Philly Rabbit
07-07-2014, 12:06 PM
The absolute symbol of governmental authority, nine lawyers dressed in black robes to whom too many of the people in the states now consider to be the final arbitrator and ruler of all citizens, who's decisions are too often emotionally driven, unchangeable by common citizens, undaunted in final authority.
Originally, this body of lawyers were intended to settle federal disputes between the federal bodies of congress and the executive branch and the more prudent and more powerful legal decision making between the people to settle their disputes belonged to the state courts who had the authority over the federal body of the supreme court nestled within the deliberately made that way, smallest body of federal government, the judicial. That was how the founders intended the court and the judicial branch itself to be in order for it to never become too powerful and authoritarian over the people themselves. The high court is sufficient when acting as a referee go between to settle disputes between two states or a number of states, but when the court becomes authoritarian is when it serves as a referee between any given state and the federal government when it almost always comes down in favor of the fed. Affirmative action and forced busing to achieve what the court originally opposed being segregation were two examples of the court's feel good, legislative unconstitutional moody decisions of authoritarian elitism against the people in the different states. The high court has also given unlimited unconstitutional powers of executive privilege to the executive branch again on feel good, social engineering elitism outside the boundaries of the constitution that the nine lawyers in black robes swore to uphold and defend. From the atrocious Dred Scott decision to the present day declaration that the penalty phase of Obama Care was somehow a legal tax, the court has worked against the freedoms and constitutional guarantees of the citizens rights and freedoms with unbending and irreversible totalitarian decisions.
When the founders gave the people a federal republic, nullification of any unjust ruling of federal judicial authoritarian law upon the citizenry which violated said citizen's constitutional rights within the states was fully expected and protected by the Bill of Rights. And trial juries under the system of nullification of unconstitutional laws should have the legal authority to nullify any law that violated a citizen's rights which made him a defendant within an unconstitutional trial.
Originally, this body of lawyers were intended to settle federal disputes between the federal bodies of congress and the executive branch and the more prudent and more powerful legal decision making between the people to settle their disputes belonged to the state courts who had the authority over the federal body of the supreme court nestled within the deliberately made that way, smallest body of federal government, the judicial. That was how the founders intended the court and the judicial branch itself to be in order for it to never become too powerful and authoritarian over the people themselves. The high court is sufficient when acting as a referee go between to settle disputes between two states or a number of states, but when the court becomes authoritarian is when it serves as a referee between any given state and the federal government when it almost always comes down in favor of the fed. Affirmative action and forced busing to achieve what the court originally opposed being segregation were two examples of the court's feel good, legislative unconstitutional moody decisions of authoritarian elitism against the people in the different states. The high court has also given unlimited unconstitutional powers of executive privilege to the executive branch again on feel good, social engineering elitism outside the boundaries of the constitution that the nine lawyers in black robes swore to uphold and defend. From the atrocious Dred Scott decision to the present day declaration that the penalty phase of Obama Care was somehow a legal tax, the court has worked against the freedoms and constitutional guarantees of the citizens rights and freedoms with unbending and irreversible totalitarian decisions.
When the founders gave the people a federal republic, nullification of any unjust ruling of federal judicial authoritarian law upon the citizenry which violated said citizen's constitutional rights within the states was fully expected and protected by the Bill of Rights. And trial juries under the system of nullification of unconstitutional laws should have the legal authority to nullify any law that violated a citizen's rights which made him a defendant within an unconstitutional trial.