General Petraeus hangs McCain out to dry

[Cigar]

Senator John McCain has been making the argument that President Obama should fire his entire intelligence people and hire folks like General David Petraeus and others that were involved in the Iraq War surge.

General Petraeus was clear to make a distinction between his and Senator McCain's comments:

“If there is to be support for Iraq, it has to be support for a government of Iraq. That is, a government of all the people, and that is representative of and responsive to all elements of Iraq,” Petraeus said, according to The Spectator. “President Obama has been quite clear on this: This cannot be the United States being the air force for Shia militias or a Shia on Sunni Arab fight. It has to be a fight of all of Iraq against extremists.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2014/06/18/david-petraeus-issues-warning-about-u-s-military-involvement-in-iraq/

Take That! McBitch! :laugh:

Remember .. The Generals are Right!

[exotix]

McKook.

[Alyosha]

So its Loose Lips and McCrazy in a bitch fight now? Awesome.

[Matty]

Oh, I remember him, the one the libtards called General Betray US. That guy? Yep.

[Alyosha]

Oh, I remember him, the one the libtards called General Betray US. That guy? Yep.

He was the big wig at the CIA who told his mistress classified info. What a tool.

[Peter1469]

He was the big wig at the CIA who told his mistress classified info. What a tool.


All in. :smiley:

[Blackrook]

Cigar, you're grasping at straws in your efforts to divert attention from Obama's failures as Commander-in-Chief.

[Private Pickle]

All in. :smiley:

Balls deep.

[Blackrook]

I assume that most generals, admirals, politicians, and ambassadors have mistresses on the side, so when one of them is outed for cheating I assume it is happening because he pissed off the people who really run this country, and not because he actually did something immoral, since most men in power are doing the same thing.

[Alyosha]

I assume that most generals, admirals, politicians, and ambassadors have mistresses on the side, so when one of them is outed for cheating I assume it is happening because he pissed off the people who really run this country, and not because he actually did something immoral, since most men in power are doing the same thing.

Um so if they all do it then it's no longer immoral?

[Blackrook]

Um so if they all do it then it's no longer immoral?
No, it's very immoral. I am faithful to my wife, and believe that a husband should always be faithful to his wife.

But the men who run this country are powerful and they believe their power entitles them to certain privileges, like a little side sex with pretty secretaries and interns. My guess is that most men in power are doing this, and Clinton only got in trouble because he was sued for sexual harrassment and had to answer questions about his sex life.

General Petreus was purged from the military, not for whatever he did with his mistress, but because Obama wanted to get rid of him. Perhaps he was not playing ball with Obama's agenda.

By the way, Presidents who had mistresses: FDR, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Clinton -- we only found about Clinton, the others got away with it.

[Peter1469]

True. Had the CIA wished, this never would have come out. Someone wanted Petraeus silenced.



I assume that most generals, admirals, politicians, and ambassadors have mistresses on the side, so when one of them is outed for cheating I assume it is happening because he pissed off the people who really run this country, and not because he actually did something immoral, since most men in power are doing the same thing.

[Blackrook]

The thing to realize is that none of what they tell you in the media is the truth. If a man is outed for having a mistress, the real reason he got in trouble is because he crossed someone more powerful, who then used the mistress thing as an excuse to get rid of him.

Look at Ted Kennedy, who left a trail of women behind him in his path, never getting in trouble except for the one time he actually killed a woman, and then, even the mainstream media had to report it.

But there was a cover-up, Mary Jo Kopechne never had an autoposy, at the insistence of her parents. They were bought off obviously, covering up a pregnancy or whatever Teddy was trying to hide about Mary Jo.

[Mini Me]

The thing to realize is that none of what they tell you in the media is the truth. If a man is outed for having a mistress, the real reason he got in trouble is because he crossed someone more powerful, who then used the mistress thing as an excuse to get rid of him.

Look at Ted Kennedy, who left a trail of women behind him in his path, never getting in trouble except for the one time he actually killed a woman, and then, even the mainstream media had to report it.

But there was a cover-up, Mary Jo Kopechne never had an autoposy, at the insistence of her parents. They were bought off obviously, covering up a pregnancy or whatever Teddy was trying to hide about Mary Jo.

You are a pathetic grievance collector, bringing that up and portraying TK as a murderer!

It was just a tragic accident.

[Peter1469]

You are a pathetic grievance collector, bringing that up and portraying TK as a murderer!

It was just a tragic accident.

Stop trolling. Teddy just had way too much to drink.

[Bob]

Oh, I remember him, the one the libtards called General Betray US. That guy? Yep.

Oh GOD yes. I recall them calling him that. This was all over AOL and other forums.

[Bob]

The thing to realize is that none of what they tell you in the media is the truth. If a man is outed for having a mistress, the real reason he got in trouble is because he crossed someone more powerful, who then used the mistress thing as an excuse to get rid of him.

Look at Ted Kennedy, who left a trail of women behind him in his path, never getting in trouble except for the one time he actually killed a woman, and then, even the mainstream media had to report it.

But there was a cover-up, Mary Jo Kopechne never had an autoposy, at the insistence of her parents. They were bought off obviously, covering up a pregnancy or whatever Teddy was trying to hide about Mary Jo.

Democrats don't like the stinking truth. Not when it is one of theirs.

Sure, Teddy the party boy was getting drunk. And he figured he could get some. I recall that event since then I was a Democrat. But I never said he was not guilty. At the least, he by law had to immediately call for help and report to the cops. Too bad she did not have a man to do that for her.

[zelmo1234]

Um so if they all do it then it's no longer immoral?

NO it is always immoral! That is the thing about truth and morals, they really don't care if you believe in them or not!

This is why I refuse to live my life on the bell curve

[zelmo1234]

You are a pathetic grievance collector, bringing that up and portraying TK as a murderer!

It was just a tragic accident.

Enjoying that Ocean Front Property in Arizona!