PDA

View Full Version : tPF Retribution is Coming



MisterVeritis
05-14-2019, 12:00 PM
Attorney General William Barr (https://thehill.com/people/william-barr) has reportedly assigned a federal prosecutor in Connecticut to examine the origins of the investigation into Russia's election interference and alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Moscow.

John H. Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, has been tapped by Barr to look into the probe's inception.


https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/443509-top-connecticut-federal-prosecutor-assigned-to-investigate-russia


Good. Let's hope this is accurate. A Federal prosecutor has the tools he needs to investigate the hell out of this.

Retribution is coming.

MMC
05-14-2019, 12:04 PM
Attorney General William Barr (https://thehill.com/people/william-barr) has reportedly assigned a federal prosecutor in Connecticut to examine the origins of the investigation into Russia's election interference and alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Moscow.

John H. Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, has been tapped by Barr to look into the probe's inception.


https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/443509-top-connecticut-federal-prosecutor-assigned-to-investigate-russia


Good. Let's hope this is accurate. A Federal prosecutor has the tools he needs to investigate the hell out of this.

Retribution is coming.

Good news.....Barr should also have Huber out of Utah give an update on his investigation. That way Barr can make sure for the next 6 months and going into the 2020 election.....that the Democrats look treasonous to the Country.


The Lame Stream will hate having to report it. :wink:

MMC
05-14-2019, 12:43 PM
Rosenstein is out trashing Comey. The Lame Stream don't want to ask him questions about supporting Barr's summary of the Mueller Report. Doing all they can to give the Demo cover.


Any other time their reporters would be asking about the Barr summary. Marvin said.....Whats Goin On.

FindersKeepers
05-14-2019, 01:52 PM
While I'm not the sort of person who typically seeks revenge, the American people were dragged through two years of an intentional witch hunt and someone ought to answer for that. If we can expose and punish those who are responsible, perhaps it will keep others from traveling down that deceptive road.

Sergeant Gleed
05-14-2019, 02:26 PM
What did Obama know and when did he order the felonies?

Hillary, too.

Sergeant Gleed
05-14-2019, 02:30 PM
While I'm not the sort of person who typically seeks revenge, the American people were dragged through two years of an intentional witch hunt and someone ought to answer for that. If we can expose and punish those who are responsible, perhaps it will keep others from traveling down that deceptive road.

It's a matter of national survival.

If the peons see that the self-proclaimed elite really are above the laws we suffer under, society will eventually collapse.

Criminals like Obama and Hillary and Kerry and all their toady underlings need to be prosecuted and then executed as a lesson to others of their ilk.
.we can hand them over to their pals in North Korea if people here are too squeamish to want the task dine oroperly.

mamooth
05-14-2019, 03:10 PM
This will quietly tank. We know it will, because every other Republican fake investigation has tanked.

Naturally, the rubes will forget about it completely, having moved on to whatever the next Republican fake investigation is. Being conservative means being blissfully free of the curse of long-term memory.

Captdon
05-14-2019, 03:27 PM
This will quietly tank. We know it will, because every other Republican fake investigation has tanked.

Naturally, the rubes will forget about it completely, having moved on to whatever the next Republican fake investigation is. Being conservative means being blissfully free of the curse of long-term memory.

This investigator has proprietorial power. Look for indictments soon enough.

MMC
05-14-2019, 05:20 PM
While I'm not the sort of person who typically seeks revenge, the American people were dragged through two years of an intentional witch hunt and someone ought to answer for that. If we can expose and punish those who are responsible, perhaps it will keep others from traveling down that deceptive road.

Exactly.....we can't allow the Demos and their Lame Stream to commit another soft coup.

MMC
05-14-2019, 05:22 PM
This investigator has proprietorial power. Look for indictments soon enough.

Meh.....you know it can't figure out why Hillary's people took the 5th so as to not incriminate themselves. Some of them just don't have the brain capacity to figure out what took place.

Peter1469
05-14-2019, 05:24 PM
Durham has uncovered FBI corruption in the past. A good choice.

MMC
05-14-2019, 05:25 PM
Durham has uncovered FBI corruption in the past. A good choice.

The Demos are quite worried, huh? At least they have the smarts to be worried.

Sergeant Gleed
05-14-2019, 07:07 PM
The Demos are quite worried, huh? At least they have the smarts to be worried.

And now you know why they're going to pull out all the stops to steal the next election. They know if they don't, they'll be going to jail. Even their 98% ownership if the media won't keep this quiet if the can't stop the investigations at the source.

Standing Wolf
05-14-2019, 07:15 PM
Someone should explain to the AG that he is not Donald Trump's personal attorney. The corruption of this Administration truly knows no bounds.

The blind partisanship and personality cult worship displayed by many of this forum's self-identified "conservative" members is, quite frankly, nauseating.

MisterVeritis
05-14-2019, 07:17 PM
Someone should explain to the AG that he is not Donald Trump's personal attorney. The corruption of this Administration truly knows no bounds.

The blind partisanship and personality cult worship displayed by many of this forum's self-identified "conservative" members is, quite frankly, nauseating.
Retribution is Coming.

Tahuyaman
05-14-2019, 07:25 PM
Durham has uncovered FBI corruption in the past. A good choice.
Do you suppose some of the future subjects of this investigation will flee the country in hopes to wait out this investigation?

Tahuyaman
05-14-2019, 07:27 PM
Someone should explain to the AG that he is not Donald Trump's personal attorney. The corruption of this Administration truly knows no bounds.

The blind partisanship and personality cult worship displayed by many of this forum's self-identified "conservative" members is, quite frankly, nauseating.

That comment is pure partisan hackery.

How is it corrupt to investigate the corruption which caused this whole thing to happen?

Private Pickle
05-14-2019, 07:31 PM
Attorney General William Barr (https://thehill.com/people/william-barr) has reportedly assigned a federal prosecutor in Connecticut to examine the origins of the investigation into Russia's election interference and alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Moscow.

