PDA

View Full Version : The top-ten reasons not to vote Republican in the Midterms



Cigar
10-08-2014, 08:02 AM
http://i0.wp.com/sheppardpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/182279.png?resize=692%2C360





They shouldn’t be there in the first place
This Republican House has the least public mandate of any Congress in history. In the 2012 elections, the Republicans won 234 seats to the Democrats 201. But the Democrats won 48.8% of the popular vote, to the Republican’s 47.6%. The Democrat’s vote tally was nearly one-and-a-half-million higher. There is no precedent for this, not even close – never has the legitimate preference of the voters been so distorted.

If the Democrats had won – because they got the most votes – the Tea Party would be far less influential. There would have been no debt ceiling crisis, roiling markets and shaking consumer confidence, and no government shutdown lasting sixteen days.

With the Senate having passed a bi-partisan Immigration bill with more than two-thirds of the chamber voting yea, the house would, by now, have followed suit, with a final bill coming out of conference, bound for the president’s desk.

They don’t realize we get it already
The Republicans have voted more than 50 times to repeal or defund Obamacare.

“They have been obsessed with repealing the Affordable Care Act,” President Obama told a Democratic National Committee meeting in Washington. “You know what they say: 50th time is the charm. Maybe when you hit your 50th repeal vote, you will win a prize. Maybe if you buy 50 repeal votes, you get one free. We get it.”

No one likes them
The lowest point in the average of the polls that Nancy Pelosi’s Democrat-led House ever reached was 17%, as Obamacare was being passed. Generally speaking, the Democrats mainly stayed above 20%. Hardly amazing, but worthwhile remembering, given what was to come. The Republican controlled House has been by far the most disliked in modern history. An associated Press poll from the last week of September had them at 7%. It’s not just the least popular Congress, though: It’s also, according to Gallup, the least popular institution of any kind ever recorded.

They don’t do anything
The 113th Congress remains on track to be the least productive in modern history. Just 142 public bills have been enacted into law in the current session, down from the 906 the 80th “Do-Nothing” Congress passed in 1947-48. At this same point in the last Congress, which set the record for the fewest bills passed into public law in the modern era, 151 bills had made it into law.

They don’t represent society
Backers of Rep. Steve Southerland threw the Florida Republican a men-only fundraiser earlier this year. The invitation came complete with instructions that attendees should “tell the missus not to wait up” because “the after dinner whiskey and cigars will be smooth and the issues to discuss are many.”

In 1950, 98% of House Democrats and 97% of House Republicans were white men. In the 64 years since, that share has fallen 51 points for Democrats, but only 8 points for Republicans. Today, 89% of House Republicans are white men, compared to just 47% of House Democrats. On election night 2012, Democrats took pride in the fact that, for the first time ever, women and minorities would compose a majority — 53% — of their caucus. Meanwhile, the share of women and minorities in the GOP House conference went down, from 14% to 11%.

They’re too into Israel
Recent polls make it clear that, in the U.S., the strongest support for Israel’s right-wing policies now comes not from Jews, but from Republicans. Around the time of the Gaza conflict, Pew reported that the share of Republicans who sympathize more with Israel had risen from 68% to 73%, far larger than the proportion of Democrats.

Republican love for Israel knows almost no bounds, stemming, perhaps, from an absolutist trait in the conservative worldview. Israel is the Middle East’s only “good guy,” surrounded by a sea of “bad guys.”

In 2013, Israel’s GDP was $291.3 billion. The U.S. has subsidized about 25% of the tiny country’s annual defense budget in recent years; and U.S. military aid is roughly 1% of Israel’s economy. Yet the Republicans still complain that the Obama administration hasn’t been sufficiently supportive. For all their unwavering loyalty, however, it is really strange that, after the surprise defeat of Eric Cantor, there are now exactly zero Jewish Republicans in the House.

Their outreach to the Black community still faces hurdles
“To a significant extent, the Republican base does have elements that are animated by racism. And that’s unfortunate,” Democrat Steve Israel said recently on CNN.

“I couldn’t be consistent with myself and my core beliefs, and stay with a party that was so unfriendly toward the African-American president,” former Florida governor Charlie Crist said in an interview.“I was a Republican and I saw the activists and what they were doing, it was intolerable to me.”

“The reason why Fox News and the GOP attract people like Cliven Bundy, Ted Nugent, and George Zimmerman is because they have spent the entire Obama years using racial divides as a political weapon,” Bill Maher argued earlier this year, later going on to argue that Fox News called the New Black Panthers scary, but portrayed white militia members as heroes.

