PDA

View Full Version : US Gives Exceptions to China Over Iranian Sanctions.....



MMC
06-29-2012, 06:44 AM
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States gave China a six-month reprieve from Iran financial sanctions on Thursday, avoiding a diplomatic spat with a country whose support it needs to try to quell violence in Syria and rein in Tehran's nuclear ambitions.

With Thursday's decision to grant exceptions to China, which buys up to a fifth of Iran's oil exports, and Singapore, which buys Iranian fuel oil, the Obama administration has now spared all 20 of Iran's major oil buyers from its unilateral sanctions.

Earlier this month the administration granted exceptions to India and six other economies. Japan and 10 European Union countries got exceptions in March.....snip~

http://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-u-expected-grant-iran-sanction-exceptions-china-170515793.html
Reuters – 13 hrs ago<<<<<


Seems the Obama Adminsitration that wanted those tougher sanctions on Iran are not to be as true as they make it seem. As evidenced by the piece. All 20 nations that were to have the embargo have all been given reprieve so that they can Import Oil from Iran.

Clinton's rationale is they know Iran IS paying more to keep their Nuke Program up and going. (Could this be due to those Inter-connected Economies staring off into the Abyss?) So.....she is and Obama are willing to deal with China so that they can get the vote they want over Syria. Now with Russia agreeing that Assad needs to go and to shut down the escalation. Clinton will be able to assist some things that the UN and Annan will want to see. Such as UN peacekeepers to go in. Course she will get more assistance thru her Friends of Syria Meeting.

MMC
06-29-2012, 10:25 AM
Somemore double talk by the Obama Administration.....People! :angry:

moon
06-29-2012, 10:31 AM
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States gave China a six-month reprieve from Iran financial sanctions on Thursday, avoiding a diplomatic spat with a country whose support it needs to try to quell violence in Syria and rein in Tehran's nuclear ambitions.

*

The US is actively backing the insurrection in Syria and Iran doesn't have a bomb program. *We know that because the CIA and MOSSAD have said so. *So it isn't looking for Chinese support in either of those areas. *More likely China is not required to comply with the US of AIPAC sanctions program because China owns so much US of AIPAC debt.*

MMC
06-30-2012, 02:22 AM
The US is actively backing the insurrection in Syria and Iran doesn't have a bomb program. *We know that because the CIA and MOSSAD have said so. *So it isn't looking for Chinese support in either of those areas. *More likely China is not required to comply with the US of AIPAC sanctions program because China owns so much US of AIPAC debt.*

Oh I see, so you can't take Assad's word about the French and the Brits with their jump off.....not surprising coming from one such as yourself. Seems the Author of the article cites that Clinton and the US need the support of the Chinese to quell the violence in Syria. Also it states to avoid a diplomatic spat. Looks like they differ with your statement concerning such.
You do understand what a Diplomatic Spat is.....Don't you? Now why would you think the Author of the article chose to use those Words specifically to described this scenario?

Moreover.....don't you mean the US of AIPAC is backing the Saudi and Sunni Arabs Move brought to you by OPEC! You know the one where the Sunni have plans to Subjugate the Shia and any mixed bags of Sunni Stock.(which that won't be looking good for Palestine when the Saud decide to focus that way) Besides their Grand Delusion of being able to control the planet.

In addition.....just how did you come up with Iran don't have a bomb? No where in the article did it even say Iran had a bomb. Do you know the difference between a nuclear program and the making of bombs?

So 20 nations that were getting Oil from Iran all have been given reprieves by Obama. Yet Clinton wanted the Embargo.....Correct? They managed to get this Sanction passed did they not? Then Obama gave a Speech on exactly what was taking place.....Right? He stated there was an Oil Embargo put into effect.....did he not? Yet then he turned around and gave all 20 Nations reprieves. So, did Obama Lie to the American People.....Again?

moon
06-30-2012, 02:37 AM
Oh I see, so you can't take Assad's word about the French and the Brits with their jump off.....not surprising coming from one such as yourself.***What's this supposed to mean ? * You're not still spouting the juvenile flamebait, surely. * Didn't the message get through ?*Again, there is no Iranian bomb program so asking China to help prevent one would not figure in US of AIPAC thinking. *So you're wrong on that score;
'Mossad, CIA agree Iran has yet to decide to build nuclear weapon'New York Times report quotes senior American officials who believe there is little disagreement between Israeli and U.S. intelligence over Iran’s nuclear program, despite calls for a strike by Israeli officials.http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/mossad-cia-agree-iran-has-yet-to-decide-to-build-nuclear-weapon-1.419300Do you also deny that the dissent in Syria is fanned by the West and Western arab allies ?

