To the 'conservatives' here

[iustitia]

Can you stop making conservatism look bad with blatantly false, batshit crazy, link-bait, blanket statements about muslims?

Thanks,
An actual conservative

[Green Arrow]

false!!!!11!1

[PolWatch]

<whiny snark> I wanna use my big, fat Crayons to scream at people too! Y'all are picking on me 'cause I'm an old lady....whiney, whiney, whiney...

[Cigar]

Can you stop making conservatism look bad with blatantly false, bat$#@! crazy, link-bait, blanket statements about muslims?

Thanks,
An actual conservative


I Love it when you put a Mirophone in front of a Conservative ... they always say things that drive people away. :laugh:


:grin: I hope they keep up the great work, it elects Liberal Progressives

[Green Arrow]

I Love it when you put a Mirophone in front of a Conservative ... they always say things that drive people away. :laugh:


:grin: I hope they keep up the great work, it elects Liberal Progressives

Like it did in November?

[PolWatch]

:shocked:

[Captain Obvious]

Like it did in November?

http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r45/Keeva1983/dickpunch.gif (http://s141.photobucket.com/user/Keeva1983/media/dickpunch.gif.html)

[Chris]

Rule 34.

[Green Arrow]

Rule 34.

If it exists on the internet there's porn of it?

[Chris]

If it exists on the internet there's porn of it?

http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/38518-Urban-Dictionary-Definition-of-the-Day

[Redrose]

Can you stop making conservatism look bad with blatantly false, batshit crazy, link-bait, blanket statements about muslims?

Thanks,
An actual conservative


I didn't realize you set the standard for what defines a Conservative.


None of us fit snuggly into a box of conservatism, just as Liberals don't. There are degrees of conservative and liberal thinking, learn to deal with it.

[Animal Mother]

I think what he's saying is when you act like a prick and also claim it's a conservative position you make people believe that your prick position is conservative.

[Brett Nortje]

Yes, there are degrees of conservative thinking, but, it comes out as one law that everyone agrees on.

[TrueBlue]

Like it did in November?
You know that's most times inevitable. The opposition party to the current sitting president always gets the most votes during midterm elections. Can't seem to be helped as it is repeated over and over again in cycle after cycle.

[The Sage of Main Street]

Yes, there are degrees of conservative thinking, but, it comes out as one law that everyone agrees on.
More of a slogan than a law: "My Daddy's rich and if yours isn't, you can eat dirt."

[iustitia]

I didn't realize you set the standard for what defines a Conservative.

None of us fit snuggly into a box of conservatism, just as Liberals don't. There are degrees of conservative and liberal thinking, learn to deal with it.

Oh I'm so sorry I questioned the conservative credentials of a bunch of statist warmongers and drug prohibitionists. Neocons aren't conservatives, and sweeping condemnation of a very conservative religion and culture isn't conservative either. There's bullshit political conservatism like pleasuring yourself to Reagan's nonsense invasion of Grenada, and then there's actual philosophical conservatism drawn from the likes of Burke. I'm on board with the latter and I have no interest in fighting harmless plants or destroying a foreign religious and culture with war and secularism.

The values of the modern 'conservative' are so far removed from what conservatism is supposed to mean that the word has been just as robbed of its meaning as 'liberal' has.

No I don't claim to be a paragon of conservatism. But I do claim that it's embarrassing to share a descriptor with people so irrational that they actually believe the principles of Christ are compatible with murder and genocide. And that said people are completely casual in their expression of this belief no less.

[Peter1469]

Protectionist is no conservative. He is a liberal posting in his twisted view of how a conservative would. Like Libhater.

[Mac-7]

Protectionist is no conservative. He is a liberal posting in his twisted view of how a conservative would. Like Libhater.

Protectionist is more conservative than any of the libertarian fence sitters posting on this board.

[Common Sense]

Lulz...there's two of em!

[iustitia]

Protectionist is more conservative than any of the libertarian fence sitters posting on this board.

