PDA

View Full Version : decades of republican voter fraud in the court documents



truthmatters
05-07-2013, 08:37 AM
do you people know the history?

Cigar
05-07-2013, 08:40 AM
http://mssparky.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Hear-no-evil.jpg

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 08:40 AM
I can teach you all the REAL court documented facts

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 08:41 AM
The republican party has cheated legal American voters out of their votes for decades to win elections.

Bush would have never been president without this cheating

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 08:43 AM
http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/12835-the-thread-in-which-micketto-will-learn-all-about-the-republicans-decades-of-cheatingmaking


i started the lessons here but messed up the threadx title in veiw of the rules so I though I would fix it as best I can by making a better thread

Chris
05-07-2013, 09:05 AM
do you people know the history?

No, please present it.

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 09:09 AM
as you wish


the republican party was forced to enter into a consent decree which forbade them from doing voter roll purges due to a court case in whouch they were sued in the late 70 or eeraly 80s.


they admitted to a memo in the mid 80s that proved they were attempting to cull the voting rolls of black voters in an attempt to win an election.

To this day they are held under this court documented consent decree due to their continued attempts to cill voter roles to win elections.

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 09:20 AM
http://personalliberty.com/2009/12/09/judge-denies-republicans-effort-to-end-voter-intimidation-consent-decree-19493836/


Judge Denies Republicans' Effort To End Voter Intimidation Consent Decree

December 9, 2009 by Personal Liberty News Desk (http://personalliberty.com/author/personallibertynewsdeskpl/)

http://pictures.directnews.co.uk/liveimages/voting_1961_19493836_0_0_7021094_300.jpgLast week, a federal judge in New Jersey rejected an attempt by the Republican National Committee (RNC) to dissolve a 27-year-old court order that is intended to prevent the intimidation of minority voters.
Stemming from a lawsuit brought forth by the Democratic National Committee in 1982, a consent decree was agreed upon which forced the RNC to gain court approval to use certain election tactics, including the creation of voter challenge lists, photographing voters at the polls and posting off-duty police at voting locations in minority neighborhoods, according to The New York Times.
Republicans argued that the consent decree was hampering efforts to combat voter fraud, which had escalated over the previous few years, according to RNC lawyers.
Voting expert Tom Josefiak argued on behalf of the Republicans, stating that the political landscape had changed with African Americans serving as president and attorney general. He also said that the RNC chairman and chief administrative officer are African American, and that the party had no incentive to intimidate minority voters.
In a 79-page ruling, Judge Dickinson Debevoise extended the restrictions for at least another eight years, although he did narrow the scope of the decree.
"It appears that the RNC has been largely unsuccessful in its efforts to attract minority voters," said Debevoise, quoted by the news source. "Until it is able to do so, it will have an incentive to engage in the type of voter suppression that it allegedly committed in the actions that led to the enactment and modification of the consent decree."

keymanjim
05-07-2013, 09:21 AM
as you wish


the republican party was forced to enter into a consent decree which forbade them from doing voter roll purges due to a court case in whouch they were sued in the late 70 or eeraly 80s.


they admitted to a memo in the mid 80s that proved they were attempting to cull the voting rolls of black voters in an attempt to win an election.

To this day they are held under this court documented consent decree due to their continued attempts to cill voter roles to win elections.
Well, since you've said it then it must be true./s/

Micketto
05-07-2013, 09:22 AM
do you people know the history?

The history of US voter fraud?

Or the history of threads you have created about this subject...... just today.

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 09:23 AM
you can not deny the court records

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 09:26 AM
now that I have proven that the republican party has cheated for decades in elections by cheating leagal American voters out of their right to vote will you accept that as fact?

Chris
05-07-2013, 09:29 AM
as you wish


the republican party was forced to enter into a consent decree which forbade them from doing voter roll purges due to a court case in whouch they were sued in the late 70 or eeraly 80s.


they admitted to a memo in the mid 80s that proved they were attempting to cull the voting rolls of black voters in an attempt to win an election.

To this day they are held under this court documented consent decree due to their continued attempts to cill voter roles to win elections.

