Chinese Consulate Terrorist Attack. ( San Francisco )

[Germanicus]

The main entrance to the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco was set afire on Wednesday night, drawinghttp://supremesa-a.akamaihd.net/items/it/img/arrow-10x10.png (http://www.smh.com.au/world/chinese-consulate-entrance-set-ablaze-in-san-francisco-20140103-hv7bw.html#) a strong protest from Chinese officials who condemned the "despicable attack."The consulate said that an unidentified attacker had poured two buckets of gasoline onto the front door of the consulate and set it on fire, causing severe damage. No one was injured.
"The arson attack is a violent crime targeted at the Chinese consular institution in the United States, causing severe damage to the consulate facilities and posing a threat to the safety of the consulate staff and the residents living nearby," said a statement by the consulate. "We urge the U.S. side to take all necessary measures to provide adequate protection for Chinese consular personnel and properties, and bring the culprit(s) to justice as soon as possible."


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/chinese-consulate-entrance-set-ablaze-in-san-francisco-20140103-hv7bw.html#ixzz2pITpfQTG

What the hell? Who would attack the Chinese Consulate? Why would someone? What is to gain? Who is to gain?

This is an outrage. What kind of nation are Americans running when you cant even ensure the safety the Chinese citizens working at the consulate?

Where is the outrage from the US side? Where is the man hunt? Where is the justice?

Does China need to investigate this themselves?


The attack comes as tensions have risen between the United States and China over territorial disputes in the waters off China's coast. There were no claims of responsibility for the attack, and the police had no suspects Thursday morning.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/chinese-consulate-entrance-set-ablaze-in-san-francisco-20140103-hv7bw.html#ixzz2pIUfm3iS

Hmmmm. Seems like the Aussie media has an idea of some suspects.

Who would do this? NASA? Jimmy Kimmel? (: Who else hates Chinese people in the USA?

Maybe now we can get the imperialist cult member Falun Gong protesters to stop annoying people at the entrances of western Chinese Consulates/Embassies? Why do they get a permit to protest so easily?

Clearly the US side is not providing adequate safety to Chinese officials in the USA.

With the ongoing row between the US side and India still running is it safe to conclude that the USA is not a good or safe place for foreign diplomats?


If I was China I would consider bringing staff home if the US side cannot guarantee safety and justice.

edit- this was a cowardly act of terror against the people of China. Against the nation of China.

Man hunt! USA needs to bring the culprit to justice or the US side will be seen as unsafe place for diplomats.

edit- if this was the work of the CIA then they need to find a patsy. And quick. (: ( any Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, will do. Put a ludicrous mask on them if you want.. (: Fuck me. Even the Aussie media thinks the US government are terrorist. Its like watching a terrible hollywood blockbuster as Ahmadinijad would point out. )

Where is the outrage?

edit- yep, I believe that the US Government had those Americans killed in Libya. To perpetuate the 9/11 nonsense and as an excuse to move military around Africa.

--Its obvious isnt it?

The Wall Street Journal is the weakest link.

Now use logic. Why is the Wall Street Journal (owned by Murdoch ) giving an interview to an obscure 'film maker' when nobody had heard of him or his movie? Why would they do that? Think about it.

Why then would the AP interview the guy? Why would it be dubbed into arabic and shown on Egyptian television? We know that the Muslim Brotherhood is in the pocket of the United States.

The offensive clip was aired in Egypt on the channel Al Nas. Al Nas is a station founded in 2006 by a Saudi businessman. Think about that for a second. Why would a Saudi businessman starthttp://supremesa-a.akamaihd.net/items/it/img/arrow-10x10.png (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread882378/pg1#) an Egyptain Islamic TV Station? Think about it.

Now back to the mysterious Sam Basile. Does he not remind you of the mysterious pathetic crim that the US Government used as a patsy for the fake Iranian 'terror plot' to blow up the Saudi and Israeli Embassies? How stupid does the US Government think people are?




