View Full Version : The Border War
Agent Zero
11-27-2018, 05:34 PM
Is that what it is? Is it a war?
Tahuyaman
11-27-2018, 05:38 PM
What kind of stuff do you overhear when you are bussing the big shot's tables in the cafeteria?
Helena
11-27-2018, 05:39 PM
Yep. And if it goes as well as the war on drugs, we are truly screwed.
Helena
11-27-2018, 05:40 PM
All of it boils down to lawyers whispering in dirty ears.
Agent Zero
11-27-2018, 05:41 PM
What kind of stuff do you overhear when you are bussing the big shot's tables in the cafeteria?
Does this count @DGUtley (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=2019)
In the second post.
Peter1469
11-27-2018, 05:43 PM
It is currently a law enforcement action.
MisterVeritis
11-27-2018, 05:44 PM
We have secured the border. If invaders try to cross it they are waging a war against us. We should return the favor.
Tahuyaman
11-27-2018, 05:44 PM
Does this count @DGUtley (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=2019)
In the second post.
Count as what?
Tahuyaman
11-27-2018, 05:45 PM
We have secured the border. If invaders try to cross it they are waging a war against us. We should return the favor.
Have we secured the border in total?
Standing Wolf
11-27-2018, 05:50 PM
In physics, what do you call a reaction between two objects that have very different properties, such as temperature, and which have been placed in close proximity? Is there a word for that? Here I think you have a number of countries with very corrupt governments and impoverished citizens in close proximity to a relative land of plenty, and what we are seeing is the somewhat predicable outcome.
Peter1469
11-27-2018, 05:54 PM
Count as what?
Sounds like he asked a private question as to what is a violation of the rules. And then set this thread up as bait.
Peter1469
11-27-2018, 05:55 PM
In physics, what do you call a reaction between two objects that have very different properties, such as temperature, and which have been placed in close proximity? Is there a word for that? Here I think you have a number of countries with very corrupt governments and impoverished citizens in close proximity to a relative land of plenty, and what we are seeing is the somewhat predicable outcome.
It will get worse in the future - for the US and for other first world nations. Citizens in the first world are not going to stand for it.
Tahuyaman
11-27-2018, 05:57 PM
Sounds like he asked a private question as to what is a violation of the rules. And then set this thread up as bait.
Fine with me.
Agent Zero
11-27-2018, 06:31 PM
Count as what?
1. Members are expected to post in good faith. By this, we mean they are expected to engage in and contribute to discussion rather than detract from it. Examples of posting in bad faith include, but are not limited to: baiting members, going off topic outside of a natural progression, flooding the forum with threads of little or no content, and ignoring moderator requests. Members who consistently violate this principle will be at risk of being banned.
Agent Zero
11-27-2018, 06:32 PM
Sounds like he asked a private question as to what is a violation of the rules. And then set this thread up as bait.
Dude...I don't need to start a thread to set him up to violate the rules.
Agent Zero
11-27-2018, 06:33 PM
It is currently a law enforcement action.
Didn't Trump say it's a war?
MisterVeritis
11-27-2018, 06:36 PM
Have we secured the border in total?
No. Things are relative. Individuals and small groups will continue to cross.
jimmyz
11-27-2018, 06:37 PM
1. Members are expected to post in good faith. By this, we mean they are expected to engage in and contribute to discussion rather than detract from it. Examples of posting in bad faith include, but are not limited to: baiting members, going off topic outside of a natural progression, flooding the forum with threads of little or no content, and ignoring moderator requests. Members who consistently violate this principle will be at risk of being banned.
You post in a way reminiscent of BeThere. And you parrot his dislike for the WWII era term "Jap" in the other thread. What a coincidence.
MisterVeritis
11-27-2018, 06:37 PM
1. Members are expected to post in good faith. By this, we mean they are expected to engage in and contribute to discussion rather than detract from it. Examples of posting in bad faith include, but are not limited to: baiting members, going off topic outside of a natural progression, flooding the forum with threads of little or no content, and ignoring moderator requests. Members who consistently violate this principle will be at risk of being banned.
What should happen to someone who converts black text to white to conceal facts?
Peter1469
11-27-2018, 06:38 PM
Didn't Trump say it's a war?
I don't have a clue. I don't follow him. I don't really even watch the news anymore.
