For those of you who thought Hillary was inevitable:

[Reason10]

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/02/11/shock_poll_fauxcahontas_leads_mrs_inevitable_in_io wa_new_hampshire

This is just too funny for words:
http://www.rushimg.com/cimages//media/images/fearhillarywarren/1348781-1-eng-GB/FearHillaryWarren.jpg

Lo and behold, we have a new poll just out today, YouGov poll of likely Democrat voters. It was done for MoveOn.org and Democracy for America, and it contains shocking results. Elizabeth Warren leads Hillary Clinton in Iowa and New Hampshire. "The YouGov poll of likely Democratic voters for MoveOn.org and Democracy for America also found that 79 percent want Warren and majorities support her anti-Wall Street positions. "Warren has said she doesn't plan to challenge Clinton, though several others have indicated that they are looking at a bid, including Vice President Joe Biden. ... The poll of 400 conducted Jan. 30 to Feb. 5 put Warren ahead of Clinton in Iowa, 31 percent to 24 percent. In New Hampshire, her lead is 30 percent to 27 percent. The groups cautioned that the poll mostly shows that voters are extremely open to her candidacy rather than her being a Clinton killer."


I thought the Fauxcahontas touch was sublime.

And what's so funny, IT'S A FAR LEFT WING DEMOCRAT POLL.

http://front.moveon.org/elizabeth_warren_polling/#.VNuuVSyM7b5
MUST SEE: Poll Shows Big Opening for Elizabeth Warren in IA, NH

[Cigar]

:grin: Nurvious are you? :laugh:

[Blackrook]

If Democrats nominate Elizabeth Warren, they will lose all 50 states.

[Cigar]

If Democrats nominate Elizabeth Warren, they will lose all 50 states.


How about Vice President Elizabeth Warren :laugh:

[PolWatch]

if the repubs are going with Bush nostalgia, maybe the dems should think about finding a Gore to run....political instant replay. We would all love to become reacquainted with 'chad'....

[Cigar]

if the repubs are going with Bush nostalgia, maybe the dems should think about finding a Gore to run....political instant replay. We would all love to become reacquainted with 'chad'....

Payback is due :grin:

[texan]

:grin: Nurvious are you? :laugh:

NO.

[nic34]

She's not running folks. So can the 3rd grader indian jokes.

[Common Sense]

Talking points doled out and delivered like a good bot.

Good bot.

[Redrose]

How about Vice President Elizabeth Warren :laugh:


Indian Princess Little Bare Face Liar, is the whaco left's version of Sarah Palin. La La La Loser.

[Common Sense]

Out of all of them, she would actually make the best president.

But I don't think it's going to happen.

[nic34]

Out of all of them, she would actually make the best president.

But I don't think it's going to happen.


I think we'd be much less involved in war activities with her.....


Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Thursday voted against legislation authorizing President Obama to arm and train Syrian rebels, taking a stand that could distinguish her from Hillary Clinton in 2016.

She voted against legislation to fund the government until Dec. 11, which included a provision giving Obama Title 10 authority to equip Syrian militants in hopes they will fight violent Sunni extremists.

Warren has a thin foreign policy résumé but by voting against the authority Obama requested, she will earn points with members of the Democratic base who are skeptical about another military campaign in the Middle East.


http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/218268-warren-votes-no-on-syrian-motion

[Howey]

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/02/11/shock_poll_fauxcahontas_leads_mrs_inevitable_in_io wa_new_hampshire

This is just too funny for words:
http://www.rushimg.com/cimages//media/images/fearhillarywarren/1348781-1-eng-GB/FearHillaryWarren.jpg


I thought the Fauxcahontas touch was sublime.

And what's so funny, IT'S A FAR LEFT WING DEMOCRAT POLL.

http://front.moveon.org/elizabeth_warren_polling/#.VNuuVSyM7b5
MUST SEE: Poll Shows Big Opening for Elizabeth Warren in IA, NH

Move On, as it's name implies, is a very progressive website and has been pushing Warren for a while. The poll went out to those on Move On's e-mail mailing list. I know, because I got it.

