The left is 1 ISIS attack away from losing the election

[texan]

One attack of any magnitude like a mall shot up or a car bomb under a bridge.........Just one and they lose the election. They are already in trouble due to his foreign policy as it is growing on the voters list.

[Ethereal]

What do you think Obama should be doing that he's not doing?

[Common Sense]

I'm betting some would rather see a terrorist attack then see the Dems remain in power.

[Cigar]

Look Everyone ... more Gloom & Doom Predictions from The Right :biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh:

[Cigar]

What do you think Obama should be doing that he's not doing?

This is Great News ... only ONE MORE Attack :laugh: after Decades of Fighting

[Cigar]

I'm betting some would rather see a terrorist attack then see the Dems remain in power.

It's All The Right has ... Wars ... :laugh:

[Common Sense]

All they really have is fear.

[Ethereal]

This is Great News ... only ONE MORE Attack :laugh: after Decades of Fighting

Obama has been incredibly aggressive in his militarism towards a wide range of countries, yet neo-cons think he hasn't been aggressive enough. Sad times for the anti-war movement.

[texan]

Look Everyone ... more Gloom & Doom Predictions from The Right :biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh:

It isn't Gloom and Doom WTF a talking about? It is however a fact.

[texan]

You, common, common sense are missing the point, not unusual I am sure in a minute we will turn this into a gay rights or abortion thread.

AND ANYONE that thinks he isn't screwy on his foreign policy doesn't watch the simple news. GOOOOOOD GOD how stupid you would be to debate that! Hell the Pentagon doesn't even know the strategy with everyone contradicting each other. But oh yeah sure it is the war mongering neo-cons that don't see it. Might want to check the Fing polls on this issue or even read every now and then. You folks are seriously joke.

[Ethereal]

It's All The Right has ... Wars ... :laugh:

Democrats love war just as much as Republicans. Obama has been prosecuting numerous military and paramilitary campaigns in a wide range of proxy wars, bombings, and covert action. Under his administration, the democratically elected President of the Ukraine was overthrown under suspicious circumstances. Hillary Clinton admitted to be involved an Honduran coup (http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/9/hillary-clinton-honduraslatinamericaforeignpolicy.html). Obama and Clinton also oversaw the overthrow of Gaddafi, a secular strongman who was cooperating with the US in its "war on terror". Obama uniltaterally declared that Venezeula an "extraordinary threat" to US national security (https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/03/11/maybe-obamas-sanctions-venezuela-really-deep-concern-human-rights-abuses/). Obama assassinated two American citizens without trial, one of which was a teenager sitting at a cafe. Obama is helping Sunni Islamists overthrow Assad in Syria, another secular strongman. Obama is helping Saudi Arabia bomb Yemen.

What more does Obama have to do to make neo-con Republicans happy?

[texan]

They all damn sure voted for war and have spent their time since about 06 trying to spin it so they could say they were tricked LOL.

It turns out President Obama was urged to intervene in Syria much earlier. In a new book "Worthy Fights," former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta writes that in a meeting in the fall of 2012, he, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the director of the CIA, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs all urged the president to arm moderate Syrians who had started the revolution against the dictatorship to begin with. That might have left no room for ISIS to grow. - See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeffrey-meyer/2014/09/22/abc-nbc-ignore-leon-panettas-criticism-obamas-isis-strategy#sthash.AMF1PU1F.dpuf


Of curse it is the Neo-Cons fault he had his head up the JV ass.

and before you try and spin the source it is from Panetta's book, the source is irrelevant not that it would stop the morons here.

[Ethereal]

They all $#@! sure voted for war and have spent their time since about 06 trying to spin it so they could say they were tricked LOL.

It turns out President Obama was urged to intervene in Syria much earlier. In a new book "Worthy Fights," former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta writes that in a meeting in the fall of 2012, he, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the director of the CIA, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs all urged the president to arm moderate Syrians who had started the revolution against the dictatorship to begin with. That might have left no room for ISIS to grow. - See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeffrey-meyer/2014/09/22/abc-nbc-ignore-leon-panettas-criticism-obamas-isis-strategy#sthash.AMF1PU1F.dpuf


Of curse it is the Neo-Cons fault he had his head up the JV ass.

and before you try and spin the source it is from Panetta's book, the source is irrelevant not that it would stop the morons here.

