PDA

View Full Version : "Scott Walker, Please Come Home" says Major Wisconsin Editorial



Cigar
06-24-2015, 12:44 PM
"Scott Walker, Please Come Home" says Major Wisconsin Editorial (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/06/23/1395860/--Scott-Walker-Please-Come-Home-says-Major-Wisconsin-Editorial)http://images.dailykos.com/images/146531/small/RTR4YIWC.jpg?1433335565

The headline just says it all (http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/scott-walker-please-come-home-b99522920z1-308548371.html). Things are so bad here in the Legislature that the newspaper is begging Scott Walker to come home, if only for a short time. This isn't from The Onion, but from the most highly read Wisconsin newspaper, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. One that has endorsed Scott Walker, tends to ignore his bad news, and prints his talking points like Gospel.

But here in Wisconsin, the budget he proposed last winter is foundering, and not because of Democratic opposition but because his Republican colleagues can't come to terms. Last week, Republican leaders were sniping at each other over whether Assembly Republicans wanted to delay the reconstruction of the Zoo Interchange to build pressure for increasing the gas tax or vehicle registration fees.

The impasse is apparently over how to pay for the transportation budget and how to finance a deal for a new arena in downtown Milwaukee. These are big issues, and they deserve Walker's attention. In addition, as an editorial on Friday on this page noted, there are a host of items in the budget that simply shouldn't be there. Mainly, they're non-budget items sneaked into the budget with little discussion or public input, a practice that candidate Walker decried in 2010. In an informal Journal Sentinel poll last week, readers overwhelmingly were giving the Legislature an F grade on its handling of the budget.




Look folks, yet another successful GOP Governor ... see a pattern yet Republican Voters?

Told yea :laugh:

texan
06-24-2015, 01:40 PM
HE IS STILL THE GUVNA AND WILL BE WHEN YOU WAKE UP IN THE MORNING! GET OVER IT........The Union Owned Milwaukee Journal S. Doesn't like the Guvna? Shocking.....

​http://media.jrn.com/images/b99457819z.1_20150309222310_000_gu1a8j3f.1-0.jpg

texan
06-24-2015, 01:41 PM
Maybe we could bus in some protesters! Oh we already tried that? Twice?

Lineman
06-24-2015, 01:49 PM
He might be indicted for all those investigations going on into his shady deals.

Has he ever made it to halfway on his original job creation promise?

:D


"Scott Walker, Please Come Home" says Major Wisconsin Editorial (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/06/23/1395860/--Scott-Walker-Please-Come-Home-says-Major-Wisconsin-Editorial)http://images.dailykos.com/images/146531/small/RTR4YIWC.jpg?1433335565

The headline just says it all (http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/scott-walker-please-come-home-b99522920z1-308548371.html). Things are so bad here in the Legislature that the newspaper is begging Scott Walker to come home, if only for a short time. This isn't from The Onion, but from the most highly read Wisconsin newspaper, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. One that has endorsed Scott Walker, tends to ignore his bad news, and prints his talking points like Gospel.

But here in Wisconsin, the budget he proposed last winter is foundering, and not because of Democratic opposition but because his Republican colleagues can't come to terms. Last week, Republican leaders were sniping at each other over whether Assembly Republicans wanted to delay the reconstruction of the Zoo Interchange to build pressure for increasing the gas tax or vehicle registration fees.

The impasse is apparently over how to pay for the transportation budget and how to finance a deal for a new arena in downtown Milwaukee. These are big issues, and they deserve Walker's attention. In addition, as an editorial on Friday on this page noted, there are a host of items in the budget that simply shouldn't be there. Mainly, they're non-budget items sneaked into the budget with little discussion or public input, a practice that candidate Walker decried in 2010. In an informal Journal Sentinel poll last week, readers overwhelmingly were giving the Legislature an F grade on its handling of the budget.




Look folks, yet another successful GOP Governor ... see a pattern yet Republican Voters?