2 cases, you consider that a history?


http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/26/ballot-fraud-convictions-shed-light-on-obamas-08-illinois-campaign/
http://eastaustinvoice.wordpress.com/2012/01/20/democrats-arrested-andor-convicted-of-voter-fraud-specfriggintaculars-blog/
http://www.newsnet14.com/?p=92957 52 DEMOCRATS Arrested and/or Convicted of Voter Fraud...
http://washingtonexaminer.com/york-when-1099-felons-vote-in-race-won-by-312-ballots/article/2504163
http://www.freedomworks.org/blog/grusbf5/four-ny-democrats-sentenced-to-community-service-j

Want more?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 09:37 AM
those links are taking forever and messing up.

can you outline them or give better links from more reputable sources

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 09:38 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_New_Hampshire_Senate_election_phone_jamming_s candal

The 2002 New Hampshire Senate election phone jamming scandal involves the use of a telemarketing (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Telemarketing) firm hired by that state's Republican Party (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)) (NHGOP) for election tampering. The tampering involved using a call center to jam the phone lines of a Get Out the Vote (GOTV) operation. In the end, 900 calls were made for 45 minutes of disruption to the Democratic-leaning call centers

Chris
05-07-2013, 09:38 AM
you can not deny the court records

I didn't.

I questioned how two cases establish history.

So? How?

Chris
05-07-2013, 09:40 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_New_Hampshire_Senate_election_phone_jamming_s candal

Is that a 3rd case. So we have 3 rep cases, half a dozen dem cases. I'm sure you can find more. I know I can find more. What's that add up to but that both parties engage in voter fraud.

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 09:42 AM
http://www.brennancenter.org/

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 09:44 AM
http://www.brennancenter.org/court-cases



Court Cases


The Brennan Center for Justice fights to protect the principles of democracy and justice in federal and state courts across the country. The Center advances a strong vision of the Constitution as a charter for a self-governing democracy, through top-flight litigation and cutting-edge legal advocacy. Throughout our history, the Center has been involved in several major court decisions.
For a complete list of Brennan Center court cases, click here (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work).
Voting Rights & Elections (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting)
Nationwide, the Brennan Center’s legal experts have helped protect the voting rights of hundreds of thousands of eligible Americans. In 2012, our efforts overturned curbs on registration drives in Florida (http://thepoliticalforums.com/content/resource/league_of_women_voters_of_florida_v._browning/) helped strike down restrictive voter ID laws in Texas (http://thepoliticalforums.com/content/resource/texas_v._holder/) and South Carolina (http://thepoliticalforums.com/content/resource/south_carolina_v._holder/), and prevented voter intimidation (http://thepoliticalforums.com/content/resource/dnc_v_rnc_consent_decree/) by political groups at the polls.

TheDictator
05-07-2013, 09:50 AM
The Democratic Party has cheated for a 100 years or more in elections by cheating leagal American voters out of their right to vote. The Democrat Party Jim Crow laws. The Democratic Party Dead vote program. The KKK was an official program of the Democratic Party and kept millions of Republicans and Blacks from voting. That is True History.

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 09:58 AM
you are correct and then Nixon did the southern startegy and the partys flipped

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 09:59 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy



Southern strategyFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation (http://thepoliticalforums.com/#mw-navigation), search (http://thepoliticalforums.com/#p-search)
For the British strategy in the American Revolutionary War, see Southern theater of the American Revolutionary War (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Southern_theater_of_the_American_Revolutionary_War ).
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e4/Us_south_census.png/290px-Us_south_census.png (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/File:Us_south_census.png)http://bits.wikimedia.org/static-1.22wmf3/skins/common/images/magnify-clip.png (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/File:Us_south_census.png)
The Southern United States as defined by the United States Census Bureau (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/United_States_Census_Bureau)


In American politics (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Politics_of_the_United_States), the Southern strategy refers to the Republican Party (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)) strategy of gaining political support or winning elections in the Southern section (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Southern_United_States) of the country by appealing to racism against African Americans (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Racism_in_the_United_States#Racism_against_African _Americans).[1] (http://thepoliticalforums.com/#cite_note-Herbert-1)[2] (http://thepoliticalforums.com/#cite_note-Boyd-2)[3] (http://thepoliticalforums.com/#cite_note-Counter-3)[4] (http://thepoliticalforums.com/#cite_note-Branch-4)[5] (http://thepoliticalforums.com/#cite_note-HerbertReagan-5)
Though the "Solid South (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Solid_South)" had been a longtime Democratic Party (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)) stronghold due to the Democratic Party's defense of slavery before the American Civil War (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/American_Civil_War) and segregation for a century thereafter, many white Southern Democrats stopped supporting the party following the civil rights plank of the Democratic campaign in 1948 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1948) (triggering the Dixiecrats (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Dixiecrats)), the African-American Civil Rights Movement (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/African-American_Civil_Rights_Movement_(1955–1968)), the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964) and Voting Rights Act of 1965 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965), and desegregation (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Desegregation).
The strategy was first adopted under future Republican President Richard Nixon (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Richard_Nixon) and Republican Senator Barry Goldwater (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Barry_Goldwater)[6] (http://thepoliticalforums.com/#cite_note-6)[7] (http://thepoliticalforums.com/#cite_note-7) in the late 1960s.[8] (http://thepoliticalforums.com/#cite_note-NY_Times_1996-8) The strategy was successful in many regards. It contributed to the electoral realignment (http://thepoliticalforums.com/wiki/Realigning_election) of Southern states to the Republican Party, but at the expense of losing more than 90 percent of black voters to the Democratic Party. As the twentieth century came to a close, the Republican Party began trying to appeal again to black voters, though with little success

Private Pickle
05-07-2013, 10:00 AM
do you people know the history?

