Just in, Democrats try to spin off Sterling

[Bob]

This has to suck since he belongs to Democrats

The Progressive Attack & Spin Doctors Got It Wrong Again! Donald Sterling Is A Democrat.

Posted by Mike (http://www.teapartynation.com/profile/Mike465) on April 29, 2014 at 5:18pm in Tea Party Nation Forum (http://www.teapartynation.com/forum/categories/tea-party-nation-forum/listForCategory)
View Discussions (http://www.teapartynation.com/forum/topic/listForContributor?user=2jf1zu33pgbz6)


Something from the Tradesman's blog reprinted with permission;
The Progressive attack dogs & spin doctors have gotten it wrong again. I'll bet the main Stream Media forms a blackout on the truth about this, and will never allow it to hit the press. It seems that the recording that was released by TMZ ( http://www.tmz.com/2014/04/26/donald-sterling-clippers-owner-black-... (http://www.tmz.com/2014/04/26/donald-sterling-clippers-owner-black-people-racist-audio-magic-johnson/) ) is in fact true and actually did happen. The problem with the reported racist comments by L.A.Clippers owner Donald Sterling, lie in the fact that Progressive spin doctors ( commentators ) have tied him to the Republican Party.
I can understand why they want to do this to discredit the Republicans with anything they can to the African-American community to stop the bleed off of votes from the Progressive Democrats who are beginning to surface as the real Racist Party. The attempt to smear the Conservatives happened immediately after Sterling made his statements.
If you can stomach listening to the tape you will hear the disgusting comments Sterling made to his girlfriend V. Stiviano and will be able to draw your own conclusions as to how deeply offensive and racist they are. The fact of the matter that the always ready to sling mud commentators failed to do was to vett their information about Sterling. Sterling it seems has only given campaign contributions to Democratic Candidates. That is confirmed according to the campaign contribution records on file.
I wonder if the many attempts to link him with the Republican Party is some weird form of damage control where the progressive lap-dog reporters were expected to cover up the fact that a dyed in the wool Democrat was such a bigot, and cast doubts on the veracity of the Democrats he contributed to so they would not be negatively affected and lumped in with him by the incident?
Between 1990 and 1992 Donald Sterling made a $2,000 donations to the former New Jersey Senator Bill Bradley, a $1000 donation to current Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy, as well as a $1000 donation to the recalled former governor of California Gray Davis. Despite having a 100% track record of donating to Democrats, Littlesis.org has no records of him donating to either of President Barack Obama’s election campaigns.
The comments Sterling made have drawn condemnation from the NBA and other groups as they rightly should have. However the Mis-Reported connection/contributions show clearly that it's not Donald Sterling ( http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/donald-sterlin... (http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/donald-sterling.asp?cycle=12) ) who contributed to the Republican Party. The contributions were actually from retired George W. Sterling from Georgetown Texas. I wonder why they thought Donald Sterling was actually retired and living in Georgetown? Could it be that he was the only Sterling that was a Republican contributor, and why didn't they check their facts?
The real L.A. Clippers owner has reportedly a long history of bigoted behavior and comments associated with his Los Angeles business dealings. For more information on this see,
( http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/233141/Owners-Want-Donald-Ster... (http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/233141/Owners-Want-Donald-Sterling-To-Sell-Clippers) )
You can also see where Sterling was facing Federal Racial discrimination lawsuits for refusing to rent to African Americans at; ( http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4187729 ) Is it just me, or are the Democrats beginning to show their true colors?
The National Basketball Association on Tuesday banned Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling from the game for life for racist comments that outraged players, fans and the president. The Main Stream Media still has not corrected the information about Sterling as a Democratic party contributer.

[keymanjim]

Does it really matter?
When you look past the hype, there is only one party, the establishment party.
Sure, democrats and republicans may sing a different tune. But, they dance to the same rhythm.

[Green Arrow]

Watching partisans desperately try to pin bad people on the opposing party is entertaining, but also depressing when you consider that this is the state of politics in America.

[patrickt]

Who had heard of Sterling before the brouhaha between his wife, his girlfriend, and him? He's nobody. Who had heard of Cliven Bundy, for pity's sake, before Sen. Reid tried to take his land?

Racists like President Obama, AG Eric Holder, and Justice Sotomayor matter. Sterling and Bundy don't matter.

I really don't care is Sterling is a registered Democrat or Republican. I have registered as Democrat in states where it was the Democrat primary that decided the office holders and registered Republican in states where the Democrats didn't have any competition in primaries. Of course, in some states the socialists have fucked the system around so Democrats can vote in Republican primaries and the opposite.