An interesting proxy for measuring racial prejudice is a person’s views on interracial dating and marriage. The Pew Research Center has been polling on this question for 25 years. In 2012, 18 percent of Republicans disapproved of blacks and whites dating each other.

They’ve wasted a huge amount of money
The Republicans have cost the taxpayer, directly and in terms of hindered economic potential, a huge amount since taking over the House.

The lawsuit against the president will cost up to $350,000, billed at a rate of $500 per hour.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) estimated that the House Republican’s prolonged showdown with the administration over the raising of the debt ceiling, a procedure, up till then largely a formality, increased government borrowing costs by $1.3 billion.

Standard & Poors estimated that the Republican-initiated shutdown, which lasted just over two weeks, cost $1.5 billion per day, and took a total of $24 billion out of the U.S. economy.

Almost continuously, since 2012, the Republican controlled House has been investigating Benghazi. “The Department has devoted thousands of man-hours to responding to the numerous and often repetitive congressional requests regarding Benghazi,” Assistant Secretary of Defense for Legislative Affairs Elizabeth King said in a letter to Congress. That estimate included “time devoted to approximately 50 congressional hearings, briefings, and interviews which the Department has led or participated in.”

In May, the Republicans formed a special committee to re investigate Benghazi – the budget is $5,650,000 – bigger than the budgets for the committees on Veteran’s affairs, Intelligence and the budget itself.

When House Republicans voted to appoint a special counsel for the IRS investigation, House Ways and Means Committee Ranking Member Sander Levin responded by saying, “The IRS has spent more than $14 million in taxpayer money accommodating Republican requests, turning over more than 600,000 pages of documents, none of which substantiate the GOP’s wild attempt from the get-go to tar the administration.”

Its amazing that a fiscally conservative party has contrived to spend or waste this much money. Would anyone seriously suggest most of it had been well spent?

They can’t get their story straight
Despite having actually issued fewer executive orders than most of his predecessors, the Republicans have accused the President of being aggressively unilateral. In June, Republican Speaker John Boehner criticised the President’s use of executive orders, saying Congress must act to avoid Obama from acting like a “king.”

When Boehner was forced to cancel a vote on his border legislation after he didn’t have enough votes to pass it, he then issued a press release demanding that Obama act alone to secure the border. “There are numerous steps the president can and should be taking right now, without the need for congressional action, to secure our borders…” The logic being that it is not okay for Obama to take executive action unless the House is paralyzed by Republican infighting.

They’re going backwards in their thinking
Fewer Republicans today than in 2009 believe in evolution, according to a Pew poll last year. The poll showed that less than half – 43 percent – of those who identify with the Republican Party say they believe humans have evolved over time, plunging from 54 percent four years ago. Forty-eight percent say they believe “humans and other living things have existed in their present form since the beginning of time,” up from 39 percent in 2009. According to a recent National Science Foundation study, only 28 percent of conservative Republicans believe that humans evolved from earlier species. The fact these statistics are going backwards, in the twenty-first century, is amazing.

And all of this without the Republicans having control of the Senate. FROM: http://sheppardpost.com/



If you can't argue and debate the 10 points, then don't prove the article correct. :wink:

Mac-7
10-08-2014, 08:06 AM
I see that obumer's most loyal apologist is at it again.

Cigar
10-08-2014, 08:09 AM
I see that obumer's most loyal apologist is at it again.


Would you like to debate the Thread or just be the first idiot crybaby to complain about it?

Captain Obvious
10-08-2014, 08:10 AM
More trollbait, yay...

Refugee
10-08-2014, 08:21 AM
Not being an American I just find the op a set of meaningless subjective figures which mean absolutely nothing. Surely, the Republicans cant be blamed for the biggest deficit in history, financially collapsing cities, uncontrolled mass immigration, no-go ghetto areas, near a hundred million unemployed . . . ? It can't be everybody else's fault, can it?

Captain Obvious
10-08-2014, 08:26 AM
Not being an American I just find the op a set of meaningless subjective figures which mean absolutely nothing. Surely, the Republicans cant be blamed for the biggest deficit in history, financially collapsing cities, uncontrolled mass immigration, no-go ghetto areas, near a hundred million unemployed . . . ? It can't be everybody else's fault, can it?

Yinz probably get the same thing over there, maybe not but here a large part of our voting base looks at politics like a football game. Women and football actually (yeah, I'm gender slighting) - these people cheer for the team that they feel have the best looking uniforms but they understand basically nothing about the game.

