PDA

View Full Version : Obama’s Budget: Spending Too High, But Bush Was Worse



Chris
04-12-2013, 07:54 AM
Interesting, while it's true Bush spent too much and Obama is spending even more, the reverse is true if you look at spending increase rates.


President Barack Obama’s new budget proposes to spend $3.78 trillion in 2014, which would be 27 percent higher than spending in 2008. President Obama believes in expansive government, and he is proposing a range of new programs, including subsidies for infrastructure, preschool, and mental health care.

However, total federal outlays increased substantially faster under President George W. Bush than they have under Obama so far. It is true that Obama’s spending ambitions have been restrained by House Republicans. But looking at the raw data, it appears that the last Republican president was more profligate than the current Democratic one....

http://i.snag.gy/66xv8.jpg

...Here is another comparison:


Spending growth in Bush’s first seven years: 4%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 8%, 7%, 3%, 9%.
Spending growth in Obama’s six years: 13%, 6%, 2%, -3%, 5%, 2%.




@ Obama’s Budget: Spending Too High, But Bush Was Worse (http://www.cato.org/blog/obamas-budget-spending-too-high-bush-was-worse)

Mainecoons
04-12-2013, 07:57 AM
Just another confirmation that these two administrations, back to back, are the worst thing that ever happened to the U.S.

IT'S THE SPENDING, STUPID!

Mainecoons
04-12-2013, 09:03 AM
BTW, that 2009 nine percenter came from the Pelosi/Reid Congress. Don't forget that.

Notice how the "Republican Congress" definitely spent like drunken Democrats under Bush.

Chris
04-12-2013, 09:09 AM
Yes, it's not just the Administration to blame, but Congress as well, if not more so. But that takes focus off personalities and shifts it to policies.

truthmatters
04-12-2013, 09:27 AM
Look at history

Rs tend to spend more than dems

Ransom
04-12-2013, 01:53 PM
Has any Preisdent ever 'budgeted' for a 744 billion dollar deficit?

Chris
04-12-2013, 02:02 PM
Look at history

Rs tend to spend more than dems

Not true, partisan matters, they simply all outspend their predecessors:

http://i.snag.gy/3KXAj.jpg

Chris
04-12-2013, 02:05 PM
Lest you meant Congress, same damned thing:

http://i.snag.gy/WvM4a.jpg

nic34
04-12-2013, 02:25 PM
A graph NOT from Christopher Chantrill.

http://factcheck.org/Images/image/2010/Wire%20Items/Spending_GDP(3).png

zelmo1234
04-12-2013, 05:07 PM
A graph NOT from Christopher Chantrill.

http://factcheck.org/Images/image/2010/Wire Items/Spending_GDP(3).png

2009 belongs to Obama! Not Bush

Mainecoons
04-12-2013, 05:13 PM
No, no, according to the Nicwit, Bush is still there and it is still all his fault!

:rofl:

Chris
04-12-2013, 05:29 PM
A graph NOT from Christopher Chantrill.

http://factcheck.org/Images/image/2010/Wire%20Items/Spending_GDP(3).png

Ad hom and appeal to authority arte basically the same fallacy.

Yours says the same as the OP.

Why's yours go back only to 1982?