PDA

View Full Version : Governor Walker under fire for neglecting his gubernatorial duties



PolWatch
07-18-2015, 07:21 PM
Like Jindal of LA, it looks like all is not happiness in the candidate's home state. Running on your record as governor usually requires your home state to be happy with your performance. 41% approval rating in his own state doesn't look happy. His claim of political witch hunts doesn't seem to include that the politicians he is complaining about were from his own party.

'Governor Walker has come under fire for neglecting his gubernatorial duties in favor of the presidential campaign trail, as well as for his political moves, which have always caused controversy.

“We don't blame him for running, but he still has to do his job as governor,” said a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial (http://www.jsonline.com/news/the-ever-divisive-scott-walker-b99537632z1-315083601.html) published Tuesday. “There were signs during the recent debate over the state budget that Walker was AWOL at times.”

The Journal Sentinel criticized Walker for attempting to “win over” Republicans by “bragging” about his legislation to slash collective bargaining rights for public employee unions – an act that “cleaved the state in two” and inspired “angry protests.” Walker’s approval rating in Wisconsin is down to 41 percent as of an April poll (http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/scott-walkers-wisconsin-approval-rating-drops-in-latest-poll-b99482677z1-300128921.html), though he is leading in all-important Iowa. The Journal Sentinel editorial also criticized Walker’s delivery on promises regarding job creation saying he has lagged behind other Midwestern states and could not “come close” to the 250,000 jobs he vowed to create in his first term.

The Journal Times of Racine also noted (http://journaltimes.com/eedition/page-a/page_8f4106a4-056b-523d-9e22-bf9182679062.html) in an editorial Monday the role Walker’s office played in the ill-received Republican attack on Wisconsin’s open records law, as well as its subsequent haste to pass the buck onto other Republicans.

The Wisconsin GOP as a whole is also drawing attention for its accusations that the Government Accountability Board is biased against Republicans. A Sunday Wisconsin State Journal editorial (http://host.madison.com/news/opinion/editorial/little-evidence-suggests-gab-out-to-get-gop/article_619ce3ce-05f9-5cce-a2c5-e6c3a9383e19.html) said there was “little evidence” to support the claims and criticized Republicans for citing the board’s secret investigation of Walker’s recall election campaign in 2012 as proof of anti-Republican sentiment. The Journal noted that two out of four attorneys who approved the investigation were Republicans themselves, and the special prosecutor in charge has said he voted for Walker.


http://news.yahoo.com/scott-walker-takes-national-stage-wisconsinites-cry-foul-150715953.html

Bob
07-18-2015, 07:27 PM
This complaint cracks me up. Obama hardly ever is at the White house. The man flies all over America every week. But now the complaint is the brand new Walker campaign takes him away from his duties?

The media never whines at the vast number of days Obama is off his job. But let Walker just get started and the same day they whine. Cracks me up.

Peter1469
07-18-2015, 07:38 PM
It is a political attack piece.

PolWatch
07-18-2015, 07:42 PM
Do you think they faked the approval rate?

Peter1469
07-18-2015, 07:48 PM
No, I think they wouldn't run the story if he was a (D).

PolWatch
07-18-2015, 07:51 PM
Yahoo seems to run items on both parties....including the article about campaign finance which was pretty much critical of both leading candidates. Just because this contains negative remarks, doesn't make it a hit piece.

whatukno
07-18-2015, 07:51 PM
This complaint cracks me up. Obama hardly ever is at the White house. The man flies all over America every week. But now the complaint is the brand new Walker campaign takes him away from his duties?

The media never whines at the vast number of days Obama is off his job. But let Walker just get started and the same day they whine. Cracks me up.

That's because the President is never really "off his job" even as much time as Bush spent at his ranch in Texas, he wasn't "off his job" he was working. (Well, in that case, Cheney was working) but the point is the same. It doesn't matter where the President is, the information he needs and the resources he needs to get the job done are with him.