Told yea :laugh:

Cigar
06-24-2015, 01:51 PM
He might be indicted for all those investigations going on into his shady deals.

Has he ever made it to halfway on his original job creation promise?

:D

That's right ... the best is yet to come :laugh:

Cigar
06-24-2015, 01:52 PM
Maybe we could bus in some protesters! Oh we already tried that? Twice?

It's sweeter to just let him screw himself ... and take the ignorant with him :laugh:

Common
06-24-2015, 01:54 PM
Scott Walker the biggest pos of the entire republican lineup

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 02:02 PM
"Scott Walker, Please Come Home" says Major Wisconsin Editorial (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/06/23/1395860/--Scott-Walker-Please-Come-Home-says-Major-Wisconsin-Editorial)

http://images.dailykos.com/images/146531/small/RTR4YIWC.jpg?1433335565

The headline just says it all (http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/scott-walker-please-come-home-b99522920z1-308548371.html). Things are so bad here in the Legislature that the newspaper is begging Scott Walker to come home, if only for a short time. This isn't from The Onion, but from the most highly read Wisconsin newspaper, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. One that has endorsed Scott Walker, tends to ignore his bad news, and prints his talking points like Gospel.

But here in Wisconsin, the budget he proposed last winter is foundering, and not because of Democratic opposition but because his Republican colleagues can't come to terms. Last week, Republican leaders were sniping at each other over whether Assembly Republicans wanted to delay the reconstruction of the Zoo Interchange to build pressure for increasing the gas tax or vehicle registration fees.

The impasse is apparently over how to pay for the transportation budget and how to finance a deal for a new arena in downtown Milwaukee. These are big issues, and they deserve Walker's attention. In addition, as an editorial on Friday on this page noted, there are a host of items in the budget that simply shouldn't be there. Mainly, they're non-budget items sneaked into the budget with little discussion or public input, a practice that candidate Walker decried in 2010. In an informal Journal Sentinel poll last week, readers overwhelmingly were giving the Legislature an F grade on its handling of the budget.




Look folks, yet another successful GOP Governor ... see a pattern yet Republican Voters?

Told yea :laugh:
They're now singing Bill Bailey won't you please...Bill Bailey won't you please? Bill Bailey (Scott Walker) won't you please Come Home. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/artists/mother_goose/MG_125.gif

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 02:18 PM
Scott Walker Took Money From Racist Group that Inspired Dylann Roof’s Terrorist Attack
By: Sarah Jones

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/06/22/scott-walker-thousands-racist-hate-group-inspired-dylann-roofs-terrorist-attack.html
(http://www.politicususa.com/2015/06/22/scott-walker-thousands-racist-hate-group-inspired-dylann-roofs-terrorist-attack.html)
"The list of Republicans who took money (http://www.politicususa.com/2015/06/22/republicans-reeling-white-house-candidates-congressmen-cash-white-supremacists.html) from a known hate group keeps growing. Add Governor Scott Walker (R-WI) to the list, as it’s revealed that he took thousands from the Council of Conservative Citizens (CofCC)."

=======================================

How about that? Incredible but well there you have it. And the dirty laundry just keeps on piling up for Walker and others. Thanks to Politicususa for this report.

zelmo1234
06-24-2015, 02:25 PM
He might be indicted for all those investigations going on into his shady deals.

Has he ever made it to halfway on his original job creation promise?

:D

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=wisconsin+unemployment+rate

Yeah that Wisconsin Unemployment Rate is a Bitch at 4.4% What is the national rate again?

All that and he was elected by liberal Wisconsin 3 times in 4 years, each time by a bigger margin.

And as far as the law breaking? He is JV to Hillary in that department. plus the could not prove anything in 3 elections cycles, highly unlikely that the have anything at all.

