just gone from ignore list candidate to ignore list member. Welcome to the most prestigious club on the internet.

Yeah, I just don't bother anymore. I just skim on by, there's better stuff around here generally.

Sergeant Gleed
11-14-2018, 12:08 AM
The premise of this thread is wrong .

That boy socials from Kenya was the worst prep ever for blacks.

She was just the worst president ever

For everyone.

Sergeant Gleed
11-14-2018, 12:10 AM
Check out this fleecing of Equality re Educational Affirmative Action in 2013. This is sickening:

So you believe children should be educated according to their skin color...

...do tell, which of the 256 shades of brown is most deserving of the best possible education?

Raffishragabash
11-14-2018, 12:11 AM
With this asinine post

What you call, asinine, I call facts/truths which your 'Hurt Heart' can't override :cool2: therefore you resort to juvenile-delinquency's Ad Hominem tactics, as if, that will somehow change the truth into lies.



...you have just gone to ignore list...

Promise?

Sergeant Gleed
11-14-2018, 12:14 AM
The Eternal Legacy Of Slavery is always a "pressing public necessity" when you love Black people and hate the racism which subjugates them. Always. It does not take a day off, thereby Affirmative Action should not take a day off either.

Even White Supremacist Ann Coulter understood that fact much, much better than Uncle Thomas.

Identify, from your vast public education knowledge base, which party traded in slaves before the civil war.

Which party invented the KKK.

which party created Jim crow.

Which party set the dogs loose

Which party filibuster ed the civil rights act .

Which party has made the inner cities, where the vast majority of blacks live, turd world shitholes.

Which party are you a member of, really.

Raffishragabash
11-14-2018, 12:18 AM
So you believe children should be educated according to their skin color...

Please sir/ma'am do feel free to ask me about anything whatsoever, which I actually posted, but please please spare me any nonsense you made up which I clearly never posted.

Raffishragabash
11-14-2018, 12:24 AM
...which party traded in slaves before the civil war.

Which party invented the KKK.

which party created Jim crow.

Which party set the dogs loose

Which party filibuster ed the civil rights act .

Which party has made the inner cities, where the vast majority of blacks live, turd world $#@!holes...

This video features Ann Coulter describing why it simply, does not matter, which party did those things which you mention:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwyvLrq-8mc




We owe Black people something, thanks to the eternal legacy of the US Slave Trade. Both parties are culpable!!

Raffishragabash
11-14-2018, 12:26 AM
wear us down...
Thanks for revealing your murky heart's, synopsis, of what I have done to you.

Chris
11-14-2018, 09:43 AM
Back to Affirmative Action: Michelle Obama Felt 'the Shadow of Affirmative Action' as Princeton Undergrad (http://reason.com/blog/2018/11/13/michelle-obama-felt-the-shadow-of-affirm)


Michelle Obama felt "the shadow of affirmative action" as an undergraduate student at Princeton University, the former first lady writes in her new book, Becoming.

Obama, who graduated in 1985, says she sometimes wondered why she had been accepted into Princeton, a majority-white school, in the first place. "It was impossible to be a black kid at a mostly white school and not feel the shadow of affirmative action," Obama writes. "You could almost read the scrutiny in the gaze of certain students and even some professors, as if they wanted to say, 'I know why you're here.'" This was often "demoralizing," Obama says, while acknowledging she "was just imagining some of it."

"It planted a seed of doubt. Was I here merely as part of some social experiment?" she asks.

The former first lady says she gradually realized that affirmative action wasn't the only way the school filled quotas. "As minorities, we were the most visible, but it became clear that special dispensations were made to admit all kinds of students whose grades or accomplishments might not measure up to the acknowledged standard," she writes. Obama cites student-athletes, as well as the "legacy kids" who attended Princeton like their "fathers and grandfathers" before them, "or whose families had funded the building of a dorm or a library."