Though many key documents from the U.S. District Court case remain sealed, a June 2010 sentencing transcript provides an accounthttp://supremesa-a.akamaihd.net/items/it/img/arrow-10x10.png (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread882378/pg1#) of Nakoula’s cooperation with federal investigators in Los Angeles (and how his prison sentence was reduced as a result).
cannonfire.blogspot.com.au... (http://cannonfire.blogspot.com.au/)

Would you not agreehttp://supremesa-a.akamaihd.net/items/it/img/arrow-10x10.png (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread882378/pg1#) that its a touch suspicious that Basile is a snitch that got a reduced sentence for working with the Feds? Think about that.

Back to The Wall Street Journal, the weakest link, why is nobody questioning their role in all of this? Why would they interview an obscure loser like Basile?

These fake news stories created by the US Government are becoming absurd. Its telling.

-- And this seems like something the CIA would do as well. Even the Aussie media suspects it.

[Germanicus]

Associated Press |Federal officials said Thursday a fire at the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco was ignited at the front of the building, leading to an arson investigation and calls from the Chinese government for better protection of diplomats in the U.S.
The blaze on Wednesday night was not being investigated as an act of terrorism, the FBI said.



"An incendiary device fueled by gas was detonated at the consulate," David Johnson, FBI special agent in charge of the San Francisco division, said at a news conference.

Johnson did not provide any specifics about a possible motive or suspects.

No one was hurt in the fire that charred a doorway, damaged the lobby and burned upward toward the roof.

No bomb-making materials were found, FBI spokesman Peter Lee said earlier.

The building was open for business on Thursday with an increased police presence.

Consulate workers say surveillance footage showed a person coming out of a van parked outside the compound with two buckets of gasoline, pouring it on the front of the building, and setting it on fire, said Wang Chuan, a spokesman for the consulate.

"We strongly condemn this despicable act and have already made representations with the U.S. on the attack," Wang said. "And we hope that the U.S. takes all necessary measures to provide adequate protection to the consular personnel and properties and bring the culprits to justice as soon as possible."

The consulate also would not speculate on who might be responsible for the attack, Wang said. The cost of repairs was not yet known.

Lee said he did not know whether the consulate had received any threats or been the target of demonstrations.

U.S. State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said it was too early to judge whether security at the consulate had been adequate.




"We take this incident very seriously, and the Bureau of Diplomatic Security is working with the FBI and local authorities to investigate and apprehend the perpetrators," Harf said.Associated Press |

Federal officials said Thursday a fire at the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco was ignited at the front of the building, leading to an arson investigation and calls from the Chinese government for better protection of diplomats in the U.S.
The blaze on Wednesday night was not being investigated as an act of terrorism, the FBI said.



"An incendiary device fueled by gas was detonated at the consulate," David Johnson, FBI special agent in charge of the San Francisco division, said at a news conference.

Johnson did not provide any specifics about a possible motive or suspects.

No one was hurt in the fire that charred a doorway, damaged the lobby and burned upward toward the roof.

No bomb-making materials were found, FBI spokesman Peter Lee said earlier.

The building was open for business on Thursday with an increased police presence.

Consulate workers say surveillance footage showed a person coming out of a van parked outside the compound with two buckets of gasoline, pouring it on the front of the building, and setting it on fire, said Wang Chuan, a spokesman for the consulate.

"We strongly condemn this despicable act and have already made representations with the U.S. on the attack," Wang said. "And we hope that the U.S. takes all necessary measures to provide adequate protection to the consular personnel and properties and bring the culprits to justice as soon as possible."

The consulate also would not speculate on who might be responsible for the attack, Wang said. The cost of repairs was not yet known.

Lee said he did not know whether the consulate had received any threats or been the target of demonstrations.

U.S. State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said it was too early to judge whether security at the consulate had been adequate.




"We take this incident very seriously, and the Bureau of Diplomatic Security is working with the FBI and local authorities to investigate and apprehend the perpetrators," Harf said.
http://www.recorderonline.com/news/state_news/fbi-chinese-consulate-fire-set-intentionally/article_98e1f5c3-42e7-545d-a213-298d287c9529.html

Why is the US side refusing to call this an act of terror? If this is not terrorims then what is?