I like Warren, but my vote right now is going to Hillary. No republican is capable of beating her.

Especially Rush.

http://i.imgur.com/UY29g8P.gif

[Reason10]

Move On, as it's name implies, is a very progressive website and has been pushing Warren for a while. The poll went out to those on Move On's e-mail mailing list. I know, because I got it.

I like Warren, but my vote right now is going to Hillary. No republican is capable of beating her.

Especially Rush.

http://i.imgur.com/UY29g8P.gif
Dream on.
If Hillary survives the attack from the left "Fauxcahontas" or from the quasi center "Joe Bite Me" (and that's a big IF) she'll be defeated in a landslide in the general. America is ready for a female president, but NOT NURSE RATCHED.

THIS MONSTER
http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/HILL2.jpg
is not going to be president.

[Common Sense]

Dream on.
If Hillary survives the attack from the left "Fauxcahontas" or from the quasi center "Joe Bite Me" (and that's a big IF) she'll be defeated in a landslide in the general. America is ready for a female president, but NOT NURSE RATCHED.

THIS MONSTER
http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/HILL2.jpg
is not going to be president.

Yeah, they said that about Obama as well.

[Reason10]

Yeah, they said that about Obama as well.

Obama was handsome. He was likeable. And he was black. Oh, and he wasn't some aging scarecrow everyone refers to as Nurse Ratched.

[Ransom]

Obama didn't have baggage. Didn't have a resume, didn't have a success story, didn't have experience, leadership skills, or competency. But he could read a teleprompter.

[Howey]

Dream on.
If Hillary survives the attack from the left "Fauxcahontas" or from the quasi center "Joe Bite Me" (and that's a big IF) she'll be defeated in a landslide in the general. America is ready for a female president, but NOT NURSE RATCHED.

THIS MONSTER
http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/HILL2.jpg
is not going to be president.

Reason10

Are you so shallow you would vote for president on looks?

[Captain Obvious]

@Reason10 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1397)

Are you so shallow you would vote for president on looks?

How many people voted for the O'bama simply because he's black?

[Ransom]

@Reason10 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1397)

Are you so shallow you would vote for president on looks?

Isn't that why you selected Green Arrow? Or did you meet at a Communism Retreat?

[domer76]

If Democrats nominate Elizabeth Warren, they will lose all 50 states.
That's why they won't and also why the Republicans will lose if they nominate anyone except Christie or Bush. Your other clowns don't stand a chance.

[Peter1469]

Obama didn't have baggage. Didn't have a resume, didn't have a success story, didn't have experience, leadership skills, or competency. But he could read a teleprompter.

He did have baggage, the "news" ignored it.

[Captain Obvious]

That's why they won't and also why the Republicans will lose if they nominate anyone except Christie or Bush. Your other clowns don't stand a chance.

You're the perfect match for rook, you speak on his level.

...carry on

[Peter1469]

Most Americans are. First, Hillary won't run. Second, if she does she will look like an old spinster and won't win.
@Reason10 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1397)

Are you so shallow you would vote for president on looks?

[nic34]

He did have baggage, the "news" ignored it.

Ignored "baggage" but focused on his birth certificate.......

Riiiiiiiiiiiiight

[PolWatch]

Obama was handsome. He was likeable. And he was black. Oh, and he wasn't some aging scarecrow everyone refers to as Nurse Ratched.

let's see how the candidacy of Dr Carson works out for the gop....some people never learn

[PolWatch]

@Reason10 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1397)

Are you so shallow you would vote for president on looks?

one word: palin....questions?

[Mac-7]

I think Hillary is a very bad candidate.

She has no personality and she's stupid.

But never underestimate the gullibility of Obama voters.

The cookie lady could get nominated.

and she could win.

[Captain Obvious]

I think Hillary is a very bad candidate.

She has no personality and she's stupid.

But never underestimate the gullibility of Obama voters.

The cookie lady could get nominated.

and she could win.

That' more a testament to the incompetency of the GOP.

[domer76]

You're the perfect match for rook, you speak on his level.

...carry on
Watch and learn, grasshopper. None of the other candidates are viable on the national level, no matter how you wish it to be otherwise. It's so painfully apparent, but many of you just don't seem to get it. 5 of 6, going on 6 of 7.

[Captain Obvious]

Watch and learn, grasshopper. None of the other candidates are viable on the national level, no matter how you wish it to be otherwise. It's so painfully apparent, but many of you just don't seem to get it. 5 of 6, going on 6 of 7.

I already made the comment, you really don't need to continue proving it.

[Peter1469]

Ignored "baggage" but focused on his birth certificate.......

Riiiiiiiiiiiiight

I wasn't thinking about the bc

[domer76]

I already made the comment, you really don't need to continue proving it.
Get back to me when my observation is validated. Otherwise, just sit back with me and share that uncomfortable laugh one has when you see people humiliate themselves. The Shriners can't compare with the Republicans these days.

[Captain Obvious]

Get back to me when my observation is validated. Otherwise, just sit back with me and share that uncomfortable laugh one has when you see people humiliate themselves. The Shriners can't compare with the Republicans these days.

Ok, Gomer - I'll be right on that.

:biglaugh:

[domer76]

Ok, Gomer - I'll be right on that.

:biglaugh:
It's domer, dbag. Obviously, things are not all that obvious to you, Obvious. Perhaps you should change that tag name to Sgt. Inthedark, or something more consistent with your knowledge base. I seem to have to enlighten you on any number of threads.

[Reason10]

@Reason10 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1397)

Are you so shallow you would vote for president on looks?

You should ask all the ignorant low information Obama voters that question.
Hillary has so many problems that completely dwarf her looks. She has been a FAILURE at pretty much everything she's attempted. She's a failed Senator, a failed Secretary Of State, a failed wife, and a failed Democrat candidate in 2008. And soon she'll be a failed Democrat candidate in 2016.

[Captain Obvious]

It's domer, dbag. Obviously, things are not all that obvious to you, Obvious. Perhaps you should change that tag name to Sgt. Inthedark, or something more consistent with your knowledge base. I seem to have to enlighten you on any number of threads.

You really lit something up, no argument there.

:biglaugh:

[TrueBlue]

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/02/11/shock_poll_fauxcahontas_leads_mrs_inevitable_in_io wa_new_hampshire


I thought the Fauxcahontas touch was sublime.

And what's so funny, IT'S A FAR LEFT WING DEMOCRAT POLL.

http://front.moveon.org/elizabeth_warren_polling/#.VNuuVSyM7b5
MUST SEE: Poll Shows Big Opening for Elizabeth Warren in IA, NH


And just as your article says, and it's important to understand that correctly because that's the KEY:


"The groups cautioned that the poll mostly shows that voters are extremely open to her candidacy rather than her being a Clinton killer."

Warren has repeatedly stated she is not running although her fans push her to do so. In the end, I feel she may end up being Hillary Clinton's VP choice.

And Talk About a WINNING TICKET!! That's the One to watch out for!!

[Reason10]

And just as your article says, and it's important to understand that correctly because that's the KEY:



Warren has repeatedly stated she is not running although her fans push her to do so. In the end, I feel she may end up being Hillary Clinton's VP choice.

And Talk About a WINNING TICKET!! That's the One to watch out for!!

If she and Warren are nominated, their landslide loss and humiliation will be worse than Mondale/Ferraro. Scott Walker will cream them.

[Captain Obvious]

If she and Warren are nominated, their landslide loss and humiliation will be worse than Mondale/Ferraro. Scott Walker will cream them.

A while ago, maybe 6 months they sampled the water with her. The public reaction I believe was that there is too much kook factor with her to risk a nomination run.

[TrueBlue]

If she and Warren are nominated, their landslide loss and humiliation will be worse than Mondale/Ferraro. Scott Walker will cream them.
You might as well get rid of that wish list because if those two ran together all of America would be so enthused about Two Women running for the nation's top prize that give them whom you would from your side, including Scott Walker, that would not be enough to get them to not vote for a Clinton/Warren winning ticket.