Princeton probably did use affirmative action to raise enrollment numbers for minority students, but the school apparently didn't do a great job. "There were so few of us minority kids at Princeton, I suppose, that our presence was always conspicuous," Obama writes. She adds that this drove her to "overperform" in order to "keep up with or even plow past the more privileged people around" her.

This is not the first time Obama has talked about her experience as a black student at Princeton. In May, she posted on Instagram about how "scary" it was to be a black "first generation college student" at a school consisting of "generally white and well-to-do" students....

Raffishragabash
11-14-2018, 10:28 AM
Once again you failed to use critical thinking skills, a la carte Clarence "Uncle" Thomas, where you blame Michelle Obama because a peculiar institution (GOP citizens) has spent the past 40yrs shaming and castigating AA and deceitfully make it appear as reverse-discrimination.

Society's xenophobes who hate AA and think we should all just wait until White-racism decides to just, go away, are the ones who caused Michelle this grief. It was not AA.

Chris
11-14-2018, 10:57 AM
Once again you failed to use critical thinking skills, a la carte Clarence "Uncle" Thomas, where you blame Michelle Obama because a peculiar institution (GOP citizens) has spent the past 40yrs shaming and castigating AA and deceitfully make it appear as reverse-discrimination.

Society's xenophobes who hate AA and think we should all just wait until White-racism decides to just, go away, are the ones who caused Michelle this grief. It was not AA.


Uh, I did not blame Michelle. I pointed to her very valid criticism of the ill-effects of AA. Is she, in your book, also an Uncle Tom?

Captdon
11-14-2018, 11:01 AM
It is a fact, that only satanic/demonic citizens do not want laws like AA yes because only satanic demonic people feel that White people's ILLEGAL racial discrimination should be left alone to just go away whenever it feels like it.

You want to end discrimination by discrimination? What a brilliant idea.

Captdon
11-14-2018, 11:02 AM
This video features Ann Coulter describing why it simply, does not matter, which party did those things which you mention:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwyvLrq-8mc




We owe Black people something, thanks to the eternal legacy of the US Slave Trade. Both parties are culpable!!

I owe Blacks nothing.

Captdon
11-14-2018, 11:04 AM
That's right. For when the truth is, undefeated, then it must be constantly repeated!

Goebbels said say it long enough and people will believe it. You aren't Goebbels.

Chris
11-14-2018, 11:08 AM
You want to end discrimination by discrimination? What a brilliant idea.

From Hayek: Social Justice Demands the Unequal Treatment of Individuals (https://fee.org/articles/hayek-social-justice-demands-the-unequal-treatment-of-individuals/)

"The classical demand is that the state ought to treat all people equally in spite of the fact that they are very unequal. You can’t deduce from this that because people are unequal you ought to treat them unequally in order to make them equal. And that’s what social justice amounts to. It’s a demand that the state should treat people differently in order to place them in the same position. . . .To make people equal a goal of governmental policy would force government to treat people very unequally indeed."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnMd40dqBlQ

Captdon
11-14-2018, 11:10 AM
What you call, asinine, I call facts/truths which your 'Hurt Heart' can't override :cool2: therefore you resort to juvenile-delinquency's Ad Hominem tactics, as if, that will somehow change the truth into lies.




Promise?

You think you are making some sort of sense but you aren't. I understand Orion more than you. I respect Safety more than you. I think Exo is sharper than you. Strange is a better poster.

You're premise is wrong as your evidence shows it. How the liberal SCOTUS could find this nonsense as Constitutional is why so many of us wanted Trump doing the picking. Favoritism is wrong now and it was wrong 50 years ago. I think the liberals are out for revenge. That's a hell of a political stance.

Tahuyaman
11-14-2018, 12:34 PM
This video features Ann Coulter describing why it simply, does not matter, which party did those things which you mention:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwyvLrq-8mc




We owe Black people something, thanks to the eternal legacy of the US Slave Trade. Both parties are culpable!!

Why do you keep posting this video? Are you obsessed with Ann Coulter?