OP fail.

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 10:01 AM
so you dont believe these court documents?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 10:02 AM
http://www.brennancenter.org/court-cases



Court Cases




The Brennan Center for Justice fights to protect the principles of democracy and justice in federal and state courts across the country. The Center advances a strong vision of the Constitution as a charter for a self-governing democracy, through top-flight litigation and cutting-edge legal advocacy. Throughout our history, the Center has been involved in several major court decisions.
For a complete list of Brennan Center court cases, click here (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work).
Voting Rights & Elections (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting)
Nationwide, the Brennan Center’s legal experts have helped protect the voting rights of hundreds of thousands of eligible Americans. In 2012, our efforts overturned curbs on registration drives in Florida (http://thepoliticalforums.com/content/resource/league_of_women_voters_of_florida_v._browning/) helped strike down restrictive voter ID laws in Texas (http://thepoliticalforums.com/content/resource/texas_v._holder/) and South Carolina (http://thepoliticalforums.com/content/resource/south_carolina_v._holder/), and prevented voter intimidation (http://thepoliticalforums.com/content/resource/dnc_v_rnc_consent_decree/) by political groups at the polls.

what about this?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 10:03 AM
the courts agreed with this and knocked all those cases down.

That is only one years worth

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 10:15 AM
you can see all of the history at that site.

Chris
05-07-2013, 10:18 AM
Is that a 3rd case. So we have 3 rep cases, half a dozen dem cases. I'm sure you can find more. I know I can find more. What's that add up to but that both parties engage in voter fraud.

matters, that was for you....

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 10:22 AM
that earlier post of mine talked of court cases on like four states over jsut one year.


do you deny they happened and on what basis do you deny those cases esxist?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 10:23 AM
http://www.brennancenter.org/legal-work



Court Cases

Shelby County v. Holder (Amicus Brief) (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/shelby-county-v-holder-amicus-brief)


The Voting Rights Act was passed in 1965 to ensure state and local governments do not pass laws or policies that deny American citizens the equal right to vote based on race. On February 27, 2013, the Supreme Court will consider a key provision of this landmark civil rights law in Shelby County v. Holder.



February 4, 2013


Voting Rights & Elections (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-rights-elections)
Other Voting Issues (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/other-voting-issues)





Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. (Amicus Brief) (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/arizona-v-inter-tribal-council-arizona-inc-amicus-brief)


Due to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18, 2013, Arizona v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. will determine whether an Arizona law, Proposition 200, can lawfully require applicants to present documentary proof of citizenship as a condition for voter registration.



January 25, 2013


Voting Rights & Elections (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-rights-elections)
Restricting the Vote (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/restricting-vote)





Gessler v. Johnson (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/gessler-v-johnson)


The Brennan Center for Justice is partnering with Colorado Common Cause in its litigation to ensure that all registered and eligible Colorado voters have ability right to participate fully in Colorado elections.



January 21, 2013


Voting Rights & Elections (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-rights-elections)
Voting Reform Agenda (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-reform-agenda)
Restricting the Vote (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/restricting-vote)
Other Voting Issues (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/other-voting-issues)





In re: Mortgage Foreclosure Cases (Amicus Brief) (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/re-mortgage-foreclosure-cases-amicus-brief)


The Brennan Center filed an amicus brief in the First Circuit Court of Appeals in support of the Rhode Island district court’s settlement conference process. The program, which is being challenged by some bankers, helps borrowers and lenders negotiate affordable loan modification that restore value to distressed mortgage loans and keep families in their homes.



January 14, 2013


Closing the Justice Gap (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/closing-justice-gap)





Sanders County Republican Central Committee v. Bullock (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/sanders-county-republican-central-committee-v-bullock)


The Brennan Center submitted an amicus curiae brief supporting Montana’s petition for en banc review of a decision by a 3-judge panel of appellate judges.