[Mini Me]

That' more a testament to the incompetency of the GOP.

Cap, isn't it fun to be in the middle and being able to take pot shots at both sides?

One day, you sound like a liberal, the next day you sound like a con bagger.

But, that's cool, you don't want someone to hang a jacket on you. I'm the same way.

[Mini Me]

A while ago, maybe 6 months they sampled the water with her. The public reaction I believe was that there is too much kook factor with her to risk a nomination run.

Kook factor? WTF!

What is kooky about wanting justice over the Wall Street crooks who caused the financial collapse, and would do so again with massive bailouts as millions of people lose their homes, jobs, and sanity?

Is it kooky to give a damn about those people
Is it kooky to restrain Wall Streets dangerous elements?
Is it kooky to give relief to millions of folks with student loans they are being gouged on?
Is being a Populist, going to bat for the people wrong?

Do you see any other politician going to bat for the people? Of course not. They are too enthralled by the bribes and corruption they get.

It takes guts to stand up against the powers that be.

[Mini Me]

You might as well get rid of that wish list because if those two ran together all of America would be so enthused about Two Women running for the nation's top prize that give them whom you would from your side, including Scott Walker, that would not be enough to get them to not vote for a Clinton/Warren winning ticket.

No, no no! You got it wrong.

Hillary is a globalist sellout, like Obama, both Bushes, Bill.
Pairing Warren with Hillary is like mixing oil and water.

Now, Bernie Sanders and Warren would be a strong populist ticket for the people.

The Dem party was taken over by corporatists and globalist sellouts when Bill was in.

We need a new Dem party, that goes back to its roots, pro labor, pro education, minimal war mongering and willing to take on the Wall Street and corporate pigs interests who have sold out America and its workers.

Why in the Hell can't people understand what has happened to America in the last 40 years? Is the brainwashing so strong?

[Dr. Who]

No, no no! You got it wrong.

Hillary is a globalist sellout, like Obama, both Bushes, Bill.
Pairing Warren with Hillary is like mixing oil and water.

Now, Bernie Sanders and Warren would be a strong populist ticket for the people.

The Dem party was taken over by corporatists and globalist sellouts when Bill was in.

We need a new Dem party, that goes back to its roots, pro labor, pro education, minimal war mongering and willing to take on the Wall Street and corporate pigs interests who have sold out America and its workers.

Why in the Hell can't people understand what has happened to America in the last 40 years? Is the brainwashing so strong?
I like Bernie Sanders.

[Ransom]

Yeah....why in hell can't people look at the last 40 years? The Dems need to go back to "roots", pro-labor(raise minimum wage, tax the rich, universal health care, entitlement after entitlement after f'n entitlement). Pro-education(cause the last 40 years we've put...how much...into this colossal disaster of a public education system dominated by Teacher Unions, has become a employer service rather than a teaching service). Minimal war mongering....you remember like Roosevelt the 'roots' Democrat President, didn't see him doin any war mongering.

People just keep defining themselves in here. Our historical perspective...grades about a D-......and that's with me offering a solid and consistent A+.

That D- is our class average.......the reason for some of the rocket f'n scientist shat you see in here.

[Captain Obvious]

the reason for some of the rocket f'n scientist shat you see in here.

http://comefillyourcup.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/look_into_the_mirror.jpg

[Captain Obvious]

Kook factor? WTF!

What is kooky about wanting justice over the Wall Street crooks who caused the financial collapse, and would do so again with massive bailouts as millions of people lose their homes, jobs, and sanity?

Is it kooky to give a damn about those people
Is it kooky to restrain Wall Streets dangerous elements?
Is it kooky to give relief to millions of folks with student loans they are being gouged on?
Is being a Populist, going to bat for the people wrong?

Do you see any other politician going to bat for the people? Of course not. They are too enthralled by the bribes and corruption they get.

