PDA

View Full Version : YUM! Brands: KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell & Food Stamps for Unsafe Foods



ironboltbruce
11-19-2011, 12:29 PM
http://ldrlongdistancerider.com/images/Yum_Brands_China_EBT_Obesity.jpg

YUM! BRANDS: KFC, PIZZA HUT, TACO BELL & FOOD STAMPS FOR UNSAFE FOODS
Global Revolution 1: American Revolution 2: Day 64: Communication 1
IronBoltBruce's Kleptocracy Chronicles for 19 Nov 2011 (g1a2d0064c1)
How many examples of greed and corruption must you see before you act?


Thanks to the American Frozen Food Institute and other corporate lobbies pouring on the payola, our bought and paid for puppet politicians in Washington have determined that a slice of pizza is a healthy vegetable if served to our kids at school, but not if served to our poor by a restaurant. And up until this week YUM! Brands - the global conglomerate that owns well-known junk food chains like KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell - was working hard to correct that contradiction. Not by eliminating the obvious insanity of classifying pizza as a vegetable, of course, but by lobbying to approve the use of EBT cards (a.k.a. "food stamps") to make purchases at their restaurants. According to BusinessWeek.com:

"Yum [had] lobbied government officials in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Kentucky to allow its restaurants to participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which is administered by the states. The nearly five-decade-old program distributed a record $64.4 billion in the 2010 fiscal year. 'Everybody wants to get a piece of that action,' says Marion Nestle, a New York University professor of nutrition and public health. 'Right now it's going to grocery stores; restaurants think that's not fair.' [But health] advocates howled when they learned that fast-food giant Yum! Brands (YUM) wants to let low-income Americans use food stamps at its Taco Bell and KFC restaurants. Now the U.S. Agriculture Dept., which funds the food stamp program, has also voiced its opposition and is encouraging states not to give Yum a green light. 'For us to be indifferent to the quality of the food is just a serious mistake,' says Kevin Concannon, the Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services. 'We should promote access to healthy foods.'"

http://tinyurl.com/6ugph2w

I'm sure Mr. Concannon meant to end that sentence with "...except when it comes to school lunches for our children".

http://tinyurl.com/d4rcal9

Anyway... Regardless of whether you pay with food stamps or Federal Reserve notes, the food you buy at KFC, Pizza Hut or Taco Bell may (remotely) taste "Southern", Italian or Mexican, but a portion of its ingredients - the exact amount being kept as secret as the Colonel's recipe - may actually be Chinese and consequently unsafe by American standards:

"China has become an agricultural powerhouse and leading food exporter. Though supermarket labels may not always
indicate it, a growing portion of the American diet is now made in China. In 2009, 70 percent of the apple juice, 43
percent of the processed mushrooms, 22 percent of the frozen spinach and 78 percent of the tilapia Americans ate
came from China. Unfortunately, it's not just China's food that's reaching American shores - it's also China's food safety problems. The shortcomings in China's food safety system were highlighted when ingredients tainted with the chemical melamine entered the global food supply... [Melamine] contaminated Chinese dairy products, sickening 300,000 children and infants in China, six of whom died... The melamine scandal played out across the globe, ending up in the food supplies of corporate producers including Mars, Unilever, Heinz, Cadbury and YUM! Brands, Inc. (which owns Pizza Hut, Subway and other fast food chains)."

http://documents.foodandwaterwatch.org/DecadeofDangerousImports.pdf

I find no consolation in the likelihood that whatever YUM! is doing to "us", they are also doing to "them":

"Urban consumers in China are increasingly embracing American-style diets. Eating out is the fastest-growing segment
of Chinese consumer food spending. Much of this spending ends up at KFC, owned by Yum! Brands. KFC opens a new restaurant in China every 18 hours and purchases one quarter of all chicken thighs produced in China - literally
billions of pieces of meat. In 2010, Yum! Brands earned 36 percent of its profits from its 3,200 KFC and 500 Pizza Hut
restaurants in China - more than it made from the 19,000 KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut and other company restaurants in
the United States. China now faces a new 'era of obesity,' mirroring U.S. overconsumption of fatty foods."

http://documents.foodandwaterwatch.org/DecadeofDangerousImports.pdf


Related Image:

http://ldrlongdistancerider.com/images/Yum_Brands_China_EBT_Obesity.jpg

Related Videos:

Who wants to subsidize Taco Bell, KFC, and Pizza Hut? ACC 7-5-2011 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aSqzUQCYMI#)

Fast-Food Giant Lobbies For Food Stamp Acceptance (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFYznrrtlzI#noexternalembed-ws)

Hoofy & Boo: Taco Bell Rats Bring Down Yum Brands Profit in US, but not China (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQJ4IUMKA90#)

Why Americans are Fat: Reason 283 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrWamAfmj-k#ws)


This document contains links shortened using http://tinyurl.com to facilitate emailing. If you are concerned that we would use them to cloak phishing or malware, you should open them with this: http://longurl.org


###

A LETTER TO THE NEW YORK TIMES AND MAYOR BLOOMBERG FROM 88 YEAR-OLD OWS SUPPORTER PEARL VOLKOV

http://www.occupyr.com/General/thread.php?id=832


###

SHOW ME WHAT KLEPTOCRACY LOOKS LIKE! THIS IS WHAT KLEPTOCRACY LOOKS LIKE!

