Victory for Walmart as huge sex bias case is thrown out

[Captain Obvious]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/jun/20/walmart-sex-discrimination-class-action-rejected

The US supreme court has rejected the biggest sex discrimination case in history, ruling that the claim against retail giant Walmart on behalf of as many as 1.6 million women was too big to bring to trial.

...

[spunkloaf]

Too big for justice.

[Mister D]

Too big for justice.


What would justice be in this case?

[Captain Obvious]

Too big for justice.


What would justice be in this case?


A decision that is more in grain with liberal ideology rather than logical justice.

[Mister D]

Too big for justice.


What would justice be in this case?


A decision that is more in grain with liberal ideology rather than logical justice.


What's funny is that will turn out to be a good summation of Spunk's future argument. ;D

[Captain Obvious]

Too big for justice.


What would justice be in this case?


A decision that is more in grain with liberal ideology rather than logical justice.


What's funny is that will turn out to be a good summation of Spunk's future argument. ;D


Easier to predict than yesterdays weather.

[Mister D]

Too big for justice.


What would justice be in this case?


A decision that is more in grain with liberal ideology rather than logical justice.


What's funny is that will turn out to be a good summation of Spunk's future argument. ;D


Easier to predict than yesterdays weather.


:D

Now Spunk...show us up!

[blaster]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/jun/20/walmart-sex-discrimination-class-action-rejected (/business/2011/jun/20/walmart-sex-discrimination-class-action-rejected) The US supreme court has rejected the biggest sex discrimination case in history, ruling that the claim against retail giant Walmart on behalf of as many as 1.6 million women was too big to bring to trial. ... Is too big to bring to trial anything like too big to fail?

[Common]

This is from 2011 ? we live in a different country now