It's a Mystery....

[patrickt]

"Take Prince William County in northern Virginia, which was recently identified by The New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/us/politics/obamas-victory-presents-gop-with-demographic-test.html) as the poster county for the Obama Majority. In 2008 and 2012 over 160,000 voters turned out to give Obama identical 16 point margins over John McCain and Mitt Romney respectively. But in 2009, when Obama was not on the ballot, only 75,000 voters turned out to vote in Prince William and Republican Bob McDonnell crushed Democratic Creigh Deeds by an even bigger 18-point margin. Then in 2010, again with no Obama on the ballot, 91,000 Prince William voters turned out to vote and they voted for Republican House candidates, 52 percent to 46 percent.

If the Obama Majority supposedly arrived in 2008, where did it go in 2009 and 2010? Will it show up in 2014 or 2016? Even Obama’s closest advisers sound skeptical. “The organization doesn’t exist without belief in the candidate,” White House senior adviser David Plouffe told Politico (http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/why-obama-isnt-caving-85443.html) after November’s election. “They turned out for Barack Obama. It was all because of him.”
http://washingtonexaminer.com/will-the-democratic-party-survive-obama/article/2519485#.UQBH0idEE08

This is a column but the author seems to think that the extra 85,000 voters are due to Barack Obama's popularity. "White House senior adviser David Plouffe told Politico (http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/why-obama-isnt-caving-85443.html) after November’s election. “They turned out for Barack Obama. It was all because of him.”

That is one possibility. Another would be that he's much better at fraud than even other Democrats. We know he managed to created an internet donation system twice that would allow foreign nations to donate and we know he has his Department of Justice--oh, the irony--fighting tooth and nail to maintain voter fraud. I think that fraud is more likely than Barack Obama's narcissistic personality in explaining the bizarre numbers.

[Deadwood]

"Take Prince William County in northern Virginia, which was recently identified by The New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/us/politics/obamas-victory-presents-gop-with-demographic-test.html) as the poster county for the Obama Majority. In 2008 and 2012 over 160,000 voters turned out to give Obama identical 16 point margins over John McCain and Mitt Romney respectively. But in 2009, when Obama was not on the ballot, only 75,000 voters turned out to vote in Prince William and Republican Bob McDonnell crushed Democratic Creigh Deeds by an even bigger 18-point margin. Then in 2010, again with no Obama on the ballot, 91,000 Prince William voters turned out to vote and they voted for Republican House candidates, 52 percent to 46 percent.

If the Obama Majority supposedly arrived in 2008, where did it go in 2009 and 2010? Will it show up in 2014 or 2016? Even Obama’s closest advisers sound skeptical. “The organization doesn’t exist without belief in the candidate,” White House senior adviser David Plouffe told Politico (http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/why-obama-isnt-caving-85443.html) after November’s election. “They turned out for Barack Obama. It was all because of him.”
http://washingtonexaminer.com/will-the-democratic-party-survive-obama/article/2519485#.UQBH0idEE08

This is a column but the author seems to think that the extra 85,000 voters are due to Barack Obama's popularity. "White House senior adviser David Plouffe told Politico (http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/why-obama-isnt-caving-85443.html) after November’s election. “They turned out for Barack Obama. It was all because of him.”

That is one possibility. Another would be that he's much better at fraud than even other Democrats. We know he managed to created an internet donation system twice that would allow foreign nations to donate and we know he has his Department of Justice--oh, the irony--fighting tooth and nail to maintain voter fraud. I think that fraud is more likely than Barack Obama's narcissistic personality in explaining the bizarre numbers.




This simply isn't possible based on the numbers. There is, roughly, a 40% increase in turn out for a presidential election. That I would say is the high end of normal, there is more money, workers, and emotion in a presidential campaign all of which drives voter turn out.

What you have to look at is the plurality. 57% for Obama. That is NOT 12%....that figure would be the differential and more likely due to the fact that neither McCain nor Romney represented the core values supported by the traditional republican voting pattern.

Obama and his turds will say anything.....even a blatant lie like that.