Reason10
03-07-2015, 07:44 AM
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/56023000-record-number-women-not-labor-force
56,023,000: Record Number of Women Not in Labor Force
CNSNews.com) - A record 56,023,000 women, age 16 years and over, were not in the labor force in February. Not only was that a record high, but it's also the first time the number has exceeded 56 million, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
To be counted as ‘not in the labor force,’ according to the BLS, one must not have a job or have looked for one in the past four weeks. In January 2015, there were 55,756,000 women not in the labor force, which means that 267,000 women dropped out of the labor force since then.
I guess the OBAMORONS want those chicks to get their biscuits in the oven and their buns in bed.
How about it libs? WHO IS REALLY WAGING THE WAR ON WOMEN, (since you all seem to want to OWN this latest unemployment scam out of Washington)?
56,023,000: Record Number of Women Not in Labor Force
CNSNews.com) - A record 56,023,000 women, age 16 years and over, were not in the labor force in February. Not only was that a record high, but it's also the first time the number has exceeded 56 million, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
To be counted as ‘not in the labor force,’ according to the BLS, one must not have a job or have looked for one in the past four weeks. In January 2015, there were 55,756,000 women not in the labor force, which means that 267,000 women dropped out of the labor force since then.
I guess the OBAMORONS want those chicks to get their biscuits in the oven and their buns in bed.
How about it libs? WHO IS REALLY WAGING THE WAR ON WOMEN, (since you all seem to want to OWN this latest unemployment scam out of Washington)?