John H. Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, has been tapped by Barr to look into the probe's inception.


https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/443509-top-connecticut-federal-prosecutor-assigned-to-investigate-russia


Good. Let's hope this is accurate. A Federal prosecutor has the tools he needs to investigate the hell out of this.

Retribution is coming.

No it’s not. Just another distraction. Another pinprick into the absolute corruption that exists within the American political elite. Maybe a few staffers might get tagged. An advisor here a consultant there. But if you think anyone of note is going to prison you’re wrong.

MisterVeritis
05-14-2019, 07:45 PM
No it’s not. Just another distraction. Another pinprick into the absolute corruption that exists within the American political elite. Maybe a few staffers might get tagged. An advisor here a consultant there. But if you think anyone of note is going to prison you’re wrong.
We shall have to wait and see. I want executions. Deaths to pay for this. The Terrible Twenty must be executed by the state. Or we will see this from now on.

Private Pickle
05-14-2019, 07:51 PM
We shall have to wait and see. I want executions. Deaths to pay for this. The Terrible Twenty must be executed by the state. Or we will see this from now on.

Dude this isn’t 1782. There will be no discernible prosecutions let alone executions. We’ve seen this for decades. Wish in one hand and shit in the other. See which one fills up the fastest.

By the way your rhetoric about executions is disturbing to me. Reeks of authoritarian regimes we see in places like Saudi Arabia, North Korea and Syria. That’s your vision of the US?

Tahuyaman
05-14-2019, 08:15 PM
Lol.

Sergeant Gleed
05-14-2019, 08:20 PM
Someone should explain to the AG that he is not Donald Trump's personal attorney. The corruption of this Administration truly knows no bounds.

The blind partisanship and personality cult worship displayed by many of this forum's self-identified "conservative" members is, quite frankly, nauseating.

So you belive thst the DOJ should exonerate Rodents for felony violations of the Espionage Act, because of the (D), pursue blatantly false charges against the President, because of the (R) and then, when clear evidence if a felonious coup is made public, dissemination the investigations because the criminals all have those magic (D)s.

That is not a question. It's a semen of fact.

What are people with your attitude called?

Sergeant Gleed
05-14-2019, 08:21 PM
Do you suppose some of the future subjects of this investigation will flee the country in hopes to wait out this investigation?

Hopefully they go to someplace we have Predator drones operating...

Sergeant Gleed
05-14-2019, 08:22 PM
Dude this isn’t 1782. There will be no discernible prosecutions let alone executions. We’ve seen this for decades. Wish in one hand and $#@! in the other. See which one fills up the fastest.

By the way your rhetoric about executions is disturbing to me. Reeks of authoritarian regimes we see in places like Saudi Arabia, North Korea and Syria. That’s your vision of the US?
Death is the prescribed sentence for treason in the Constitution, and an attempted coup is treason.

texan
05-14-2019, 08:27 PM
While I'm not the sort of person who typically seeks revenge, the American people were dragged through two years of an intentional witch hunt and someone ought to answer for that. If we can expose and punish those who are responsible, perhaps it will keep others from traveling down that deceptive road.
Agreed. Revenge shouldn’t be a factor. But this BS shouldn’t ever happen again. Also, it just got real because this guy can charge people and put them in jail himself. AGs just make recommendations. Maybe something happens. 5is is more serious.

Sergeant Gleed
05-14-2019, 08:49 PM
Agreed. Revenge shouldn’t be a factor. But this BS shouldn’t ever happen again. Also, it just got real because this guy can charge people and put them in jail himself. AGs just make recommendations. Maybe something happens. 5is is more serious.

It would seem that the best way to discourage the never ending efforts of the Rodents to enslave my children is to wreak bloody vengeance on the perpetual perpetrators of these crimes, down to the fourth tier of repsonsibility, so the Future Rodents, for the next 100 years, will see the blood stains on the steps if the Capitol and the Supreme Court and quail at the thought of even planning such a heinous crime again.

Peter1469
05-14-2019, 08:53 PM
Someone should explain to the AG that he is not Donald Trump's personal attorney. The corruption of this Administration truly knows no bounds.

The blind partisanship and personality cult worship displayed by many of this forum's self-identified "conservative" members is, quite frankly, nauseating.
He isn't acting as Trump's personal attorney. He is investigating how the prior administration turned the FBI and CIA against its political appointment. And heads will roll because laws were broken.

Peter1469
05-14-2019, 08:54 PM
Do you suppose some of the future subjects of this investigation will flee the country in hopes to wait out this investigation?
I would.

Private Pickle
05-14-2019, 08:56 PM
Death is the prescribed sentence for treason in the Constitution, and an attempted coup is treason.

Yawn. Words like treason and coup are thrown around pretty recklessly these days.

Tahuyaman
05-14-2019, 09:05 PM
Yawn. Words like treason and coup are thrown around pretty recklessly these days.

What happened and is still happening is indeed a form of a coup.


We have a situation where supposed trusted givernment agencies concocted evidence then used that to initiate an investigation into a campaign of a presidential candidate then drive him from office after he won the election.

Is that treason?

Private Pickle
05-14-2019, 09:35 PM
What happened and is still happening is indeed a form of a coup.


We have a situation where supposed trusted givernment agencies concocted evidence then used that to initiate an investigation into a campaign of a presidential candidate then drive him from office after he won the election.

Is that treason?

A “form of coup”? What does that even mean?

Apparently we need to review some definitions here.

coup
noun

1.
a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.


Well that is no where near what took place or what is taking place.

treason

noun

the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.

Pretty broad definition there. But no one has tried to kill or overthrow (especially by a Coup) the government.

So how do you define “betraying one’s country? Let’s go through a comparison: Would Hillary’s use of a server that was not secure thereby opening it up to hacking be considered “treason”? Or would Petraeus’ willful divulging of classified information be considered treason? Or both?

Manning willfully divulged confidential information to a third party and was pardoned by a President but he wasn’t charged with treason. More so considered a whistle blower.