November 29, 2012


Fair Courts (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/fair-courts)






Pages

1
2 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=1&splash=)
3 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=2&splash=)
4 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=3&splash=)
5 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=4&splash=)
6 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=5&splash=)
7 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=6&splash=)
8 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=7&splash=)
9 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=8&splash=)

next › (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=1&splash=)
last » (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=36&splash=)

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 10:25 AM
pages and pages of court cases

Chris
05-07-2013, 10:27 AM
that earlier post of mine talked of court cases on like four states over jsut one year.


do you deny they happened and on what basis do you deny those cases esxist?


Where have I denied anything, matters, stop making things up. You presented rep cases, I presented dem cases, what can we possibly conclude but that both engage in voter fraud?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 11:08 AM
OP fail.


this guy sure did

Chris
05-07-2013, 11:16 AM
pages and pages of court cases

Of rep voter fraud and dem voter fraud. I'll bet you still vote dem.

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 11:19 AM
becuase the dems cheat way less and have better ideas

Chris
05-07-2013, 11:21 AM
becuase the dems cheat way less and have better ideas

Please back this up and send me a PM when you have.

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 11:25 AM
I already did with all those court cases ajudicated in the disfavor of the republican party

Chris
05-07-2013, 11:29 AM
I already did with all those court cases ajudicated in the disfavor of the republican party

And I posted more of dem voter fraud. And we could both keep posting instances. All that gets us is they are both guilty. It does not get us to one is more or less guilty. Your claim dems are less guilty needs to be demonstrated. Send me a PM when you find proof.

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 11:37 AM
how many cases where shown at the brenen center that I posted?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 11:38 AM
http://www.brennancenter.org/legal-work



Court Cases


Shelby County v. Holder (Amicus Brief) (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/shelby-county-v-holder-amicus-brief)




The Voting Rights Act was passed in 1965 to ensure state and local governments do not pass laws or policies that deny American citizens the equal right to vote based on race. On February 27, 2013, the Supreme Court will consider a key provision of this landmark civil rights law in Shelby County v. Holder.



February 4, 2013


Voting Rights & Elections (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-rights-elections)
Other Voting Issues (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/other-voting-issues)
Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. (Amicus Brief) (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/arizona-v-inter-tribal-council-arizona-inc-amicus-brief)




Due to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18, 2013, Arizona v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. will determine whether an Arizona law, Proposition 200, can lawfully require applicants to present documentary proof of citizenship as a condition for voter registration.



January 25, 2013


Voting Rights & Elections (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-rights-elections)
Restricting the Vote (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/restricting-vote)
Gessler v. Johnson (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/gessler-v-johnson)




The Brennan Center for Justice is partnering with Colorado Common Cause in its litigation to ensure that all registered and eligible Colorado voters have ability right to participate fully in Colorado elections.



January 21, 2013


Voting Rights & Elections (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-rights-elections)
Voting Reform Agenda (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-reform-agenda)
Restricting the Vote (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/restricting-vote)
Other Voting Issues (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/other-voting-issues)
In re: Mortgage Foreclosure Cases (Amicus Brief) (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/re-mortgage-foreclosure-cases-amicus-brief)




The Brennan Center filed an amicus brief in the First Circuit Court of Appeals in support of the Rhode Island district court’s settlement conference process. The program, which is being challenged by some bankers, helps borrowers and lenders negotiate affordable loan modification that restore value to distressed mortgage loans and keep families in their homes.



January 14, 2013


Closing the Justice Gap (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/closing-justice-gap)
Sanders County Republican Central Committee v. Bullock (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/sanders-county-republican-central-committee-v-bullock)




The Brennan Center submitted an amicus curiae brief supporting Montana’s petition for en banc review of a decision by a 3-judge panel of appellate judges.



November 29, 2012


Fair Courts (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/fair-courts)

Pages


1
2 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=1&splash=)
3 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=2&splash=)
4 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=3&splash=)
5 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=4&splash=)
6 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=5&splash=)
7 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=6&splash=)
8 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=7&splash=)
9 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=8&splash=)

next › (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=1&splash=)
last » (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=36&splash=)


pages and pages

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 11:39 AM
court documented

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 12:00 PM
and now that the truth is provided the dishonest right runs away instead of admitting the cold hard facts

Chris
05-07-2013, 12:02 PM
And I could post pages and pages of dem voter fraud.

They're both guilty.

Yet you vote dem.

No, I don't vote either.

zelmo1234
05-07-2013, 12:14 PM
becuase the dems cheat way less and have better ideas

The Cheat less. The republicans Cheat by trying to make sure people are citizens before they vote, the democrats block this so they can bus people around the cities and have them vote several times!