Kleptocracy [klep-TOK-ruh-see]: A government or state in which those in power exploit national resources and steal; rule by a thief or thieves. See also the United States of America where, as Goethe said, "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." Want documented examples of the corporate greed that corrupts our government and fuels the Revolution? Find dozens here, with more to come:

http://kleptocracychronicles.com


###

IT IS NO COINCIDENCE THAT OF THE LAST 14 U.S. PRESIDENTS, 7 HAVE BEEN DEMOCRATS AND 7 HAVE BEEN REPUBLICANS.

Our Kleptocracy-controlled media focuses on America's two-year election cycles as if who wins or loses in the swinging of the pendulum was a matter of life or death, when in fact even at the Presidential level it makes no more difference than the outcomes of Monday Night Football, American Idol, Dancing With The Stars, Hillbilly Handfishing or the trial of Michael Jackson's doctor. U.S. elections are staged primarily to give Sheeple the illusion of control so they will (a) vent their frustrations and expend their energy, emotions and resources supporting or attacking the Puppet on the Left hand or the Puppet on the Right, and consequently (b) never recognize and challenge the common omnipotent Puppetmaster.

There was no real change in 2008. There was no real change in 2010. There WILL be real change in 2012, but it won't be coming from tele-brainwashed couch potatoes, manipulated voter lists, rigged voting machines or predetermined ballot counts. It will be coming from us...

The 99 Percent

http://corporategreedchronicles.com


###

I AM NOT ANONYMOUS. I AM AN AMERICAN.

I am not just a Consumer. I am a Citizen.

I will no longer be labeled Left or Right, Liberal or Conservative, Demopublican or Republocrat.

I will no longer follow Puppets labeled Left or Right, Liberal or Conservative, Demopublican or Republocrat.

I am the People. And I am coming for the Puppetmasters.

I am part of the 99 Percent. And I demand the following:

1. End the Fed.
2. Reverse Citizens United.
3. Repeal PATRIOT Act.
4. Expose 9/11 Truth.
5. End Profit Wars.
6. Refund Taxpayer Trillions.
7. Imprison the Kleptocrats.
8. Single Term Limits.

Or, if these demands are not addressed promptly:

1. Regime Change.

http://ironboltbruce.com


###

LABELS (A POEM OF PROTEST)

"Democrat", "Republican",
The parties of the system;
Puppets both, for sale their votes,
No character or wisdom.

"Liberal", "Conservative",
For change or status quo?
Pick either one, the change is none,
All charlatans and whores.

Far "Left" we place the Anarchists,
Libertarians claim far "Right";
Yet both decry the government:
False continuum brought to light.

For oil, "We" bomb their mud huts,
Strip them bare, then offer "Aid";
And fake their retribution as
Pretext - a false flag raised.

Unarmed hundred thousands killed
By weapons of "Defense",
While rights are lost for "Freedom" sake -
On profit, all depends.

With stroke of pen, the "Patriot" Act,
And patriots' gifts are taken;
Then "Citizens United" leaves
Our citizens forsaken.

We protest loss of liberties,
Put "World Wide Web" to use;
Cloudmark Authority censors us
For "messaging abuse".

They label us to finger-point,
With labels, "They" deride us;
Their labels keep us all at bay,
For with labels, "They" divide us.

http://ldrlongdistancerider.com


###

JOIN THE GLOBAL REVOLUTION!

Occupy Wall Street/OWS:

http://occupywallst.org/

Occupy DC/Stop the Machine:

http://october2011.org/

Occupy Together:

http://occupytogether.org/

Watch these Videos:

http://tinyurl.com/kleptocracytutorial

Take this Pledge:

http://wp.me/p19dS3-9o

How many examples of greed and corruption must you see before you act?

http://corporatecriminalsexposed.com

Conley
11-19-2011, 12:54 PM
If we're going to allow EBT food stamps to buy alcohol and tobacco why not fast food too? I don't agree with any of it but at least fast food is food, unlike alcohol and tobacco.

