PDA

View Full Version : Defeat of USA FREEDOM Act is a Victory for Freedom



Chris
11-24-2014, 04:30 PM
Ron agrees with Rand: Defeat of USA FREEDOM Act is a Victory for Freedom (http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/november/23/defeat-of-usa-freedom-act-is-a-victory-for-freedom/):


...After several re-authorizations of the PATRIOT Act, including some cosmetic reforms, Congress last October unveiled the USA FREEDOM Act. This was advertised as the first wholesale PATRIOT Act Reform bill. In fact, the House version was watered down to the point of meaninglessness and the Senate version was not much better. The final straw was the bill’s extension of key elements of the PATRIOT Act until 2017.

Fortunately, last week the USA FREEDOM Act was blocked from further consideration in the US Senate. The procedural vote was significant and important, but it caused some confusion as well. While some well-meaning pro-privacy groups endorsed the FREEDOM Act as a first step to reform, some anti-liberty neoconservatives opposed the legislation because even its anemic reforms were unacceptable. The truth is, Americans should not accept one more extension of the PATRIOT Act and should not endorse its continued dismemberment of our constitutional liberties. If that means some Senators vote with anti-liberty colleagues to kill the extension, we should still consider it a victory.

...With the failure of the FREEDOM Act to move ahead in the Senate last week, several of the most egregious sections of the PATRIOT Act are set to sunset next June absent a new authorization. Congress will no doubt be under great pressure to extend these measures. We must do our very best to make sure they are unsuccessful!

The Xl
11-24-2014, 04:32 PM
The Patriot Act needs to go completely. Watered down reform is not needed or wanted.

Ethereal
11-24-2014, 05:13 PM
Freedom Act...what a joke.

Codename Section
11-24-2014, 05:24 PM
I love how these assholes put "Freedom" and "Patriot" into the names and people just buy on.

Chris
11-24-2014, 05:44 PM
Happens all the time though. Politicians say they're enacting free market treaties when what they mean is centrally designed, planned and managed markets. Not to mention Protectionism not protecting but harming consumers. Affordable Care Act is hardly affordable and has nothing to do with health.

Anything Ingsoc wants to push through MiniTrue.

Or, Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, Chapter 11 "The End of Truth":


The most effective way of making people accept the validity of the values they are to serve is to persuade them that they are really the same as those they have always held, but which were not properly understood or recognized before. And the most efficient technique to this end is to use the old words but change their meaning. Few traits of totalitarian regimes are at the same time so confusing to the superficial observer and yet so characteristic of the whole intellectual climate as this complete perversion of language.

The worst sufferer in this respect is the word ‘liberty’. It is a word used as freely in totalitarian states as elsewhere. Indeed, it could almost be said that wherever liberty as we know it has been destroyed, this has been done in the name of some new freedom promised to the people. Even among us we have planners who promise us a ‘collective freedom’, which is as misleading as anything said by totalitarian politicians. ‘Collective freedom’ is not the freedom of the members of society, but the unlimited freedom of the planner to do with society that which he pleases. This is the confusion of freedom with power carried to the extreme.