PDA

View Full Version : Congressional Democrats to Introduce Ambitious New Bill to Restore the Voting Rights



Cigar
06-24-2015, 11:51 AM
Congressional Democrats to Introduce Ambitious New Bill to Restore the Voting Rights Act

Two years ago, the Supreme Court gutted the VRA. Senator Patrick Leahy and Congressman John Lewis have a plan to fix that.

Two years ago, on June 25, 2013 in Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court invalidated the centerpiece of the Voting Rights Act. Tomorrow, Congressional Democrats will introduce an ambitious new bill that would restore the important voting rights protections the Supreme Court struck down. The Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2015 would compel states with a well-documented history of recent voting discrimination to clear future voting changes with the federal government, require federal approval for voter ID laws and outlaw new efforts to suppress the growing minority vote.

The legislation will be formally introduced tomorrow by Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and leaders of the Black Caucus, Hispanic Caucus and Asian Pacific American Caucus in the House. Civil rights icon Representative John Lewis will be a co-sponsor. The bill is much stronger than the Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2014 (VRAA), Congress’s initial response to the Supreme Court’s decision, which garnered bipartisan support in the House but was not embraced by the Congressional Republican leadership, which declined to schedule a hearing, let alone a vote, on the bill.

“The previous bill we did in a way to try and get bipartisan support—which we did,” Senator Leahy told me. “We had the Republican Majority Leader of the House {Eric Cantor}] promise us that if we kept it like that it would come up for a vote. It never did. We made compromises to get {Republican}support and they didn’t keep their word. So this time I decided to listen to the voters who had their right to vote blocked and they asked for strong legislation that fully restores the protections of the VRA.

The 2016 election will be the first in fifty years where voters will not have the full protections of the VRA, which adds urgency to the Congressional effort. Since the Shelby decision, onerous new laws have been passed or implemented in states like North Carolina and Texas, which have disenfranchised thousands of voters, disproportionately those of color. In the past five years, 395 new voting restrictions have been introduced in 49 states, with half the states in the country adopting measures making it harder to vote. “If anybody thinks there’s not racial discrimination in voting today, they’re not really paying attention,” Senator Leahy said.

more...

http://www.thenation.com/article/210673/congressional-democrats-introduce-ambitious-new-bill-restore-voting-rights-act?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow#

Lineman
06-24-2015, 02:44 PM
Its good to see a spine redeveloping among the Democrats. What will be fun to watch will no doubt be the Republican governors in large minority populated states like Alabama, Texas, Carolinas, Michighan, and Florida try to avoid the negative political shrapnel this will create.

zelmo1234
06-24-2015, 03:10 PM
So does this mean that Democrats expect to need the illegal immigrant vote to win the election?

Can anyone point me to a law that was passed the prevented an American from voting?

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 04:24 PM
So does this mean that Democrats expect to need the illegal immigrant vote to win the election?

Can anyone point me to a law that was passed the prevented an American from voting?
Read this thoroughly before you even think of continuing with your unfounded supposition.

Republicans Admit Voter-ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/28/republicans-admit-voter-id-laws-are-aimed-at-democratic-voters.html

"When liberals decry voter-identification laws (http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2013/08/12/hillary-clinton-voter-id-laws-are-b-s.html) as tools for voter suppression, they aren’t arguing ex nihilo. The evidence is clear (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/23/colin-powell-lashes-out-at-the-gop-s-bogus-claims-on-voter-fraud.html): identification requirements for voting reduce turnout among low-income and minority voters. And the particular restrictions imposed by Republican lawmakers—limiting the acceptable forms of identification, ending opportunities for student voting, reducing hours for early voting—certainly do appear aimed at Democratic voters."


Thanks to The Daily Beast for this report.

MisterVeritis
06-24-2015, 04:25 PM
Read this thoroughly before you even think of continuing with your unfounded supposition.

Republicans Admit Voter-ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters

Makes sense. You democrats are the liars and cheats.

Lineman
06-24-2015, 04:31 PM
So provide factual evidence of elections where illegal voting handed democrats a presidency, a congress seat, or a senate seat.


Makes sense. You democrats are the liars and cheats.

Peter1469
06-24-2015, 04:49 PM
So provide factual evidence of elections where illegal voting handed democrats a presidency, a congress seat, or a senate seat.

Study up. (http://blackboxvoting.org/reports/transparency/)

gettit
06-24-2015, 04:58 PM
suppress multiple voting by Democrats and suppress voting by illegal aliens, you mean. There's no suppression of the HONEST, LEGAL minority vote, punks.

Lineman
06-24-2015, 05:54 PM
https://www.brennancenter.org/publication/truth-about-voter-fraud

Peter1469
06-24-2015, 06:21 PM
https://www.brennancenter.org/publication/truth-about-voter-fraud

Study up. (http://blackboxvoting.org/reports/transparency/)