PDA

View Full Version : Democrats trickery in VA



Bob
06-11-2014, 11:11 AM
AP
Congressman Eric Cantor.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor's loss (http://www.businessinsider.com/democrats-rejoice-cantors-loss-2014-6) to his little-known primary rival Tuesday night was made all the more surprising by Cantor's own pollster's confident predictions on the race.
Less than a week before Cantor's upset loss, the pollster, John McLaughlin, released a survey (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/06/06/cantor-internal-poll-claims-34-point-lead-over-primary-opponent-brat/) indicating Cantor had a 62% to 28% lead over his Republican opponent, Dave Brat. Brat would go on to win by 11% (http://electionresults.virginia.gov/resultsSW.aspx?type=CON&map=CTY) — a huge, 45-point shift that was far outside the poll's margin of error.
In an interview with the National Journal (http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/eric-cantor-s-pollster-tries-to-explain-why-his-survey-showed-cantor-up-34-points-20140611) after Tuesday's election, McLaughlin accused Democrats, especially "Dukes of Hazard" actor Ben Jones, of meddling in the race. In Virginia, voters can cast ballots in whatever primary they like. Jones, who once ran against Cantor himself, had reportedly called on Democrats to do exactly that and back Brat (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/06/ben-cooter-jones_n_5463196.html).
"Over the weekend Democrats like Ben Jones and liberal media were driving their Democratic voters on the internet into the open primary," McLaughlin said while noting an "almost 50% increase in turnout" from two years ago. "Eric got hit from right and left. In our polls two weeks out Eric was stronger with Republicans at 70% of the vote, but running under 50% among non Republicans."
"Untold story," McLaughlin continued, "is who were the new primary voters? They were probably not Republicans."
McLaughlin, whose firm has been criticized for badly missing (https://storify.com/DKElections/mclaughlin-and-associates-terrible-2012-polling) in a number of other races, also argued that last-minute attacks had hurt Cantor after he polled the district.
"[A]ttacks on immigration and amnesty charges from the right in last week hurt," he said.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/eric-cantors-pollster-blames-democrats-131901793.html

nathanbforrest45
06-11-2014, 11:18 AM
A bigger turnout because of greater urgency in replacing a RINO should not be entertained for even a nano second.

Codename Section
06-11-2014, 11:20 AM
Why do you think Democratic donors put money into Sarvis's campaign. Politics is dirty. It's why we now have a HUGE asshole for governor in VA.

nic34
06-11-2014, 11:22 AM
but much better than the last asshole.....:wink:

Codename Section
06-11-2014, 11:24 AM
but much better than the last asshole.....:wink:

Six of one, half a dozen of the other. If Wilder could run again I'd be cool with a Dem. This guy came in like a New York Liberal in a state he only won BECAUSE of Sarvis taking 147,000 votes that would have (unfortunately) gone to Cuccinelli.

Not that I liked that tool, but the way they did it was assholish and not appreciated. I think state elections should only have inside the state money pumped in.

sachem
06-11-2014, 12:20 PM
Gee, a pollster who got it wrong accusing someone else. Imagine that. :D

nathanbforrest45
06-11-2014, 12:21 PM
Gee, a pollster who got it wrong accusing someone else. Imagine that. :D

Must be related to Hillary

Mainecoons
06-11-2014, 01:15 PM
And once again we have a demonstration of why these primaries are such a bad idea.

sachem
06-11-2014, 01:28 PM
Must be related to HillaryMaybe. ;)