Libertarians aren't conservatives and seldom claim to be. Because they're libertarians and that's a different thing. Neocons, on the other hand, are the bastard offspring of Trotskyists that claim to be conservatives while seeking the destruction of a foreign religion and culture.

[Mac-7]

Libertarians aren't conservatives and seldom claim to be. Because they're libertarians and that's a different thing. Neocons, on the other hand, are the $#@! offspring of Trotskyists that claim to be conservatives while seeking the destruction of a foreign religion and culture.

Ok.

Since fence sitting libs hate being called libs how about unRepublicans?

That way every act in the libertarian freak show gets equal billing

[Private Pickle]

Can you stop making conservatism look bad with blatantly false, batshit crazy, link-bait, blanket statements about muslims?

Thanks,
An actual conservative

While I get the bat-shit crazy stuff it is a threat that needs continual attention.

[Bob]

Libertarians aren't conservatives and seldom claim to be. Because they're libertarians and that's a different thing. Neocons, on the other hand, are the bastard offspring of Trotskyists that claim to be conservatives while seeking the destruction of a foreign religion and culture.

Neocons? More bashing. That is not their mission.

[iustitia]

Neocons? More bashing. That is not their mission.

Neocons are an actual thing, Bob.

[iustitia]

Ok.

Since fence sitting libs hate being called libs how about unRepublicans?

That way every act in the libertarian freak show gets equal billingIs there a reason you're bitching about libertarians in a topic about conservatives?

[Chris]

Is there a reason you're bitching about libertarians in a topic about conservatives?


No, no, fence-sitting Mac was asking to be called unRepublican.

[Safety]

Is there a reason you're bitching about libertarians in a topic about conservatives?

That's all he's programmed to say.

[Mac-7]

Is there a reason you're $#@!ing about libertarians in a topic about conservatives?

I said we can just call you an unRepublican if being called a lib bothers you.

The title of this thread is "To the conservatives here" and I think it is flame bait and should be removed.

But as long as you are allowed to bash conservatives I'm going to give you my opinion of libs like you too.

[iustitia]

I said we can just call you an unRepublican if being called a lib bothers you.

The title of this thread is "To the conservatives here" and I think it is flame bait and should be removed.

But as long as you are allowed to bash conservatives I'm going to give you my opinion of libs like you too.

Hey Trotskyite, did you miss the part where I said I was a conservative? I'm not a libertarian. Try thinking of another straw man or red herring.

[Mac-7]

Hey Trotskyite, did you miss the part where I said I was a conservative? .

Maybe you are.

But you also have bug up your ass against other conservatives.

and how that translates into the voting booth might be interesting to see.

[Alyosha]

Libertarians aren't conservatives and seldom claim to be. Because they're libertarians and that's a different thing. Neocons, on the other hand, are the bastard offspring of Trotskyists that claim to be conservatives while seeking the destruction of a foreign religion and culture.

Yes, this is true. That's why its funny when Republicans bitch about us not voting for their chosen asswipe.

We can't get with Republicans for their war mongering ways and propensity to want to throw people in jail for what they do in the privacy of their own home and we can't be with the Democraps who believe that the government is our new God and thus deserves our money, loyalty and labor.

[Mac-7]

Yes, this is true. That's why its funny when Republicans $#@! about us not voting for their chosen asswipe.

We can't get with Republicans for their war mongering ways and propensity to want to throw people in jail for what they do in the privacy of their own home and we can't be with the Democraps who believe that the government is our new God and thus deserves our money, loyalty and labor.

There are two main parties in America and since 1860 one or the other has won congress and the White House.

If libertarians cannot or refuse to make up their mind which party to support then there is no harm done.

Libertarians will just remain the 1% kooks who have no impact on elections.

Its as if they do not even exist.

[iustitia]

Maybe you are.

But you also have bug up your ass against other conservatives.
No, Trotskyite, I don't have a problem with conservatives. I have a problem with bigoted, genocidal war mongers trying to use secular force to wipe out sovereign nations and their religions, cultures and traditions while wrapping themselves in the American flag and praising Jesus.

[iustitia]

There are two main parties in America and since 1860 one or the other has won congress and the White House.