TrueBlue
07-18-2015, 07:52 PM
Like Jindal of LA, it looks like all is not happiness in the candidate's home state. Running on your record as governor usually requires your home state to be happy with your performance. 41% approval rating in his own state doesn't look happy. His claim of political witch hunts doesn't seem to include that the politicians he is complaining about were from his own party.

'Governor Walker has come under fire for neglecting his gubernatorial duties in favor of the presidential campaign trail, as well as for his political moves, which have always caused controversy.

“We don't blame him for running, but he still has to do his job as governor,” said a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial (http://www.jsonline.com/news/the-ever-divisive-scott-walker-b99537632z1-315083601.html) published Tuesday. “There were signs during the recent debate over the state budget that Walker was AWOL at times.”

The Journal Sentinel criticized Walker for attempting to “win over” Republicans by “bragging” about his legislation to slash collective bargaining rights for public employee unions – an act that “cleaved the state in two” and inspired “angry protests.” Walker’s approval rating in Wisconsin is down to 41 percent as of an April poll (http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/scott-walkers-wisconsin-approval-rating-drops-in-latest-poll-b99482677z1-300128921.html), though he is leading in all-important Iowa. The Journal Sentinel editorial also criticized Walker’s delivery on promises regarding job creation saying he has lagged behind other Midwestern states and could not “come close” to the 250,000 jobs he vowed to create in his first term.

The Journal Times of Racine also noted (http://journaltimes.com/eedition/page-a/page_8f4106a4-056b-523d-9e22-bf9182679062.html) in an editorial Monday the role Walker’s office played in the ill-received Republican attack on Wisconsin’s open records law, as well as its subsequent haste to pass the buck onto other Republicans.

The Wisconsin GOP as a whole is also drawing attention for its accusations that the Government Accountability Board is biased against Republicans. A Sunday Wisconsin State Journal editorial (http://host.madison.com/news/opinion/editorial/little-evidence-suggests-gab-out-to-get-gop/article_619ce3ce-05f9-5cce-a2c5-e6c3a9383e19.html) said there was “little evidence” to support the claims and criticized Republicans for citing the board’s secret investigation of Walker’s recall election campaign in 2012 as proof of anti-Republican sentiment. The Journal noted that two out of four attorneys who approved the investigation were Republicans themselves, and the special prosecutor in charge has said he voted for Walker.


http://news.yahoo.com/scott-walker-takes-national-stage-wisconsinites-cry-foul-150715953.html
And that couldn't have happened to a better man! :) As a famous lady around here would say "whodathunkit?"

PolWatch
07-18-2015, 07:57 PM
Since Walker is running based on his successful policies in his home state, the opinions of those in his state are valid.....both negative & positive.

Bob
07-18-2015, 08:06 PM
That's because the President is never really "off his job" even as much time as Bush spent at his ranch in Texas, he wasn't "off his job" he was working. (Well, in that case, Cheney was working) but the point is the same. It doesn't matter where the President is, the information he needs and the resources he needs to get the job done are with him.

I used to tell Democrats that Bush constantly worked as well. They too came back with this Cheney stuff. Cheney was a very good companion to Bush. Sadly Biden is seldom seen and seems to enjoy a form of on the job retirement.

Walker too has what he needs with him to perform his job.
Governors in this era can't be off the job.

Bob
07-18-2015, 08:06 PM
Since Walker is running based on his successful policies in his home state, the opinions of those in his state are valid.....both negative & positive.

Same as for Obama. Correct opinions are good. Incorrect lies are plain awful.

PolWatch
07-18-2015, 08:12 PM
I can see where some have a PhD in silly lies, old rumors, trash e-mails. yeppers....there are some professional levels in that subject.

Bob
07-18-2015, 08:19 PM
I can see where some have a PhD in silly lies, old rumors, trash e-mails. yeppers....there are some professional levels in that subject.

We specialized in those when I still was a Democrat. I find none of that by Republicans.

PolWatch
07-18-2015, 08:34 PM
Be sure to tell Huckabee about it the next time he sends you more silly e-mails. He appreciates your experience in misinformation & rumor mongering.