NOW FOR THE IDEAS PART???

What bright ideas have the Democrats come up with lately?

zelmo1234
05-07-2013, 12:15 PM
how many cases where shown at the brenen center that I posted?

The Brennen Center is not going to show one case against the Dems, theya re a left wing think tank!

zelmo1234
05-07-2013, 12:19 PM
and now that the truth is provided the dishonest right runs away instead of admitting the cold hard facts

Do you admit that the Balck Panthers were trying to intimidate voters.

Do you think it is possible that 21 districts in Cleveland did not have one vote for Romney?

Do you think that the person that admited to voting 16 times?

What about the districts in Colorado and Detroit that had between 110% and 115% voter turn out, would that be voter fruad?

Will you admit that the Dems comit voter fruad!

And do you think that you should have to be a legal citizen before you have a right to vote?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 12:38 PM
maybe you can give me a nonpartisan source to all those claims so I can look at them?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 12:40 PM
the black panather case is NOT democratic party fraud.

It is two guys in a vastly black voting area thinking they are protecting the voters.

Prove one voter didnt vote because they were standing there.

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 12:42 PM
Now why do you ignore the mountains of court documented cases I presented?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 12:43 PM
http://www.brennancenter.org/about



About


http://thepoliticalforums.com/sites/default/files/stock/Brennan_William_J_Justice.jpg (http://thepoliticalforums.com/history)Our Mission
The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that seeks to improve our systems of democracy and justice. We work to hold our political institutions and laws accountable to the twin American ideals of democracy and equal justice for all. The Center’s work ranges from voting rights to campaign finance reform, from racial justice in criminal law to Constitutional protection in the fight against terrorism. A singular institution — part think tank, part public interest law firm, part advocacy group, part communications hub — the Brennan Center seeks meaningful, measurable change in the systems by which our nation is governed.

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 12:44 PM
http://www.brennancenter.org/celebrating-justice-brennan


Celebrating Justice Brennan




http://thepoliticalforums.com/sites/default/files/stock/Brennan_William_J_Justice.jpgJustice William J. Brennan, Jr. is universally regarded as one of the most influential and liberal justices of the second half of the 20th century. His 34 years on the U.S. Supreme Court was one of the Court's longest tenures, spanning eight presidencies and 17 Congresses. During that time he served with 22 justices, wrote 461 majority opinions, 425 dissents, and 474 other opinions. Brennan's legacy was so powerful and far-reaching that even those who disagreed with his opinions still recognized his singular influence. According to the conservative National Review in 1984, "there is no individual in this country, on or off the Court, who has had a more profound and sustained impact upon public policy in the United States."
Born in 1906 to Irish immigrants, Brennan grew up as witness to the economic hardships and indignities of those in his hometown. "What got me interested in people's rights and liberties," Brennan would later recall, "was the kind of neighborhood I was brought up in. I saw all kinds of suffering—people had to struggle."
Despite his humble beginnings, Brennan excelled academically. He completed his law degree at Harvard and entered private practice in his home state of New Jersey. But when his practice intruded on his devotion to his family, Brennan opted for service as a trial judge. He was promoted to the state's highest court in 1952 and was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1956 by President Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Justice Brennan's devotion to core democratic freedoms was unwavering. He authored important opinions in the areas of free expression, criminal procedure, and reapportionment. As a result of his leadership, Brennan imparted his constitutional vision to a broad coalition of his colleagues. He resigned on account of health in 1990

TheDictator
05-07-2013, 12:45 PM
maybe you can give me a nonpartisan source to all those claims so I can look at them?

Like the left wing, Democratic party, The Brennen Center you gave?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 12:48 PM
all of those court cases show their court filings.

why do you pretend they dont link right to the court documented PROOF the cases were ajudicated?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 12:49 PM
Its not illegal for a law school to honor a justice because he was liberal is it?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 12:53 PM
We can go over the cases one by one and look at their court documents if you like?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 12:55 PM
http://www.brennancenter.org/legal-work/shelby-county-v-holder-amicus-brief



Shelby County v. Holder (Amicus Brief)


February 4, 2013


Voting Rights & Elections (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-rights-elections)
Other Voting Issues (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/other-voting-issues)


