PDA

View Full Version : You Live To Serve The State: Radical Agendas



iustitia
01-06-2015, 06:06 PM
A Review of the State: Do You Trust Government?


“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.” - C. S. Lewis
“This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.” - Plato
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." - H. L. Mencken

Continuing from YLTSTS: Eugenics (http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/19537-You-Live-To-Serve-The-State-Eugenics)

Eugenics and other radical agendas

In the April 1933 Birth Control Review Paul Popenoe writes:

"Eugenic sterilization is one of the many indispensable measures in any modern program of social welfare. It is an integral part of a general system of protection, parole, and supervision, for those who by reason on mental disease or deficiency are unable to meet the responsibilities of citizenship.

It promotes eugenics by cutting off some of the lines of descent that are spreading mental disease and mental defect throughout the population. It is conservatively estimated that there are approximately 5,000,000 people in the United States who will at some time be committed to state hospitals as insane and that there are approximately 5,000,000 more who are so deficient intellectually (with less than 70% of average intelligence) as to be, in many cases, liabilities rather than assets to the race. The situation will grow worse instead of better if steps are not taken to control the reproduction of the mentally handicapped. Eugenic sterilization represents one such step that is practicable, humanitarian, and certain in its results."

Food as a weapon

NSSM 200 (National Security Study Memorandum), a 1974 memorandum concluded that the United States was threatened by population growth in the former colonial sector. Listed 13 "key countries" in which the United States had a "special political and strategic interest".

These countries were: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Brazil, and Columbia. It claimed that population growth in those states was especially worrisome, since it would quickly increase their relative political, economic, and military strength.

Some notes from the report-
Nigeria: "Already the most populous country on the continent, with an estimated 55 million people in 1970, Nigeria's population by the end of this century is projected to number 135 million. This suggests a growing political and strategic role for Nigeria, at least in Africa."
Brazil: "Brazil clearly dominated the continent demographically." The study warned of a "growing power status for Brazil in Latin America and on the world scene over the next 25 years."

There were several measures that Kissinger advocated to deal with this alleged threat, most prominently, birth control and related population-reduction programs. He also warned that even if such measures were adopted "populous growth rates are likely to increase appreciably before they begin to decline".

A second measure was a curtailing food supplies to targeted states, in part to force compliance with birth control policies: "There is also some established precedent for taking account of family planning performance in appraisal of assistance requirements by AID (US Agency for International Development) and consultative groups. Since population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand, allocation scarce PL 480 resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control as well as food production. In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion."

"Mandatory programs may be needed and we should be considering these possibilities now," the document continued, adding, "Would food be considering an instrument of nation power? ... Is the US prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can't/won't control their population growth?"

It's all about control

"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure--one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." - David Rockefeller

"...the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations." - Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, p.324 of the 1966 MacMillan edition

"Never let serious crisis go to waste. What I mean by that is it's an opportunity to do things you couldn't do before." - Rahm Emmanuel Nov. 22, 2008 The Washington Journal

The infamous Tuskegee study

The Tuskegee Study was a scientific research program in which 400 syphilis-infected black men were recruited from the poorest areas of Tuskegee, Alabama by the US Public Health Service in 1932. The participants were all told that they would be treated for their infections, but instead of treating their illness all medicines were withheld.

The black men were then actively prevented from obtaining treatment elsewhere as their bodies, and the bodies of their wives and children were ravaged by disease. The men who conceived the Nazi-style study justified their atrocity by alleging that scientists needed to learn how untreated syphilis progressed in the human body. The study continued for 40 years until 1972, eight years after the civil rights movement, when one newspaper finally had the courage to break the story to the public.

By that time, only 125 of the original 400 black men had survived. To this day none of the perpetrators of that experiment have ever been accused or indicted for their crimes. Back in 1932, the study began, Margaret Sanger's ideas had already begun to infect the minds and souls of physicians and scientists in America. According to Margaret Sanger's sense of morality, experiments on "human weeds" were fully justified in the name of "science."