Lot of good that's done for anyone but the elites.


If libertarians cannot or refuse to make up their mind which party to support then there is no harm done. Libertarians will the 1% kooks who have no impact on elections. It's as if they do not even exist.

Libertarians don't have a problem "mak[ing]up their mind" about which party to vote for. They're not retarded unlike neocons and progressives. They know outright that neither party deserves their support. Refusing to vote for a shitbag out of principle isn't the inability to decide which party is more awesome.

[Mister D]

Libertarians aren't conservatives and seldom claim to be. Because they're libertarians and that's a different thing. Neocons, on the other hand, are the $#@! offspring of Trotskyists that claim to be conservatives while seeking the destruction of a foreign religion and culture.

That's only because they sit dazed among the ashes of their own culture.

[Bob]

Yes, this is true. That's why its funny when Republicans bitch about us not voting for their chosen asswipe.

We can't get with Republicans for their war mongering ways and propensity to want to throw people in jail for what they do in the privacy of their own home and we can't be with the Democraps who believe that the government is our new God and thus deserves our money, loyalty and labor.

We will move forward without you two then. I realize you don't recall who Ross Perot was, and I can think of a good number of others, talking as you talk, but are yet to have a single win under their belt.

We that vote for republicans don't vote for them to call them perfect, we know they are not perfect. We see what happens when they vote for third parties. They get nothing and we end up with more Obama's or Clintons or Carters.

No thanks.

Here is a third party.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPIVI0CbCmg

[Mac-7]

No, Trotskyite, I don't have a problem with conservatives. I have a problem with bigoted, genocidal war mongers trying to use secular force to wipe out sovereign nations and their religions, cultures and traditions while wrapping themselves in the American flag and praising Jesus.

We have not wiped out any sovereign nations or religions.

Although if its islam or the Cult of Man-Made Global Warming that's not a bad idea.

Its a free country and you can call yourself a conservative if you are truth challenged.

But a lot of people who do not agree with you on a variety of issues are also conservatives.

[iustitia]

We have not wiped out any sovereign nations or religions.

What part of "trying" escapes you?


Although if its islam or the Cult of Man-Made Global Warming that's not a bad idea.

Scapegoat boogeymen. Yes there are islamic radicals and yes there are environmentalist radicals. There are also nationalist radicals and their track record in this country sucks shit.


Its a free country

No it's not.


and you can call yourself a conservative if you are truth challenged.

Conservative (adjective):
disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.
cautiously moderate or purposefully low
traditional in style or manner; avoiding novelty or showiness

Conservative (noun):
a person who is conservative in principles, actions, habits, etc.

Pretty sure I fit the bill more than statist, genocidal, warmongering, preemptive strike neocons.


But a lot of people who do not agree with you on a variety of issues are also conservatives.

No sorry, I'm not going to let 'conservative' be hijacked like 'liberal' was. You're not conservative, you're a neocon. You thrive through war, through destruction of that which is foreign, through fear of the alien. Conservatism is not a philosophy for those who seek to wring their bread from the sweat of other men's faces. It's for the preservation of tradition, of institutions dear to the soul, the heart of civilization. Conservatism is a shield that protects society from passionate upheaval, and neocon nationalism is a double-edged sword that bleeds societies foreign and domestic.

[Mac-7]

What part of "trying" escapes you?


If America had tried we would have succeeded.

The truth is that military rules of engagement made our war effort anything but genocide.

Is that an example of how your species of "conservatives" think?

You sit around and tell bullshit to each other and call it news?

[iustitia]

If America had tried we would have succeeded.

The truth is that military rules of engagement made our war effort anything but genocide.

Is that an example of how your species of "conservatives" think?

You sit around and tell bullshit to each other and call it news?

Your retarded capacity to follow a series of remarks is astonishing. I didn't say the US military was trying to commit genocide, I said bigoted war mongers like you, protectionist and apparently nathan as well. Go back and read the comments in succession. The whole origin of this topic was so-called conservatives acting batshit crazy about Muslims. This was never about the troops being fucked up, but about your kind wanting to do fucked up shit.