It takes guts to stand up against the powers that be.


A very similar argument could be made on Sarah Palin's behalf but I doubt you'd argue her kook factor much.

[texan]

:grin: Nurvious are you? :laugh:


No I hope it is Billary............She won't excite anyone and she will trash Obama and that will be fun to watch. Not to mention Bill surgically cutting on Obama for her grinding that racial ax. It would be fun...............BTW most of the left doesn't want her, do the math.

[Ransom]

Elizabeth "you didn't build that" Warren for President!

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSpXJkZES1yArb1ZYb8SJkx506HEQvUf MCYs3_l1R-uZoipqR-RzxX136I (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAQQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fredrich1917.deviantart.com%2Fart% 2FAlternate-Flag-of-the-New-Soviet-Army-390354674&ei=4yDiVNqmMbDksAT174Aw&bvm=bv.85970519,d.cWc&psig=AFQjCNHPohlak4jyymmez5azzPqD1AvPUA&ust=1424192099849347)

[PolWatch]

at this point...the dems could put Gore on the ticket & still beat anyone the repubs have. The repubs are too busy fighting each other to notice that the dems are very, very organized....

[Captain Obvious]

at this point...the dems could put Gore on the ticket & still beat anyone the repubs have. The repubs are too busy fighting each other to notice that the dems are very, very organized....

It's a weird time.

We have an unpopular president, alienated by his party (or vice versa actually) and the GOP can't manage to scrape up an average conservative to go in there and pick off that low hanging fruit.

[PolWatch]

I don't understand the GOP...2016 should be their year with little to no effort. The sitting president is a liability. The most prominent dem possibility has so much baggage its not even funny...but the gop is still squabbling like a yard full of chickens...

[Captain Obvious]

I don't understand the GOP...2016 should be their year with little to no effort. The sitting president is a liability. The most prominent dem possibility has so much baggage its not even funny...but the gop is still squabbling like a yard full of chickens...

Agreed in large part, but I think that's due to the incompetence of the GOP and also because the GOP is so far out of touch with the average voter it's ridiculous.

They keep wanting to shove that social conservatism down everyone's throat - just stop, nobody wants that shit except the fringe loons, they're not your voting base anymore.

[Reason10]

It's a weird time.

We have an unpopular president, alienated by his party (or vice versa actually) and the GOP can't manage to scrape up an average conservative to go in there and pick off that low hanging fruit.

Let's just say the Wall Street donor class doesn't want a conservative as president. A Scott Walker or a Ted Cruz is going to have to claw his way to the top.

[Captain Obvious]

Let's just say the Wall Street donor class doesn't want a conservative as president. A Scott Walker or a Ted Cruz is going to have to claw his way to the top.

Scott Walker is a legit candidate, it's more than amusing watching the bottom feeding left all shit their pants over the guy. I hope he gets nominated for that reason alone.

Ted Cruz is a circus act, those are the kinds of candidates the GOP needs to be separating itself from.

[Reason10]

I don't understand the GOP...2016 should be their year with little to no effort. The sitting president is a liability. The most prominent dem possibility has so much baggage its not even funny...but the gop is still squabbling like a yard full of chickens...

The race hasn't even started. Nobody has announced. We know who the donor class wants on the Republican side.
But watch Scott Walker. He's going to surprise everyone.

[Green Arrow]

It hardly matters. I can no longer support Elizabeth Warren because she refuses to support anti-Federal Reserve legislation. You can't say you're all about helping students and the poor and then refuse to support legislation that would help them.

[texan]

at this point...the dems could put Gore on the ticket & still beat anyone the repubs have. The repubs are too busy fighting each other to notice that the dems are very, very organized....

:lame:

Don't drink during the day. Not to mention the notion the dems are so together is one person for sure not paying attention.

[PolWatch]

how may other dems do you see being talked about as candidate for president?

[texan]

It hardly matters. I can no longer support Elizabeth Warren because she refuses to support anti-Federal Reserve legislation. You can't say you're all about helping students and the poor and then refuse to support legislation that would help them.