How many people in America’s history have been accused and convicted of treason or an attempted coup?

My point stands. Some are throwing those words around loosely for a political agenda and some are calling for executions. How many Americans in our history have been executed for treason? Yet some are calling for 20 current politicians or federal employees to be executed for the same.

If we executed 20 people tomorrow for treason it would far exceed the amount we have in our entire history. Tell me that isn’t political rhetoric. Hackery at its best.

MisterVeritis
05-14-2019, 09:56 PM
Dude this isn’t 1782. There will be no discernible prosecutions let alone executions. We’ve seen this for decades. Wish in one hand and shit in the other. See which one fills up the fastest.

By the way your rhetoric about executions is disturbing to me. Reeks of authoritarian regimes we see in places like Saudi Arabia, North Korea and Syria. That’s your vision of the US?
There is nothing wrong with the federal government executing people for horrible crimes. A death penalty is not an authoritarian punishment. You err.

Tahuyaman
05-14-2019, 09:57 PM
When someone says “a form of a coup”, most people understand what that means.

Private Pickle
05-14-2019, 09:59 PM
There is nothing wrong with the federal government executing people for horrible crimes. A death penalty is not an authoritarian punishment. You err.
Yet that isn’t the topic is it? We are talking about coups and treason. Not serial killings as a matter of race or across State lines.

Private Pickle
05-14-2019, 10:02 PM
When someone says “a form of a coup”, most people understand what that means.
Do they? I think it’s now being used as a political dog whistle. Most people watch the NEWS as a form of entertainment not as a source of actual information.

I gave you the definition of a coup and that simply hasn’t happened. Prove me wrong per the definition. Unless you want to argue that definition.

Tahuyaman
05-14-2019, 10:15 PM
What’s happening a what people call a soft coup. I don’t know why you would argue the term.

MisterVeritis
05-14-2019, 10:21 PM
Yet that isn’t the topic is it? We are talking about coups and treason. Not serial killings as a matter of race or across State lines.
A coup attempt is an attack on the Constitution itself. Former President Barack Hussein O used his regime's intelligence community and the federal police to conduct political spying on the opposing party. The intelligence and police agencies then attempted to frame an innocent man to overthrow the election. Tht deserves death for every coup plotter. The Terrible Twenty must die via state executions. The Dirty Thirty who were instrumental in moving the coup plot forward must see their lives destroyed. They should be bankrupted, ruined, ane imprisoned for life with no parole. The Dreadful Three Hundred, the next tier down must be bankrupted and imprisoned for decades.

Private Pickle
05-14-2019, 10:40 PM
A coup attempt is an attack on the Constitution itself.

Not by definition. I gave you the definition of a coup.



Former President Barack Hussein O used his regime's intelligence community and the federal police to conduct political spying on the opposing party.

Not a coup.


The intelligence and police agencies then attempted to frame an innocent man to overthrow the election. Tht deserves death for every coup plotter. The Terrible Twenty must die via state executions. The Dirty Thirty who were instrumental in moving the coup plot forward must see their lives destroyed. They should be bankrupted, ruined, ane imprisoned for life with no parole. The Dreadful Three Hundred, the next tier down must be bankrupted and imprisoned for decades.
Never a coup. Sorry bro. They won’t even face charges. Maybe a couple of Obama’s inner circle might just like Trump’s and maybe they will do a few years in prison. But Obama? Hillary? Not gonna happen. And executions? That’s hackery.

Private Pickle
05-14-2019, 10:53 PM
The desire for a civil war as a result of the idea of a coup is both silly and inconceivable. Not going to happen and the rhetoric by itself is nothing more than rhetoric but if it invokes actions as a result? That is treason.

Cletus
05-15-2019, 12:32 AM
I gave you the definition of a coup and that simply hasn’t happened. Prove me wrong per the definition. Unless you want to argue that definition.

You gave one definition of "coup". Cambridge defines it differently. "illegal, often violent, taking of government power"


A coup does not have to be violent.

MisterVeritis
05-15-2019, 09:32 AM
Not by definition. I gave you the definition of a coup.
Not a coup.
Never a coup. Sorry bro. They won’t even face charges. Maybe a couple of Obama’s inner circle might just like Trump’s and maybe they will do a few years in prison. But Obama? Hillary? Not gonna happen. And executions? That’s hackery.
Yes, it was a coup attempt. And yes, the right solution is to execute the coup plotters.

MisterVeritis
05-15-2019, 09:34 AM
The desire for a civil war as a result of the idea of a coup is both silly and inconceivable. Not going to happen and the rhetoric by itself is nothing more than rhetoric but if it invokes actions as a result? That is treason.
Civil wars regularly occur in history. We are in a cold civil war today. Yes, the tyrannical state will view one side of the civil war as treasonous. The side I will take is the side that supports and defends the Constitution. Which side will you be on?

mamooth
05-15-2019, 03:23 PM
This investigator has proprietorial power. Look for indictments soon enough.
For how many years is it now that you've all been saying indictments are just around the corner?

Yet it never happens. It never will happen.

Just as you'll never figure out you're being played.

This illustrates a problem with the internet. In pre-internet days, when the crazy guy on the barstool talked crazy, other people in the bar would tell him he's crazy, so his crazy was limited.

Now, the crazy people gather in little isolated cliques like this one. Instead of having sane people around to point out they're talking nuts, they surround themselves with other crazy people, and they all egg on each other's crazy to ever-increasing heights. Thus, we see threads like this one.

Seriously, y'all aren't normal. And it shouldn't be left to me to stage these interventions.

Don29palms
05-15-2019, 04:33 PM
For how many years is it now that you've all been saying indictments are just around the corner?

Yet it never happens. It never will happen.

Just as you'll never figure out you're being played.

This illustrates a problem with the internet. In pre-internet days, when the crazy guy on the barstool talked crazy, other people in the bar would tell him he's crazy, so his crazy was limited.