Maybe if you pushed aside the big red, white and blue dick from your face you'd have better sight of the comments you're replying to.

[Mac-7]

Your retarded capacity to follow a series of remarks is astonishing. I didn't say the US military was trying to commit genocide, I said bigoted war mongers like you, protectionist and apparently nathan as well. Go back and read the comments in succession. The whole origin of this topic was so-called conservatives acting bat$#@! crazy about Muslims. This was never about the troops being $#@!ed up, but about your kind wanting to do $#@!ed up $#@!.

Maybe if you pushed aside the big red, white and blue dick from your face you'd have better sight of the comments you're replying to.

I supported the war effort in Iraq.

Thats not news.

And since there was no attempted genocide then branding me and others as advocating genocide is just a lib lie.

But I don't want you to go away with nothing so here's a bone for you.

I do advocate a ban on Muslim immigration till the war on terror is over.

[Peter1469]

Your retarded capacity to follow a series of remarks is astonishing. I didn't say the US military was trying to commit genocide, I said bigoted war mongers like you, protectionist and apparently nathan as well. Go back and read the comments in succession. The whole origin of this topic was so-called conservatives acting batshit crazy about Muslims. This was never about the troops being fucked up, but about your kind wanting to do fucked up shit.

Maybe if you pushed aside the big red, white and blue dick from your face you'd have better sight of the comments you're replying to.

Warning: Please don’t call members names.

[Professor Peabody]

:grin: I hope they keep up the great work, it elects Liberal Progressives

Like in 2010 and 2014?

[Safety]

Like in 2010 and 2014?

He's probably talking about the big ones of 2008 and 2012, and probably 2016.

[The Sage of Main Street]

Oh I'm so sorry I questioned the conservative credentials of a bunch of statist warmongers and drug prohibitionists. Neocons aren't conservatives, and sweeping condemnation of a very conservative religion and culture isn't conservative either. There's bull$#@! political conservatism like pleasuring yourself to Reagan's nonsense invasion of Grenada, and then there's actual philosophical conservatism drawn from the likes of Burke. I'm on board with the latter and I have no interest in fighting harmless plants or destroying a foreign religious and culture with war and secularism.

The values of the modern 'conservative' are so far removed from what conservatism is supposed to mean that the word has been just as robbed of its meaning as 'liberal' has.

No I don't claim to be a paragon of conservatism. But I do claim that it's embarrassing to share a descriptor with people so irrational that they actually believe the principles of Christ are compatible with murder and genocide. And that said people are completely casual in their expression of this belief no less. In other words, more honest words, you don't have the guts to fight for your country, so you have to save face by defining that as murder.

[Peter1469]

In other words, more honest words, you don't have the guts to fight for your country, so you have to save face by defining that as murder.
I believe he is talking about the politicians and the old men who send our military into war, not the people who actually do the fighting.

[The Sage of Main Street]

I supported the war effort in Iraq.

That's not news.

And since there was no attempted genocide then branding me and others as advocating genocide is just a lib lie.

But I don't want you to go away with nothing so here's a bone for you. Some genos need to be cided. Besides, the predatory beasts who converted to Islam are not a geno; they are an unfit species living on borrowed time.

[The Sage of Main Street]

I believe he is talking about the politicians and the old men who send our military into war, not the people who actually do the fighting. Well, I don't believe that honorable dodge. Doubling down, he is also too cheap to pay taxes to defend the country.

Which brings me to Grenada. Way back in the 1820s, President Monroe saw our Manifest Destiny to include the entire Caribbean. But the plutocrats were too cheap to fund the Navy necessary to do that. So all he was allowed to do was write a cheap piece of paper called the Monroe Doctrine.

[Peter1469]

Well, I don't believe that honorable dodge. Doubling down, he is also too cheap to pay taxes to defend the country.

Which brings me to Grenada. Way back in the 1820s, President Monroe saw our Manifest Destiny to include the entire Caribbean. But the plutocrats were too cheap to fund the Navy necessary to do that. So all he was allowed to do was write a cheap piece of paper called the Monroe Doctrine.