The Voting Rights Act was passed in 1965 to ensure state and local governments do not pass laws or policies that deny American citizens the equal right to vote based on race. On February 27, 2013, the Supreme Court will consider a key provision of this landmark civil rights law in Shelby County v. Holder.
In April 2010, Shelby County, Alabama filed suit asking a federal court in Washington, DC to declare Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act unconstitutional. Section 5 is a key part of the Voting Rights Act, requiring certain jurisdictions with a history of discrimination to submit any proposed changes in voting procedures to the U.S. Department of Justice or a federal district court in D.C. – before it goes into effect – to ensure the change would not harm minority voters. In September 2011, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia upheld (http://thepoliticalforums.com/sites/default/files/legal-work/2011.9.21 District Court Mem. Op..pdf) the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, and in May 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed (http://thepoliticalforums.com/sites/default/files/legal-work/2012.5.18 DC Court of Appeals Opinion and Order.pdf) with the district court that Section 5 was constitutional. Shelby County appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court agreed to take the case in November 2012.
The Brennan Center filed an amicus brief (http://thepoliticalforums.com/sites/default/files/legal-work/2013.2.1 Brennan_Center_Brief.pdf) on behalf of those defending Section 5, arguing that the Fifteenth Amendment was designed to give Congress the authority to protect against discrimination in voting rights, and Congress’s broad enforcement authority is entitled special deference by the Courts. Moreover, the amicus brief argues that the Fifteenth Amendment provides Congress the flexibility to address all practices which abridge the right to vote, including vote dilution.
Supreme Court Merits Briefs

Brief of Petitioner Shelby County (http://thepoliticalforums.com/sites/default/files/legal-work/2012.12.26 Brief for Petitioner Shelby County.pdf)
Brief of Respondent United States (http://thepoliticalforums.com/sites/default/files/legal-work/2013.1.25 Brief for Federal Respondent.pdf)
Brief for Respondent-Intervenors Earl Cunningham et al. (http://thepoliticalforums.com/sites/default/files/legal-work/2013.1.25 Brief of Respondent-Intervenors Earl Cunningham.pdf)
Brief for Respondent-Intervenors Bobby Pierson et al. (http://thepoliticalforums.com/sites/default/files/legal-work/12-96 bs Bobby Pierson et al..pdf)
Brief for Respondent-Intervenor Bobby Lee Harris (http://thepoliticalforums.com/sites/default/files/legal-work/12-96 bs Bobby Lee Harris.pdf)

Micketto
05-07-2013, 12:57 PM
http://www.brennancenter.org/about

You keep asking why no one is interested.

I think you have two things working against you.

1) You are obsessed like no one has even been obsessed. Closing in on 150 posts (about this) today alone... including 3 separate threads of yours.
(it's creepy.... and reeks of mental issues).

2) The source you have linked to in about 100 of those 150 posts... is a KNOWN liberal organization that would never talk about Democratic voter fraud or election fraud. In fact, it is funded by Soros himself... and would never say a bad word about the left.

http://www.mrc.org/articles/soros-backed-voting-study-promoted-soros-funded-media

http://www.nationalcenter.org/PR-Brennan_Center_072612.html

Instead of hitting "reply" at 80 MPH... maybe spend a few minutes Googling the word "credibility".

Good luck !

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 12:57 PM
http://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legal-work/2012.12.26 Brief for Petitioner Shelby County.pdf


this is a pdf to a court document.

there is a whole list of alll the court documents in this one case at the other link.

there is no denying these cases exist

Cigar
05-07-2013, 12:58 PM
South Carolina Voters Confused Because Elizabeth Colbert Busch Is On The Ballot Twice

Voters in South Carolina’s special House election are expressing confusion because Elizabeth Colbert Busch appears on the ballot twice.

Joseph Debney, the Director of Election for Charleston County, says any candidate who qualifies to be on the ballot as the candidate for more than one party can do so, however , the candidate can only receive one voter per voter, “voters can only vote for her one time. You can only get one vote in this election. Those votes together will be tallied for her, so she’ll get the totals for the Democratic and the Working Families nomination.”


Notice that it is okay for Colbert Busch to be on the ballot twice, but voters can only vote for her once. If a voter checks her name twice, their vote will be disqualified. This might be legal in South Carolina, but it certainly looks like a way for votes for Colbert Busch to be thrown out.

The election tonight should be close. Polling shows a statistical tie Sanford and Busch. If even a handful of Colbert Busch voters have their ballots tossed because they voted for her twice, that could be enough to swing this election to Sanford. Mark Sanford has erased a nine point deficit in a week. The heavily Republican district is naturally tilted towards him, but this sort of confusion will only help the unpopular Sanford win.

Full article: http://www.politicususa.com/south-carolina-voters-confused-elizabeth-colbert-busch-ballot.html

I smell a GOP Rat

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zFVXWQ_Ad6c/TxszYsveqpI/AAAAAAAAAVo/Tk83DOQub4w/s320/smelling-a-rat.jpg

JimH52
05-07-2013, 01:00 PM
The republican party has cheated legal American voters out of their votes for decades to win elections.