Democrats are just But hurt because he stooped the union from laundering money for the DNC

zelmo1234
06-24-2015, 02:26 PM
Scott Walker Took Money From Racist Group that Inspired Dylann Roof’s Terrorist Attack
By: Sarah Jones

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/06/22/scott-walker-thousands-racist-hate-group-inspired-dylann-roofs-terrorist-attack.html
(http://www.politicususa.com/2015/06/22/scott-walker-thousands-racist-hate-group-inspired-dylann-roofs-terrorist-attack.html)

=======================================

How about that? Incredible but well there you have it. And the dirty laundry just keeps on piling up for Walker and others. Thanks to Politicususa for this report.

And Gave it back!

HILLARY CLINTON TOOK MONEY FROM THE PEOPLE THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR 911 AND THE DEMOCRATS APPLUAD IT

zelmo1234
06-24-2015, 02:27 PM
Scott Walker the biggest pos of the entire republican lineup

And that is why I like him so much anything that liberal democrats hate,,,,,, I like it!

Bob
06-24-2015, 02:29 PM
Scott Walker works for the public. Not the unions. Government unions are anti public in their nature.

Lineman
06-24-2015, 02:30 PM
I doubt ANY of the recipients of White Power money would have given it back had that church shooting not happened.


And Gave it back!

HILLARY CLINTON TOOK MONEY FROM THE PEOPLE THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR 911 AND THE DEMOCRATS APPLUAD IT

Cigar
06-24-2015, 02:30 PM
Scott Walker works for the public. Not the unions. Government unions are anti public in their nature.

GOP, he's all yours, own him all the way to the Losers Circle. :laugh:

Bob
06-24-2015, 02:31 PM
I doubt ANY of the recipients of White Power money would have given it back had that church shooting not happened.

It is highly amusing to read any Democrat defend any church.

Bob
06-24-2015, 02:34 PM
yuneyions stand up to the Government. Democrat hate that. Can't see why Democrats like those standing up to the Government.

zelmo1234
06-24-2015, 02:34 PM
I doubt ANY of the recipients of White Power money would have given it back had that church shooting not happened.

So the Clintons are giving the Saudi money back when????? OH! that's right they are not, they are just going to oppose exploration for oil in the USA

And then of course nobody would have checked if there was not the shooting either. But you already know that none of the candidates know who is donating money, the only thing they can do is return it when the issue comes up, Unless they are the Clintons and then it is OK

Bob
06-24-2015, 02:38 PM
GOP, he's all yours, own him all the way to the Losers Circle. :laugh:

Thankye thankye thankye

They luve me.

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 02:39 PM
And Gave it back!
Only after it was found out. But it was YEARS after the fact! How about that! http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/remake/biggrin.gif


HILLARY CLINTON TOOK MONEY FROM THE PEOPLE THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR 911 AND THE DEMOCRATS APPLUAD IT
Next thing you know they're going to be blaming Hillary for Chernobyl. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/icq/biggrin.gif

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 02:42 PM
It is highly amusing to read any Democrat defend any church.
Why? Because you believe that churches are the exclusive property of Republicans? I've got NEWS for you, bro!

Bob
06-24-2015, 02:44 PM
Why? Because you believe that churches are the exclusive property of Republicans? I've got NEWS for you, bro!

You guys crap all over churches so often. I suppose you could be lying ... but I hope not.

Bob
06-24-2015, 02:46 PM
Only after it was found out. But it was YEARS after the fact! How about that! http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/remake/biggrin.gif


Next thing you know they're going to be blaming Hillary for Chernobyl. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/icq/biggrin.gif


nuh uhh

Just Benghazi for the moment. We still need to chat about her time spent in combat. Boots on the ground and all that muck.

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 02:47 PM
You guys crap all over churches so often. I suppose you could be lying ... but I hope not.
No brag. Just FACT, Bob! There are millions upon millions of church-going Democrats, fyi. You need to come to the present century already and wake-up and smell the coffee!