Common
07-18-2015, 10:07 PM
Same with christie he hasnt been involved in NJ business for a few months my kids tell me. It was reported that polls show NJ think Christie sucks

donttread
07-19-2015, 05:02 AM
Like Jindal of LA, it looks like all is not happiness in the candidate's home state. Running on your record as governor usually requires your home state to be happy with your performance. 41% approval rating in his own state doesn't look happy. His claim of political witch hunts doesn't seem to include that the politicians he is complaining about were from his own party.

'Governor Walker has come under fire for neglecting his gubernatorial duties in favor of the presidential campaign trail, as well as for his political moves, which have always caused controversy.

“We don't blame him for running, but he still has to do his job as governor,” said a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial (http://www.jsonline.com/news/the-ever-divisive-scott-walker-b99537632z1-315083601.html) published Tuesday. “There were signs during the recent debate over the state budget that Walker was AWOL at times.”

The Journal Sentinel criticized Walker for attempting to “win over” Republicans by “bragging” about his legislation to slash collective bargaining rights for public employee unions – an act that “cleaved the state in two” and inspired “angry protests.” Walker’s approval rating in Wisconsin is down to 41 percent as of an April poll (http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/scott-walkers-wisconsin-approval-rating-drops-in-latest-poll-b99482677z1-300128921.html), though he is leading in all-important Iowa. The Journal Sentinel editorial also criticized Walker’s delivery on promises regarding job creation saying he has lagged behind other Midwestern states and could not “come close” to the 250,000 jobs he vowed to create in his first term.

The Journal Times of Racine also noted (http://journaltimes.com/eedition/page-a/page_8f4106a4-056b-523d-9e22-bf9182679062.html) in an editorial Monday the role Walker’s office played in the ill-received Republican attack on Wisconsin’s open records law, as well as its subsequent haste to pass the buck onto other Republicans.

The Wisconsin GOP as a whole is also drawing attention for its accusations that the Government Accountability Board is biased against Republicans. A Sunday Wisconsin State Journal editorial (http://host.madison.com/news/opinion/editorial/little-evidence-suggests-gab-out-to-get-gop/article_619ce3ce-05f9-5cce-a2c5-e6c3a9383e19.html) said there was “little evidence” to support the claims and criticized Republicans for citing the board’s secret investigation of Walker’s recall election campaign in 2012 as proof of anti-Republican sentiment. The Journal noted that two out of four attorneys who approved the investigation were Republicans themselves, and the special prosecutor in charge has said he voted for Walker.


http://news.yahoo.com/scott-walker-takes-national-stage-wisconsinites-cry-foul-150715953.html

It amazes me that this doesn't come up more often

Tahuyaman
07-19-2015, 10:01 AM
No, I think they wouldn't run the story if he was a (D).


Precisely.

Tahuyaman
07-19-2015, 10:05 AM
Like Jindal of LA, it looks like all is not happiness in the candidate's home state. Running on your record as governor usually requires your home state to be happy with your performance. 41% approval rating in his own state doesn't look happy. His claim of political witch hunts doesn't seem to include that the politicians he is complaining about were from his own party.

'Governor Walker has come under fire for neglecting his gubernatorial duties in favor of the presidential campaign trail, as well as for his political moves, which have always caused controversy.

“We don't blame him for running, but he still has to do his job as governor,” said a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial (http://www.jsonline.com/news/the-ever-divisive-scott-walker-b99537632z1-315083601.html) published Tuesday. “There were signs during the recent debate over the state budget that Walker was AWOL at times.”

The Journal Sentinel criticized Walker for attempting to “win over” Republicans by “bragging” about his legislation to slash collective bargaining rights for public employee unions – an act that “cleaved the state in two” and inspired “angry protests.” Walker’s approval rating in Wisconsin is down to 41 percent as of an April poll (http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/scott-walkers-wisconsin-approval-rating-drops-in-latest-poll-b99482677z1-300128921.html), though he is leading in all-important Iowa. The Journal Sentinel editorial also criticized Walker’s delivery on promises regarding job creation saying he has lagged behind other Midwestern states and could not “come close” to the 250,000 jobs he vowed to create in his first term.