Obama is a neo-con on foreign policy issues, but instead of furthering neo-con foreign policy issues with full-out invasions and occupations, he has done it with proxy wars, remote technology, and covert action.

[donttread]

One attack of any magnitude like a mall shot up or a car bomb under a bridge.........Just one and they lose the election. They are already in trouble due to his foreign policy as it is growing on the voters list.

So with the dems in power how ill the false flag be planned?

[Lineman]

One attack of any magnitude like a mall shot up or a car bomb under a bridge.........Just one and they lose the election. They are already in trouble due to his foreign policy as it is growing on the voters list.https://youtu.be/sR0XXPZUDQU

[Lineman]

https://youtu.be/sR0XXPZUDQU

[GRUMPY]

is that how far we have fallen that it would take a terrorist attack for the american electorate to pull their heads out of their collective arse....and then what would they elect....another so called compassionate conservative.....does anyone have any faith that any rep candidate will actually honor any promise they make....peter got is panties in a wad when i stated that the need for a think tank re debt is absurd....and this is just another absurdity....this is how far we have fallen and by historical perspectives it did not take very long....likely a momentum thing.....

[Redrose]

One attack of any magnitude like a mall shot up or a car bomb under a bridge.........Just one and they lose the election. They are already in trouble due to his foreign policy as it is growing on the voters list.



One would think that, but they'd still vote (D) and blame (R). It helps them sleep better and feel better about themselves.

[Ivan88]

Wow! When we get tired of being stabbed by our left hand, we can give the knife to our right hand!

[zelmo1234]

It is impossible to tell weather a resident force in Iraq and Afghanistan, like we have in other areas of the world, would have prevented the current situation or not. I like to think that it would have, but have NO facts only gut feeling to base that on!

That being said the OP is right, if there is a significant terrorist attack, like the Boston Bombing, the left and the Democrats will be seen as being weak on the Terrorists and ISIS, or ISIL what ever they are calling themselves. This would move the electorate in the direction of the Republicans.

The problem is, they will not handle it any better. If, God forbid we do ever send troops back to that hell hole, it should be to eliminate the anti western Imams, and Madrasa's and to reduce the overall population so they can only be concerned about rebuilding for decades to come. This Nation building Shit has got to stop

[texan]

So with the dems in power how ill the false flag be planned?


Pretty simple marketing. It is an easy campaign to put together, most people believe that republicans handle foreign policy better (Don't go all Bush on me yet), that is a historical fact. Don't look at this thru your far left point of view step back and look. Terrorism is again polling 74% important just barely behind the economy, which should scare democrats knowing the 8 out of 10 are concerned 6.5 years into a dem presidency......

ISIS is on the march, Russia looks like they are thumbing their noses at us, well they are doing that its not hard to prove and China is pushing us around in the S. pacific right now. That provides plenty of material for a competitor to run against. When you add this up you get what the perception is and they will play off that perception in a campaign. Many times it doesn't matter if its completely accurate.

An example is the Iraq war. We officially went there because he was in violation of 7 nato orders, inspectors being shut out and shooting at US planes in the buffer zone. Yes WMDs were a part he acted like he had them, had them at one point because he used them, and the world thought he had them. Did Bush ride the momentum yes, but they believed it as did every dem and ally that supported. Did that stop Howard Dean from his strategy in demonizing Bush about it? Nope and it worked.

Perception is sometimes true and sometimes false but it is for sure reality.

You can bet your last dollar that any act will be held against Obama. CIA and the DOD contradict what teh admin says daily on these issues. he looks weak and unorganized.

[Ethereal]

So with the dems in power how ill the false flag be planned?

A central government would never do something like that, though.

[Lineman]

McCain stood in front of a camera and told us all these things Obama did wrong then had no answer for the question "what would you do differently?"

He stammered that same old claptrap as always.

Send in someone elses kids in a full out attack.

A military solution is not worth 10c. Bush Cheney proved that.