In 1966 Peter Buxtun, a PHS venereal-disease investigator in San Francisco, sent a letter to the national director of the Division of Venereal Diseases to express his concerns about the ethics and morality of the extended Tuskegee Study. The Center for Disease Control (which by then controlled the study) reaffirmed the need to continue the study until completion (until all subjects had died and been autopsied). To bolster its position, the CDC sought and gained support for the continuation of the study from local chapters of the National Medical Association (representing African-American physicians) and the American Medical Association.

The nurse in charge of administering this study was black as were several of the local doctors who knowingly assisted in its implementation.

The Club of Rome

"We are at the end of an era – a turning point in history. We are approaching the threshold of runaway climate change. We underline the urgency of radical action to reduce emissions, by both immediate action and longer-term measures; to stress to political leaders the non-linear nature of the processes at work which will generate sudden change; and to assert that the overriding priority must be to avert the impending risk of catastrophic climate change." - Club of Rome/UNESCO

"This is the way we are setting the scene for mankind's encounter with the planet. The opposition between the two ideologies that have dominated the 20th century has collapsed, forming their own vacuum and leaving nothing but crass materialism.
It is a law of Nature that any vacuum will be filled and therefore eliminated unless this is physically prevented. "Nature," as the saying goes, "abhors a vacuum." And people, as children of Nature, can only feel uncomfortable, even though they may not recognize that they are living in a vacuum. How then is the vacuum to be eliminated?
It would seem that humans need a common motivation, namely a common adversary, to organize and act together in the vacuum; such a motivation must be found to bring the divided nations together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one invented for the purpose.

New enemies therefore have to be identified.
New strategies imagined, new weapons devised.

The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.

The old democracies have functioned reasonably well over the last 200 years, but they appear now to be in a phase of complacent stagnation with little evidence of real leadership and innovation.

Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time."

"The acceleration of critical trends and cross-impacts among them indicates that the ‘window of opportunity’ for pulling out of the present global crisis and breaking through to a more peaceful and sustainable world is likely to be no more than four to five years from the end of 2008. This is close in time to the Mayan 2012 prophecy for the end of the current world. The period around the end of 2012 is likely to be a turbulent one for this and other reasons. Predictions coming from the physical sciences foresee disturbances in the geomagnetic, electromagnetic and related fields that embed the planet causing significant damage to telecommunications and impacting many aspects of human activity and health. For the esoteric traditions the end of 2012 will be the end of the known world, although the more optimistic interpretations speak of a new world taking the place of the old."

iustitia
01-06-2015, 06:11 PM
Sierra Club, Wilderness Society, Earth First!

Dave Foreman served on the Sierra Club's board of directors between 1995 and 1997. He hinted in the April 1990 issue of Smithsonian magazine that the radical group Earth First! may be "secretly controlled" by groups like the Sierra Club:

"We thought it would have been useful to have a group to take a tougher position than the Sierra Club and the Wilderness Society. It could be sort of secretly controlled by the mainstream and trotted out at hearings to make the Sierra Club or Wilderness Society look moderate."

Longtime Sierra Club executive director David Brower once argued that Earth First! helped the Sierra Club accomplish its goals, an example of dialectical incrementalism:

"The Sierra Club made the Nature Conservancy look reasonable. Then I founded Friends of the Earth to make the Sierra Club look reasonable. Then I founded Earth Island Institute to make Friends of the Earth look reasonable. Earth First! now makes us look reasonable. We’re still looking for a group to come along and make Earth First! look reasonable."

John Holdren, Eco-Nazis, and one world environmentalism

From page 808 of (Obama's "Science Czar") John Holdren's Ecoscience:
"Thus there is good reason to hope that organized Western religious groups may become a powerful force in working toward population control worldwide, especially as the human suffering caused by overpopulation becomes more widely recognized."

From Ecoscience pages 942-943, section titled "Toward a Planetary Regime":
"... Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.

The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries' shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits."

From page 917, on the "need" to surrender national sovereignty to an international police force:
"If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization."

From page 944:
"Humanity cannot afford to muddle through the rest of the twentieth century; the risks are too great, and the stakes are too high. This may be the last opportunity to choose our own and our descendants' destiny. Failing to choose or making the wrong choices may lead to catastrophe. But it must never be forgotten that the right choices could lead to a much better world."

"Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs." - John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal, 2005

"Cannibalism is a “radical but realistic solution to the problem of overpopulation.” - Lyall Watson, The Financial Times, 15 July 1995

"Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover the source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it." - Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute

"If radical environmentalists were to invent a disease to bring human populations back to sanity, it would probably be something like AIDS. So as hysteria sweeps over the governments of the world, let me offer an ecological perspective on the disease.

I take it as axiomatic that the only real hope for the continuation of diverse ecosystems on this planet is an enormous decline in human population. Conservation, social justice, appropriate technology, etc., are great to discuss and even laudable, but they simply don't address the problem. Furthermore, the whole economy of industrial affluence must give way to a hunter-gatherer way of life, which is the only economy compatible with a healthy land.

Of course, such a decline is inevitable. Through nuclear war or mass starvation due to desertification or some other environmental cataclysm, human overpopulation will succumb to ecological limits. But in such cases, we would inherit a barren, ravaged world, devoid of otters and redwoods, Blue Whales and butterflies, tigers and orchids.

Barring a cure, the possible benefits of this (AIDS) to the environment are staggering. If, like the Black Death in Europe, AIDS affected one-third of the world's population, it would cause an immediate respite for endangered wildlife on every continent. More significantly, just as the Plague contributed to the demise of feudalism, AIDS has the potential to end industrialism, which is the main force behind the environmental crisis.

None of this is intended to disregard or discount the suffering of AIDSvictims. But one way or another there will be victims of overpopulation -through war, famine, humiliating poverty. As radical environmentalists, we cansee AIDS not as a problem, but a necessary solution (one you probably don't wantto try for yourself). To paraphrase Voltaire: if the AIDS epidemic didn't exist,radical environmentalists would have to invent one." - Christopher Manes, former Earth First! activist; written under the pseudonym "Miss Ann Trophy" in 1987

"If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels." - Prince Phillip, World Wildlife Fund

"What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group's conclusion is 'no'. The rich countries won't do it. They won't change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" - Maurice Strong, Head of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro

"People are the cause of all the problems; we have too many of them; we need to get rid of some of them, and [banning of DDT] is as good a way as any." - Charles Wurster, Environmental Defense Fund

"If we're trading carbon credits now, will we be trading baby credits in the future? Should the right to bear children be more regulated, or is it a fundamental right that we should breed nilly-willy even if it destroys the planet? Is China ahead of the rest of the world on this one? Should we be urgently airlifting condoms to regions of the world that don't have enough access to contraception?" - Susannah F. Locke in a 2009 Popular Mechanics article titled "The Cheapest Way To Curb Carbon Dioxide: Contraception"

"England will not exist by the year 2000." - Paul Ehrlich

In his book The Population Explosion Paul Ehrlich predicted that in the 1970's and 1980's hundreds of millions would die of starvation and nothing could be done about it. Radical action was needed to "save the planet":
"The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970's the world will undergo famines--hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death"

"The United States would see its life expectancy drop to 42 years by 1980 because of pesticide usage, and the nation's population would drop to 22.6 million by 1999." - Paul Ehrlich

"If you don't know an answer, a fact, a statistic, then make it up on the spot." - Paul Watson, in Earthforce: An Earth Warrior's Guide to Strategy

"It’s terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn't even say it. But the general situation in which we are involved is lamentable." - Jacques Cousteau, 1991 UNESCO courier

"...advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool." - The Project for a New American Century, Rebuilding America's Defenses, page 60 ( Dick Cheney was on their Board of Directors btw)


I leave you with this- What is the real purpose of politics?
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed -- and hence clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.“ - H.L. Mencken

Can you really, safely assume that the state's machinations are not diabolical?

You Live To Serve The State #1 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/19537-You-Live-To-Serve-The-State-Eugenics)
You Live To Serve The State #2 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/19815-You-Live-To-Serve-The-State-Education)
You Live To Serve The State #3 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/19990-You-Live-To-Serve-The-State-Gun-Control)
You Live To Serve The State #4 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/20588-You-Live-To-Serve-The-State-Judicial-Supremacy)
You Live To Serve The State #5 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/20638-You-Live-to-Serve-the-State-Social-Justice-1)
You Live To Serve The State #6 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/20773-You-Live-to-Serve-the-State-Social-Justice-2)