Tahuyaman
11-27-2018, 06:40 PM
1. Members are expected to post in good faith. By this, we mean they are expected to engage in and contribute to discussion rather than detract from it. Examples of posting in bad faith include, but are not limited to: baiting members, going off topic outside of a natural progression, flooding the forum with threads of little or no content, and ignoring moderator requests. Members who consistently violate this principle will be at risk of being banned.
I was asking in good faith if you have overheard anything interesting while on your job. Of course those folks are probably careful about what they talk about in a public setting.
MisterVeritis
11-27-2018, 06:40 PM
I was asking in good faith if you have overheard anything interesting while on your job. Of course those folks are probably careful about what they talk about in a public setting.
LOL. Good one.
Peter1469
11-27-2018, 06:41 PM
I was asking in good faith if you have overheard anything interesting while on your job. Of course those folks are probably careful about what they talk about in a public setting.
One would hope.
Tahuyaman
11-27-2018, 06:43 PM
Dude...I don't need to start a thread to set him up to violate the rules.
Where’s this violation of the rules?
Tahuyaman
11-27-2018, 06:45 PM
What should happen to someone who converts black text to white to conceal facts?
They should just be exposed as being dishonest.
Captdon
11-27-2018, 06:46 PM
In physics, what do you call a reaction between two objects that have very different properties, such as temperature, and which have been placed in close proximity? Is there a word for that? Here I think you have a number of countries with very corrupt governments and impoverished citizens in close proximity to a relative land of plenty, and what we are seeing is the somewhat predicable outcome.
Predictable or not, we can't allow it.
Captdon
11-27-2018, 06:48 PM
1. Members are expected to post in good faith. By this, we mean they are expected to engage in and contribute to discussion rather than detract from it. Examples of posting in bad faith include, but are not limited to: baiting members, going off topic outside of a natural progression, flooding the forum with threads of little or no content, and ignoring moderator requests. Members who consistently violate this principle will be at risk of being banned.
Relax. I can't see anything about you to get you banned.
MisterVeritis
11-27-2018, 06:49 PM
Do you remember when we used to kill people who attacked America?
Tahuyaman
11-27-2018, 06:54 PM
I don't have a clue. I don't follow him. I don't really even watch the news anymore.
I think he refers to the caravan as an invasion.
Peter1469
11-27-2018, 08:06 PM
I think he refers to the caravan as an invasion.
I though he was referring to Trump or something he tweeted.
Tahuyaman
11-27-2018, 09:25 PM
I though he was referring to Trump or something he tweeted.
I believe he was. He often gets things mixed up.
donttread
11-27-2018, 09:48 PM
In physics, what do you call a reaction between two objects that have very different properties, such as temperature, and which have been placed in close proximity? Is there a word for that? Here I think you have a number of countries with very corrupt governments and impoverished citizens in close proximity to a relative land of plenty, and what we are seeing is the somewhat predicable outcome.
If you take that to the molecular level we are stealing Mexico's electrons and creating new bonds. Bonds of what is the question?
donttread
11-27-2018, 09:50 PM
Is that what it is? Is it a war?
Well we sent the Army there as a warning of border war. Unless you really believed we needed them to string barbed wire
Hoosier8
11-27-2018, 09:58 PM
Is that what it is? Is it a war?
Libs don’t believe in borders so how could it be a war? For libs it is fascism except when dems do it.
Peter1469
11-28-2018, 12:02 AM
Well we sent the Army there as a warning of border war. Unless you really believed we needed them to string barbed wire
Please do not spread stupid.
That is not what the military was sent to do.
Tahuyaman
11-28-2018, 04:47 AM
Please do not spread stupid.
That is not what the military was sent to do.
At least he didn’t say it was a “donkeyphant” ruse.
Common
11-28-2018, 06:14 AM
1. Members are expected to post in good faith. By this, we mean they are expected to engage in and contribute to discussion rather than detract from it. Examples of posting in bad faith include, but are not limited to: baiting members, going off topic outside of a natural progression, flooding the forum with threads of little or no content, and ignoring moderator requests. Members who consistently violate this principle will be at risk of being banned.
Does this count @DGUtley (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=2019)
In the second post.