I believe Joe will run and Obama will support him. The infighting hasn't started yet. If the dem on the street thinks they are just gonna anoint Hillary as the nominee they are crazy. Its wide open she will be challenged. Obama won't support her behind the scenes.

[PolWatch]

You believe Joe will run....how much publicity has Joe gotten...the only names I have seen are Clinton or Warren. Compared to the number of repubs making noise about running, the dem landscape looks pretty deserted.

[texan]

how may other dems do you see being talked about as candidate for president?

First of all its Feb 2015........second I can't believe your question.............Like the dems are gonna concede to Hillary and run one person?....Its an open run there will be people.....Keep in mind the real left that helped Obama doesn't want her..............Quick search?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016
Potential candidates[edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Democratic_Party_presidential_cand idates,_2016&action=edit&section=2)]

The individuals listed below have been identified by reliable media sources as potential candidates for president in 2016. Those listed under "Formally exploring a candidacy" have taken formal action(s) - such as the formation of an exploratory committee (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploratory_committee), political action committee (PAC) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_action_committee), or a 527 organization (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/527_organization) - to build the groundwork for a possible presidential campaign. As of February 2015, all others have been the focus of media speculation in reliable secondary sources within the past three months. They are listed alphabetically by surname.
Formally exploring a candidacy[edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Democratic_Party_presidential_cand idates,_2016&action=edit&section=3)]



http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/55/O'Malley-Portrait-2013.jpg/86px-O'Malley-Portrait-2013.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:O'Malley-Portrait-2013.jpg)

Martin O'Malley (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_O'Malley),Governor of Maryland (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governor_of_Maryland)2007–2015; Mayor of Baltimore (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayor_of_Baltimore) 1999–2007; formed a political action committee (PAC) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_action_committee)[8] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-8)[9] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-9)[10] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-Whois-10)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/85/Jim_Webb_official_110th_Congress_photo.jpg/95px-Jim_Webb_official_110th_Congress_photo.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jim_Webb_official_110th_Congress_photo.jpg)

Jim Webb (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Webb), U.S. Senator from Virginia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia) 2007–2013;U.S. Secretary of the Navy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secretary_of_the_Navy) 1987–1988; formed an exploratory committee (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploratory_committee)[10] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-Whois-10)[11] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-11)[12] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-12)
Publicly expressed interest[edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Democratic_Party_presidential_cand idates,_2016&action=edit&section=4)]



http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ea/Official_portrait_of_Vice_President_Joe_Biden.jpg/96px-Official_portrait_of_Vice_President_Joe_Biden.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Official_portrait_of_Vice_President_Joe_Biden .jpg)

Joe Biden (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden), Vice President of the United States (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_President_of_the_United_States) since 2009; U.S. Senator (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Senator) from Delaware (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delaware)1973–2009; presidential candidate in 1988 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden_presidential_campaign,_1988) and2008 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden_presidential_campaign,_2008)[10] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-Whois-10)[13] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-13)[14] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-14)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/27/Hillary_Clinton_official_Secretary_of_State_portra it_crop.jpg/96px-Hillary_Clinton_official_Secretary_of_State_portra it_crop.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hillary_Clinton_official_Secretary_of_State_p ortrait_crop.jpg)

Hillary Rodham Clinton (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_Clinton),U.S. Secretary of State (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secretary_of_State)2009–2013; U.S. Senator from New York (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York) 2001–2009; presidential candidate in2008 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_presidential_campaign,_2008)[15] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-15)[16] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-16)[17] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-17)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/de/Bernie_Sanders.jpg/95px-Bernie_Sanders.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bernie_Sanders.jpg)

Bernie Sanders (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders),Independent (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_(politician)) U.S. Senator from Vermont (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermont)since 2007; Independent U.S. Representative from Vermont 1991–2007[18] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-18)[19] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-19)[20] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-20)
Other potential candidates[edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Democratic_Party_presidential_cand idates,_2016&action=edit&section=5)]



http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0e/Andrew_Cuomo_by_Pat_Arnow_cropped.jpeg/97px-Andrew_Cuomo_by_Pat_Arnow_cropped.jpeg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Andrew_Cuomo_by_Pat_Arnow_cropped.jpeg)