Bush would have never been president without this cheating

I had a consultant in my office a few years ago that told me about all the streets that were blocked in minority areas in Florida on polling day in 2008. I have no idea, but he was sure that something was up. Someone was trying reduce the minority vote. The GOP are going to find tough going to win national elections from this point out. The Gerrymandering works for the House, but they will have to come up with some new ideas to the national scene.

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 01:01 PM
You keep asking why no one is interested.

I think you have two things working against you.

1) You are obsessed like no one has even been obsessed. Closing in on 150 posts (about this) today alone... including 3 separate threads of yours.
(it's creepy.... and reeks of mental issues).

2) The source you have linked to in about 100 of those 150 posts... is a KNOWN liberal organization that would never talk about Democratic voter fraud or election fraud. In fact, it is funded by Soros himself... and would never say a bad word about the left.

http://www.mrc.org/articles/soros-backed-voting-study-promoted-soros-funded-media

http://www.nationalcenter.org/PR-Brennan_Center_072612.html

Instead of hitting "reply" at 80 MPH... maybe spend a few minutes Googling the word "credibility".

Good luck !



How is it illegal for soros to give to a law school for education?


now There are court documents to PROVE the cases they speak of exist.

Do yiou deny they exist because Soros is wealthy and gave a law school a donation?

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 01:02 PM
I had a consultant in my office a few years ago that told me about all the streets that were blocked in minority areas in Florida on polling day in 2008. I have no idea, but he was sure that something was up. Someone was trying reduce the minority vote. The GOP are going to find tough going to win national elections from this point out. The Gerrymandering works for the House, but they will have to come up with some new ideas to the national scene.




didd you see the news reports of the people standing in long lines last time arround?


it was done on purpose

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 01:03 PM
South Carolina Voters Confused Because Elizabeth Colbert Busch Is On The Ballot Twice

Voters in South Carolina’s special House election are expressing confusion because Elizabeth Colbert Busch appears on the ballot twice.

Joseph Debney, the Director of Election for Charleston County, says any candidate who qualifies to be on the ballot as the candidate for more than one party can do so, however , the candidate can only receive one voter per voter, “voters can only vote for her one time. You can only get one vote in this election. Those votes together will be tallied for her, so she’ll get the totals for the Democratic and the Working Families nomination.”


Notice that it is okay for Colbert Busch to be on the ballot twice, but voters can only vote for her once. If a voter checks her name twice, their vote will be disqualified. This might be legal in South Carolina, but it certainly looks like a way for votes for Colbert Busch to be thrown out.

The election tonight should be close. Polling shows a statistical tie Sanford and Busch. If even a handful of Colbert Busch voters have their ballots tossed because they voted for her twice, that could be enough to swing this election to Sanford. Mark Sanford has erased a nine point deficit in a week. The heavily Republican district is naturally tilted towards him, but this sort of confusion will only help the unpopular Sanford win.

Full article: http://www.politicususa.com/south-carolina-voters-confused-elizabeth-colbert-busch-ballot.html

I smell a GOP Rat

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zFVXWQ_Ad6c/TxszYsveqpI/AAAAAAAAAVo/Tk83DOQub4w/s320/smelling-a-rat.jpg

they wont get away with that one

JimH52
05-07-2013, 01:06 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/24/elizabeth-colbert-busch-to-appear-on-south-carolina-ballot-twice/

Something smells for sure...

Cigar
05-07-2013, 01:08 PM
they wont get away with that one



Geeee I wonder WHO is in control of Printing the Ballots?

Maybe it's the Black Panthers :grin: or worst ... ACORN


Shhhhhh ... what that i hear? Nothing ... that it.

Micketto
05-07-2013, 01:13 PM
How is it illegal for soros to give to a law school for education?


now There are court documents to PROVE the cases they speak of exist.

Do yiou deny they exist because Soros is wealthy and gave a law school a donation?

Did anyone say it was illegal?
If they did... why are you asking me?

Soros funds Brennan heavilty... it is run by a liberal (former Clinton employee)... and is KNOWN for it's liberal slant to it's findings.

That all works for you. Everyone else sees the glaring lack of cred.

153 posts today and counting....

truthmatters
05-07-2013, 01:14 PM
noww does any of that EVEN if itss true make the court documents they present unreal?

Micketto
05-07-2013, 01:29 PM
So no one actually said it was illegal?
You just throw irrelevant claims in the middle of your obsessive ranting?

Got it.

patrickt
05-07-2013, 06:52 PM
do you people know the history?