I don't really care that the socialists are screaming that murders are the work of right-wingers before the blood spatters settle. They realize that by the time the truth comes out the public has moved on. How sad.

[Akula]

The main idea is to keep people distracted..."Look!..more racists over there!..Let's all act offended and outraged together!"

[Mainecoons]

The "Establishment Party." I like that, we should definitely rename that bunch in D.C. Fits to a "T."

[Bob]

Does it really matter?
When you look past the hype, there is only one party, the establishment party.
Sure, democrats and republicans may sing a different tune. But, they dance to the same rhythm.

I keep reading comments like this. Supposedly a Democrat and Republican are actually the same team.

I have no clue who the other team is.

This in no way implies I have a smug satisfaction with the R party. If I was totally satisfied, I would simply say so.

Nobody can tell me who I can vote for that has a remote chance to win. I can't simply pull the Ross Perot stunt that cost GHW Bush the job as president. I was very miffed with Bush the dad. I felt he broke promises. So we got Clinton.

Clinton was so lucky that he got credit for an economy that none of his particular policies can be shown to cause either a decent, bad or good economy. It had no impact when he was in office. Politicians love credit. Clinton took credit over the revenues produced by the Dot.com boom yet for the following crash, not a bit of credit. It is a one way door. Clinton took credit for what he claims was his balanced budget. Had the republicans not taken action, nothing like a balanced budget would appear.

http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16

[Bob]

Who had heard of Sterling before the brouhaha between his wife, his girlfriend, and him? He's nobody. Who had heard of Cliven Bundy, for pity's sake, before Sen. Reid tried to take his land?

Racists like President Obama, AG Eric Holder, and Justice Sotomayor matter. Sterling and Bundy don't matter.

I really don't care is Sterling is a registered Democrat or Republican. I have registered as Democrat in states where it was the Democrat primary that decided the office holders and registered Republican in states where the Democrats didn't have any competition in primaries. Of course, in some states the socialists have fucked the system around so Democrats can vote in Republican primaries and the opposite.

I don't really care that the socialists are screaming that murders are the work of right-wingers before the blood spatters settle. They realize that by the time the truth comes out the public has moved on. How sad.

You are in Mexico. No wonder you don't give a shit and flip flop as to party principles.

[Bob]

The "Establishment Party." I like that, we should definitely rename that bunch in D.C. Fits to a "T."

How can a person vote for Democrats at any point?

I spent 4 decades as a Democrat so you might ask, who the hell are you to ask that question since you did it.

My explanation is sheer ignorance had me voting for Democrats. I assumed they actually were for the non rich. That turned out to be a lie.

Both parties are for the rich. But that does not hint that they are only for the rich. Republicans policies show they are for the nation and not merely one class vs an other. Democrats talk as if they are anti rich, and that is ugly; nobody should discriminate against those who create jobs, even though they have more power as one person than I have. Look at what Obama says loudly. He is for we the middle class. Then he blocks Keystone Pipeline. That sumbitch is stopping jobs. He is supposedly smart. The dumb shit can't even approve a simple steel pipe in going on 6 years. That is stupid to the max. Then he lavishes his rich pals on enormous sums of cash. Who forgot Solyndra. This company was in my city and shut the doors. A new company now is there. You can easily walk from that plan to Tesla Motors, also in this town.

[Cigar]

What Sterling said was on tap ... long before any Democrat, Republican or Independent even heard about this.

What said is said and what Done is Done ... spin it anyway you want, changes nothing.

[Captain Obvious]

What Sterling said was on tap ... long before any Democrat, Republican or Independent even heard about this.

What said is said and what Done is Done ... spin it anyway you want, changes nothing.

"on tap"

LOL!

[darroll]

Race cause be gone.
Maybe he knows that his girlfriend is hanging with a bunch of bad actors. No they have to hang the guy anyway. Does anyone understand how dumb this sounds. Black shady people ok, white shady people bad.
Grow the F up.

[nic34]

This has to suck since he belongs to Democrats

The Progressive Attack & Spin Doctors Got It Wrong Again! Donald Sterling Is A Democrat.