Well we sent the Army there as a warning of border war. Unless you really believed we needed them to string barbed wire
Cmon seriously Dontread, the troops were sent to the border to keep THOUSANDS of illegal immigrants who are DEMANDING and THREATENING they are coming in no matter what to protect the border and keep them from entering illegally.
That is not anything near what you described
Tahuyaman
11-28-2018, 06:49 AM
Cmon seriously Dontread, the troops were sent to the border to keep THOUSANDS of illegal immigrants who are DEMANDING and THREATENING they are coming in no matter what to protect the border and keep them from entering illegally.
That is not anything near what you described
Besides, they were probably stringing out concertina wire not barber wire. There’s a difference.
DGUtley
11-28-2018, 07:30 AM
Does this count @DGUtley (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=2019) In the second post.
Agent Zero has received a 3-day infraction for violation of the forum rules: http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/103302-Infraction-for-Agent-Zero-Violation-of-Forum-Rules-(3-Days-in-The-Hole)
donttread
11-28-2018, 08:02 AM
Yep. And if it goes as well as the war on drugs, we are truly screwed.
I once said given the results of the wars on drugs , terror and poverty I'd be much better off if the feds declared war on my bank accounts . But no luck so far.
Standing Wolf
11-28-2018, 08:10 AM
Libs don’t believe in borders so how could it be a war? For libs it is fascism except when dems do it.
Every time I start to think this forum might be a worthwhile place to discuss the issues with other at least halfway rational adults, somebody posts something incredibly stupid and ignorant like the above and forces me to reconsider.
Common
11-28-2018, 08:27 AM
Every time I start to think this forum might be a worthwhile place to discuss the issues with other at least halfway rational adults, somebody posts something incredibly stupid and ignorant like the above and forces me to reconsider.
Hes partially correct, there are democrat politicians and democrats that support wide open borders and to abolish ice and have no enforcement at the border. That is undeniable so his statement isnt that outside facts except he didnt narrow it down.
You seem to take personal anytime anyone disparages liberals in general or a liberal agenda item.
You shouldnt I dont and there are several liberal posters that do the same and a couple that are far worse.
Its a two way street here dontcha know
Standing Wolf
11-28-2018, 08:48 AM
Hes partially correct, there are democrat politicians and democrats that support wide open borders and to abolish ice and have no enforcement at the border. That is undeniable so his statement isnt that outside facts except he didnt narrow it down.
You seem to take personal anytime anyone disparages liberals in general or a liberal agenda item.
You shouldnt I dont and there are several liberal posters that do the same and a couple that are far worse.
Its a two way street here dontcha know
Oh, I know. And I DO try to correct negative generalizations about conservatives and Republicans, as well, whenever I'm involved in a thread and that sort of thing comes up. I try to be very specific in criticizing "Trump apologists" or individuals and groups that are genuinely and overtly racist, for example. Maybe it's because at least 80% of the active posters on the forum are currently what I would have to say are hard Rightists, but there just seems to be a lot more unfair stereotyping and misrepresentations about "liberals" here than are going the other way.
Helena
11-28-2018, 09:24 AM
I once said given the results of the wars on drugs , terror and poverty I'd be much better off if the feds declared war on my bank accounts . But no luck so far.
They have; the odds were forever not in your favor on that one.
Common
11-28-2018, 10:00 AM
Oh, I know. And I DO try to correct negative generalizations about conservatives and Republicans, as well, whenever I'm involved in a thread and that sort of thing comes up. I try to be very specific in criticizing "Trump apologists" or individuals and groups that are genuinely and overtly racist, for example. Maybe it's because at least 80% of the active posters on the forum are currently what I would have to say are hard Rightists, but there just seems to be a lot more unfair stereotyping and misrepresentations about "liberals" here than are going the other way.
80% arent hard rightists, we are being pushed right and pushed to take a firmer stance. We are under assault daily, its not the left having most of the media beating them up. Its not the left thats being called racists and white supremists over every single thing liberals dont like. Its we that are under assault and WE have the right not only to defend ourselves but to go on the offensive.
No matter how many times they tell me it isnt so, I know that there is a campaign by the left, especially the news media and the entertainment industry who are the spearheads because they control what people see to diminish white males in every aspect. EVERYTHING is racist based nothing is anyones opinion if it doesnt agree with the liberal line Its automatically racist, same with anything female white males are attacks. Its more than obvious and noticeable that its not black males attacked its WHITE males.