Mister D
11-19-2011, 01:42 PM
The pepperoni pie looks great. :o

jgreer
11-19-2011, 01:49 PM
Poor should be able to eat whatever they want - thats the real class war fare in this country

the war on the poor :(

Mister D
11-19-2011, 01:51 PM
Poor should be able to eat whatever they want - thats the real class war fare in this country

the war on the poor :(


They can eat whatever they want. What are you talking about, greer?

jgreer
11-19-2011, 01:55 PM
Saying that you cant use food stamps for fast food. Why not?

Mister D
11-19-2011, 01:58 PM
Saying that you cant use food stamps for fast food. Why not?


They can use their own money to buy whatever they want, greer. I certainly have no issues with purchases being restricted to real food for someone on the public dole.

jgreer
11-19-2011, 02:07 PM
fast food is real food and its cheap too

Conley
11-19-2011, 02:17 PM
This thread is making me hungry...since pizza is the only one who will deliver I guess I'll go with that :D

Eh, not really into Pizza Hut though I am hungry.

Here's something, I was talking about how cheap I am. I love thin crust much better than regular, and it's healthier, but I feel like I'm getting ripped off because I'm getting charged the same as for regular crust :D Does anyone else have this problem? I'm such a mess :-\ :'( ;D

Peter1469
11-19-2011, 02:44 PM
perfect example of not allowing the government to get involved in such decisions.

jgreer
11-19-2011, 02:46 PM
perfect example of not allowing the government to get involved in such decisions.


So we should let the poor starve?

Mister D
11-19-2011, 03:04 PM
fast food is real food and its cheap too


Actually, it's garbage and real food is significantly cheaper and longer lasting. A box of pasta versus a medium order of fries?

Mister D
11-19-2011, 03:06 PM
This thread is making me hungry...since pizza is the only one who will deliver I guess I'll go with that :D

Eh, not really into Pizza Hut though I am hungry.

Here's something, I was talking about how cheap I am. I love thin crust much better than regular, and it's healthier, but I feel like I'm getting ripped off because I'm getting charged the same as for regular crust :D Does anyone else have this problem? I'm such a mess :-\ :'( ;D


;D They wouldn't serve it if they were going to make significantly less off of it.

Mister D
11-19-2011, 03:07 PM
perfect example of not allowing the government to get involved in such decisions.


So we should let the poor starve?


??? Non-sequitur.

Peter1469
11-19-2011, 03:08 PM
perfect example of not allowing the government to get involved in such decisions.


So we should let the poor starve?


Should we issue the poor a government minder to hand feed the poor?

Why would the poor in America starve? Where is this going on in America?


BTW, look for another job; as a clown you are an utter failure.
Is your day job preforming as a clown? Are you trying to make me laugh? Who has advocated for poor people to be starved? Who?

Peter1469
11-19-2011, 03:09 PM
fast food is real food and its cheap too


Actually, it's garbage and real food is significantly cheaper and longer lasting. A box of pasta versus a medium order of fries?


Look even longer term and add the health costs of eating crap versus eating healthy.

Conley
11-19-2011, 03:10 PM
perfect example of not allowing the government to get involved in such decisions.


So we should let the poor starve?


Should we issue the poor a government minder to hand feed the poor?

Why would the poor in America starve? Where is this going on in America?


BTW, look for another job; as a clown you are an utter failure.
Is your day job preforming as a clown? Are you trying to make me laugh? Who has advocated for poor people to be starved? Who?


http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c292/mikeytherat/oh-snap.jpg

Peter's day job is calling out clowns. Someone just got told! ;D

Mister D
11-19-2011, 03:12 PM
fast food is real food and its cheap too


Actually, it's garbage and real food is significantly cheaper and longer lasting. A box of pasta versus a medium order of fries?


Look even longer term and add the health costs of eating crap versus eating healthy.


Good point.

Honestly, I don't even think it tastes good anymore.

Conley
11-19-2011, 03:14 PM
I'm always surprised when people say it doesn't taste good any more. To me it always tastes good, and I think from an evolutionary perspective fat and salt are supposed to taste good. Still I limit it to once every few months if that. Probably just a few times a year.

Peter1469
11-19-2011, 03:15 PM
I think that a lot of these junk foods have been made to create a light form of addition. Once you get used to not eating them they don't taste so good.

In fact, there are some lawsuits coming up against the fast food industry that will seek to use the cigarette offense against them. Not that I think it is the same thing. Unless they actually get documents showing the industry knew the fast food was bad / cancer causing and hid that from the public.

Conley
11-19-2011, 03:17 PM
I think that a lot of these junk foods have been made to create a light form of addition. Once you get used to not eating them they don't taste so good.

