PDA

View Full Version : The case for local government



Peter1469
03-07-2019, 11:42 AM
The case for local government (https://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2019/03/04/the_case_for_local_government_111089.html)

Here is a good article that advocates devolving much of federal power to states and local governments. A great idea, I wonder where I have heard of that before (the Constitution as written).


This essay is part of a RealClearPolicy series (https://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2019/03/04/reclaiming_our_american_project_110713.html) centered on the American Project (https://publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu/academics/research/the-american-project/), an initiative of the Pepperdine School of Public Policy. The project looks to the country’s founding principles to respond to our current cultural and political upheaval.



Nearly three-quarters of Americans trust (https://news.gallup.com/poll/243563/americans-trusting-local-state-government.aspx)their local governments. And Congress? Just 40 percent trust our country’s legislative branch — the lowest of all major institutions in this country. It is also in these smaller governments located outside of Washington, D.C., where Americans perceive progress (http://heartlandmonitor.com/)on the country’s major challenges. So why do we so often call on the distant reach of our capital to solve problems that are right in front of us?



Americans trust their local governments because they are tasked with doing things we want: keeping us safe, educating our children, cleaning the streets. And while we have some say in who our nationally elected leaders are and what they do, it is hardly the sort of choice offered by our nearly 36,000 (https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk) local governments. At the local level, we may vote with our feet as well as our ballots.




It is time we gave local a chance once again. The people and places closest to us are where we tend to direct our care and our energy; they should enjoy the authority necessary for diverse citizens to pursue flourishing lives together. In the 21st century, localism should be the rallying cry for those who believe in a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.



Local governments are a living tradition within the political order set out in the Constitution. The Founders recognized the municipality as a natural political entity arising from Americans’ associational life. Self-government depends on an active citizenry owning their own affairs. That is why American federalism, while formally two-tiered, is practically three-tiered. Local governments are constitutionally subordinate to states, but they reserve and preserve some legal and political autonomy, if not direct power.



People are the ultimate source of power in this country, and municipalities exercise their power closest to the people. In contrast to the top-down, centralized authorities higher up in the governmental food chain, local governments are decentralized bottom-up polities. In this way, municipalities, along with the states, help devolve authority away from the federal government and keep power from becoming too concentrated in Washington — or at least that’s how it’s supposed to work.

Read the rest at the link.

MisterVeritis
03-07-2019, 02:32 PM
One might imagine amending the constitution. I know. let's examine the Tenth Amendment.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Chris
03-07-2019, 02:54 PM
To me the Articles of Confederation were state-centered, the Constitution somewhere between state- and federal-centered, and has led to ever-increasing, ever-intrusive centralization of power.

If you want truly localized federalism to the level of subsidiarity, then you have to go all the way back to Johannes Althusius and his 1603 work, "Politica Methodice Digesta, Atque Exemplis Sacris et Profanis Illustrata,' available in translation as Politica.

donttread
03-09-2019, 07:41 PM
Clearly The Constitution did not limit federal government enough

Chris
03-09-2019, 07:50 PM
Clearly The Constitution did not limit federal government enough

The Constitution clearly expanded and centralized the federal government from what it was under the Articles of Confederation. It was counterrevolutionary.

Clearly, there are arguments for a strong central government in a world of the same. I just don't think that federal government should be placed over state and local governance; it should be kept dependent on them.

Mister D
03-09-2019, 07:58 PM
To me the Articles of Confederation were state-centered, the Constitution somewhere between state- and federal-centered, and has led to ever-increasing, ever-intrusive centralization of power.

If you want truly localized federalism to the level of subsidiarity, then you have to go all the way back to Johannes Althusius and his 1603 work, "Politica Methodice Digesta, Atque Exemplis Sacris et Profanis Illustrata,' available in translation as Politica.

Would we go back to Althusius or his political environment (i.e. the Holy Roman Empire)?

Captdon
03-10-2019, 07:03 PM
Clearly The Constitution did not limit federal government enough

It did until government went too far and the Court allowed it.

MisterVeritis
03-10-2019, 07:28 PM
Clearly The Constitution did not limit federal government enough
Of course it did. Article I Section 8 lays out everything the federal government may Constitutionally do. it is a very short list. One might even say it is limited.

MisterVeritis
03-10-2019, 07:29 PM
It did until government went too far and the Court allowed it.
The people allowed it. We should have dragged the court out of its chambers and hanged them on the spot.

Chris
03-10-2019, 08:35 PM
Would we go back to Althusius or his political environment (i.e. the Holy Roman Empire)?

Well, no, we can only move forward. It would require people getting involved in local self-government.

Mister D
03-10-2019, 08:46 PM
Well, no, we can only move forward. It would require people getting involved in local self-government.

Of course we can only move forward but Althuisus' thought has to be placed in itd proper imperial context. This was not abstract theorizing but, at least to some extent, the product of direct historical experience. He was a jurist after all.