This was started by Obama in collusion with the media and hollywood.
Look standing wolf in all sincerity.
These are Democrat Agenda items,.
Wide Open borders with no enforcement for votes and to dilute the population
Socialize HealthCare
Socialize Higher Education
DeGender america
Enhance Minorities by diminishing Whites <males>
Enhance women by diminishing white <males>
Why would I be a democrat and why would I not be forceful and passionate in the defense of myself
If you need any proof that hollywood is in collusion to diminish white males, watch televlsion including commercials. 13% of the population is in 95% of everything. That is an intentional HUGE distortion and the purpose is to enhance minorities enhance and promote interacial relationships and to diminish white males.
Im sure some whacko forum liberal will call this post racist, but I care not, I know that this post is my personal observations.
MisterVeritis
11-28-2018, 10:47 AM
In physics, what do you call a reaction between two objects that have very different properties, such as temperature, and which have been placed in close proximity? Is there a word for that? Here I think you have a number of countries with very corrupt governments and impoverished citizens in close proximity to a relative land of plenty, and what we are seeing is the somewhat predicable outcome.
Our cells have walls for a reason. When our cell walls are easily breached our cells die. Build the wall. Let's choose to live.
Standing Wolf
11-28-2018, 11:54 AM
80% arent hard rightists, we are being pushed right and pushed to take a firmer stance. We are under assault daily, its not the left having most of the media beating them up. Its not the left thats being called racists and white supremists over every single thing liberals dont like. Its we that are under assault and WE have the right not only to defend ourselves but to go on the offensive.
No matter how many times they tell me it isnt so, I know that there is a campaign by the left, especially the news media and the entertainment industry who are the spearheads because they control what people see to diminish white males in every aspect. EVERYTHING is racist based nothing is anyones opinion if it doesnt agree with the liberal line Its automatically racist, same with anything female white males are attacks. Its more than obvious and noticeable that its not black males attacked its WHITE males.
This was started by Obama in collusion with the media and hollywood.
Look standing wolf in all sincerity.
These are Democrat Agenda items,.
Wide Open borders with no enforcement for votes and to dilute the population
Socialize HealthCare
Socialize Higher Education
DeGender america
Enhance Minorities by diminishing Whites <males>
Enhance women by diminishing white <males>
Why would I be a democrat and why would I not be forceful and passionate in the defense of myself
If you need any proof that hollywood is in collusion to diminish white males, watch televlsion including commercials. 13% of the population is in 95% of everything. That is an intentional HUGE distortion and the purpose is to enhance minorities enhance and promote interacial relationships and to diminish white males.
Im sure some whacko forum liberal will call this post racist, but I care not, I know that this post is my personal observations.
C, I will only say this. When you begin to view television commercials featuring interracial couples as an instance of you being pushed, beaten up and persecuted, and you make a point of stating that thought in public, you cast doubt on the validity, maturity and intelligence of whatever the point is that you were attempting to make.
Common
11-28-2018, 12:26 PM
C, I will only say this. When you begin to view television commercials featuring interracial couples as an instance of you being pushed, beaten up and persecuted, and you make a point of stating that thought in public, you cast doubt on the validity, maturity and intelligence of whatever the point is that you were attempting to make.
You misconstrued my entire post, if you took away just that narrow point and ignored the rest
That was a small part of the entire thread, having said that I didnt expect before I started writing it that you would agree with any of it.
Your poorly veiled insult concerning my maturity and intelligence didnt go unnoticed. Actually I kind of like when im underestimated
texan
11-28-2018, 12:32 PM
We have secured the border. If invaders try to cross it they are waging a war against us. We should return the favor.
I love it when they send lists of "their" demands.
donttread
11-28-2018, 01:10 PM
Hes partially correct, there are democrat politicians and democrats that support wide open borders and to abolish ice and have no enforcement at the border. That is undeniable so his statement isnt that outside facts except he didnt narrow it down.
You seem to take personal anytime anyone disparages liberals in general or a liberal agenda item.
You shouldnt I dont and there are several liberal posters that do the same and a couple that are far worse.