That's the average Joe politics here, our mainstream media institutionalizes people by constantly barraging them with "republicans suck" or "democrats suck" and these people who aren't that sharp to begin with buy into it.

And once they're scripts are programmed they do and act according to script, incapable of thinking objectively or considering alternatives. As long as they have their SUV's, IPods and Disney vacations, they're blissfully ignorant.

Refugee
10-08-2014, 08:39 AM
There was a time when politics actually meant something in the UK, people were passionate, rightly or wrongly. That has now changed to resemble your American razzamataz politics. The millionaires queue up for your votes, each promise a slight tax cut, shake your hand, kiss a child for the camera, but we still don’t do the crying bit and wailing saviour return stuff. Yet just like America, nothing changes.

For the op to say don’t vote Republican and imply it could only get worse . . . Worse than it already is? You’d really have to sit down and concentrate on making things worse than they are already.

Cigar
10-08-2014, 08:39 AM
Not being an American I just find the op a set of meaningless subjective figures which mean absolutely nothing. Surely, the Republicans cant be blamed for the biggest deficit in history, financially collapsing cities, uncontrolled mass immigration, no-go ghetto areas, near a hundred million unemployed . . . ? It can't be everybody else's fault, can it?


In a America We The People are suppose to have Freedom of Expression.

On this Forum you are Free to Express your reasons not to Vote Democrat

Refugee
10-08-2014, 09:07 AM
In a America We The People are suppose to have Freedom of Expression.

On this Forum you are Free to Express your reasons not to Vote Democrat

Thanks, I just have done.

Matty
10-08-2014, 09:12 AM
Democrats are stupid, and offensive in their stupidity! Stupidly.

Captain Obvious
10-08-2014, 09:22 AM
Democrats are stupid, and offensive in their stupidity! Stupidly.

http://www.guitarmasterclass.net/guitar_forum/uploads/monthly_06_2014/post-8794-1403702267.gif

nathanbforrest45
10-08-2014, 09:32 AM
Democrats are stupid, and offensive in their stupidity! Stupidly.

I don't think Democrats are stupid per se. I think they are non thinkers who vote with their emotions and never look at the consequences of those votes. And when they fail, they blame it on the "rich" or the "greedy" and never ever look at what their policies actually produce.

Actually, I cannot put the blame entirely on Democrats. As Refugee has pointed out both parties are equally guilty of making promises and then doing something entirely different. Its really not the party at fault by the voters who want the government to give them free stuff. We must change our own thinking (stinking thinking it could be called) and then and only then will we truly see a change.

Too many people want something for nothing.

Matty
10-08-2014, 09:34 AM
http://www.guitarmasterclass.net/guitar_forum/uploads/monthly_06_2014/post-8794-1403702267.gif
Your little meter mis spelled TRUTH! Stupidly!

Matty
10-08-2014, 09:35 AM
I don't think Democrats are stupid per se. I think they are non thinkers who vote with their emotions and never look at the consequences of those votes. And when they fail, they blame it on the "rich" or the "greedy" and never ever look at what their policies actually produce.

Actually, I cannot put the blame entirely on Democrats. As Refugee has pointed out both parties are equally guilty of making promises and then doing something entirely different. Its really not the party at fault by the voters who want the government to give them free stuff. We must change our own thinking (stinking thinking it could be called) and then and only then will we truly see a change.

Too many people want something for nothing.


Your first paragraph! Does that not add up to stupid?

Captain Obvious
10-08-2014, 09:39 AM
Your little meter mis spelled TRUTH! Stupidly!

http://images5.fanpop.com/image/photos/31700000/P-W-H-pee-wee-herman-31763368-500-281.gif

Matty
10-08-2014, 09:45 AM
9052

Polecat
10-08-2014, 10:04 AM
I have never and will never vote for any democrat. They are too poisonous to liberty. Even when they try to do something good it turns out being a turd pie.

GrassrootsConservative
10-08-2014, 10:06 AM
People vote Republican when they stop being low-information thugs.

Mac-7
10-08-2014, 11:08 AM
People vote Republican when they stop being low-information thugs.

Or their extended unemployment benefits run out and they have to go back to work.

Professor Peabody
10-08-2014, 04:30 PM
In a America We The People are suppose to have Freedom of Expression.

On this Forum you are Free to Express your reasons not to Vote Democrat

Here's 32 reasons NOT to vote DemocRAT...........