:shocked:

[TrixWitch]

Well, I don't believe that honorable dodge. Doubling down, he is also too cheap to pay taxes to defend the country.

Which brings me to Grenada. Way back in the 1820s, President Monroe saw our Manifest Destiny to include the entire Caribbean. But the plutocrats were too cheap to fund the Navy necessary to do that. So all he was allowed to do was write a cheap piece of paper called the Monroe Doctrine.

The Monroe Doctrine was simply a highlighted part of his 5th State of the Union Address before Congress, not a proposal at all. The "state" of the Union is a telling of what is, not what will or could be.

[protectionist]

There are two main parties in America and since 1860 one or the other has won congress and the White House.

If libertarians cannot or refuse to make up their mind which party to support then there is no harm done.

Libertarians will just remain the 1% kooks who have no impact on elections.

Its as if they do not even exist.

Yes, Libertarians are a political irrelevancy. The have essentially removed themselves from the political process, as nothing more than Reaganist (ie. anti-big govt) Republicans, who want to do drugs.

[protectionist]

No, Trotskyite, I don't have a problem with conservatives. I have a problem with bigoted, genocidal war mongers trying to use secular force to wipe out sovereign nations and their religions, cultures and traditions while wrapping themselves in the American flag and praising Jesus.

Wow. Until you got to the American flag, I thought you were talking about Muslims. :icon_biggrin:

[protectionist]

What part of "trying" escapes you?

Scapegoat boogeymen. Yes there are islamic radicals and yes there are environmentalist radicals. There are also nationalist radicals and their track record in this country sucks $#@!.

No it's n
Conservative (adjective):
disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.
cautiously moderate or purposefully low
traditional in style or manner; avoiding novelty or showiness
Conservative (noun):
a person who is conservative in principles, actions, habits, etc.
Pretty sure I fit the bill more than statist, genocidal, warmongering, preemptive strike neocons.

No sorry, I'm not going to let 'conservative' be hijacked like 'liberal' was. You're not conservative, you're a neocon. You thrive through war, through destruction of that which is foreign, through fear of the alien. Conservatism is not a philosophy for those who seek to wring their bread from the sweat of other men's faces. It's for the preservation of tradition, of institutions dear to the soul, the heart of civilization. Conservatism is a shield that protects society from passionate upheaval, and neocon nationalism is a double-edged sword that bleeds societies foreign and domestic.

What is this "war" that you are so hot and bothered about ? Do you have a basic idea of way US troops are deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan ? What on earth is going on in your mind ?

[protectionist]

Your retarded capacity to follow a series of remarks is astonishing. I didn't say the US military was trying to commit genocide, I said bigoted war mongers like you, protectionist and apparently nathan as well. Go back and read the comments in succession. The whole origin of this topic was so-called conservatives acting bat$#@! crazy about Muslims. This was never about the troops being $#@!ed up, but about your kind wanting to do $#@!ed up $#@!.

Maybe if you pushed aside the big red, white and blue dick from your face you'd have better sight of the comments you're replying to.

I've never hear the slightest justification from you, regarding your accusation of me and the others you accuse of being "war mongers". Is this another example of your ability to post a lot of words, while saying nothing. Similar to your lack of knowledge about Islamization.

And what is this acting batshit crazy about Muslims ? Doing what ?

[protectionist]

I believe he is talking about the politicians and the old men who send our military into war, not the people who actually do the fighting.

The trouble is, he (iustitia) doesn't specify WHICH politicians, WHICH war, and what he opposes about it. He just makes these wide, blanket statements that really say nothing about anyone or anything, that we can relate to. He talks and talks, and after he's all finished, one hardly knows (or cares) what he said.