Its a two way street here dontcha know
If either "side" had any intention of fixing immigration it would be done already. But there is too much secondary gain to allow that to happen
donttread
11-28-2018, 01:13 PM
Please do not spread stupid.
That is not what the military was sent to do.
Which wasn't the Military sent there to do? Warn about border war ( yes they were ) Or the string barbed wire.? In which case I know and was being sarcastic.
Sop from your POV what WERE they sent there to do?
Peter1469
11-28-2018, 01:16 PM
If either "side" had any intention of fixing immigration it would be done already. But there is too much secondary gain to allow that to happen
You mean both sides. They have to agree to something.
Peter1469
11-28-2018, 01:17 PM
Yeah that's kinda my point. Did you have your sarcasm bone removed?
At birth. :smiley:
MisterVeritis
11-28-2018, 01:21 PM
Every time I start to think this forum might be a worthwhile place to discuss the issues with other at least halfway rational adults, somebody posts something incredibly stupid and ignorant like the above and forces me to reconsider.
You are so easily led. I am surprised by your willingness to admit it.
Safety
11-28-2018, 03:51 PM
80% arent hard rightists, we are being pushed right and pushed to take a firmer stance. We are under assault daily, its not the left having most of the media beating them up. Its not the left thats being called racists and white supremists over every single thing liberals dont like. Its we that are under assault and WE have the right not only to defend ourselves but to go on the offensive.
No matter how many times they tell me it isnt so, I know that there is a campaign by the left, especially the news media and the entertainment industry who are the spearheads because they control what people see to diminish white males in every aspect. EVERYTHING is racist based nothing is anyones opinion if it doesnt agree with the liberal line Its automatically racist, same with anything female white males are attacks. Its more than obvious and noticeable that its not black males attacked its WHITE males.
This was started by Obama in collusion with the media and hollywood.
Look standing wolf in all sincerity.
These are Democrat Agenda items,.
Wide Open borders with no enforcement for votes and to dilute the population
Socialize HealthCare
Socialize Higher Education
DeGender america
Enhance Minorities by diminishing Whites <males>
Enhance women by diminishing white <males>
Why would I be a democrat and why would I not be forceful and passionate in the defense of myself
If you need any proof that hollywood is in collusion to diminish white males, watch televlsion including commercials. 13% of the population is in 95% of everything. That is an intentional HUGE distortion and the purpose is to enhance minorities enhance and promote interacial relationships and to diminish white males.
Im sure some whacko forum liberal will call this post racist, but I care not, I know that this post is my personal observations.
LoL
Tahuyaman
11-28-2018, 04:13 PM
I love it when they send lists of "their" demands.
I saw that clown on Univision, Jorge Ramos I think, say that America is “obligated” to absorb everyone who wants to here.
Tahuyaman
11-28-2018, 04:15 PM
Which wasn't the Military sent there to do? Warn about border war ( yes they were ) Or the string barbed wire.? In which case I know and was being sarcastic.
Sop from your POV what WERE they sent there to do?augment border security where needed.
Tahuyaman
11-28-2018, 04:16 PM
80% arent hard rightists, we are being pushed right and pushed to take a firmer stance. We are under assault daily, its not the left having most of the media beating them up. Its not the left thats being called racists and white supremists over every single thing liberals dont like. Its we that are under assault and WE have the right not only to defend ourselves but to go on the offensive.
No matter how many times they tell me it isnt so, I know that there is a campaign by the left, especially the news media and the entertainment industry who are the spearheads because they control what people see to diminish white males in every aspect. EVERYTHING is racist based nothing is anyones opinion if it doesnt agree with the liberal line Its automatically racist, same with anything female white males are attacks. Its more than obvious and noticeable that its not black males attacked its WHITE males.
This was started by Obama in collusion with the media and hollywood.
Look standing wolf in all sincerity.
These are Democrat Agenda items,.
Wide Open borders with no enforcement for votes and to dilute the population
Socialize HealthCare
Socialize Higher Education
DeGender america
Enhance Minorities by diminishing Whites <males>
Enhance women by diminishing white <males>
Why would I be a democrat and why would I not be forceful and passionate in the defense of myself
If you need any proof that hollywood is in collusion to diminish white males, watch televlsion including commercials. 13% of the population is in 95% of everything. That is an intentional HUGE distortion and the purpose is to enhance minorities enhance and promote interacial relationships and to diminish white males.