SEN. HARRY REID (D-Nev.): “In fact, one of our core principles is that if you like the health care you have, you can keep it.” (Sen. Reid, Congressional Record, S.8642, 8/3/09)

SEN. RICHARD DURBIN: “We believe — and we stand by this — if you like your current health insurance plan, you will be able to keep it, plain and simple, straightforward.” (Sen. Durbin, Congressional Record, S.6401, 6/10/09)

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY): “If you like your insurance, you keep it.” (U.S. Senate, Finance Committee, Bill Mark-Up, 9/29/09)

SEN. PATTY MURRAY (D-Wash.): “Again, if you like what you have, you will be able to keep it. Let me say this again: If you like what you have, when our legislation is passed and signed by the President, you will be able to keep it.” (Sen. Murray, Congressional Record, S.6400, 6/10/09)

SEN. MAX BAUCUS (D-Mont.): “That is why one of the central promises of health care reform has been and is: If you like what you have, you can keep it. That is critically important. If a person has a plan, and he or she likes it, he or she can keep it.” (Sen. Baucus, Congressional Record, S.7676, 9/29/10)

SEN. TOM HARKIN (D-Iowa): “One of the things we put in the health care bill when we designed it was the protection for consumers to keep the plan they have if they like it; thus, the term ‘grandfathered plans.’ If you have a plan you like — existing policies — you can keep them. … we said, if you like a plan, you get to keep it, and you can grandfather it in.” (Sen. Harkin, Congressional Record, S.7675-6, 9/29/10)

THEN-REP. TAMMY BALDWIN (D-Wis.): “Under the bill, if you like the insurance you have now, you may keep it and it will improve.” (Rep. Baldwin, Press Release, 3/18/10)

SEN. MARK BEGICH (D-Alaska): “If you got a doctor now, you got a medical professional you want, you get to keep that. If you have an insurance program or a health care policy you want of ideas, make sure you keep it. That you can keep who you want.” (Sen. Begich, Townhall Event, 7/27/09)

SEN. MICHAEL BENNET (D-Colo.): “We should begin with a basic principle: if you have coverage and you like it, you can keep it. If you have your doctor, and you like him or her, you should be able to keep them as well. We will not take that choice away from you.” (Sen. Bennet, Press Release, 6/11/09)

SEN. BARBARA BOXER (D-Calif.): “So we want people to be able to keep the health care they have. And the answer to that is choice of plans. And in the exchange, we're going to have lots of different plans, and people will be able to keep the health care coverage they need and they want.” (Sen. Boxer, Press Release, 2/8/11)

SEN. SHERROD BROWN (D-Ohio): “Our bill says if you have health insurance and you like it, you can keep it…”(Sen. Brown, Congressional Record, S.12612, 12/7/09)

SEN. BEN CARDIN (D-Md.): “For the people of Maryland, this bill will provide a rational way in which they can maintain their existing coverage…” (Sen. Cardin, Congressional Record, S.13798, 12/23/09)

SEN. BOB CASEY (D-Pa.): “I also believe this legislation and the bill we are going to send to President Obama this fall will also have secure choices. If you like what you have, you like the plan you have, you can keep it. It is not going to change.” (Sen. Casey, Congressional Record, S.8070, 7/24/09)

SEN. KAY HAGAN (D-N.C.): ‘People who have insurance they're happy with can keep it’ “We need to support the private insurance industry so that people who have insurance they're happy with can keep it while also providing a backstop option for people without access to affordable coverage.” (“Republicans Vent As Other Compromise Plans Get Aired,” National Journal’s Congress Daily, 6/18/09)

SEN. MARY LANDRIEU (D-La.): “If you like the insurance that you have, you'll be able to keep it.” (MSNBC’s Hardball, 12/16/09)

SEN. PAT LEAHY (D-Vt.): “[I]f you like the insurance you now have, keep the insurance you have.” (CNN’s “Newsroom,” 10/22/09)

SEN. BOB MENENDEZ (D-N.J.): “If you like what you have, you get to keep it” “Menendez is a member of the Senate Finance Committee, which is expected to release a bill later this week. He stressed that consumers who are satisfied with their plans won't have to change. ‘If you like what you have, you get to keep it,’ he said.” (“Health Care Plan Would Help N.J., Menendez Says,” The Record, 6/19/09)

SEN. JEFF MERKLEY (D-Oreg.): “[E]nsuring that those who like their insurance get to keep it” “The HELP Committee bill sets forward a historic plan that will, for the first time in American history, give every American access to affordable health coverage, reduce costs, and increase choice, while ensuring that those who like their insurance get to keep it.” (Sen. Merkley, Press Release, 7/15/09)

