Conservative Lawyers say Trump has undermined rule of law

[AZ Jim]

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/14/us/politics/conservative-lawyers-trump.html

[Tahuyaman]

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/14/us/politics/conservative-lawyers-trump.html

Did you read the article? If you did, what's your spin on this?

Trump's statements on birthright citizenship aren't undermining the law. Voiding regulations put in place by the previous administration isn't either.

[MMC]

LMAO.....Conway and some Never Trumper attorneys calling themselves Conservatives.


OPINION: Trump Is Right On Birthright Citizenship | The ... (https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/02/trump-right-birthright-citizenship/)The Daily Caller[/URL]
12 days ago · John Eastman is a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute and constitutional law professor at Chapman University. The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of The Daily Caller.



[URL="https://thefederalist.com/author/johneastman/"]John C. Eastman, Author at The Federalist (https://www.bing.com/search?q=John+Eastman++talks+about+Trump&form=PRHPR1&src=IE11TR&pc=EUPP_HRTS#)https://thefederalist.com/author/johneastman
Dr. John Eastman is a senior fellow of the Claremont Institute and founding director of its Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence. He is also the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law and Community …



Eastman will tear them up.....just by his self.

[MisterVeritis]

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/14/us/politics/conservative-lawyers-trump.html
Jim, These are Bush-"conservatives". Never Trumpers.

They are also wrong. Stupidly wrong.

[MMC]

Jim, These are Bush-"conservatives". Never Trumpers.

They are also wrong. Stupidly wrong.


He also forgot Hugh Hewitt an Larry Elder are Conservative Attorneys that stand with Eastman, on Trump.


What will really cornfuzzle him is when he sees Dershowitz and Turley, the lefts Constitutional Attorneys siding with Trump. Like they have been. :grin:

[Tahuyaman]

Jim doesn’t do any research to see who these people are and check their history. He doesn’t read these articles either. He just goes by a headline.

[Hoosier8]

So basically nothing has been done other than someone whining about what Trump has said. The appointment of Whittaker loo ks to be founded in the US Code and complaining about the lies the MSM push is not undermining the press, they are doing that to themselves. A small group in the DOJ looks to have been working to undermine the Presidency. That is the real danger.

[AZ Jim]

So basically nothing has been done other than someone whining about what Trump has said. The appointment of Whittaker loo ks to be founded in the US Code and complaining about the lies the MSM push is not undermining the press, they are doing that to themselves. A small group in the DOJ looks to have been working to undermine the Presidency. That is the real danger.If you were anything but a wide eyed trumpie you would realize trump has undermined himself!

[Peter1469]

I have long said there is no SCOTUS case on point that defines birth right citizenship. The US has no constitutional, legal, or moral need to make illegals or their babies US citizens.

[Tahuyaman]

If you were anything but a wide eyed trumpie you would realize trump has undermined himself!


You really should read your article and not just look at the headline. But then, you might not understand the substance of the matter.

[Hoosier8]

If you were anything but a wide eyed trumpie you would realize trump has undermined himself!
By being right of course. Not something the lefty press or Trump haters can stand.

[Tahuyaman]

I have long said there is no SCOTUS case on point that defines birth right citizenship. The US has no constitutional, legal, or moral need to make illegals or their babies US citizens.


At some point we will be forced to end this and place stricter controls on immigration. It's at a point now where something like a third of the adult population in Latin American nations will be heading to the US. We can't handle that.

[Hoosier8]

At some point we will be forced to end this and place stricter controls on immigration. It's at a point now where something like a third of the adult population in Latin American nations will be heading to the US. We can't handle that.
You mean something like a third of the adult population in Latin American nations will be heading to the US to become democrats.

[Peter1469]

At some point we will be forced to end this and place stricter controls on immigration. It's at a point now where something like a third of the adult population in Latin American nations will be heading to the US. We can't handle that.

Very true.

[Tahuyaman]

So basically nothing has been done other than someone whining about what Trump has said. The appointment of Whittaker loo ks to be founded in the US Code and complaining about the lies the MSM push is not undermining the press, they are doing that to themselves. A small group in the DOJ looks to have been working to undermine the Presidency. That is the real danger.
The political establishment consisting of both Republicans and Democrats are resentful that Trump defeated an approved establishment candidate. They can not accept that. They want to destroy him by any means necessary and also make sure that no other political outsider thinks he or she can seek the office of the presidency.

[Tahuyaman]

You mean something like a third of the adult population in Latin American nations will be heading to the US to become democrats.

I'm sure a fairly significant number of them will be unable to support themselves or their family, so they will just enlarge the dependent class. Once they are dependent upon government, they will vote to maintain their means of support.

[Captdon]

I have long said there is no SCOTUS case on point that defines birth right citizenship. The US has no constitutional, legal, or moral need to make illegals or their babies US citizens.

Illegals never did.

Babies born here depends on what SCOTUS rules. Trump and congress can'tr decide anything about the constitution beyond indicting and removing an office holder.

The problem could come from the Court's relying on notes from the process. If they go strictly by the wording, it will rule they are citizens. that's how gays got the right to be married.

I wouldn't put money on anything.

[MisterVeritis]

Illegals never did.

Babies born here depends on what SCOTUS rules. Trump and congress can'tr decide anything about the constitution beyond indicting and removing an office holder.

The problem could come from the Court's relying on notes from the process. If they go strictly by the wording, it will rule they are citizens. that's how gays got the right to be married.

I wouldn't put money on anything.
If the courts go on the words in the Amendment anchor babies will be a thing of the past.