PDA

View Full Version : Hillary Clinton Equates Gun Control Opponents With Terrorists



Chris
06-18-2014, 06:25 PM
Clinton doesn't have a clue but must have emotional appeal for some.

Hillary Clinton Equates Gun Control Opponents With Terrorists (http://reason.com/blog/2014/06/18/hillary-clinton-equates-gun-control-oppo)


During a CNN "town hall" yesterday, Hillary Clinton said she was disappointed that Congress did not pass new gun control legislation following the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in December 2012. "I believe that we need a more thoughtful conversation," said the former secretary of state and presumptive presidential candidate. "We cannot let a minority of people—and that's what it is, it is a minority of people—hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people." Evidently Clinton's idea of a more thoughtful conversation about gun control involves equating disagreement with terrorism while claiming some opinions are so dangerous that "we cannot let" people hold them.

I am not sure how Clinton plans to implement this new opinion control policy. As for gun control, she says she wants "background checks that work." If she means background checks that block gun purchases by people with no disqualifying criminal or psychiatric records (a description that fits the perpetrators of almost all mass shootings, including the Sandy Hook massacre), she might as well wish for a unicorn. If she means background checks that strip harmless people of their Second Amendment rights based on irrational criteria, that much surely could be achieved.

Clinton, by the way, twice referred to mass shooters with "automatic" weapons, meaning she does not understand the difference between semi-automatic firearms and machine guns, even after eight years as first lady in an administration that supported a highly contentious "assault weapon" ban and eight years as a senator who supported further restrictions. Her confusion on that point, which President Obama seems to share, in itself would be enough reason to take her advice about gun policy with a grain of salt.

Cigar
06-18-2014, 06:29 PM
If a group Blacks showed up to a rally armed ... what would you call it? :grin:

http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/images/bpp/2-28-69 cr2.jpg (http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/BPP.htm)

Private Pickle
06-18-2014, 06:45 PM
If a group Blacks showed up to a rally armed ... what would you call it? :grin:

http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/images/bpp/2-28-69 cr2.jpg (http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/BPP.htm)

The 2nd Amendment.

Redrose
06-18-2014, 07:03 PM
Originally Posted by Cigar
If a group Blacks showed up to a rally armed ... what would you call it?

Private Pickle says: the 2nd Amendment

Wrong.

the Second Amendment does not allow carrying a gun to intimidate or threaten. That's a crime. But Holder looks the other way with his racist eye.

Hillary and other liberal nitwits are so quick to take away our Right to Bear Arms, ban all guns, guns are bad. What a crock. They want me to be defenseless, unarmed, a victim since the bad guy will always have a weapon. They have armed body guards with them constantly. They're all full of shit. A one way street...their way.

Private Pickle
06-18-2014, 07:05 PM
Originally Posted by Cigar
If a group Blacks showed up to a rally armed ... what would you call it?



Wrong.

the Second Amendment does not allow carrying a gun to intimidate or threaten. That's a crime. But Holder looks the other way with his racist eye.

Hillary and other liberal nitwits are so quick to take away our Right to Bear Arms, ban all guns, guns are bad. What a crock. They want me to be defenseless, unarmed, a victim since the bad guy will always have a weapon. They have armed body guards with them constantly. They're all full of shit. A one way street...their way.

Who said they were there to intimidate or threaten?

exotix
06-18-2014, 07:14 PM
Yeah like duh ... the tea party is the same as al-queada.

Chris
06-18-2014, 07:35 PM
Yeah like duh ... the tea party is the same as al-queada.

But if someone said Obama was a terrorist you'd fly ino a rage.

Refugee
06-18-2014, 07:40 PM
I started the same way in the UK as well. One guy went crazy at a school, (The Dunblane massacre) and all of a sudden firearms were banned - for your own good of course. The inference now is to label gun owners as 'terrorists' and you need to ban terrorism, right? So they won't ban people's rights to own guns, they'll be doing everyone a favour and banning terrorism. It's all so British and predictable.

Cigar
06-18-2014, 07:40 PM
But if someone said Obama was a terrorist you'd fly ino a rage.


Naaa ... only the Stupid would believe that :laugh:

exotix
06-18-2014, 07:41 PM
But if someone said Obama was a terrorist you'd fly ino a rage.
No I wouldn't ... that's old news conservatives still bitter-cling too.

Redrose
06-18-2014, 08:50 PM
Who said they were there to intimidate or threaten?
Are you kidding?

GrumpyDog
06-19-2014, 01:44 AM
The Democrat Party, haters of Christianity, tolerant of the Islamic brotherhood beheading Iraqi civilians, does not condone the idea of Caucasians with guns, and especially guns with Bibles.

However, if you are willing to submit to ALLAH, and renounce your infidel Judeo Christian heritage, and repent for your white racist forefathers use of slaves, and admit your US Constitution is an antiquated rag of a document, bereft of any meaning, then you may carry your AK 47 in public, on your way to the Imperial New York Islamic Mosque built across the street from the remains of the former decadent infidel towers. Praise be Allah, and our Great Leader of the Faith, Barrak Hussein Obama.

Refugee
06-19-2014, 01:50 AM
If a group Blacks showed up to a rally armed ... what would you call it? :grin:

http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/images/bpp/2-28-69 cr2.jpg (http://depts.washington.edu/civilr/BPP.htm)

What is 'it' doing here.

kilgram
06-19-2014, 02:38 AM
Who said they were there to intimidate or threaten?
Carrying a visible weapon is to threaten or intimidate.

I see a guy with a weapon and it is certain that I am going to feel threaten or intimidated. It is the natural reaction to a guy with a weapon.

Wearing a weapon has only sense if you expect having to use it from time to time.

kilgram
06-19-2014, 02:41 AM
What is 'it' doing here.
LOL.

It is refering to the act. To the fact of blacks carrying weapons.

Refugee
06-19-2014, 04:24 AM
LOL.

It is refering to the act. To the fact of blacks carrying weapons.

Yes, 'it' did sound strange coming from Cigar, an avowed Obama liberal. :laugh:

donttread
06-19-2014, 04:36 AM
Clinton doesn't have a clue but must have emotional appeal for some.

Hillary Clinton Equates Gun Control Opponents With Terrorists (http://reason.com/blog/2014/06/18/hillary-clinton-equates-gun-control-oppo)

All while undoubtedly being , herself, protected by guns

Chris
06-19-2014, 07:19 AM
Naaa ... only the Stupid would believe that :laugh:


No I wouldn't ... that's old news conservatives still bitter-cling too.


We've seen how you react to any criticism of Obama, usually with whines of racism.

Chris
06-19-2014, 07:21 AM
Naaa ... only the Stupid would believe that :laugh:



What is 'it' doing here.


Protecting a white guy, it looks like, in fact it looks like Rush Limbaugh, lol.

IOW, staged.