Mini Me
11-14-2018, 04:51 PM
This video features Ann Coulter describing why it simply, does not matter, which party did those things which you mention:

She doesn't even look SANE anymore!(if she ever was!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwyvLrq-8mc




We owe Black people something, thanks to the eternal legacy of the US Slave Trade. Both parties are culpable!!

Mini Me
11-14-2018, 04:55 PM
Once again you failed to use critical thinking skills, a la carte Clarence "Uncle" Thomas, where you blame Michelle Obama because a peculiar institution (GOP citizens) has spent the past 40yrs shaming and castigating AA and deceitfully make it appear as reverse-discrimination.

Society's xenophobes who hate AA and think we should all just wait until White-racism decides to just, go away, are the ones who caused Michelle this grief. It was not AA.

True!

Mini Me
11-14-2018, 05:00 PM
I owe Blacks nothing.

Ok. Do they owe you something?

Peter1469
11-14-2018, 05:00 PM
I largely approve of J. Thomas's record - however I do not like his decision where he allowed our food to be patented. But he was a Monsanto lawyer early in his career.

Peter1469
11-14-2018, 05:02 PM
True!

Xenophobia is not something you see in the West. Unless you change the definition of the word.

Captdon
11-14-2018, 05:19 PM
Ok. Do they owe you something?

How would even you come up with a question like this? Why would they owe anything. Tell me what they could owe me?

Raffishragabash
11-14-2018, 10:02 PM
...social justice ...
Stop trolling in here with @Captdon (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=2480), displaying your horrid hypocrisy here where you smear eggyolk upon your own face, just to spite yourself.


Black people ILLEGALLY burglarize and steal, then you cheer for their arrests and imprisonment when equitably-paying their debt to the society which they cheated or harmed. Black people ILLEGALLY sell drugs, and you cheer for their arrests and their imprisonment when equitably-paying their debt to the society which they cheated or harmed. Black people ILLEGALLY commit murders, and you cheer for their arrests and imprisonment when equitably-paying their debt to the society which they cheated or harmed. Black people ILLEGALLY bank fraud/identity theft, and you cheer for their arrests and imprisonment when equitably-paying their debt to the society which they cheated or harmed

White America fleeces and subjugates and oppresses Black citizens by way of ILLEGAL racial-discrimination, but then, you boo and you hiss when Affirmative Action is used to make White America equitably-pay their debt to the society's Black citizens who they cheat and harm and pilfer.

Raffishragabash
11-14-2018, 10:06 PM
True!
Thanks, bro.


And consider checking out that titanium-coated, ironclad Ann Coulter video I posted here/view how even a White Supremacist embarrasses the GOP xenophobes on this website, when she explains why AA and every other social imperative is a-okay.

Chris
11-14-2018, 10:08 PM
From Hayek: Social Justice Demands the Unequal Treatment of Individuals (https://fee.org/articles/hayek-social-justice-demands-the-unequal-treatment-of-individuals/)

"The classical demand is that the state ought to treat all people equally in spite of the fact that they are very unequal. You can’t deduce from this that because people are unequal you ought to treat them unequally in order to make them equal. And that’s what social justice amounts to. It’s a demand that the state should treat people differently in order to place them in the same position. . . .To make people equal a goal of governmental policy would force government to treat people very unequally indeed."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnMd40dqBlQ


Stop trolling in here with Captdon, displaying your horrid hypocrisy here where you smear eggyolk upon your own face, just to spite yourself.


Black people ILLEGALLY burglarize and steal, then you cheer for their arrests and imprisonment when equitably-paying their debt to the society which they cheated or harmed. Black people ILLEGALLY sell drugs, and you cheer for their arrests and their imprisonment when equitably-paying their debt to the society which they cheated or harmed. Black people ILLEGALLY commit murders, and you cheer for their arrests and imprisonment when equitably-paying their debt to the society which they cheated or harmed. Black people ILLEGALLY bank fraud/identity theft, and you cheer for their arrests and imprisonment when equitably-paying their debt to the society which they cheated or harmed

White America fleeces and subjugates and oppresses Black citizens by way of ILLEGAL racial-discrimination, but then, you boo and you hiss when Affirmative Action is used to make White America equitably-paying their debt to the society's Black citizens who they cheat or harm.


1) You fail to address what I posted.

2) You make things up about my cheering and booing and hissing.

3) You are being intellectually dishonest when you make sense, which is not often.

4) You should number your days.

Raffishragabash
11-14-2018, 10:33 PM
:cool2:





1) I addressed the harlequinade you posted, by my invalidating it, yes, right where you now try to use 'word trickery' regarding my summary of your (and other Americans) feelings toward Black criminals and White Privilege's beneficiaries.


2) see 'word trickery' scholarship, above.


3) I have no control over your hallucinations.


4) Promise?

Raffishragabash
11-14-2018, 10:42 PM
Sure Obama's the worst President ever, for Blacks, but Clarence Thomas is the worst Human being, ever, for Blacks who try to be free.


Lets look at more examples, of Clarence 'Uncle' Thomas anti-Black mindset...



Look at how outraged he got, over the idea of laws which stop White-racism from cheating Black citizens out of Fair Housing in a nation which they pay taxes to. This is sickening:





Clarence Thomas attacked his colleagues for saving a law aimed at desegregating America

Erin Fuchs (https://www.businessinsider.com/author/erin-fuchs)
Jun. 25, 2015, 12:21 PM





(https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com %2Fclarence-thomas-dissent-in-fair-housing-act-case-2015-6%3Futm_source%3Dfacebook%26utm_medium%3Dreferral% 26utm_content%3Dtopbar%26utm_term%3Ddesktop%26refe rrer%3Dfacebook)
(https://share.flipboard.com/bookmarklet/popout?v=2&title=Clarence Thomas dissent in Fair Housing Act case - Business Insider&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Fclaren ce-thomas-dissent-in-fair-housing-act-case-2015-6&t=1542253723613&utm_campaign=tools&utm_medium=article-share&utm_source=www.businessinsider.com)
(https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Clarence Thomas attacked his colleagues for saving a law aimed at desegregating America https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Fclarence-thomas-dissent-in-fair-housing-act-case-2015-6%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dreferral%2 6utm_content%3Dtopbar%26utm_term%3Ddesktop%26refer rer%3Dtwitter via @businessinsider)
(https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Fclaren ce-thomas-dissent-in-fair-housing-act-case-2015-6%3Futm_source%3Dlinkedin%26utm_medium%3Dreferral% 26utm_content%3Dtopbar%26utm_term%3Ddesktop%26refe rrer%3Dlinkedin&title=Clarence+Thomas+attacked+his+colleagues+for+ saving+a+law+aimed+at+desegregating+America&summary=The+Supreme+Court+saved+the+Fair+Housing+A ct+on+Thursday%2C+but+Clarence+Thomas+wasn't+happy .)
(https://www.businessinsider.com/clarence-thomas-dissent-in-fair-housing-act-case-2015-6#)
(https://www.businessinsider.com/clarence-thomas-dissent-in-fair-housing-act-case-2015-6#)

https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/558c270d6da811da2ca282d8-750-563.jpgReuters/Larry Downing

The Supreme Court saved a law Thursday aimed at preventing housing discrimination (https://www.businessinsider.com/supreme-court-opinion-in-fair-housing-case-2015-6), and Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a scathing dissent calling out his liberal colleagues for their "audacity." In a 5-4 decision on Thursday, the Supreme Court's majority found that the Fair Housing Act (FHA) prevents housing practices that unfairly affect minorities even if those practices are not intentionally discriminatory.

Many cases brought under the FHA involve so-called disparate-impact claims, so a ruling against fair-housing advocates would have seriously hobbled the law.

Thomas — the court's only African-American justice — wrote a separate dissent questioning the notion that the government should have a role in "racially balancing" America's neighborhoods. Thomas famously opposes affirmative action in college admissions (https://www.businessinsider.com/how-clarence-thomas-grew-to-hate-affirmative-action-2013-10), so it makes sense that he opposes efforts at desegregation.

https://www.businessinsider.com/clarence-thomas-dissent-in-fair-housing-act-case-2015-6

Raffishragabash
11-14-2018, 10:50 PM
Why do you keep posting this video? Are you obsessed with Ann Coulter?

Why do you keep posting your, cowardices, toward Ann Coulter's video? Are you obsessed with your own, pussilanimity, toward the idea of speaking truth to GOP pundit Ann Coulter's words?

You won't honestly address Clarence Thomas' historic anti-Black mindset nor the words of a GOP lady who invalidates the quint Clarence Thomas anti-Black mindset

Tahuyaman
11-15-2018, 12:32 AM
Why do you keep posting your, cowardices, toward Ann Coulter's video? Are you obsessed with your own, pussilanimity, toward the idea of speaking truth to GOP pundit Ann Coulter's words?

You won't honestly address Clarence Thomas' historic anti-Black mindset nor the words of a GOP lady who invalidates the quint Clarence Thomas anti-Black mindset



I don't believe you are capable of engaging in an honest discussion.

Raffishragabash
11-15-2018, 08:48 AM
I don't believe you've met honesty. Ever.

Peter1469
11-15-2018, 08:50 AM
I don't believe you've met honesty. Ever.

You can change that. All things are possible with the Internet.

Chris
11-15-2018, 08:58 AM
Look at how outraged he got, over the idea of laws which stop White-racism from cheating Black citizens out of Fair Housing in a nation which they pay taxes to. This is sickening:

Let's include what raff cherry picked out of the article:


..."This court has repeatedly reaffirmed that 'racial balancing' by state actors is 'patently unconstitutional,' even when it supposedly springs from good intentions," Thomas wrote.

Thomas, one of the court's conservative justices, also called out the liberal justices for assuming that "in the absence of discrimination, an institution's racial makeup would mirror that of society."

https://i.snag.gy/SZ7ByU.jpg

"[T]he absence of racial disparities in multi-ethnic societies has been the exception, not the rule," Thomas wrote, adding that racial imbalances "do not always disfavor minorities."
In a particularly blistering footnote, Thomas also insinuated that efforts to make neighborhoods more diverse have backfired.

"It takes considerable audacity for today's majority to describe the origins of racial imbalances in housing ... without acknowledging this court's role in the development of this phenomenon," Thomas wrote. "In the past, we have admitted that the sweeping desegregation remedies of the federal courts contributed to 'white flight' from our nation's cities ... in turn causing the racial imbalances that make it difficult to avoid disparate impact from housing development decisions."

Thomas added: "Today's majority, however, apparently is as content to rewrite history as it is to rewrite statutes."

Hoosier8
11-15-2018, 09:58 AM
Human being, ever, for Blacks who try to be free.

Lets look at more examples, of Clarence 'Uncle' Thomas anti-Black mindset, which Obama could never stoop to:

Let me get this straight. Thomas voted with the majority but that is a bad thing because he is black?

Captdon
11-15-2018, 10:38 AM
Why do you keep posting your, cowardices, toward Ann Coulter's video? Are you obsessed with your own, pussilanimity, toward the idea of speaking truth to GOP pundit Ann Coulter's words?

You won't honestly address Clarence Thomas' historic anti-Black mindset nor the words of a GOP lady who invalidates the quint Clarence Thomas anti-Black mindset

You must be part of our AA policy.

DGUtley
11-15-2018, 01:58 PM
wear us down...


Thanks for revealing your murky heart's, synopsis, of what I have done to you.

NOTICE - Raffishragabash has received a 24 hour suspension for changing the meaning of someone's quote.