Now, the crazy people gather in little isolated cliques like this one. Instead of having sane people around to point out they're talking nuts, they surround themselves with other crazy people, and they all egg on each other's crazy to ever-increasing heights. Thus, we see threads like this one.

Seriously, y'all aren't normal. And it shouldn't be left to me to stage these interventions.

I tell liberal sheeple like you that they are insane all the time.

Tahuyaman
05-15-2019, 05:20 PM
For how many years is it now that you've all been saying indictments are just around the corner?

Yet it never happens. It never will happen.

Just as you'll never figure out you're being played.

This illustrates a problem with the internet. In pre-internet days, when the crazy guy on the barstool talked crazy, other people in the bar would tell him he's crazy, so his crazy was limited.

Now, the crazy people gather in little isolated cliques like this one. Instead of having sane people around to point out they're talking nuts, they surround themselves with other crazy people, and they all egg on each other's crazy to ever-increasing heights. Thus, we see threads like this one.

Seriously, y'all aren't normal. And it shouldn't be left to me to stage these interventions.
Obama administration political operatives aren’t as convinced of that as you are. They are pointing the finger at each other now. They are running scared.

I suspect Brennan and Clapper will leave the country.

AZ Jim
05-15-2019, 05:34 PM
Yes, it was a coup attempt. And yes, the right solution is to execute the coup plotters. Hitler would have LOVED you!!

mamooth
05-15-2019, 07:24 PM
Obama administration political operatives aren’t as convinced of that as you are. They are pointing the finger at each other now. They are running scared.

You all said that each previous time as well. How'd it turn out?

Your cult leaders read you the same script every time, with a few minor variations.

Tahuyaman
05-15-2019, 07:33 PM
You all said that each previous time as well. How'd it turn out?

Your cult leaders read you the same script every time, with a few minor variations.
What prevuious times? There is no previous situation.

Don29palms
05-15-2019, 07:37 PM
You all said that each previous time as well. How'd it turn out?

Your cult leaders read you the same script every time, with a few minor variations.

Your delusions are not reality.

Peter1469
05-15-2019, 07:39 PM
A “form of coup”? What does that even mean?

Apparently we need to review some definitions here.

coup
noun

1.
a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.


Well that is no where near what took place or what is taking place.

treason

noun

the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.

Pretty broad definition there. But no one has tried to kill or overthrow (especially by a Coup) the government.

So how do you define “betraying one’s country? Let’s go through a comparison: Would Hillary’s use of a server that was not secure thereby opening it up to hacking be considered “treason”? Or would Petraeus’ willful divulging of classified information be considered treason? Or both?

Manning willfully divulged confidential information to a third party and was pardoned by a President but he wasn’t charged with treason. More so considered a whistle blower.

How many people in America’s history have been accused and convicted of treason or an attempted coup?

My point stands. Some are throwing those words around loosely for a political agenda and some are calling for executions. How many Americans in our history have been executed for treason? Yet some are calling for 20 current politicians or federal employees to be executed for the same.

If we executed 20 people tomorrow for treason it would far exceed the amount we have in our entire history. Tell me that isn’t political rhetoric. Hackery at its best.







That is why I, Victor Davis Hansen and others use the term soft coup.

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 08:35 PM
You gave one definition of "coup". Cambridge defines it differently. "illegal, often violent, taking of government power"


A coup does not have to be violent.
My bad. Only “often”. Did they define when the “often” isn’t violent?

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 08:41 PM
Yes, it was a coup attempt. And yes, the right solution is to execute the coup plotters.
Not by definition.

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 08:44 PM
Civil wars regularly occur in history. We are in a cold civil war today. Yes, the tyrannical state will view one side of the civil war as treasonous. The side I will take is the side that supports and defends the Constitution. Which side will you be on?

If that’s the case you want to take a cold civil war into a hot one. Pretty definitive of you.

I would take the side the Supreme Court sides with. That is after all the legal entity that determines what is Constitutionally correct.

MisterVeritis
05-15-2019, 08:45 PM
Hitler would have LOVED you!!
To think that is to show how goofy you have become.

MisterVeritis
05-15-2019, 08:47 PM
Not by definition.
Believe as you must.

MisterVeritis
05-15-2019, 08:47 PM
If that’s the case you want to take a cold civil war into a hot one. Pretty definitive of you.

I would take the side the Supreme Court sides with. That is after all the legal entity that determines what is Constitutionally correct.
The supremes do not act within the Constitution.

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 08:52 PM
That is why I, Victor Davis Hansen and others use the term soft coup.

A Soft coup, sometimes referred to as a Silent coup, is a coup d'état without the use of violence, but based on a conspiracy or plot that has as its objective the taking of state power by partially or wholly illegal means, in order to facilitate an exchange of political leadership - and in some cases also of the ...

What illegal means? And not your opinion. What had been determined to have been illegal? Something tells me you’ll say something like we need to investigate or we need to create an investigation.

Neither of which will result in anything other than fodder for the media and spoon fed hackery for the masses.

Like the Mueller report.

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 08:54 PM
Believe as you must.

I don’t have to believe. I have the definition. Definitions aren’t beliefs. They are facts.

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 08:55 PM
The supremes do not act within the Constitution.
Wut??

MisterVeritis
05-15-2019, 08:57 PM
I don’t have to believe. I have the definition. Definitions aren’t beliefs. They are facts.
You err.

It doesn't matter. This will play out now.

Retribution is coming and there isn't a damned thing you can do about it.

Cletus
05-15-2019, 08:58 PM
Not by definition.

Yes, by definition.

MisterVeritis
05-15-2019, 08:59 PM
Wut??
Read Article Three. Point out where it says the judiciary has the authority to decide what is and what is not constitutional.
SECTION 1The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

SECTION 2The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;— to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects. (https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/articles/article-iii#tooltip-1)
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment; shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.

SECTION 3Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

Cletus
05-15-2019, 09:00 PM
I don’t have to believe. I have the definition. Definitions aren’t beliefs. They are facts.