Im sure some whacko forum liberal will call this post racist, but I care not, I know that this post is my personal observations.
LoL
What exactly is so funny?
donttread
11-28-2018, 06:55 PM
You mean both sides. They have to agree to something.
If they wanted it bad enough it would lead to agreement but look at all the secondary gain.
1) Cheap labor
2) Votes
3) Distraction from what the politicians are really doing to us with our money
Captdon
11-28-2018, 07:04 PM
Every time I start to think this forum might be a worthwhile place to discuss the issues with other at least halfway rational adults, somebody posts something incredibly stupid and ignorant like the above and forces me to reconsider.
Here's a short response: It seems to be okay to call me any anything but when I do it (I do it), then all of a sudden I'm a racist, WN, anti-Woman and uncaring monster who favors genocide and unnecessary wars. I also want the poor to die off.
If you want to ignore that, do so. I won't. I'm willing to give tit for tat. I didn't get by in some of the places I worked by being a pussy.
jimmyz
11-28-2018, 07:07 PM
80% arent hard rightists, we are being pushed right and pushed to take a firmer stance. We are under assault daily, its not the left having most of the media beating them up. Its not the left thats being called racists and white supremists over every single thing liberals dont like. Its we that are under assault and WE have the right not only to defend ourselves but to go on the offensive.
No matter how many times they tell me it isnt so, I know that there is a campaign by the left, especially the news media and the entertainment industry who are the spearheads because they control what people see to diminish white males in every aspect. EVERYTHING is racist based nothing is anyones opinion if it doesnt agree with the liberal line Its automatically racist, same with anything female white males are attacks. Its more than obvious and noticeable that its not black males attacked its WHITE males.
This was started by Obama in collusion with the media and hollywood.
Look standing wolf in all sincerity.
These are Democrat Agenda items,.
Wide Open borders with no enforcement for votes and to dilute the population
Socialize HealthCare
Socialize Higher Education
DeGender america
Enhance Minorities by diminishing Whites <males>
Enhance women by diminishing white <males>
Why would I be a democrat and why would I not be forceful and passionate in the defense of myself
If you need any proof that hollywood is in collusion to diminish white males, watch televlsion including commercials. 13% of the population is in 95% of everything. That is an intentional HUGE distortion and the purpose is to enhance minorities enhance and promote interacial relationships and to diminish white males.
Im sure some whacko forum liberal will call this post racist, but I care not, I know that this post is my personal observations.
I understand your statements portraying a "Dem agenda". I would only ask if you acknowledge any Repub agenda exists?
You state a worry that the "white males are being diminished" by a conspiracy of the Left/Dems. I'll ask, if you are secure in your abilities, personal security and are in pursuit of life, liberty and happiness how can anyone attempt and succeed in diminishing you? You would have to personally give-up some or all of your efforts to be put aside by whom you see as a threat.
If you feel the heat from "the other side", imagine what your political foes perceive in our era of the Trump effect. I wonder if you and my fellow Cons appreciate the hell we have given the Left in many successe these last 2 years.
Be confident my friend. The "white heterosexual male" is not an endangered species and never will be. I hear some brown people even have a thing for white guys. :wink:
MisterVeritis
11-28-2018, 07:08 PM
Here's a short response: It seems to be okay to call me any anything but when I do it (I do it), then all of a sudden I'm a racist, WN, anti-Woman and uncaring monster who favors genocide and unnecessary wars. I also want the poor to die off.
If you want to ignore that, do so. I won't. I'm willing to give tit for tat. I didn't get by in some of the places I worked by being a pussy.
SW just needs some leadership. He all but admitted he can be led around by the nose.
donttread
11-29-2018, 08:24 AM
It is currently a law enforcement action.
Termonology is everything. Orwell knew that
Common
11-29-2018, 12:35 PM
I understand your statements portraying a "Dem agenda". I would only ask if you acknowledge any Repub agenda exists?
You state a worry that the "white males are being diminished" by a conspiracy of the Left/Dems. I'll ask, if you are secure in your abilities, personal security and are in pursuit of life, liberty and happiness how can anyone attempt and succeed in diminishing you? You would have to personally give-up some or all of your efforts to be put aside by whom you see as a threat.