SAN FRANCISCO — The FBI says a fire at the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco was not an act of terrorism.
FBI Special Agent David Johnson said Thursday the agency is investigating the blaze as acriminalhttp://supremesa-a.akamaihd.net/items/it/img/arrow-10x10.png (http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/arson-attack-on-chinese-consulate-in-san-francisco/2014/01/02/e23f93d6-739d-11e3-bc6b-712d770c3715_story.html#) matter as opposed to a threat to national security.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/arson-attack-on-chinese-consulate-in-san-francisco/2014/01/02/e23f93d6-739d-11e3-bc6b-712d770c3715_story.html

What?

This was an act of terror. Clearly. Is it not terrorism because the victims were Chinese? Why is this not terror?

What does Susan Rice say? (:

[GrassrootsConservative]

Sum ting wong?

[Mini Me]

Ho Lee Fuk!

[Captain Obvious]

Shit the bed much?

Relax, probobly just a random act of douchbaggery.

[jillian]

The FBI stated that the incident, in which no one was harmed, was being investigated as arson, but not as an act of terrorism. Wang Chuan, spokesman for the consulate, said that surveillance footage showed a person pouring two buckets of petrol on the building before setting it ablaze.
“We hope that the U.S. takes all necessary measures to provide adequate protection to the consular personnel and properties and bring the culprits to justice as soon as possible,” Chuan added.

Read more: Chinese Consulate Fire not Terrorism, Says FBI | TIME.com (http://world.time.com/2014/01/03/fire-at-chinese-consulate-in-san-francisco-investigated-as-arson/#ixzz2pWX5p5Hb) http://world.time.com/2014/01/03/fire-at-chinese-consulate-in-san-francisco-investigated-as-arson/#ixzz2pWX5p5Hb

[zelmo1234]

Don't worry Germ this administration does not call anything a terrorist attack, because Obama has ended terrorism world wide.

So nothing is allowed to challenge the word of the chosen man child! But I agree it should not have happened to anyone, not here!

[jillian]

Don't worry Germ this administration does not call anything a terrorist attack, because Obama has ended terrorism world wide.

So nothing is allowed to challenge the word of the chosen man child! But I agree it should not have happened to anyone, not here!

stop making up things, Zelmo. you know what you're saying isn't true.

and not every thread should be an opportunity for partisan rage.

[zelmo1234]

stop making up things, Zelmo. you know what you're saying isn't true.

and not every thread should be an opportunity for partisan rage.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/fort-hood-shooter-blasts-obama-admin-story/

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/15/Obama-speech-Boston-attack

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2012/oct/16/green-factcheck-obama-did-not-call-benghazi-act-te/


You let me know when I am making things up????

Of would you like me to continue.

[donttread]

My feelings are the same as they are about our embassies overseas . If you don't feel safe get the hell out



What the hell? Who would attack the Chinese Consulate? Why would someone? What is to gain? Who is to gain?

This is an outrage. What kind of nation are Americans running when you cant even ensure the safety the Chinese citizens working at the consulate?

Where is the outrage from the US side? Where is the man hunt? Where is the justice?

Does China need to investigate this themselves?



Hmmmm. Seems like the Aussie media has an idea of some suspects.

Who would do this? NASA? Jimmy Kimmel? (: Who else hates Chinese people in the USA?

Maybe now we can get the imperialist cult member Falun Gong protesters to stop annoying people at the entrances of western Chinese Consulates/Embassies? Why do they get a permit to protest so easily?

Clearly the US side is not providing adequate safety to Chinese officials in the USA.

With the ongoing row between the US side and India still running is it safe to conclude that the USA is not a good or safe place for foreign diplomats?


If I was China I would consider bringing staff home if the US side cannot guarantee safety and justice.

edit- this was a cowardly act of terror against the people of China. Against the nation of China.

Man hunt! USA needs to bring the culprit to justice or the US side will be seen as unsafe place for diplomats.

edit- if this was the work of the CIA then they need to find a patsy. And quick. (: ( any Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, will do. Put a ludicrous mask on them if you want.. (: Fuck me. Even the Aussie media thinks the US government are terrorist. Its like watching a terrible hollywood blockbuster as Ahmadinijad would point out. )

Where is the outrage?

edit- yep, I believe that the US Government had those Americans killed in Libya. To perpetuate the 9/11 nonsense and as an excuse to move military around Africa.

--Its obvious isnt it?

The Wall Street Journal is the weakest link.

Now use logic. Why is the Wall Street Journal (owned by Murdoch ) giving an interview to an obscure 'film maker' when nobody had heard of him or his movie? Why would they do that? Think about it.

Why then would the AP interview the guy? Why would it be dubbed into arabic and shown on Egyptian television? We know that the Muslim Brotherhood is in the pocket of the United States.

The offensive clip was aired in Egypt on the channel Al Nas. Al Nas is a station founded in 2006 by a Saudi businessman. Think about that for a second. Why would a Saudi businessman starthttp://supremesa-a.akamaihd.net/items/it/img/arrow-10x10.png (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread882378/pg1#) an Egyptain Islamic TV Station? Think about it.

Now back to the mysterious Sam Basile. Does he not remind you of the mysterious pathetic crim that the US Government used as a patsy for the fake Iranian 'terror plot' to blow up the Saudi and Israeli Embassies? How stupid does the US Government think people are?

Though many key documents from the U.S. District Court case remain sealed, a June 2010 sentencing transcript provides an accounthttp://supremesa-a.akamaihd.net/items/it/img/arrow-10x10.png (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread882378/pg1#) of Nakoula’s cooperation with federal investigators in Los Angeles (and how his prison sentence was reduced as a result).
cannonfire.blogspot.com.au... (http://cannonfire.blogspot.com.au/)

Would you not agreehttp://supremesa-a.akamaihd.net/items/it/img/arrow-10x10.png (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread882378/pg1#) that its a touch suspicious that Basile is a snitch that got a reduced sentence for working with the Feds? Think about that.

Back to The Wall Street Journal, the weakest link, why is nobody questioning their role in all of this? Why would they interview an obscure loser like Basile?

These fake news stories created by the US Government are becoming absurd. Its telling.

-- And this seems like something the CIA would do as well. Even the Aussie media suspects it.

[Contrails]

This was an act of terror. Clearly. Is it not terrorism because the victims were Chinese? Why is this not terror?

Doesn't an act have to provoke terror in the intended target to be classified as terrorism? Unlike a bomb or shooting, how terrifying is arson?

[jillian]

http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/fort-hood-shooter-blasts-obama-admin-story/

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/15/Obama-speech-Boston-attack

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2012/oct/16/green-factcheck-obama-did-not-call-benghazi-act-te/


You let me know when I am making things up????

Of would you like me to continue.

don't use breitbart if you want anyone who isn't in the furthest rightwing to believe you.

and what you were dishonest about was he did say it was an "act of terror" in the rose garden a day or two after BENGHAAAAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZZIIIIIIII!

or is that too complicated a truth?

[Peter1469]

don't use breitbart if you want anyone who isn't in the furthest rightwing to believe you.

and what you were dishonest about was he did say it was an "act of terror" in the rose garden a day or two after BENGHAAAAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZZIIIIIIII!

or is that too complicated a truth?

I don't use breitbart or any other site that have their video streams start automatically- I am typically already listening to music or the radio on my computer and the arrogance of these sites to have their crap play automatically ticks me off.

[zelmo1234]

don't use breitbart if you want anyone who isn't in the furthest rightwing to believe you.

and what you were dishonest about was he did say it was an "act of terror" in the rose garden a day or two after BENGHAAAAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZZIIIIIIII!

or is that too complicated a truth?

So then the fact that Obama in his own words will not call it terror is what?

Unless you can prove it to be false I will use who ever I like, if you prove it to be false I will acknowledge that I was wrong.

But for me to take your word for it???? Not likely to happen as you are a liberal and liberals lie!