You have A definition, not THE definition. I posted a definition from an equally respected source that completely negates your definition and renders your entire argument null.

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 09:01 PM
You err.

It doesn't matter. This will play out now.

Retribution is coming and there isn't a damned thing you can do about it.
How am I in “err”? The definition is the definition.

There is no no retribution coming. Just like when Trump said Hillary would be in jail then reversed the position once he was elected.

You're right tho. There isn’t anything you not I can do about it.

MisterVeritis
05-15-2019, 09:10 PM
How am I in “err”? The definition is the definition.

There is no no retribution coming. Just like when Trump said Hillary would be in jail then reversed the position once he was elected.

You're right tho. There isn’t anything you not I can do about it.
Don't worry about it. There was political spying followed by a coup attempt. That is all being investigated by the DOJ.

Retribution is Coming.

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 09:19 PM
Yes, by definition.
I already posted the definition of a coup. It doesn’t apply. What definition are you using?

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 09:22 PM
Read Article Three. Point out where it says the judiciary has the authority to decide what is and what is not constitutional.
SECTION 1

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

SECTION 2

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;— to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects. (https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/articles/article-iii#tooltip-1)
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment; shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.

SECTION 3

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 09:23 PM
You have A definition, not THE definition. I posted a definition from an equally respected source that completely negates your definition and renders your entire argument null.
What is THE definition again? I didn’t see your post.

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 09:24 PM
Don't worry about it. There was political spying followed by a coup attempt. That is all being investigated by the DOJ.

Retribution is Coming.
Get ready for disappointment.

MisterVeritis
05-15-2019, 09:25 PM
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority
Do you see a grant of authority in the Constitution for the courts to determine what is and what is not Constitutional?

There is no grant of authority. The Supremes were to decide a very narrow range of cases and controversies. Nothing more.

MisterVeritis
05-15-2019, 09:25 PM
Get ready for disappointment.


Why? I am right.

Retribution is Coming.

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 09:39 PM
Do you see a grant of authority in the Constitution for the courts to determine what is and what is not Constitutional?

There is no grant of authority. The Supremes were to decide a very narrow range of cases and controversies. Nothing more.

Yes. That is what “shall extend to all cases” means.

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 09:40 PM
Why? I am right.

Retribution is Coming.
Why? When have you ever been satisfied when it comes to political “retribution”?

MisterVeritis
05-15-2019, 09:41 PM
Yes. That is what “shall extend to all cases” means.
No. It doesn't.

MisterVeritis
05-15-2019, 09:42 PM
Why? When have you ever been satisfied when it comes to political “retribution”?

I cannot recall any other coup attempt.

This will be a judicial retribution. And it is coming.

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 09:56 PM
No. It doesn't.
The “bu uh” argument works for you?

Private Pickle
05-15-2019, 09:57 PM
I cannot recall any other coup attempt.

This will be a judicial retribution. And it is coming.
LOL. Ok. Whatever makes you sleep at night.

Cletus
05-16-2019, 02:14 AM
I already posted the definition of a coup. It doesn’t apply. What definition are you using?
The one I posted that specifies that a coup is "often" violent. That means it is not always violent, which makes MV's position credible and seriously undermines yours. A coup can happen without violence. The position you have based your argument on is that there was no violence therefore there was no coup. That is not correct.

MisterVeritis
05-16-2019, 08:09 AM
The “bu uh” argument works for you?
You were wrong. What else needs to be said?

MMC
05-16-2019, 08:35 AM
My bad. Only “often”. Did they define when the “often” isn’t violent?

War Without Weapons: How Non-Violent Campaigns Reduce … (http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2013/10/10/war-without-weapons-how-non-violent-campaigns-reduce-the-incidence-of-war/)politicalviolenceataglance.org/2013/10/10/war-without-weapons-how-non-violent...
Oct 10, 2013 · In the 1980s, for example, some 52 percent of non-violent campaigns were successful, compared with less than 40 percent of violent campaigns. But between 2000 and 2006 (the last year for which the study has data), non-violent campaigns were successful in 70 percent of cases; violent campaigns in less than 15 percent.

Peter1469
05-16-2019, 08:47 AM
What illegal means? And not your opinion. What had been determined to have been illegal? Something tells me you’ll say something like we need to investigate or we need to create an investigation.

Neither of which will result in anything other than fodder for the media and spoon fed hackery for the masses.

Like the Mueller report.
For one, the FISA warrants were not legally obtained. The FBI misrepresented its evidence to the FISA judge.

Private Pickle
05-16-2019, 10:10 AM
The one I posted that specifies that a coup is "often" violent. That means it is not always violent, which makes MV's position credible and seriously undermines yours. A coup can happen without violence. The position you have based your argument on is that there was no violence therefore there was no coup. That is not correct.
So let me get this straight. Whether violent or not a coup is an overthrow of the government right? And the Democrats perpetrated this coup?

Private Pickle
05-16-2019, 10:10 AM
You were wrong. What else needs to be said?

Nu uh.

Private Pickle
05-16-2019, 10:11 AM
For one, the FISA warrants were not legally obtained. The FBI misrepresented its evidence to the FISA judge.
OK?

Peter1469
05-16-2019, 10:21 AM
OK?
Go back and review your question. I provided an example to answer it.

MisterVeritis
05-16-2019, 11:07 AM
So let me get this straight. Whether violent or not a coup is an overthrow of the government right? And the Democrats perpetrated this coup?
The Democrat President Barack Hussein O used his regime's intelligence and police agencies to spy on the opposing political party. Their spying was predicated on lies.

When that failed they shifted to framing an innocent man in order to remove him. That is a coup.

Private Pickle
05-16-2019, 07:11 PM
Go back and review your question. I provided an example to answer it.

Its not going to matter.

Private Pickle
05-16-2019, 07:12 PM
The Democrat President Barack Hussein O used his regime's intelligence and police agencies to spy on the opposing political party. Their spying was predicated on lies.