SEN. BARBARA MIKULSKI (D-Md.): “It means that if you like the insurance you have now, you can keep it.” (Sen. Mikulski, Press Release, 12/24/09)

SEN. JAY ROCKEFELLER (D-W.Va.): “I want people to know, the President's promise that if you like the coverage you have today you can keep it is a pledge we intend to keep.” (U.S. Senate, Finance Committee, Hearing, 9/23/09)

SEN. JACK REED (D-R.I.): “If you like the insurance you have, you can choose to keep it.” (Sen. Reed, Town Hall Event, 6/25/09)

SEN. BERNIE SANDERS (I-Vt.): “‘If you have coverage you like, you can keep it,’ says Sen. Sanders.” (“Sick And Wrong,” Rolling Stone, 4/5/10)

SEN. JEANNE SHAHEEN (D-N.H.): ‘if you have health coverage that you like, you get to keep it’ “My understanding … is that … if you have health coverage that you like you can keep it. As I said, you may have missed my remarks at the beginning of the call, but one of the things I that I said as a requirement that I have for supporting a bill is that if you have health coverage that you like you should be able to keep that. …under every scenario that I’ve seen, if you have health coverage that you like, you get to keep it.” (Sen. Shaheen, “Health Care Questions From Across New Hampshire,” Accessed 11/13/13)

SEN. DEBBIE STABENOW (D-Mich.): “As someone who has a large number of large employers in my state, one of the things I appreciate about the chairman's mark is — is the grandfathering provisions, the fact that the people in my state, 60 percent of whom have insurance, are going to be able to keep it. And Mr. Chairman, I appreciate that. That's a strong commitment. It's clear in the bill … I appreciate the strong commitment on your part and the president to make sure that if you have your insurance you can keep it. That's the bottom line for me.” (U.S. Senate, Finance Committee, Bill Mark-Up, 9/24/09)

SEN. JON TESTER (D-Mont.): “‘If you like your coverage, you'll be able to keep it,’ Tester said, adding that if Medicare changes, it will only become stronger”. (“Tester In Baker To Discuss Health Care,” The Fallon County Times, 11/20/09)

SEN. TOM UDALL (D-N.Mex.): “Some worried reform would alter their current coverage. It won't. If you like your current plan, you can keep it.” (“What I Learned: About Health Care Reform This Summer, By Your Lawmakers In Congress,” Albuquerque Journal, 9/8/09)

SEN. SHELDON WHITEHOUSE (D-R.I.): “…it honors President Obama’s programs and the promise of all of the Presidential candidates that if you like the plan you have, you get to keep it. You are not forced out of anything.”(Sen. Whitehouse, Congressional Record, S.8668, 8/3/09)

http://washingtonexaminer.com/27-democratic-senators-who-promised-you-could-keep-your-health-coverage/article/2539245

http://www.factcheck.org/2013/11/keeping-your-health-plan/

SEN. MARK PRYOR (D-ARK): After Voting To Pass ObamaCare, Pryor Said It Would “Protect And Expand An Individual’s Choice Of Doctors And Insurance Plans Without Any Government Interference.” “Elements of this package will drive down costs for families, small businesses, and government; protect and expand an individual’s choice of doctors and insurance plans without any government interference; and assure affordable, reliable healthcare for every Arkansan.” (Press Release, “On Senate Passage Of Health Care Reform,” Sen. Mark Pryor, 12/24/09)

http://www.gop.com/news/research/mark-pryors-false-obamacare-concern/

SEN. MARK UDALL (D-CO): "If you have an insurance policy you like, doctor or medical facility that provides medical services to you, you'll be able to keep that doctor or that insurance policy. (FOX21 News interview (http://www.fox21news.com/news/story.aspx?id=345468#.UjuCrD_heac), 09.2009)


Sen Al Franken On Health Care: “I’m Proud Of What We’re Doing, I’m Really Proud.” (Senator Al Franken, “Sen. Franken Delivers Final Speech on Health Care Reform,” Press Release, 12/23/09 (http://mngop.us7.list-manage.com/track/click?u=4962e29c827b10a434ddf13b6&id=7e03e485e9&e=af8d172ab8))

SEN. TIM JOHNSON (D-SD): I supported the Affordable Care Act to ensure universal health coverage and better health outcomes for our citizens. In 2014, additional reforms will ensure even more folks have access to meaningful, affordable health coverage options. (Tim Johnson's Senate website (http://www.johnson.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=Health))



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfl55GgHr5E

Really? Really, Mr.President?