His posts are a great cure for insomnia.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR8DI1ILD1idB4_jBOi_Afku-8Sc2wA4rVvkpmcEc-AeJOqLW5N https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSYJARwc4jVpef2gKzqxfRyMazEUbB2T ycrDvHixCHic-w0UZIE https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRZfafxZCO3eL8fQvSqBvtxKZKV8KZg0 Q9uwfYl4uon3Hl5NCLs

[protectionist]

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQk1AZq_1AwKE7Bd4hssxMkO0D87MTU0-CESgRh3DJjpq0bhkLe

[protectionist]

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS41owfVyoJ_HjYYHRARkslP7eporJw9 IkYB4Ovda4gqfiSztliUQ https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQoWX0pTzFyriRLpkRy8GBMW-3qrAVcBStfgElD4Hp4K4O9pKpf https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSbTNjM6zD9J9Oj1TXzI21O79oRAGQ9k hNqWtbEKiiWmEsyX6fZ

[sachem]

There are conservatives here?

[protectionist]

Can you stop making conservatism look bad with blatantly false, bat$#@! crazy, link-bait, blanket statements about muslims?

Thanks,
An actual conservative

LIKE THESE ??

"I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, strike off the very tips of their fingers." (Koran 8:12, "The Spoils," Dawood, p. 177 (http://books.google.com/books?id=J2kdS2Aa328C&pg=PA177&dq=dawood+koran+arabic+I+shall+cast+terror+into+th e+hearts+of+the+infidels.+Strike+off+their+heads,+ strike+off+the+very+tips+of+their+fingers.&hl=en&ei=O-cvTOD4LIqCsQPmsKzgBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false)

"When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them." (Koran 9:5; "Repentance," Dawood, p. 186 (http://books.google.com/books?id=J2kdS2Aa328C&pg=PP1&dq=koran+dawood&sig=F0nPOQC9GSKjbci_FVoXZI0_vDI#PPA186,M1))

"Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal firmly with them. Know that God is with the righteous." (Koran 9:123, "Repentance," Dawood, p. 206 (http://books.google.com/books?id=J2kdS2Aa328C&printsec=frontcover&dq=dawood+koran+arabic&hl=en&ei=3P6LTIeOLIL_8AbervDHCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Believers%2C make war on the infidels&f=false)

And THIS ?

"The process of settlement [of Islam in the United States] is a "Civilization-Jihadist" process with all that the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood in North America] must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" their miserable house by their hands, and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated, and Allah's religion is made victorious over all religions."

Mohamed Akram, "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America" May 22, 1991, Government Exhibit 003-0085, United States vs. Holy Land Foundation, et al. 7 (21).

[protectionist]

Can you stop making conservatism look bad with blatantly false, bat$#@! crazy, link-bait, blanket statements about muslims?

Thanks,
An actual conservative

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRjTbNEvois9rDecavPpVzz1XkscqmBB vZOvo9CaDWknL4PYNTU https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSyIs2rMbWOOVHXR5QLvRmgUtPqHm887 pf2dHkz7brrrYkX_B6WtQ https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTONHbHI1Knl3mcKdGu9UrFZoJNbCvwE GpQCxZG5BTXc0cKuDbu https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSvHNFPdqgYdNwKN5vIILKA7v2UySiaJ p45Ml_kbCgoIJ8uPZXrSQ

[Captain Obvious]

There are conservatives here?

Conservatism is the new pink.

[The Sage of Main Street]

Wow. Until you got to the American flag, I thought you were talking about Muslims. :icon_biggrin:
The races that adopted this thug religion were incapable of ever developing modern weapons. But they feel no shame in using them because they look at them as a gift from Allah to be used for His glory. Outside of that fantasy, these Neanderthal hybrids have a jealous hatred of all science, just like the Eco-Eunuchs do.

[The Sage of Main Street]

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS41owfVyoJ_HjYYHRARkslP7eporJw9 IkYB4Ovda4gqfiSztliUQ https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQoWX0pTzFyriRLpkRy8GBMW-3qrAVcBStfgElD4Hp4K4O9pKpf https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSbTNjM6zD9J9Oj1TXzI21O79oRAGQ9k hNqWtbEKiiWmEsyX6fZ As far as political strategy goes, ISIS and Boko Haram are making the right moves. Beheading and murdering whole villages appeal to the Inner Beast of potential jihadis. Enough Moslems are built that way that the terrorists don't need anyone who isn't susceptible to blood lust.