When that failed they shifted to framing an innocent man in order to remove him. That is a coup.

No. That’s spying and framing.

Cletus
05-16-2019, 07:23 PM
So let me get this straight. Whether violent or not a coup is an overthrow of the government right? And the Democrats perpetrated this coup?

It has become apparent that certain people opposed to the election of Donald Trump used illegal means to try to prevent his election. It is also apparent, and hopefully, we will soon have names, that certain people upset over the fact that Trump was elected used illegal means to try to undermine his administration and force him out of office.

The answer to your question is "No". The Democrats did not perpetrate a coup. There is however, a much better than even chance that it will not be long before it becomes known who it was who ATTEMPTED a coup and I suspect you would not lose if you bet on the fact that the majority of people involved were Democrats.

Common Sense
05-16-2019, 07:32 PM
Ironically, many of the people who criticized those who were certain that Trump colluded with Russia are now just as certain that the Dems or Deep State attempted a coup.

Maybe they should refer back to their own advice and standards of proof.

Don29palms
05-16-2019, 07:34 PM
Ironically, many of the people who criticized those who were certain that Trump colluded with Russia are now just as certain that the Dems or Deep State attempted a coup.

Maybe they should refer back to their own advice and standards of proof.

And why do you care? This has nothing to do with you.

DGUtley
05-16-2019, 07:59 PM
And why do you care? This has nothing to do with you.

NOTICE- Don29palms TB’d for discouraging discussion based on nationality. Nationality is irrelevant.

Peter1469
05-17-2019, 04:49 AM
Ironically, many of the people who criticized those who were certain that Trump colluded with Russia are now just as certain that the Dems or Deep State attempted a coup.

Maybe they should refer back to their own advice and standards of proof.
Their is a lot of evidence for a soft coup. Illegally obtained FISA warrants. Turning the FBI and CIA on a political opponent and later used them in an attempt to reverse an election. Barr will find much more evidence and their will be indictments.

MisterVeritis
05-17-2019, 12:08 PM
Ironically, many of the people who criticized those who were certain that Trump colluded with Russia are now just as certain that the Dems or Deep State attempted a coup.

Maybe they should refer back to their own advice and standards of proof.
Mueller had all the time he wanted and could not find any evidence anyone in the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians.

Now, Barr is doing what Mueller failed to do. Mueller, the Dirty Cop, failed to investigate the unlawful activities of the Democrat Obama regime's White House, DOJ, FBI and the intelligence community.

I know it was a coup attempt. Eventually you will know it too. We have time. The Dirty Cop took 22 months. I predict AG Barr will take less than half that amount of time.

Tahuyaman
05-17-2019, 02:33 PM
Ironically, many of the people who criticized those who were certain that Trump colluded with Russia are now just as certain that the Dems or Deep State attempted a coup.

Maybe they should refer back to their own advice and standards of proof.

There was and still is an obvious effort by the traditional political establishment and its supporters to remover Trump from office by any means necessary short of a violent armed action.

Now that there is an investigation being conducted on the origin of this effort look for the establishment side to get even more desperate.


There's no valid argument against this activity being portrayed as a soft coup.

mamooth
05-17-2019, 09:06 PM
What prevuious times?

All the times your side said the Democrats were running scared. That happened during every single faked pseudoscandal.


There is no previous situation.
By now, hundreds of such faked scandals have been presented.

And somehow, Hillary Clinton is _still_ not in jail.

From that, we can conclude either:

A. You keep falling for the dumbest conspiracy theories imaginable.

or

B. The conspiracy must go even deeper than we can imagine!

You'll choose B.

Tahuyaman
05-17-2019, 09:07 PM
All the times your side said the Democrats were running scared. That happened during every single faked pseudoscandal.


By now, hundreds of such faked scandals have been presented.

And somehow, Hillary Clinton is _still_ not in jail.

From that, we can conclude either:

A. You keep falling for the dumbest conspiracy theories imaginable.

or

B. The conspiracy must go even deeper than we can imagine!

You'll choose B.
Are you for real?

donttread
05-18-2019, 06:07 AM
Attorney General William Barr (https://thehill.com/people/william-barr) has reportedly assigned a federal prosecutor in Connecticut to examine the origins of the investigation into Russia's election interference and alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Moscow.

John H. Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, has been tapped by Barr to look into the probe's inception.


https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/443509-top-connecticut-federal-prosecutor-assigned-to-investigate-russia


Good. Let's hope this is accurate. A Federal prosecutor has the tools he needs to investigate the hell out of this.

Retribution is coming.


Or far more likely even more tax dollars and congressional time are about to be wasted.

Common
05-18-2019, 06:32 AM
There are investigations in the works, I will make none of the wild predictions that the left her made starting as soon as trump was elected.

He wont be president in 6 months
He will be in Prison within a year for colluding with Russia to steal the election from Hillary
He will be impeached

Well we now KNOW the outcome of all that frenzied lying by the left, their coup was a total fail.

Lets wait and see how it all shakes out in the end

donttread
05-18-2019, 06:35 AM
There are investigations in the works, I will make none of the wild predictions that the left her made starting as soon as trump was elected.

He wont be president in 6 months
He will be in Prison within a year for colluding with Russia to steal the election from Hillary
He will be impeached

Well we now KNOW the outcome of all that frenzied lying by the left, their coup was a total fail.

Lets wait and see how it all shakes out in the end


It will shake out as yet another distraction technique.

MisterVeritis
05-18-2019, 10:01 AM
Or far more likely even more tax dollars and congressional time are about to be wasted.
What do you care? Are you a tax paying citizen?

MisterVeritis
05-18-2019, 10:02 AM
It will shake out as yet another distraction technique.
Are you a coup cheerleader?

DGUtley
05-18-2019, 10:04 AM
It will shake out as yet another distraction technique.

Distraction from?