If you feel the heat from "the other side", imagine what your political foes perceive in our era of the Trump effect. I wonder if you and my fellow Cons appreciate the hell we have given the Left in many successe these last 2 years.
Be confident my friend. The "white heterosexual male" is not an endangered species and never will be. I hear some brown people even have a thing for white guys. :wink:
Of course theres a republican agenda, they both always have an agenda jimmyz
My post wasnt intended to be racist it was intended to state facts.
When people are put in the corner on forums and cant shred what you say, they pick out one small detail to take issue with so they can avoid the rest of post, thats the oldest of online dodges.
jimmyz
11-29-2018, 03:51 PM
Of course theres a republican agenda, they both always have an agenda jimmyz
My post wasnt intended to be racist it was intended to state facts.
When people are put in the corner on forums and cant shred what you say, they pick out one small detail to take issue with so they can avoid the rest of post, thats the oldest of online dodges.
Only kooks would have thought your post was in any way racist. No worries.
donttread
11-29-2018, 06:00 PM
At birth. :smiley:
LOL. Good answer!
donttread
11-29-2018, 06:02 PM
augment border security where needed.
Is that "Tally" for dog and pony show?
Tahuyaman
11-29-2018, 07:19 PM
Is that "Tally" for dog and pony show?
No. it’s a legit mission. You wouldn’t know about that sort of stuff.
donttread
11-30-2018, 06:11 PM
No. it’s a legit mission. You wouldn’t know about that sort of stuff.
What did they do that couldn't have been done by the Guard?
Tahuyaman
11-30-2018, 06:47 PM
What did they do that couldn't have been done by the Guard?
Th national guard is a state asset.
donttread
12-01-2018, 10:35 AM
Th national guard is a state asset.
Aside from the oxymoronic nature of that theoretically true statement : These borders with Mexico they are with states , no? Those states have NG, correct.?
Also why does our "state guard" go on overseas training missions?
Captdon
12-01-2018, 10:42 AM
C, I will only say this. When you begin to view television commercials featuring interracial couples as an instance of you being pushed, beaten up and persecuted, and you make a point of stating that thought in public, you cast doubt on the validity, maturity and intelligence of whatever the point is that you were attempting to make.
I chuckle at the commercials too. There is always an inter-racial couple. a gay couple, one or two white couples, a black couple, an Asian couple (bi-racial or not) and a Latino couple.
I chuckle at how Hollywood thinks the real America is like that. That wouldn't happen anywhere else but a studio.
It is funny as all get out.
Captdon
12-01-2018, 10:52 AM
Aside from the oxymoronic nature of that theoretically true statement : These borders with Mexico they are with states , no? Those states have NG, correct.?
Also why does our "state guard" go on overseas training missions?
When the President calls up the NG, they are then under the authority of the DOD. Here's a fact: a lot of National Guard soldiers have fought and died in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Tahuyaman
12-01-2018, 12:22 PM
Aside from the oxymoronic nature of that theoretically true statement : These borders with Mexico they are with states , no? Those states have NG, correct.?
Also why does our "state guard" go on overseas training missions?
The governor of a state is the authority who orders a deployment of the NG. The Governor of California said that he was not going to put the California national guard on the border. Your stance here demonstrates that you are just looking for some way to criticize Trump just because.
donttread
01-01-2019, 11:27 AM
SW just needs some leadership. He all but admitted he can be led around by the nose.
And what better leadership than a legend in his own mind?
donttread
01-01-2019, 11:29 AM
The governor of a state is the authority who orders a deployment of the NG. The Governor of California said that he was not going to put the California national guard on the border. Your stance here demonstrates that you are just looking for some way to criticize Trump just because.
Not really, I get nervous about potential violent use on the Military on American soil and you should be too. Not precedents we want to set
Peter1469
01-01-2019, 11:47 AM
Is that what it is? Is it a war?
It isn't a war, but it is conflict between globalists who want to end state borders and nationalists who make up the majority of the population.
donttread
01-01-2019, 12:00 PM
Is that what it is? Is it a war?
Nope. It's a problem . If it were a war the "invaders" would have uniforms and guns
Tahuyaman
01-01-2019, 12:03 PM
Not really, I get nervous about potential violent use on the Military on American soil and you should be too. Not precedents we want to set
Defending an international border is not a percent you want to set? It's not like they would be patrolling the streets of Chicago's south side.