[Mister D]

There are conservatives here?

You jest but there are few.

[Mini Me]

<whiny snark> I wanna use my big, fat Crayons to scream at people too! Y'all are picking on me 'cause I'm an old lady....whiney, whiney, whiney...

Yeah, they pick on Granny, until they find out she can turn from the hunted into the hunter, in an Alabama minute!
Never forget she is a moderator, and she can moderate your ass right into a 30 day hole!

YeeeeeeHaaaaaawwww!

[Mini Me]

Yes, this is true. That's why its funny when Republicans bitch about us not voting for their chosen asswipe.

We can't get with Republicans for their war mongering ways and propensity to want to throw people in jail for what they do in the privacy of their own home and we can't be with the Democraps who believe that the government is our new God and thus deserves our money, loyalty and labor.

Its being on the horns of a dilemma.

No choice is not a choice at all.

[Chris]

Its being on the horns of a dilemma.

No choice is not a choice at all.


Our choice is to take the political bull by the horns and wrestle with it.

[texan]

Can you stop making conservatism look bad with blatantly false, bat$#@! crazy, link-bait, blanket statements about muslims?

Thanks,
An actual conservative


I don't usually participate in this batshit thing on Nuslims you vent about, but can you post an example?

[evince]

Can you stop making conservatism look bad with blatantly false, bat$#@! crazy, link-bait, blanket statements about muslims?

Thanks,
An actual conservative

they don't care about that.


they want fascism

[Peter1469]

they don't care about that.


they want fascism


Warning: stop derailing threads. Address the topics.

[protectionist]

Anybody want to try to answer the 2 questions asked in Post # 59 ?

[Chris]

Anybody want to try to answer the 2 questions asked in Post # 59 ?

Sure, if you read them in context, you see they concern apostates.

[Professor Peabody]

He's probably talking about the big ones of 2008 and 2012, and probably 2016.

The Democrats lost 69 seats in Congress and control of the House in 2010. In 2012 they gained all of 10 seats back. In 2014 they lost 22 seats in Congress and control of the Senate.

[WalterSobchak]

The Democrats lost 69 seats in Congress and control of the House in 2010. In 2012 they gained all of 10 seats back. In 2014 they lost 22 seats in Congress and control of the Senate.

Democrats have 10 seats up in the Senate to 24 up for the GOP in 2016. 7 out of those 24 seats the GOP have up for re-election are in States that Obama won not once, but twice.

If I was a gambling man, I would kinda like those odds that the Dems have going into 2016.

[protectionist]

Sure, if you read them in context, you see they concern apostates.

They have NOTHING whatsoever to do with apostates. The first group are suras calling for murder to non-Muslims (ANY non-Muslims), and the second one is the Muslim Brotherhood's infamous Explanatory Memorandum, which is a goal vow to destroy North America and all Western civilization, and replace it with an Islamic state.

Just curious though - from where did you come up with a notion about "apostates" ?????

[Professor Peabody]

Democrats have 10 seats up in the Senate to 24 up for the GOP in 2016. 7 out of those 24 seats the GOP have up for re-election are in States that Obama won not once, but twice.

If I was a gambling man, I would kinda like those odds that the Dems have going into 2016.

Don't bet the ranch wally, you could end up in the street.


Historic re-election pattern doesn’t favor Democrats in 2016

http://l.yimg.com/os/152/2012/01/10/ncc-logo3line-color_235559.jpg (http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/) By NCC Staff January 25, 2013 11:00 AM

That’s only happened twice since 1828 for the Democrats, when the modern two-party era started in earnest. In 1836, the Democratic Vice President Martin Van Buren succeeded Andrew Jackson by defeating four Whig candidates, while President Franklin D. Roosevelt succeeded himself in 1940 by running for an unprecedented third term.


The Democrats have failed in four of their last five attempts to win three consecutive terms in office after taking two elections with the same candidate (or his legal successor), with just President Roosevelt winning in 1940 under very unusual circumstances.

http://news.yahoo.com/historic-election-pattern-doesn-t-120408822.html