Are you at the very least troubled by what the FBI has appeared to have done? I can tell that the media is very troubled by it - and by its role in it. It may shake out as nothing but it certainly looks bad. Does it trouble you?

mamooth
05-28-2019, 04:51 PM
It's over a week later. Is the retribution here yet? I need to work it into my calendar.

Oh wait, the same thing is happening here that's happened in every other weepy conspiracy thread from the lunatic right. Absolutely nothing. All the Trump cultists can do now is throw around impotent threats, trying to intimidate loyal Americans into abandoning liberty and democracy. It's not working.

Most of the conservatives here would gladly ship me and every liberal off to TheGulag for our various ThoughtCrimes against DearLeader and TheParty, if they had such power. It's no longer a question of whether modern Republicans are like Stalinists. They clearly are. It's only a question of whether they differ from Stalinists in any significant way. The answer is "No, they don't."

MMC
05-29-2019, 08:45 AM
Their is a lot of evidence for a soft coup. Illegally obtained FISA warrants. Turning the FBI and CIA on a political opponent and later used them in an attempt to reverse an election. Barr will find much more evidence and their will be indictments.
You have to remember that these leftists here. Are unable to comprehend what a soft coup is. Just don't have the brain capacity to figure out how a Coup would take place in the US.


They think arms have to be taken up to commit a coup. But can't figure out why their Demos can't tell them to do that.

MMC
05-29-2019, 09:04 AM
We're Watching an Antidemocratic Coup UnfoldActs of sabotage against the president are perilous to the American system of government. They're also self-serving.


David A. Graham (https://www.theatlantic.com/author/david-a-graham/) Sep 5, 2018


Yet the actions described in the book and in the op-ed are extremely worrying, and amount to a soft coup against the president. Given that one of Trump’s great flaws is that he has little regard for rule of law, it’s hard to cheer on Cabinet members and others openly thwarting Trump’s directives, giving unelected officials effective veto power over the elected president. Like Vietnam War–era generals, they are destroying the village in order to save it. As is so often the case in the Trump administration, both alternatives are awful to consider.


Say what you will about the wisdom of voters, but it is the bedrock of the nation, and Trump is the duly elected president, as Sanders says. Cabinet members are at least confirmed by the Senate, but they’re still unelected. Officials like Cohn and Porter are subject to even less scrutiny, as they are appointed directly to their posts. If protecting the rules requires tearing down the rules, what is there to be gained?


This is astonishingly shortsighted. The writer, and anyone else who thinks this way, overlooks a major flaw: Any situation in which unelected officials are sabotaging the president through a soft coup is already a constitutional crisis, as my colleague David Frum has written (https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/09/this-is-a-constitutional-crisis/569443/).


Not only are these acts of sabotage legally perilous; the leaks about them are self-serving. Woodward does not reveal his sources, either in general or in specific instances, but a read of the book strongly suggests that Porter and Cohn are among those who spoke to him. By spreading word that they stood up to the president behind closed doors, these figures hope to burnish their reputations and distance themselves from the stain the Trump presidency leaves on nearly everyone it touches. In doing so, they’ve fingered themselves in another questionable pursuit. If the price of defending democracy and rule of law is to destroy both, the price is too high.....snip~



https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/09/trump-mattis-kelly-new-york-times/569416/

MMC
05-29-2019, 09:49 AM
Now is Barr's chance.....Steele is refusing to cooperate with Durham.



Attorney General William Barr appointed (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2019/05/13/ag-barr-assigns-us-attorney-to-investigate-origins-of-russia-probe-n2546282) Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham to investigate the origins of the Russia probe. Christopher Steele, a former Russia expert for the British spy agency MI6 and author of the Russia dossier, refuses to cooperate with Durham, Reuters (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-steele/british-ex-spy-will-not-talk-to-u-s-prosecutor-examining-trump-probe-origins-source-idUSKCN1SY20K) reported.


A source told Reuters Steele refused to cooperate with Durham's investigation but would consider working with "the Justice Department’s Inspector General into how U.S. law enforcement agencies handled pre-election investigations into both Trump and Clinton." Inspector General Michael Horowitz is currently investigating how FISA warrants were obtained to spy on Page and whether or not the FBI misrepresented Steele’s history as a confidential informant for the bureau, the Daily Caller (https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/28/christopher-steele-not-cooperate-durham/)reported.....snip~


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2019/05/28/report-russia-dossier-author-christopher-steele-refuses-to-partake-in-durham-investigation-n2546985

AZ Jim
05-29-2019, 11:07 AM
Yes, it was a coup attempt. And yes, the right solution is to execute the coup plotters.You would have fit right into Hitlers inner circle.

AZ Jim
05-29-2019, 11:12 AM
You err.

It doesn't matter. This will play out now.

Retribution is coming and there isn't a damned thing you can do about it.Santa is also coming have you been a good little boy?

Tahuyaman
05-29-2019, 01:37 PM
You would have fit right into Hitlers inner circle.
Why do liberals always invoke the name Hitler?

Standing Wolf
05-29-2019, 02:08 PM
Why do liberals always invoke the name Hitler?

One might also ask why many of the conservatives on this board so frequently invoke the name of Lenin. I see a whole lot more of that going on.

Tahuyaman
05-29-2019, 02:12 PM
One might also ask why many of the conservatives on this board so frequently invoke the name of Lenin. I see a whole lot more of that going on.
I'm sure you see things one way.

MMC
05-29-2019, 02:13 PM
One might also ask why many of the conservatives on this board so frequently invoke the name of Lenin. I see a whole lot more of that going on.

Because Mao Tse Tung takes longer to print up. :grin:

Standing Wolf
05-29-2019, 02:17 PM
I'm sure you see things one way.

That doesn't address the question whatsoever. How often does a liberal poster to this forum invoke Hitler? Whereas Lenin is mentioned in insulting liberals on this forum every day of the year.