Bob
06-24-2015, 02:55 PM
No brag. Just FACT, Bob! There are millions upon millions of church-going Democrats, fyi. You need to come to the present century already and wake-up and smell the coffee!

I wonder ... do you count yourself as church going? Your BF Patty hill does not.

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 03:04 PM
nuh uhh

Just Benghazi for the moment. We still need to chat about her time spent in combat. Boots on the ground and all that muck.
You're still with Benghazi, Bob? My, my! Well, let's go there for the fifteenth-thousandth six hundred and ninety nine time. Thanks to the Daily Kos for this report.

Hillary Clinton heckled over Benghazi? 6 Facts Everyone Needs To Know

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/27/1251105/-Hillary-Clinton-heckled-over-Benghazi-6-Facts-Everyone-Needs-To-Know

"1. The non-partiasn Accountability Review Board did not find Hillary Rodham Clinton responsible for the Benghazi attacks. She was cleared of any wrong-doing.

SOURCE: UNCLASSIFIED REPORT (http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdf)"

And about other items the right likes to bring up about Hillary, it's much the same as the story above. In fact, it's always much ado about nothing. As usual. :)

zelmo1234
06-24-2015, 03:14 PM
Only after it was found out. But it was YEARS after the fact! How about that! http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/remake/biggrin.gif


Next thing you know they're going to be blaming Hillary for Chernobyl. http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/icq/biggrin.gif

Did they except millions form the Saudi's or not? Did they return it based on women's right, or their support of terrorism or did they just keep it? How about the Saudi's stance on the rights of homosexuals, they have a 100% fool proof cure I hear?

zelmo1234
06-24-2015, 03:16 PM
You're still with Benghazi, Bob? My, my! Well, let's go there for the fifteenth-thousandth six hundred and ninety nine time. Thanks to the Daily Kos for this report.

Hillary Clinton heckled over Benghazi? 6 Facts Everyone Needs To Know

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/27/1251105/-Hillary-Clinton-heckled-over-Benghazi-6-Facts-Everyone-Needs-To-Know


And about other items the right likes to bring up about Hillary, it's much the same as the story above. In fact, it's always much ado about nothing. As usual. :)




And yet just in the last few weeks the congressional committee received thousands more Emails because Hillary forgot that they needed them. I's sure she just did not see the news so it slipped her mind

Lineman
06-24-2015, 03:22 PM
Should Mrs Clinton become president, it will be fun watching all the conservative racists reveal their long held sexist underpinnings as well.

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 03:22 PM
And yet just in the last few weeks the congressional committee received thousands more Emails because Hillary forgot that they needed them. I's sure she just did not see the news so it slipped her mind
Just the fact that they did received them speaks volumes about Hillary's great integrity and eagerness to be completely open and transparent with the committee just as she's always said she would be.

zelmo1234
06-24-2015, 03:25 PM
Just the fact that they did received them speaks volumes about Hillary's great integrity and eagerness to be completely open and transparent with the committee just as she's always said she would be.

She was hiding them dude, and she destroyed the server, they had to get them from the people she was emailing.

You all can cover for anything

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 03:28 PM
I wonder ... do you count yourself as church going? Your BF Patty hill does not.
Fyi Bob, I am a Born Again Christian and do go to church regularly. And did Patty tell you that or is that just a greater sign of your old age setting in? :)

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 03:30 PM
She was hiding them dude, and she destroyed the server, they had to get them from the people she was emailing.

You all can cover for anything
The greater percentage of emails were PERSONAL, with a Capital P. She turned over what was requested of her. End of story.

Bob
06-24-2015, 03:34 PM
Fyi Bob, I am a Born Again Christian and do go to church regularly. And did Patty tell you that or is that just a greater sign of your old age setting in? :)

Patty is more like you. She likes insulting posters a lot.

Bob
06-24-2015, 03:35 PM
The greater percentage of emails were PERSONAL, with a Capital P. She turned over what was requested of her. End of story.