Andrew Cuomo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Cuomo),Governor of New York (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governor_of_New_York)since 2011; Attorney General of New York (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney_General_of_New_York)2007–2010; U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secretary_of_Housing_and_Urban_Devel opment)1997–2001[21] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-candidate-21)[22] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-22)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/70/Al_Franken_Official_Senate_Portrait.jpg/95px-Al_Franken_Official_Senate_Portrait.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Al_Franken_Official_Senate_Portrait.jpg)

Al Franken (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Franken), U.S. Senator from Minnesota since 2009[23] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-23)[24] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-24)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1d/Tim_Kaine%2C_official_113th_Congress_photo_portrai t.jpg/95px-Tim_Kaine%2C_official_113th_Congress_photo_portrai t.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tim_Kaine,_official_113th_Congress_photo_port rait.jpg)

Tim Kaine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Kaine), U.S. Senator from Virginia since 2013;Governor of Virginia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governor_of_Virginia)2006–2010[25] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-insideplans-25)[21] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-candidate-21)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2c/John_Kerry_official_Secretary_of_State_portrait.jp g/95px-John_Kerry_official_Secretary_of_State_portrait.jp g (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_Kerry_official_Secretary_of_State_portra it.jpg)

John Kerry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kerry), United States Secretary of State (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secretary_of_State) since 2013; U.S. Senator from Massachusetts 1985-2013; Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts 1983-1985; Presidential candidate in 2004 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kerry_presidential_campaign,_2004)[26] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-26)[27] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-27)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/Amy_Klobuchar%2C_official_portrait%2C_113th_Congre ss.jpg/96px-Amy_Klobuchar%2C_official_portrait%2C_113th_Congre ss.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Amy_Klobuchar,_official_portrait,_113th_Congr ess.jpg)

Amy Klobuchar (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Klobuchar), U.S. Senator from Minnesota (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota)since 2007[21] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-candidate-21)[28] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-age-28)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cc/Clairemccaskill.jpg/120px-Clairemccaskill.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Clairemccaskill.jpg)

Claire McCaskill (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claire_McCaskill), U.S. Senator from Missouri (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri)since 2007; Auditor of Missouri (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auditor_of_Missouri) 1999-2007[28] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-age-28)[29] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-29)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ae/Mark_Warner%2C_official_111th_Congress_photo_portr ait.jpg/95px-Mark_Warner%2C_official_111th_Congress_photo_portr ait.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mark_Warner,_official_111th_Congress_photo_po rtrait.jpg)

Mark Warner (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Warner), U.S. Senator from Virginia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia)since 2009; Governor of Virginia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governor_of_Virginia) 2002–2006[21] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-candidate-21)[28] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_candidates,_2016#cit e_note-age-28)

[PolWatch]

if you think those are serious possibilities...but I also heard Ben Affleck & Howard Dean are gonna run too....along with Sponge Bob SquarePants

[Green Arrow]

I believe Joe will run and Obama will support him. The infighting hasn't started yet. If the dem on the street thinks they are just gonna anoint Hillary as the nominee they are crazy. Its wide open she will be challenged. Obama won't support her behind the scenes.

They would never let Joe Biden run, let alone win the nomination. A Biden Democratic ticket would pretty much guarantee a GOP win and no amount of Republican foot shooting would change that. Biden's a colossal buffoon.

[PolWatch]

the only group that would support Biden would be SNL...

[Captain Obvious]

They would never let Joe Biden run, let alone win the nomination. A Biden Democratic ticket would pretty much guarantee a GOP win and no amount of Republican foot shooting would change that. Biden's a colossal buffoon.

Maybe that's why Jon Stewart left the Daily Show.

Biden's been very good to Jon so far...

:biglaugh: