PDA

View Full Version : One year later, families have few answers on Benghazi attack



keymanjim
09-11-2013, 11:35 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/11/1-year-later-families-have-few-answers-on-benghazi-attack/


“When I was there in Washington, when this first started, the FBI had me in a room to tell me what they were doing,” Pat Smith, the mother of Sean Smith, one of the Americans killed in the terror attacks, told Fox News.

Smith says President Obama, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the FBI promised her that finding out who killed her son Sean, an information specialist working in Benghazi, would be a top priority. But it’s a commitment Smith says the president hasn’t kept.

“The government is not doing what they should do,” she said. “Everybody knows this. They lie to you. They tell you what they want you to know. It may or may not be correct. And in my case, it’s always been lies.”

In his speech obama said that we can't look the other way on Syria. So, why does he want us to look the other way on Benghazi?

Cigar
09-11-2013, 11:42 AM
Given up on Fast and Furious, IRS and Syria already?

keymanjim
09-11-2013, 11:46 AM
Given up on Fast and Furious, IRS and Syria already?
Most people can concentrate on more than one objective.
You seem to only concentrate on counting your obama's polyps.

Cigar
09-11-2013, 11:47 AM
http://img.ezinearticles.com/blog/record-palyer-broken-record.jpg

keymanjim
09-11-2013, 11:48 AM
http://img.ezinearticles.com/blog/record-palyer-broken-record.jpg
Yes you are.

Cigar
09-11-2013, 11:50 AM
Maybe it's in the same place as Obama's Birth Certificate :laugh: go take a look.

keymanjim
09-11-2013, 11:55 AM
Maybe it's in the same place as Obama's Birth Certificate :laugh: go take a look.
Maybe your next post will make sense. Really not holding any hope for that, though.

Have you figured out why hillery sent our ambassador to that hot bed of terrorist activity? Wasn't it to recover some missiles she sold to alqueda?

Cigar
09-11-2013, 12:00 PM
Maybe your next post will make sense. Really not holding any hope for that, though.

Have you figured out why hillery sent our ambassador to that hot bed of terrorist activity? Wasn't it to recover some missiles she sold to alqueda?

You can hold whatever gives you comfort :wanker:

keymanjim
09-11-2013, 12:27 PM
You can hold whatever gives you comfort :wanker:
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a128/keymanjim/gLvM0X5_zps99b0b737.gif (http://s10.photobucket.com/user/keymanjim/media/gLvM0X5_zps99b0b737.gif.html)

fyrenza
09-11-2013, 12:39 PM
But to blatantly LIE to someone that is grief-stricken, who NEEDS the truth and some sort of closure,

just in order to Cover Your OWN Ass/Responsibility/Wrong-doing

is so ... despicable.

shaarona
10-27-2013, 12:05 PM
http://212.150.54.123/inter_ter/st_terror/lybia.htm
Senior Libyan officials, both within the political establishment and the upper echelons of the military hierarchy, are engaged in developing and maintaining Libya’s ties with terrorist organizations around the world. The scope of the vast aid granted by Libya, both in the past and at present to international terrorism, varies according to Libya’s international standing and its critical interests at any given time. Thus, when the West increases its pressure upon Libya (whether economic, diplomatic or military), it curbs some of its contacts with the various terrorist organizations. However, when Qaddafi feels the economic or military noose loosening, he immediately renews ties with the terrorist organizations, even publicly flaunting those ties.
(snip)
According to the U.S. State Department annual report on international terrorism published in May 1990, Qaddafi continues to support some thirty terrorist groups, including that of Abu Nidal, with funds, training and other assistance.
In January 1991, President Bush informed the U.S. Congress that he was continuing U.S. sanctions against Libya, since the "Libyan government continues to employ international terrorism and to support it, in violation of international law and international rules of conduct."

Cigar
10-28-2013, 07:16 AM
http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/89/2012/12/03/123335_600.jpg

Codename Section
10-28-2013, 07:45 AM
I'm pretty confident it was an arms deal gone wrong. The CIA has gone buttwild in the ME the last twenty years and totally amped up the last ten.

That is why we won't know shit.

Part of me cares and that is only because I think what the CIA is doing there needs to be exposed, but not because of the death of former SEALS who are now private contractors. The US lost more than that in various wars. Us military people know what our jobs are when we take them on. If you are handed a rifle that means you are going into a situation where someone could kill you. If you still go you accepted that fact.

Cigar
10-28-2013, 02:53 PM
Reagan Losing 241 at Beirut in 1983 Didn't Happen No More October 23rd, 1983. Ronald Reagan was President of the United States.

What stood out then, at least on television, was the toll of 241 dead at Marine BLT Barracks at Beirut Airport. Yet on the 30th Anniversary last week, in 2013, nothing was done to commemorate those losses. Not a word on network news or the commentary shows. The total number of deaths from four truck bombs there was 398. And it was carried out to get revenge for months of the U.S. Navy shelling Arab villages.

Corporate media made no mention of the Beirut, Lebanon invasion -- despite that the CBS program 60 Minutes is taking time tonight to replay the Benghazi attack and street riot that killed 4 on September 11, 2012.


\\


And when Lebanon 1983 is mentioned, for such as resume material, the bombings are blamed on Hezbollah. That is beyond absurd. In 1983 there was no Hezbollah -- getting revenge with these bombings is what let the Revolutionary Guard bring in 1,500 picked troops and get Hezbollah up and running as an effective military force.


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/27/1251119/-Hoaxes-101-Losing-241-at-Beirut-in-1983-Didn-t-Happen-No-More

keymanjim
10-28-2013, 03:58 PM
Reagan Losing 241 at Beirut in 1983
I hate to break this to you, but it 2013 now. We have a class "A" incompetent in the white house.