MisterVeritis
01-01-2019, 12:11 PM
And what better leadership than a legend in his own mind?
Standing Wolf will have to seek a leader. Who knows, he might find one that can lead him away from some of his goofier positions.
You could use a leader too.
Every time I read your name and view your posts I can think only Dontt Read. I wonder if there is a fix for that? Do you read?
MisterVeritis
01-01-2019, 12:12 PM
Not really, I get nervous about potential violent use on the Military on American soil and you should be too. Not precedents we want to set
Wait! Do you believe the American military cannot defend America against foreign invasions?
Shame on you Dontt Read.
Peter1469
01-01-2019, 12:13 PM
Nope. It's a problem . If it were a war the "invaders" would have uniforms and guns
Why do you think that?
Captain Obvious
01-01-2019, 12:13 PM
Defending an international border is not a percent you want to set? It's not like they would be patrolling the streets of Chicago's south side.
And this is why there is a perception of fearful old men hiding behind walls.
Defending? How about patrolling, enforcing, monitoring - and following up with laws, regulations and enforcing them on current squatters?
Nah, let's build a wall to show how stupid and paranoid we are as a culture.
MisterVeritis
01-01-2019, 12:14 PM
Nope. It's a problem . If it were a war the "invaders" would have uniforms and guns
Why? Is that in a rule book somewhere?
Islamists believe they can subjugate their enemies by immigration and birth rates.
MisterVeritis
01-01-2019, 12:15 PM
And this is why there is a perception of fearful old men hiding behind walls.
Defending? How about patrolling, enforcing, monitoring - and following up with laws, regulations and enforcing them on current squatters?
Nah, let's build a wall to show how stupid and paranoid we are as a culture.
We ought to build a Southern wall because walls work. We want to keep the riff-raff out. You don't.
Tahuyaman
01-01-2019, 12:16 PM
Nope. It's a problem . If it were a war the "invaders" would have uniforms and guns
We've had other armed enemies who haven't worn uniforms.
Tahuyaman
01-01-2019, 12:30 PM
And this is why there is a perception of fearful old men hiding behind walls.
Defending? How about patrolling, enforcing, monitoring - and following up with laws, regulations and enforcing them on current squatters?
Nah, let's build a wall to show how stupid and paranoid we are as a culture.
So, you are advocating using active duty military to patrol American cities rounding up illegal aliens?
I don't know why you are portraying border security as fearful, stupid and paranoid.
Captain Obvious
01-01-2019, 12:30 PM
We ought to build a Southern wall because walls work. We want to keep the riff-raff out. You don't.
That's a lie, I've more than established my position on secure borders. If you feel the need to lie about it in order in your mind to justify a stupid wall that's your dysfunction.
I'm more of a border protection guy than you frauds, I just don't want a huge wall, a symbol of fear and idiocy to do it. I want border security and laws and the enforcement of those laws to deal with the current squatters now.
Fearful old men hide behind walls.
Captain Obvious
01-01-2019, 12:32 PM
So, you are advocating using active duty military to patrol American cities rounding up illegal aliens?
I don't know why you are portraying border security as fearful, stupid and paranoid.
Once again, fearful old men have to lie.
I am not portraying border security as fearful and stupid, I'm saying a wall is fearful and stupid. I'm advocating border security, and not with military, with border patrol agents, those who are supposed to be patrolling borders.
Got it, Cliff? Or are you having difficulty processing basic english again?
MisterVeritis
01-01-2019, 12:34 PM
That's a lie, I've more than established my position on secure borders.
You haven't. You like more of the things that don't work. Why is that?
MisterVeritis
01-01-2019, 12:35 PM
Once again, fearful old men have to lie.
I am not portraying border security as fearful and stupid, I'm saying a wall is fearful and stupid. I'm advocating border security, and not with military, with border patrol agents, those who are supposed to be patrolling borders.
Got it, Cliff? Or are you having difficulty processing basic english again?
You love doing the things that don't work and oppose the wall as the foundation of a system that can work. Why is that? Cliff.
Tahuyaman
01-01-2019, 01:00 PM
Evidently some claim to support border security without calling for the security element of that. Then they claim to be opposed to open borders.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.8 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.