PDA

View Full Version : Big Lies in Politics



Chris
07-31-2012, 06:07 AM
It was either Adolf Hitler or his propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, who said that the people will believe any lie, if it is big enough and told often enough, loud enough....

Perhaps the biggest lie of this election year, and the one likely to be repeated the most often, is that the income of "the rich" is going up, while other people's incomes are going down. If you listen to Barack Obama, you are bound to hear this lie repeatedly.

But the government's own Congressional Budget Office has just published a report whose statistics flatly contradict this claim. The CBO report shows that, while the average household income fell 12 percent between 2007 and 2009, the average for the lower four-fifths fell by 5 percent or less, while the average income for households in the top fifth fell 18 percent. For households in the "top one percent" that seems to fascinate so many people, income fell by 36 percent in those same years.

...For different reasons, both politicians and the media have incentives to spread misconceptions with statistics. So long as we keep buying it, they will keep selling it.

In Big Lies in Politics (http://spectator.org/archives/2012/07/31/big-lies-in-politics), Sowell explains how CBO data is based on individuals or specific households while Obama's is based on statistics that lump people into classes, which is part of Plato's Noble Lie.

Peter1469
07-31-2012, 08:32 AM
Good article. This part explains how Obama and his ilk use statistics to lie:


Why are these data so different from other data that are widely cited, showing the top brackets improving their positions more so than anyone else?


The answer is that the data cited by the Congressional Budget Office are based on Internal Revenue Service statistics for specific individuals and specific households over time. The IRS can follow individuals and households because it can identify the same people over time from their Social Security numbers.



Most other data, including census data, are based on compiling statistics in a succession of time periods, without the ability to tell if the actual people in each income bracket are the same from one time period to the next. The turnover of people is substantial in all brackets -- and is huge in the top one percent. Most people in that bracket are there for only one year in a decade.

Chris
07-31-2012, 06:06 PM
Right, the difference between statistics on individual cases as opposed to statistics on abstract groups. There will always be the poor, the rich, but individuals are constantly moving to and from those groups.

Goldie Locks
07-31-2012, 06:16 PM
They don't even have to rely on stats, they lie anyway, knowing their sheep will believe them.