MMC
05-29-2019, 02:28 PM
That doesn't address the question whatsoever. How often does a liberal poster to this forum invoke Hitler? Whereas Lenin is mentioned in insulting liberals on this forum every day of the year.
But you not being involved in a lot of threads wherein leftists take turns on rotation with the use of Hitler or Nazis occurring does? Could it be you deliberately miss that taking place?

Tahuyaman
05-29-2019, 02:29 PM
That doesn't address the question whatsoever. How often does a liberal poster to this forum invoke Hitler? Whereas Lenin is mentioned in insulting liberals on this forum every day of the year.

Hitter is a mainstay for some. It happens all the time. It's a constant with AZ Jim. Many liberals here are constantly comparing Trump to Hitler.


I don't see Lenin mentioned much at all. I do see one person routinely reference Mao.

Standing Wolf
05-29-2019, 02:56 PM
Hitter is a mainstay for some. It happens all the time. It's a constant with AZ Jim. Many liberals here are constantly comparing Trump to Hitler...

I'm not referring to the comparison of Trump or any other public figure to Hitler, Lenin, Mao, etc. I'm referring to one member of this forum so characterizing another member.

Tahuyaman
05-29-2019, 03:03 PM
I'm not referring to the comparison of Trump or any other public figure to Hitler, Lenin, Mao, etc. I'm referring to one member of this forum so characterizing another member.
And that makes a difference how?

Standing Wolf
05-29-2019, 03:57 PM
And that makes a difference how?

Um...I very much doubt that Trump reads or is a member of this message board. It is not a violation of any forum rule (that I'm aware of) to call Trump or Nancy Pelosi or Hillary Clinton pretty much anything one wants to call them. That's the difference.

Tahuyaman
05-29-2019, 04:05 PM
Um...I very much doubt that Trump reads or is a member of this message board. It is not a violation of any forum rule (that I'm aware of) to call Trump or Nancy Pelosi or Hillary Clinton pretty much anything one wants to call them. That's the difference.
How does that mitigate liberals continually invoking Hitler when you disagree with them on policy ideas?

Standing Wolf
05-29-2019, 04:18 PM
How does that mitigate liberals continually invoking Hitler when you disagree with them on policy ideas?

I just f*cking give up.

alexa
05-29-2019, 04:19 PM
That doesn't address the question whatsoever. How often does a liberal poster to this forum invoke Hitler? Whereas Lenin is mentioned in insulting liberals on this forum every day of the year.
Don't waste your time.

Enjoy the comedy.

alexa
05-29-2019, 04:20 PM
I just f*cking give up.
Took you long enough.

Tahuyaman
05-29-2019, 04:25 PM
I just f*cking give up.

Ok. I'll take that as you can't come up with a rational response.

MisterVeritis
05-29-2019, 04:54 PM
Today's Leftist spoiler attack tells me the first of the investigations into the investigators is close.

Retribution is Coming.

Peter1469
05-29-2019, 06:11 PM
Why do liberals always invoke the name Hitler?
Public schools turn out stupid graduates.

Tahuyaman
05-29-2019, 08:12 PM
Public schools turn out stupid graduates.
Standing Wolf can't grasp that.

mamooth
05-30-2019, 05:52 PM
Today's Leftist spoiler attack tells me the first of the investigations into the investigators is close.

You said that six months ago. You'll be saying it six months from now. You'll be saying it as Trump is perp-walked, which will happen after he's voted out in a landslide.


Retribution is Coming.

Have your threats gotten any loyal Americans -- liberals, that is -- to say "Well golly, he's threatening us, so I guess we better abandon liberty and democracy!"?

No?

Figure it out. We liberals aren't like you. Threats and extortion attempts don't work on us. Quite the contrary, they confirm to us that the Stalinist GOP needs to be resisted even more strongly.

Peter1469
05-30-2019, 06:03 PM
You said that six months ago. You'll be saying it six months from now. You'll be saying it as Trump is perp-walked, which will happen after he's voted out in a landslide.



Have your threats gotten any loyal Americans -- liberals, that is -- to say "Well golly, he's threatening us, so I guess we better abandon liberty and democracy!"?

No?

Figure it out. We liberals aren't like you. Threats and extortion attempts don't work on us. Quite the contrary, they confirm to us that the Stalinist GOP needs to be resisted even more strongly.
Well mark you down as a coup cheerleader.

mamooth
05-30-2019, 06:08 PM
Well mark you down as a coup cheerleader.

Check it out, Senator McCarthy is taking names.

Pete, how does history treat a festering PoS like McCarthy? That's how history is already treating you and the Trump cult.

MisterVeritis
05-30-2019, 06:47 PM
Today's Leftist spoiler attack tells me the first of the investigations into the investigators is close.

You said that six months ago. You'll be saying it six months from now. You'll be saying it as Trump is perp-walked, which will happen after he's voted out in a landslide.
Really? How could I have said the first of the investigations into the investigators is close (to completion) six months ago?

What I do remember was marking my concerns about passing of investigations to an inspector general. Of course it is possible the first of the investigations won't be released for six more months. But I doubt it.

Remember, behind the first investigation there are several others.

Retribution is Coming.

MisterVeritis
05-30-2019, 06:48 PM
Retribution is Coming.

Have your threats gotten any loyal Americans -- liberals, that is -- to say "Well golly, he's threatening us, so I guess we better abandon liberty and democracy!"?

No?
Figure it out. We liberals aren't like you. Threats and extortion attempts don't work on us. Quite the contrary, they confirm to us that the Stalinist GOP needs to be resisted even more strongly.
What threat?

Retribution is Coming.

I will enjoy your tears.

texan
05-30-2019, 07:01 PM
Please impeach. BTW they said all the nasty things about Reagan too. How is he treated today?

Here is something for you. The world didn’t start when you stared paying attention.

MMC
05-31-2019, 04:47 PM
Trump-Russia Hysteria: It Would Appear That The British Questioned Credibility of Trump Dossier...In 2017 (https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2019/05/31/embarrassing-it-seems-even-the-british-knew-the-trump-dossier-was-trashin-2017-n2547204)

Imagine that.