Truthdoesntmatter missed the talking points. There is no election fraud.

truthmatters
05-09-2013, 11:15 AM
And I posted more of dem voter fraud. And we could both keep posting instances. All that gets us is they are both guilty. It does not get us to one is more or less guilty. Your claim dems are less guilty needs to be demonstrated. Send me a PM when you find proof.

see you denied all those court cases existed.

You claimed the pitance you posted were mountains over what I posted

Chris
05-09-2013, 11:16 AM
see you denied all those court cases existed.

No, I did not. You are again lying.

truthmatters
05-09-2013, 11:17 AM
Please back this up and send me a PM when you have.


this is post 36


I had already posted the list of court cases

truthmatters
05-09-2013, 11:18 AM
http://www.brennancenter.org/legal-work



Court Cases


Shelby County v. Holder (Amicus Brief) (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/shelby-county-v-holder-amicus-brief)




The Voting Rights Act was passed in 1965 to ensure state and local governments do not pass laws or policies that deny American citizens the equal right to vote based on race. On February 27, 2013, the Supreme Court will consider a key provision of this landmark civil rights law in Shelby County v. Holder.



February 4, 2013


Voting Rights & Elections (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-rights-elections)
Other Voting Issues (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/other-voting-issues)
Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. (Amicus Brief) (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/arizona-v-inter-tribal-council-arizona-inc-amicus-brief)




Due to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18, 2013, Arizona v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. will determine whether an Arizona law, Proposition 200, can lawfully require applicants to present documentary proof of citizenship as a condition for voter registration.



January 25, 2013


Voting Rights & Elections (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-rights-elections)
Restricting the Vote (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/restricting-vote)
Gessler v. Johnson (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/gessler-v-johnson)




The Brennan Center for Justice is partnering with Colorado Common Cause in its litigation to ensure that all registered and eligible Colorado voters have ability right to participate fully in Colorado elections.



January 21, 2013


Voting Rights & Elections (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-rights-elections)
Voting Reform Agenda (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/voting-reform-agenda)
Restricting the Vote (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/restricting-vote)
Other Voting Issues (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/other-voting-issues)
In re: Mortgage Foreclosure Cases (Amicus Brief) (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/re-mortgage-foreclosure-cases-amicus-brief)




The Brennan Center filed an amicus brief in the First Circuit Court of Appeals in support of the Rhode Island district court’s settlement conference process. The program, which is being challenged by some bankers, helps borrowers and lenders negotiate affordable loan modification that restore value to distressed mortgage loans and keep families in their homes.



January 14, 2013


Closing the Justice Gap (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/closing-justice-gap)
Sanders County Republican Central Committee v. Bullock (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work/sanders-county-republican-central-committee-v-bullock)




The Brennan Center submitted an amicus curiae brief supporting Montana’s petition for en banc review of a decision by a 3-judge panel of appellate judges.



November 29, 2012


Fair Courts (http://thepoliticalforums.com/issues/fair-courts)

Pages


1
2 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=1&splash=)
3 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=2&splash=)
4 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=3&splash=)
5 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=4&splash=)
6 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=5&splash=)
7 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=6&splash=)
8 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=7&splash=)
9 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=8&splash=)

next › (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=1&splash=)
last » (http://thepoliticalforums.com/legal-work?keys=&&page=36&splash=)


post 30

truthmatters
05-09-2013, 11:19 AM
chris I will allow you time to say you made a mistake

Chris
05-09-2013, 11:19 AM
this is post 36


I had already posted the list of court cases

And I posted dem cases. Both parties are guilty of voter fraud. Yet you still vote for one of the frauds.

Chris
05-09-2013, 11:20 AM
chris I will allow you time to say you made a mistake

I will allow you to admit you lie.

truthmatters
05-09-2013, 11:22 AM
is there far more court docuemtned evidence that the republicans cheat ?

BB-35
05-09-2013, 01:07 PM
maybe you can give me a nonpartisan source to all those claims so I can look at them?

You first,libby

simpsonofpg
05-09-2013, 06:50 PM
as you wish


the republican party was forced to enter into a consent decree which forbade them from doing voter roll purges due to a court case in whouch they were sued in the late 70 or eeraly 80s.


they admitted to a memo in the mid 80s that proved they were attempting to cull the voting rolls of black voters in an attempt to win an election.

To this day they are held under this court documented consent decree due to their continued attempts to cill voter roles to win elections.

I just can't believe it after all these years it comes out. The republicans cheated, man this is unsetteling. What do you can what was going on in Chicago since the 50's and is still going on. This is the same Chicago where the current CiC was trained.