How can you know that?

She told you so?

Don't get me to laughing again.

Bob
06-24-2015, 03:36 PM
She was hiding them dude, and she destroyed the server, they had to get them from the people she was emailing.

You all can cover for anything

That my friend is how Democrats work.

They promise and promise full transparency. Then if they get caught, they make up the rules. AGAIN

Bob
06-24-2015, 03:40 PM
http://thepoliticalforums.com/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by TrueBlue http://thepoliticalforums.com/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://thepoliticalforums.com/showthread.php?p=1149427#post1149427)
You're still with Benghazi, Bob? My, my! Well, let's go there for the fifteenth-thousandth six hundred and ninety nine time. Thanks to the Daily Kos for this report.

Hillary Clinton heckled over Benghazi? 6 Facts Everyone Needs To Know

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/1...-Needs-To-Know (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/27/1251105/-Hillary-Clinton-heckled-over-Benghazi-6-Facts-Everyone-Needs-To-Know)


And about other items the right likes to bring up about Hillary, it's much the same as the story above. In fact, it's always much ado about nothing. As usual. :)




And yet just in the last few weeks the congressional committee received thousands more Emails because Hillary forgot that they needed them. I's sure she just did not see the news so it slipped her mind

Oh I realize that to the top poster, and Hillary, they don't give a damn about the deaths in Benghazi. Hillary told us as much.

Hillary got wild and angry when the congress tried to find out what happened over Benghazi.

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 03:52 PM
How can you know that?

She told you so?

Don't get me to laughing again.
Actually, I haven't heard from her in a while.

But here's the story. Read it and understand it. Thanks to USAToday for this report.

Hillary Clinton defends use of private e-mail
Catalina Camia and Martha T. Moore , USA TODAY

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/03/10/hillary-clinton-emails-state-department/24668715/

"Clinton said she went "above and beyond" what she was required to do regarding preserving e-mails from the personal account she used on a private server. Using a personal e-mail was permissible during her tenure as the nation's top diplomat as long as she kept the records."

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 03:54 PM
Patty is more like you. She likes insulting posters a lot.
Well seeing as how you're looking in the mirror as you say that...the pot sure likes to call the kettle black doesn't it?

Bob
06-24-2015, 03:56 PM
You're still with Benghazi, Bob? My, my! Well, let's go there for the fifteenth-thousandth six hundred and ninety nine time. Thanks to the Daily Kos for this report.

Hillary Clinton heckled over Benghazi? 6 Facts Everyone Needs To Know

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/27/1251105/-Hillary-Clinton-heckled-over-Benghazi-6-Facts-Everyone-Needs-To-Know


And about other items the right likes to bring up about Hillary, it's much the same as the story above. In fact, it's always much ado about nothing. As usual. :)



@TrueBlue (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1308)

Indeed I am still with it. I read that whitewash presented by the same department Hillary runs. I am sure her investigation was not designed to exhonerate her or the two officials it called out. :rollseyes: This one gets two evil eyes :rollseyes:

Even they got no discipline.

Were that done by a Republican ran department of state your bloomers would be going wild with anger at republicans. You would call for the FBI to investigate the state department.

Wait, that is bad thinking Obama operates the FBI as well by handpicking men or women loyal to him.

Incidentally Zelmo offered you a very fine refuttal. Pay attention to him and myself.

Bob
06-24-2015, 04:00 PM
Well seeing as how you're looking in the mirror as you say that...the pot sure likes to call the kettle black doesn't it?

I am looking at my monitor. I am serious. I am looking right there. It does not reflect back. It is low glare.

I only commented due to how you bark at posters. TrueBlue

Bob
06-24-2015, 04:03 PM
Actually, I haven't heard from her in a while.

But here's the story. Read it and understand it. Thanks to USAToday for this report.