Posted by Mike (http://www.teapartynation.com/profile/Mike465) on April 29, 2014 at 5:18pm in Tea Party Nation Forum (http://www.teapartynation.com/forum/categories/tea-party-nation-forum/listForCategory)
View Discussions (http://www.teapartynation.com/forum/topic/listForContributor?user=2jf1zu33pgbz6)

Something from the Tradesman's blog reprinted with permission;
The Progressive attack dogs & spin doctors have gotten it wrong again. I'll bet the main Stream Media forms a blackout on the truth about this, and will never allow it to hit the press. It seems that the recording that was released by TMZ ( http://www.tmz.com/2014/04/26/donald-sterling-clippers-owner-black-... (http://www.tmz.com/2014/04/26/donald-sterling-clippers-owner-black-people-racist-audio-magic-johnson/) ) is in fact true and actually did happen. The problem with the reported racist comments by L.A.Clippers owner Donald Sterling, lie in the fact that Progressive spin doctors ( commentators ) have tied him to the Republican Party.
I can understand why they want to do this to discredit the Republicans with anything they can to the African-American community to stop the bleed off of votes from the Progressive Democrats who are beginning to surface as the real Racist Party. The attempt to smear the Conservatives happened immediately after Sterling made his statements.
If you can stomach listening to the tape you will hear the disgusting comments Sterling made to his girlfriend V. Stiviano and will be able to draw your own conclusions as to how deeply offensive and racist they are. The fact of the matter that the always ready to sling mud commentators failed to do was to vett their information about Sterling. Sterling it seems has only given campaign contributions to Democratic Candidates. That is confirmed according to the campaign contribution records on file.
I wonder if the many attempts to link him with the Republican Party is some weird form of damage control where the progressive lap-dog reporters were expected to cover up the fact that a dyed in the wool Democrat was such a bigot, and cast doubts on the veracity of the Democrats he contributed to so they would not be negatively affected and lumped in with him by the incident?
Between 1990 and 1992 Donald Sterling made a $2,000 donations to the former New Jersey Senator Bill Bradley, a $1000 donation to current Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy, as well as a $1000 donation to the recalled former governor of California Gray Davis. Despite having a 100% track record of donating to Democrats, Littlesis.org has no records of him donating to either of President Barack Obama’s election campaigns.
The comments Sterling made have drawn condemnation from the NBA and other groups as they rightly should have. However the Mis-Reported connection/contributions show clearly that it's not Donald Sterling ( http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/donald-sterlin... (http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/donald-sterling.asp?cycle=12) ) who contributed to the Republican Party. The contributions were actually from retired George W. Sterling from Georgetown Texas. I wonder why they thought Donald Sterling was actually retired and living in Georgetown? Could it be that he was the only Sterling that was a Republican contributor, and why didn't they check their facts?
The real L.A. Clippers owner has reportedly a long history of bigoted behavior and comments associated with his Los Angeles business dealings. For more information on this see,
( http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/233141/Owners-Want-Donald-Ster... (http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/233141/Owners-Want-Donald-Sterling-To-Sell-Clippers) )
You can also see where Sterling was facing Federal Racial discrimination lawsuits for refusing to rent to African Americans at; ( http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4187729 ) Is it just me, or are the Democrats beginning to show their true colors?
The National Basketball Association on Tuesday banned Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling from the game for life for racist comments that outraged players, fans and the president. The Main Stream Media still has not corrected the information about Sterling as a Democratic party contributer.



Who the F cares Bob?


Sterling is a registered Republican and has been at least since 1998.

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-no-donald-sterling-20140428,0,6977964.column#ixzz30OfqcyNB

[Bob]

Who the F cares Bob?


Sterling is a registered Republican and has been at least since 1998.

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-no-donald-sterling-20140428,0,6977964.column#ixzz30OfqcyNB

Does L.A. Times reporter Michael Hiltzik read the news? Apparently not, since he penned one of the most lapdog press-worthy articles praising the IRS to bubble to the surface in the wake of the news that it targeted conservative Americans. Hiltzik’s column published in the May 25 Business section (http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hiltzik-20130526,0,1884244.column) labeled the targeting as “supposed,” noted that for a small budget – the IRS does a pretty “good job.”
“Showing some love after the ‘witch-hunt,” Hiltzik insinuates that the current fiasco is rather peripheral since the IRS has done such a great job collecting revenue throughout its history. He noted that the changes made back in the Clinton administration, which shifted the agency from enforcement to a greater focus on treating the taxpayers like customers, is the epicenter of the trouble caused two administrations later. Hiltzik also lamented a that the shift away from enforcement led to a “brain drain” within the agency, and that real criminals, tax evaders, were left to operate freely. As for the bipartisan outrage over the scandal, Hiltzik wrote:


Read more: http://newsbusters.org/category/people-and-organizations/michael-hiltzik#ixzz30OkqxqLl