The Journal Times of Racine also noted (http://journaltimes.com/eedition/page-a/page_8f4106a4-056b-523d-9e22-bf9182679062.html) in an editorial Monday the role Walker’s office played in the ill-received Republican attack on Wisconsin’s open records law, as well as its subsequent haste to pass the buck onto other Republicans.

The Wisconsin GOP as a whole is also drawing attention for its accusations that the Government Accountability Board is biased against Republicans. A Sunday Wisconsin State Journal editorial (http://host.madison.com/news/opinion/editorial/little-evidence-suggests-gab-out-to-get-gop/article_619ce3ce-05f9-5cce-a2c5-e6c3a9383e19.html) said there was “little evidence” to support the claims and criticized Republicans for citing the board’s secret investigation of Walker’s recall election campaign in 2012 as proof of anti-Republican sentiment. The Journal noted that two out of four attorneys who approved the investigation were Republicans themselves, and the special prosecutor in charge has said he voted for Walker.


http://news.yahoo.com/scott-walker-takes-national-stage-wisconsinites-cry-foul-150715953.html


The Wisconsin media would have more credibility if they didn't have a history of being political hacks.

PolWatch
07-19-2015, 10:43 AM
The Wisconsin media would have more credibility if they didn't have a history of being political hacks.

Walker must be the only politician in history to win several times in an environment of completely partisan media. Anything negative is a hit piece and anything positive is the truth? uh-huh

Tahuyaman
07-19-2015, 10:48 AM
Walker must be the only politician in history to win several times in an environment of completely partisan media. Anything negative is a hit piece and anything positive is the truth? uh-huh


He has the charisma to overcome the media and the results to gain support from the voters.

hanger4
07-19-2015, 10:56 AM
Walker must be the only politician in history to win several times in an environment of completely partisan media. Anything negative is a hit piece and anything positive is the truth? uh-huhAll the bottom feeders hit pieces have been debunked PolWatch. And if I remember correctly most of which have come from WI media.

PolWatch
07-19-2015, 10:58 AM
uh-huh...without the assistance of the media? Did he go door to door? I don't know of any regional political who succeeds without the support of the majority of his local media. Perhaps he had the financial resources to purchase positive media....but that brings up the question of who owns him now?

I will continue to think that those who don't like the message find it easier to attack the messenger than the message.

hanger4
07-19-2015, 11:16 AM
uh-huh...without the assistance of the media? Did he go door to door? I don't know of any regional political who succeeds without the support of the majority of his local media. Perhaps he had the financial resources to purchase positive media....but that brings up the question of who owns him now?

I will continue to think that those who don't like the message find it easier to attack the messenger than the message.

I'm sure this same local media castigated Obama and H Clinton in 07 - 08 for shirking their senatorial duties.

The left is throwing anything, no matter how stupid, hoping to find somethin they can harp on.

Tahuyaman
07-19-2015, 11:21 AM
The left is very afraid of Scott Walker. He withstands all the attacks against him. It seems like the more the left goes after him, the more support he gains from voters.

del
07-19-2015, 12:43 PM
He has the charisma to overcome the media and the results to gain support from the voters.

http://www.peteykins.com/sparklepics5/ScottWalker.jpg

Common
07-19-2015, 12:49 PM
uh-huh...without the assistance of the media? Did he go door to door? I don't know of any regional political who succeeds without the support of the majority of his local media. Perhaps he had the financial resources to purchase positive media....but that brings up the question of who owns him now?

I will continue to think that those who don't like the message find it easier to attack the messenger than the message.


Walker is garbage all hes done in Wi was take from workers and give to the rich, just like the Koch Bros told him to do. They want the entire country to work for free for them.

Common
07-19-2015, 12:49 PM
http://www.peteykins.com/sparklepics5/ScottWalker.jpg


He wont be potus

PolWatch
07-19-2015, 12:50 PM
I'm sure this same local media castigated Obama and H Clinton in 07 - 08 for shirking their senatorial duties.

