PDA

View Full Version : Law Lets I.R.S. Seize Accounts on Suspicion, No Crime Required



Captain Obvious
10-28-2014, 10:39 AM
Fuck you, we're the IRS, that's good enough.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/26/us/law-lets-irs-seize-accounts-on-suspicion-no-crime-required.html?_r=2


ARNOLDS PARK, Iowa — For almost 40 years, Carole Hinders has dished out Mexican specialties at her modest cash-only restaurant. For just as long, she deposited the earnings at a small bank branch a block away — until last year, when two tax agents knocked on her door and informed her that they had seized her checking account, almost $33,000.

The Internal Revenue Service (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/i/internal_revenue_service/index.html?inline=nyt-org) agents did not accuse Ms. Hinders of money laundering or cheating on her taxes — in fact, she has not been charged with any crime. Instead, the money was seized solely because she had deposited less than $10,000 at a time, which they viewed as an attempt to avoid triggering a required government report.

“How can this happen?” Ms. Hinders said in a recent interview. “Who takes your money before they prove that you’ve done anything wrong with it?”

The federal government does.

Peter1469
10-28-2014, 10:43 AM
I was going to post this one. Unconstitutional, however the courts give the IRS wide latitude. I am very worried about this because I have lots of cash in 4 different banks and I always make transfers under $10K to avoid the reporting requirements. If they try to take my money I am off the grid and on the attack.

The Xl
10-28-2014, 10:46 AM
The government we have is an out of control, corrupt monster.

Mac-7
10-28-2014, 03:04 PM
This is the same IRS that harasses obumer's political opponents.