PDA

View Full Version : States Saying No To Health Care Marketplaces Is Good News for ObamaCare



Cigar
02-28-2013, 01:06 PM
Obamacare has a better chance at success if it’s taken out of the hands of Republican governors who want to see it fail.

The headlines – “Many States Say ‘No’ to Health Insurance Exchanges,” to take one example – make it seem like bad news. But it’s not. It is good news that half the states are refusing to have anything to do with the new health insurance marketplaces being set up under the Affordable Care Act.

One of the biggest differences between the good version of Obamacare passed by the House and the mediocre Senate version that became law was the question of whether the federal government or states would run the new health insurance marketplaces (called “exchanges” in the law). But resistance by Republican governors is leading to implementation of the law in a way that is much closer to the vision in the House bill.

... The last thing consumers needed was for governors who want the ACA to fail – like Florida’s Rick Scott and Texas’ Rick Perry – to be in charge of the law’s implementation. We can be sure that governors in these states would do the minimum amount under the law to sign people up or to protect consumers from high-priced, poor-quality health insurance plans.

- more: http://www.nationalmemo.com/states-saying-no-to-health-care-marketplaces-is-good-news/

Except for one Republican :grin:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tzMbqk7s-dQ

Peter1469
02-28-2013, 01:34 PM
If states take up this burden, after a few years the federal government will dump all of the costs on them, effectively pushing them into insolvency.

It is part of the plan for a single payer system.

lynn
03-06-2013, 08:44 AM
Consumers do want the ACA to fail.

nic34
03-06-2013, 08:56 AM
It is part of the plan for a single payer system.

Let's hope so. Healthcare costs are the biggest drag on our economy...

Several states (http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparemaptable.jsp?ind=962&cat=17) look like they will follow the Massachusetts example, including California, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont (which is moving toward a single-payer plan in 2017). If these states prove successful in demonstrating that acting on behalf of individuals and small businesses results in better access at lower costs, the example is likely to be followed by other states and the federal government.

Peter1469
03-06-2013, 09:01 AM
Let's hope so. Healthcare costs are the biggest drag on our economy...

Several states (http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparemaptable.jsp?ind=962&cat=17) look like they will follow the Massachusetts example, including California, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont (which is moving toward a single-payer plan in 2017). If these states prove successful in demonstrating that acting on behalf of individuals and small businesses results in better access at lower costs, the example is likely to be followed by other states and the federal government.

More power to them. I doubt that they will do both: better access and lower cost. And don't forget quality care. Massachusetts has struck out in cost and quality.