In fact, there are some lawsuits coming up against the fast food industry that will seek to use the cigarette offense against them. Not that I think it is the same thing. Unless they actually get documents showing the industry knew the fast food was bad / cancer causing and hid that from the public.


I guess I would say the first few bites taste good but if it's a lot then it can get gross quickly. I don't eat burgers or fries at home so if I made them myself I could probably do a better job. Fries right out of the fryer are great imo but if they've been sitting around and are soggy then I agree they don't taste good at all.

Peter1469
11-19-2011, 03:18 PM
I'm always surprised when people say it doesn't taste good any more. To me it always tastes good, and I think from an evolutionary perspective fat and salt are supposed to taste good. Still I limit it to once every few months if that. Probably just a few times a year.


But what type of fat.

Eat a grass fed piece of beef and then eat a grain feed piece of beef. Different taste. And the grass fed beef is much better for you; the grain fed beef are pretty much bad for you.

Table salt is pretty much a waste. But unprocessed sea salt is full of trace minerals that you need. It is very good for you.

Mister D
11-19-2011, 03:20 PM
I think that a lot of these junk foods have been made to create a light form of addition. Once you get used to not eating them they don't taste so good.

In fact, there are some lawsuits coming up against the fast food industry that will seek to use the cigarette offense against them. Not that I think it is the same thing. Unless they actually get documents showing the industry knew the fast food was bad / cancer causing and hid that from the public.


Right! I noticed that a few years ago. I feel mildly ill when I eat out at middle brow chains let alone fast food joints. You lose the desire for it after a while.

Interesting. I'm generally against those kinds of suits unless there was intentional wrongdoing

Conley
11-19-2011, 03:22 PM
I'm always surprised when people say it doesn't taste good any more. To me it always tastes good, and I think from an evolutionary perspective fat and salt are supposed to taste good. Still I limit it to once every few months if that. Probably just a few times a year.


But what type of fat.

Eat a grass fed piece of beef and then eat a grain feed piece of beef. Different taste. And the grass fed beef is much better for you; the grain fed beef are pretty much bad for you.

Table salt is pretty much a waste. But unprocessed sea salt is full of trace minerals that you need. It is very good for you.


Those are all very good points. Grass fed beef is awesome.

In my opinion the biggest issue with diet is portion size. It's not as if people ate healthy thirty years ago but obesity wasn't a problem. There was that professor recently who lost a fifteen pounds in two weeks or so eating junk, just controlling for calories. I think 1800 a day or so was his limit.

Believe me, I wish I didn't like the taste and am not defending the food just being honest.

Peter1469
11-19-2011, 03:30 PM
I remember that food study - losing weight eating limited calories of junk food.

Yes. Calories in versus calories burned is the bottom line. The problem is the rest of the story.

I would think that this professor was very hungry with this limited junk food diet. Junk food processes fast through your system, then you are hungry. It must have sucked. Then you get into health. I know the articles said that he had a lot of improvements on health markers, but we don't have a base line for him and don't know what he ate before. In fact, for him to lose as much weight as he did, he probably was pretty out of shape. His diet would push many people into diabetes and heart disease.

Portion size is very important. If you are really interested in losing weight you will calculate your resting metabolic rate, and subtract 500 calories, then count calories. This should allow for a 1 pound loss of fat per week. Which is sustainable and healthy if you are working out at the same time.

Conley
11-19-2011, 03:48 PM
Yes, I agree he must have had fat to burn for it to come off that quickly. Another question was his hydration...you can "lose" five pounds that way but it's not the same as fat loss. It would have been interesting to see how much muscle he lost as well.

Peter1469
11-19-2011, 05:46 PM
Good point. If much of the loss was muscle, that is bad.

Conley
11-20-2011, 09:15 AM
I was curious so I looked it up. 27 pounds in ten weeks, so he must have been pretty fat to begin with. Here are the measures they used. I left BMI off because I think it's useless when you have been figures such as body fat percentage:

Haub's "bad" cholesterol, or LDL, dropped 20 percent and his "good" cholesterol, or HDL, increased by 20 percent. He reduced the level of triglycerides, which are a form of fat, by 39 percent.

Haub's body fat dropped from 33.4 to 24.9 percent.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/11/08/twinkie.diet.professor/index.html

Peter1469
11-20-2011, 09:41 AM
Those are impressive numbers. His diet before this must have been horrible.

Conley
11-20-2011, 09:47 AM
Those are impressive numbers. His diet before this must have been horrible.


:D Hilarious...my thought as well. I wonder if he purposefully "chunked up" beforehand to make the end results more dramatic. It must be embarrassing being an obese nutrition professor.

Peter1469
11-20-2011, 09:50 AM
No kidding.