Hillary Clinton defends use of private e-mail
Catalina Camia and Martha T. Moore , USA TODAY

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/03/10/hillary-clinton-emails-state-department/24668715/

Remember when Donald Rumsfeld defended himself with his own self directed internal investigations?

Sure you recall. And of course you believed every word he said.

texan
06-24-2015, 04:31 PM
Speaking of posers...............here is something for the posers of this thread, and thanks in advance for your OPINION!

ed·i·to·ri·al
ˌedəˈtôrēəl/
adjective


1.
of or relating to the commissioning or preparing of material for publication.
"a pillar of scholarly publishing and editorial excellence"









noun


1.
a newspaper article written by or on behalf of an editor that gives an opinion on a topical issue.

texan
06-24-2015, 04:46 PM
In looking at their financials and their parent companies financials, maybe they should editorialize on their own budget.

TrueBlue
06-24-2015, 05:10 PM
Remember when Donald Rumsfeld defended himself with his own self directed internal investigations?

Sure you recall. And of course you believed every word he said.
Bob, for the last time, Hillary is not conducting her own investigation on herself as Rumsfeld, and that is the difference. In hearing after hearing, Congressional inquiry after Congressional inquiry, has not found that Hillary Clinton has done anything wrong or that merits an impropriety. And they won't find anything because there is nothing there at all. It is unfortunate that some things happened they way they did but they were not items that would rise to the level of a serious impropriety or Congress would have long ago found that out. Again, there's nothing there. So cool it already.

Peter1469
06-24-2015, 05:13 PM
Bob, for the last time, Hillary is not conducting her own investigation on herself as Rumsfeld, and that is the difference. In hearing after hearing, Congressional inquiry after Congressional inquiry, has not found that Hillary Clinton has done anything wrong or that merits an impropriety. And they won't find anything because there is nothing there at all. It is unfortunate that some things happened they way they did but they were not items that would rise to the level of a serious impropriety or Congress would have long ago found that out. Again, there's nothing there. So cool it already.

That is not what Congress found. They found it was more important to cover up US action in Libya. Gun running to Syrian rebels that turned out to be ISIL.

Bob
06-24-2015, 05:14 PM
Bob, for the last time, Hillary is not conducting her own investigation on herself as Rumsfeld, and that is the difference. In hearing after hearing, Congressional inquiry after Congressional inquiry, has not found that Hillary Clinton has done anything wrong or that merits an impropriety. And they won't find anything because there is nothing there at all. It is unfortunate that some things happened they way they did but they were not items that would rise to the level of a serious impropriety or Congress would have long ago found that out. Again, there's nothing there. So cool it already.


Did you read your own report? I did.

I am sorry you did not notice the e mail site. It said it came from State.gov

It was her being boss. She ordered it. She ordered it from herself in essence.

But you believe it?

Isn't she still under investigation?

Certainly she is still being investigated. If she told the truth, it would be over by now.

Bob
06-24-2015, 05:18 PM
Bob, for the last time, Hillary is not conducting her own investigation on herself as Rumsfeld, and that is the difference. In hearing after hearing, Congressional inquiry after Congressional inquiry, has not found that Hillary Clinton has done anything wrong or that merits an impropriety. And they won't find anything because there is nothing there at all. It is unfortunate that some things happened they way they did but they were not items that would rise to the level of a serious impropriety or Congress would have long ago found that out. Again, there's nothing there. So cool it already.

Rumsfeld was maligned by Democrats. They kept at and kept at blaming him as if he was in Iraq handling things.

Recall how the Democrats made so much noise that a woman General Officer lost her job?

And she was totally innocent.

You guys used to tell us the buck stops with the president.

Except the current president.

You even put the buck on the desk of Rumsfeld. What happened to save Colin powell from your angry wrath?

I think i have a good idea.

zelmo1234
06-24-2015, 09:26 PM
The greater percentage of emails were PERSONAL, with a Capital P. She turned over what was requested of her. End of story.

And you know that because why?