View Full Version : Obama says ... don't charge Officer Wilson
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-says-supports-decision-not-charge-officer-ferguson-201923326.html
PolWatch
03-06-2015, 04:46 PM
that should prove the decision was wrong...since everything else Obama has said was wrong....right?
Safety
03-06-2015, 04:50 PM
that should prove the decision was wrong...since everything else Obama has said was wrong....right?
/thread
that should prove the decision was wrong...since everything else Obama has said was wrong....right?
I see. Thanks for the contribution.
Common Sense
03-06-2015, 05:45 PM
Obama didn't say "don't charge Darren Wilson", he said he agreed with the DOJ.
Why do people always feel the need to bend the truth?
SouthernBelle82
03-06-2015, 05:51 PM
that should prove the decision was wrong...since everything else Obama has said was wrong....right?
Lol that's so smart. But, so far, I haven't seen anything from our friends yet on this... They should be out there screaming about how wrong he is. :nono:
Private Pickle
03-06-2015, 05:56 PM
Obama didn't say "don't charge Darren Wilson", he said he agreed with the DOJ.
Why do people always feel the need to bend the truth?
But the DOJ said he didn't do anything wrong.
Private Pickle
03-06-2015, 05:58 PM
Lol that's so smart. But, so far, I haven't seen anything from our friends yet on this... They should be out there screaming about how wrong he is. :nono:
I really don't think "wrong" is the right word because he really didn't make a right or wrong statement. He simply agreed with the DOJ. Hypocrite perhaps might be a better term? Or he could be lying.
Common Sense
03-06-2015, 05:58 PM
But the DOJ said he didn't do anything wrong.
What does that have to do with what I said?
hanger4
03-06-2015, 06:00 PM
Obama didn't say "don't charge Darren Wilson", he said he agreed with the DOJ.
Why do people always feel the need to bend the truth?
From LWNJs all the way to RWNJs
Private Pickle
03-06-2015, 06:01 PM
What does that have to do with what I said?
Well the DOJ was looking into whether or not they should indict Wilson on civil rights violations right?
Common Sense
03-06-2015, 06:01 PM
Well the DOJ was looking into whether or not they should indict Wilson on civil rights violations right?
Yeah, and?
Private Pickle
03-06-2015, 06:03 PM
Yeah, and?
They said there was no evidence to do so. Obama agreed. Thus by proxy Obama said not to indict Wilson.
Common Sense
03-06-2015, 06:05 PM
They said there was no evidence to do so. Obama agreed. Thus by proxy Obama said not to indict Wilson.
He didn't "say" that. The title is inaccurate.
If someone likes your post, did they say what you said?
Private Pickle
03-06-2015, 06:07 PM
He didn't "say" that. The title is inaccurate.
If someone likes your post, did they say what you said?
In essence yes...by proxy... Depends on why they liked your post. I just don't think the semantics are worth it but carry on.
Howey
03-06-2015, 06:07 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-says-supports-decision-not-charge-officer-ferguson-201923326.html
The rest of the story...conveniently left out by Bob
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/06/us-usa-missouri-shooting-idUSKBN0M21VC20150306
The Justice Department said it found that the mostly white police force routinely targeted African-Americans for arrests and ticketing in part to raise revenue for the city through fines and fees. It also found officers followed a pattern of using excessive force and illegally arresting people without cause, deploying attack dogs and tasers on unarmed people "unreasonably."
“What we saw was that the Ferguson Police Department in conjunction with the municipality saw traffic stops, arrests, tickets as a revenue generator, as opposed to serving the community, and that it systematically was biased against African Americas in that city who were stopped, harassed, mistreated, abused, called names, fined,” Obama said in comments made at a town hall-style meeting in South Carolina.
The federal investigation started after a white Ferguson police officer shot and killed an unarmed black teenager on Aug. 9, triggering nationwide protests and illuminating long-held complaints in Ferguson and elsewhere about police treatment of minorities.
The Justice Department said it did not find grounds to prosecute police officer Darren Wilson for killing 18-year-old Michael Brown, but it did find racially disparate practices rampant through the police force.
In essence yes...by proxy... Depends on why they liked your post. I just don't think the semantics are worth it but carry on.
yes, your posts on that have made it quite clear
Howey
03-06-2015, 06:09 PM
But the DOJ said he didn't do anything wrong.
*sigh*
no, they didn't.
Private Pickle
03-06-2015, 06:10 PM
yes, your posts on that have made it quite clear
Cool!
Private Pickle
03-06-2015, 06:11 PM
*sigh*
no, they didn't.
You're right. No evidence does not mean he did nothing wrong.
head trauma
no joking matter
You're right. No evidence does not mean he did nothing wrong.
no, it means they can't prove anything because there's
wait
wait
wait
no evidence
hanger4
03-06-2015, 06:19 PM
The rest of the story...conveniently left out by Bob
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/06/us-usa-missouri-shooting-idUSKBN0M21VC20150306
You do realize there were two reports right ??
Private Pickle
03-06-2015, 06:19 PM
no, it means they can't prove anything because there's
wait
wait
wait
no evidence
Correct. I just said that.
Private Pickle
03-06-2015, 06:20 PM
head trauma
no joking matter
It can be in the right circumstances.
Safety
03-06-2015, 06:21 PM
no, it means they can't prove anything because there's
wait
wait
wait
no evidence
It's a neverending mind game with him, why bother?
Correct. I just said that.
no, you didn't
just because you're pegged to the left side of the bell curve, don't think we're all there with you.
It's a neverending mind game with him, why bother?
it's marginally more interesting than watching paint dry
Obama didn't say "don't charge Darren Wilson", he said he agreed with the DOJ.
Why do people always feel the need to bend the truth?
Same thing. I heard him on TV saying that there is no reason to charge Wilson.
What does that have to do with what I said?
Note:
Readers, you must understand that the canadian loves to defend Obama.
Private Pickle
03-06-2015, 07:37 PM
no, you didn't
just because you're pegged to the left side of the bell curve, don't think we're all there with you.
What I said wasn't incorrect. Just because you're covered in douche doesn't mean I don't have love in my heart for you...it doesn't mean I do either...
Common
03-06-2015, 08:01 PM
What obama is saying that after thorough investigating WILSON committed no crime. I already knew that.
What I said wasn't incorrect. Just because you're covered in douche doesn't mean I don't have love in my heart for you...it doesn't mean I do either...
yeah, it was
hint-when you leave the bathroom, your smartest guy in the room status is revoked
What obama is saying that after thorough investigating WILSON committed no crime. I already knew that.
Obama was talking to those who still want Wilson prosecuted. He told them the evidence was clear that Wilson did no wrong.
Private Pickle
03-07-2015, 11:21 AM
yeah, it was
hint-when you leave the bathroom, your smartest guy in the room status is revoked
An insult isn't a rebuttle and "no it isn't" isn't an argument.
Was that you in the next stall tapping your foot?
texan
03-07-2015, 09:28 PM
Holder and Obama are cowards when it comes to race. They jump out and throw whitey right under the bus every time. The funny thing is they have always been wrong by law and their supposedly lawyers.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.8 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.