The left is throwing anything, no matter how stupid, hoping to find somethin they can harp on.

of course, you were objecting when the poster was creating threads about Hillary's tipping habits? uh-huh

Ransom
07-19-2015, 01:06 PM
Course, forcing him to endure recall elections because you don't agree with his policies doesn't prevent him from doing his job either, huh?

Oops.

Tahuyaman
07-19-2015, 01:07 PM
Like I've said. The left is quite scared of Walker. They know he has the ideas which gain support, the track record to give him credibility and ability to communicate effectively.

Part of the reason he overcomes the attacks upon him is that the attacks are based on false claims. He responds to them with facts and positive results. The left can't deal with that. As one can clearly see here.

Ransom
07-19-2015, 01:07 PM
Thread fail!

Tahuyaman
07-19-2015, 01:08 PM
Course, forcing him to endure recall elections because you don't agree with his policies doesn't prevent him from doing his job either, huh?

Oops.


He sure made them look like silly partisan hacks on that one.

Tahuyaman
07-19-2015, 01:10 PM
Walker is garbage all hes done in Wi was take from workers and give to the rich,


All he did was save their jobs and careers. They know this. Because of that, he converted many political enemies into an ally.

hanger4
07-19-2015, 02:13 PM
of course, you were objecting when the poster was creating threads about Hillary's tipping habits? uh-huh

I'm not objecting to this, your thread. Just showing you the reality and hyporcrisy of the situation.

Ransom
07-19-2015, 02:17 PM
He sure made them look like silly partisan hacks on that one.

I remember the whining about money too. In the scheduled election cycle, there are spending limits and donation limits. Because state's realize that a Governor forced to raise funds for that forced recall could indeed be neglecting his duties, they remove the limits for recalls. Walker was criticized for taking such donations when it was outside Wisconsin money trying to unseat him to begin with. It's why many like Walker, he bests the Left and has done it repeatedly.

hanger4
07-19-2015, 02:31 PM
Walker is garbage all hes done in Wi was take from workers and give to the rich, just like the Koch Bros told him to do. They want the entire country to work for free for them.

What has he taken from workers ??
What has he given the rich ??

I know you don't like the same questions over and over. So don't make the same unsubstantiated statements over and over.

Tahuyaman
07-19-2015, 09:47 PM
What has he taken from workers ??
What has he given the rich ??

I know you don't like the same questions over and over. So don't make the same unsubstantiated statements over and over.


He didn't take anything from workers. He made changes which saved their jobs.

donttread
07-20-2015, 02:49 AM
I find it shocking that this doesn't happen more often . From congress to president how can you do your job and 1-2 years of the campaign trail at the same time? Answer. You can't. In the president's case the campaigning cost us a ton of money everytime he goes anywhere.

Ransom
07-20-2015, 06:49 AM
You find it shocking, donttread.......after Obama ran for President neglecting Chicago and Illinois that now bends under violence trumped by only that in the ME and Ukraine. You find it shocking after Obama was the President and used your tax dime to get re-elected. Little cheese with that whine?

Safety
07-20-2015, 07:32 AM
I'm not objecting to this, your thread. Just showing you the reality and hyporcrisy of the situation.

I think Pol was trying to say, that the effort to show the reality and hypocrisy was missing in the "Hillary is a bad tipper" thread.

Common
07-20-2015, 07:49 AM
All he did was save their jobs and careers. They know this. Because of that, he converted many political enemies into an ally.

That is as disengenuous as it gets. You expect me to believe that what Scott Walker did to public sector workers and private union workers jobs, yeah ok. Nonesense

Scott Walker will not be potus and the far right is about to take a nosedive. Democrat Favorability has passed Republicans Why do you think that is ? America is aware of what Walker and Christie did and what Kasich tried to do and if you dont think the working class will be the biggest factor in this election, then you need to do some more reading.

Democratic Party Reclaims Edge in Favorable Ratings (http://www.gallupmail.com/POLL/184214/39599176/en-US/cmsitem.aspx?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_content=heading&utm_campaign=syndication)Slightly more than four in 10 Americans (42%) give the Democratic Party a favorable rating, while the Republican Party has a favorable rating of 35%. Democrats' rating has risen slightly from its November 2014 low of 36%.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/184214/democratic-party-reclaims-edge-favorable-ratings.aspx

Common
07-20-2015, 07:50 AM
Thread fail!

Only thing that failed in this thread is the Right wing attempt to discredit it. They and you have failed in this thread.

Tahuyaman
07-20-2015, 08:47 AM
That is as disengenuous as it gets. You expect me to believe that what Scott Walker did to public sector workers and private union workers jobs, yeah ok. Nonesense

Scott Walker will not be potus and the far right is about to take a nosedive. Democrat Favorability has passed Republicans Why do you think that is ? America is aware of what Walker and Christie did and what Kasich tried to do and if you dont think the working class will be the biggest factor in this election, then you need to do some more reading.

Democratic Party Reclaims Edge in Favorable Ratings (http://www.gallupmail.com/POLL/184214/39599176/en-US/cmsitem.aspx?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_content=heading&utm_campaign=syndication)

Slightly more than four in 10 Americans (42%) give the Democratic Party a favorable rating, while the Republican Party has a favorable rating of 35%. Democrats' rating has risen slightly from its November 2014 low of 36%.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/184214/democratic-party-reclaims-edge-favorable-ratings.aspx

talk about as disingenuous as it gets.........

hanger4
07-20-2015, 08:57 AM
Only thing that failed in this thread is the Right wing attempt to discredit it. They and you have failed in this thread.

This OP failed because the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial did not castigate Obama and H Clinton in 07 - 08 for shirking their senatorial duties. Plus they are ignoring Sanders time away from his Senate duties also.

PolWatch
07-20-2015, 09:06 AM
This OP failed because the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial did not castigate Obama and H Clinton in 07 - 08 for shirking their senatorial duties. Plus they are ignoring Sanders time away from his Senate duties also.

When did Obama, Clinton or Sanders have responsibilities to WI? Why would anyone in WI care if jobs in other states are going lacking? If the newspapers in WI make a habit of attacking all repub candidates, where are the articles about the other 16 nominees?

Common
07-20-2015, 09:07 AM
talk about as disingenuous as it gets.........

Prove it wrong, show me how Scott Walker screwing public workers helped them and show me how Scott Walker screwing unions helped anyone. It lowered wages for all workers is what it did

Common
07-20-2015, 09:08 AM
This OP failed because the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial did not castigate Obama and H Clinton in 07 - 08 for shirking their senatorial duties. Plus they are ignoring Sanders time away from his Senate duties also.

That has nothing to do with this thread or its title and intention

Cigar
07-20-2015, 09:08 AM
This complaint cracks me up. Obama hardly ever is at the White house. The man flies all over America every week. But now the complaint is the brand new Walker campaign takes him away from his duties?

The media never whines at the vast number of days Obama is off his job. But let Walker just get started and the same day they whine. Cracks me up.

:roflmao: Says it all

Tahuyaman
07-20-2015, 09:17 AM
Prove it wrong, show me how Scott Walker screwing public workers helped them and show me how Scott Walker screwing unions helped anyone. It lowered wages for all workers is what it did

you want me to prove your false comments?

In fact, his decisions saved their jobs. Had he not acted, they would have been out of work.

Common
07-20-2015, 09:24 AM
you want me to prove your false comments?

In fact, his decisions saved their jobs. Had he not acted, they would have been out of work.

Factual statments, Prove YOU false comments, you are the one who said walker helped workers by screwing public workers and private sector union workers. Show me how he helped workers.

hanger4
07-20-2015, 09:25 AM
When did Obama, Clinton or Sanders have responsibilities to WI? Why would anyone in WI care if jobs in other states are going lacking? If the newspapers in WI make a habit of attacking all repub candidates, where are the articles about the other 16 nominees?

Oh, so the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel don't do national news.

hanger4
07-20-2015, 09:27 AM
That has nothing to do with this thread or its title and intention

Is the hypocrisy of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial over your head ??

Tahuyaman
07-20-2015, 09:35 AM
Factual statments, Prove YOU false comments, you are the one who said walker helped workers by screwing public workers and private sector union workers. Show me how he helped workers.

It might make you unhappy, but those people are happy that he made a decision which resulted in them remaining employed.

I know that pisses off the liberals.

Liberals would prefer seeing the unions supported at the expense of the people who make up the rank and file of that union. the employees themselves are worthless to the left.

Common
07-20-2015, 09:51 AM
Is the hypocrisy of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial over your head ??

I dont care about the Milwaukee Sentinel and im not referring to anything that came out of it.

You will discredit any source that says what you dont like or disagree with anyway.

Common
07-20-2015, 09:52 AM
It might make you unhappy, but those people are happy that he made a decision which resulted in them remaining employed.

I know that pisses off the liberals.

Liberals would prefer seeing the unions supported at the expense of the people who make up the rank and file of that union. the employees themselves are worthless to the left.

SHOW me that those workers are happy. You make alot of statements prove those workers are happy. Then Ill show you they are not.

PolWatch
07-20-2015, 09:57 AM
yeap...another vast, left wing conspiracy.....I bet they rigged the job approval ratings too....just like they did in LA for Jindal. Why would anyone care what the people in their states think of their governors?

If you don't like reality, ignore it. Kinda like the left ignoring the Clinton problems.....if you support the party, forget the facts.

Tahuyaman
07-20-2015, 10:02 AM
SHOW me that those workers are happy. You make alot of statements prove those workers are happy. Then Ill show you they are not.

They are happy that their career was saved. Just admit that pisses you off.

hanger4
07-20-2015, 10:46 AM
I dont care about the Milwaukee Sentinel and im not referring to anything that came out of it.

You will discredit any source that says what you dont like or disagree with anyway.

Sorry Common, I'm not discrediting the source, I'm discrediting you. I'm sure the source's point is factual, but complaining about oneside while ignoring the other side doing the same is .... well a lot like you complaining about Koch money.

Common
07-20-2015, 11:04 AM
Sorry Common, I'm not discrediting the source, I'm discrediting you. I'm sure the source's point is factual, but complaining about oneside while ignoring the other side doing the same is .... well a lot like you complaining about Koch money.

You cant discredit me hangar until you show me that the workers that scott walker screwed are happy about it, like your buddy tahuyman. Thats the extent of my involvement in his thread to ask him to prove that statement. So your post is moot

Common
07-20-2015, 11:05 AM
yeap...another vast, left wing conspiracy.....I bet they rigged the job approval ratings too....just like they did in LA for Jindal. Why would anyone care what the people in their states think of their governors?

If you don't like reality, ignore it. Kinda like the left ignoring the Clinton problems.....if you support the party, forget the facts.

Truth is the working class for the most part greatly dislikes Scott Walker. The right is trying to make it out that the working class not only loves walker but they are thanking him for screwing them lol

Tahuyaman
07-20-2015, 11:08 AM
As one can clearly see. The liberals are scared of Scott Walker and his ability to turn the tables on the left.

He doesn't cave in to the false pressure they put on him. He makes decisions which benefit the citizens instead of the liberal institutions which hurt those who they claim to represent.

Common
07-20-2015, 11:10 AM
Ok dude im done exchanging with you. You made a statement and your only answer is liberals are this and liberals are that.

Common
07-20-2015, 11:13 AM
Scott Walker, Wisconsin Governor, Failed To Pay Full Pension Costs, Despite Pushing Change For Workers http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/14/scott-walker-pension-wisconsin_n_1011670.html

He did the same thing Pig Piggy did in NJ and you think workers are all happy about it. lol... Im done here moving on

Ransom
07-20-2015, 11:31 AM
yeap...another vast, left wing conspiracy.....I bet they rigged the job approval ratings too....just like they did in LA for Jindal. Why would anyone care what the people in their states think of their governors?

If you don't like reality, ignore it. Kinda like the left ignoring the Clinton problems.....if you support the party, forget the facts.

We'd just like you to have the facts rather than merely claiming you have them.