PDA

View Full Version : Strange Bedfellows



Chris
03-01-2013, 08:33 AM
Another thread explores Obama's alternative universe re the economy. This ine is even stranger!


The Obama Administration could soon announce a change in its policy toward Syria, the Washington Post reports. That change would likely include providing arms to some of President Basher Assad’s opposition.

We knew something like this might be coming. While President Barack Obama had said he opposed plans--backed by then-CIA director David Petraeus, then-secretary of defense Leon Panetta, and then-secretary of state Hilary Clinton--to directly arm Syrian rebels, The New York Times reported earlier this month that the president was reconsidering that stance. If Obama commits the U.S. to arming Syrian rebels, it will be the latest example of Obama thinking and acting like a neoconservative.

Ann Coulter put this brand of neoconservatism on display recently during an appearance on Stossel, where she said that countries like Syria and Iran were good candidates for “regime change” and that support for "insurgents" should be considered. On the Hill, Senators John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) have been arguing that the U.S. should be arming the rebels in Syria, saying that doing so would weaken Iran’s influence in the Middle East and hasten Assad’s downfall.

@ Obama and Neocons Seem Aligned in Pushing for Problematic Syrian Involvement (http://reason.com/archives/2013/02/27/increasing-popularity-of-jihadist-groups)


Obama, Neocons, Anne Coulter, McCain and Graham all in bed together, hard to picture such political porn! :shocked:

Peter1469
03-01-2013, 08:38 AM
The Obama administration has abandoned economics for politics. They actually don't care that their policies are going to crash the USD. They just expect that won't happen until after Obama is out of office.

Alif Qadr
03-01-2013, 10:03 AM
The Obama Administration could soon announce a change in its policy toward Syria, the Washington Post reports. That change would likely include providing arms to some of President Basher Assad’s opposition.

We knew something like this might be coming. While President Barack Obama had said he opposed plans--backed by then-CIA director David Petraeus, then-secretary of defense Leon Panetta, and then-secretary of state Hilary Clinton--to directly arm Syrian rebels, The New York Times reported earlier this month that the president was reconsidering that stance. If Obama commits the U.S. to arming Syrian rebels, it will be the latest example of Obama thinking and acting like a neoconservative.

Ann Coulter put this brand of neoconservatism on display recently during an appearance on Stossel, where she said that countries like Syria and Iran were good candidates for “regime change” and that support for "insurgents" should be considered. On the Hill, Senators John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) have been arguing that the U.S. should be arming the rebels in Syria, saying that doing so would weaken Iran’s influence in the Middle East and hasten Assad’s downfall.

I see the unfolding of a nightmare, like no other nightmare, including 11 September 2001.
All I can say is, "tuck your head between your legs and kiss your arse good-bye."
I apologize for the vulgarity. This proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that BHO is no friend of the United States, which is We The People. For him to strive to enmesh us into a conflict that is bound to spread to other nations and areas makes him either mad or outright diabolical.

Pete7469
03-01-2013, 10:15 AM
You know when repubs/dems "get into bed", we the people are the ones getting fucked.

killianr1
03-01-2013, 12:25 PM
Obama is pushing for the furlough of over 700,000 to come up with the sequester savings (trying to make it as politically unpopular as possible)
In the meantime he checks the "cushions on the sofa" and comes up with $60,000,000 for Syria resistance fighters.
At the same time we don't have the money to send another aifrcraft carrier over there.

I think Woodward has it right when he describes it as "madness"

roadmaster
03-01-2013, 12:59 PM
When Woodward was taking down Nixon he was praised by the left and I find it hard to believe he is not telling the truth.

Mainecoons
03-01-2013, 01:49 PM
Now of course, they're attacking him.

Cigar
03-01-2013, 01:56 PM
Now of course, they're attacking him.

He couldn't backup his own lie ... he got busted.

Chris
03-01-2013, 02:06 PM
He couldn't backup his own lie ... he got busted.

He didn't lie. Politico did. Get the facts straight.

So apparently you approve of NeoObamaCon.

Cigar
03-01-2013, 02:08 PM
He didn't lie. Politico did. Get the facts straight.

So apparently you approve of NeoObamaCon.

He was on Morning Joe yesterday saying the Administration Threatened him ... HE LIED!

Chris
03-01-2013, 02:31 PM
He was on Morning Joe yesterday saying the Administration Threatened him ... HE LIED!

No he didn't, cigar.

killianr1
03-01-2013, 03:02 PM
He viewed it as a threat when they told him "he would regret it"

Chris
03-01-2013, 03:04 PM
“I never characterized it as a ‘threat.' I think that was POLITICO’s word," he said, referring to the story about his initial interview with POLITICO. "I said I think that language is unfortunate, and I don’t think it’s the way to operate. . . . [Sperling’s] language speaks for itself. I don’t think that’s the way to operate.”

Woodward never used the word "threat" in his interviews with POLITICO and CNN, but he frequently fastened upon Sperling's use of the word "regret" as an example of the White House trying to exert power....

@ Woodward: I never called it a threat (http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/02/woodgate-cont-158193.html)

Peter1469
03-01-2013, 04:28 PM
The media is dead in America.

Mister D
03-01-2013, 04:30 PM
The media is dead in America.

It is everywhere