MMC
06-30-2012, 03:18 AM
What's this supposed to mean ? * You're not still spouting the juvenile flamebait, surely. * Didn't the message get through ?*Again, there is no Iranian bomb program so asking China to help prevent one would not figure in US of AIPAC thinking. *So you're wrong on that score;Do you also deny that the dissent in Syria is fanned by the West and Western arab allies ?


It means.....due to your usual rhetoric about the West and Israel. That is all it means. So save your whining and crying about the Juvenile attacks and flamebait. The only message that should have got thru was the one your were told about and have been told repeatedly, did ya get my message.....I was assured you were, so no need to deny it!!!!!

Do you deny your rhetoric about the West and Israel?

Again the Piece isn't on whether the Iranians have a bomb or not. So do try and stay focused.....

The United States gave China a six-month reprieve from Iran financial sanctions on Thursday, avoiding a diplomatic spat with a country whose support it needs to try to quell violence in Syria and rein in Tehran's nuclear ambitions.....snip~ <<<<<This.....Understand these English Words?

Nothing said about bomb-making.....huh? So that useless link what does this mean. See here, ^ it says nuclear ambitions. Yet doesnt say what those are. Or are ya trying act like a liberal and trying to think for others? Doesn't it say for the support to quell the violence in Syria? Or is the author of the piece making that up?

Perhaps you should read closer I have never said the West wasn't involved. Do you deny that the Saud and Sunni of OPEC want to subjugate and dominate the Shia and will use any means to do so? Including Others money and resources. Since they are unable to do so themselves. Which isn't that just as true?

Moreover did you miss the questions about Obama and Clinton and that Oil Embargo? Or do you think leaders should outright lie to their people and while being in the All Seeing EYE?

Trinnity
06-30-2012, 08:25 AM
Anyone who thinks Iran isn't trying to achieve nukes is nuts.

MMC
06-30-2012, 08:34 AM
Anyone who thinks Iran isn't trying to achieve nukes is nuts.

Well I am sure that might be one of their ambitions with nuclear material but they do have others. Not to mention the author listed Syria first. Still Obama has ran around telling everybody how these Sanctions have worked. How so if the Oil Embargo isn't happening?

moon
07-01-2012, 02:43 PM
Anyone who thinks Iran isn't trying to achieve nukes is nuts.
'Mossad, CIA agree Iran has yet to decide to build nuclear weapon'New York Times report quotes senior American officials who believe there is little disagreement between Israeli and U.S. intelligence over Iran’s nuclear program, despite calls for a strike by Israeli officials.http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomac...eapon-1.419300

michaelr
07-01-2012, 03:00 PM
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States gave China a six-month reprieve from Iran financial sanctions on Thursday, avoiding a diplomatic spat with a country whose support it needs to try to quell violence in Syria and rein in Tehran's nuclear ambitions.

With Thursday's decision to grant exceptions to China, which buys up to a fifth of Iran's oil exports, and Singapore, which buys Iranian fuel oil, the Obama administration has now spared all 20 of Iran's major oil buyers from its unilateral sanctions.

Earlier this month the administration granted exceptions to India and six other economies. Japan and 10 European Union countries got exceptions in March.....snip~

http://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-u-expected-grant-iran-sanction-exceptions-china-170515793.html
Reuters – 13 hrs ago<<<<<


Seems the Obama Adminsitration that wanted those tougher sanctions on Iran are not to be as true as they make it seem. As evidenced by the piece. All 20 nations that were to have the embargo have all been given reprieve so that they can Import Oil from Iran.

Clinton's rationale is they know Iran IS paying more to keep their Nuke Program up and going. (Could this be due to those Inter-connected Economies staring off into the Abyss?) So.....she is and Obama are willing to deal with China so that they can get the vote they want over Syria. Now with Russia agreeing that Assad needs to go and to shut down the escalation. Clinton will be able to assist some things that the UN and Annan will want to see. Such as UN peacekeepers to go in. Course she will get more assistance thru her Friends of Syria Meeting.

This is simple stuff. The Chinese and India said they weren't going to abide with the sanctions. The US can't do anything about that, so this is how they "save face". It's pretty pathetic when you think about it.

MMC
07-01-2012, 04:41 PM
Yeah Mike and then some Law Maker over the weekend started complaining about Tanzania Tankers dropping their Flags. While pushing that Iranian Oil. Moreover they also think Iran has removed the onboard tracking devices on these ships.

michaelr
07-01-2012, 04:44 PM
Yeah Mike and then some Law Maker over the weekend started complaining about Tanzania Tankers dropping their Flags. While pushing that Iranian Oil. Moreover they also think Iran has removed the onboard tracking devices on these ships.

When this government speaks about Iran, Libya, Syria, and other nonconformist, I have a tendency to not listen.

MMC
07-01-2012, 04:49 PM
When this government speaks about Iran, Libya, Syria, and other nonconformist, I have a tendency to not listen.

:laugh: Yeah we have a tendency to prove when Obama and this Adminstration are lieing again. :grin: