PDA

View Full Version : A Tale of Two Extremes



Howey
08-14-2015, 11:40 AM
If the 2016 presidential election becomes a tale of two extremes, Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump, who would your choice be and why?

Howey
08-14-2015, 11:42 AM
Given the lack of any other viable political party these are your only choices.

The Xl
08-14-2015, 11:45 AM
Am I missing something here? Weren't you banned?

Dafuq is going on?

Chris
08-14-2015, 11:46 AM
NOTA (None Of The Above). Why? No choice at all. I don't like populists anymore than I like Reps or Dems.

Howey
08-14-2015, 11:58 AM
NOTA (None Of The Above). Why? No choice at all. I don't like populists anymore than I like Reps or Dems.


Given the lack of any other viable political party these are your only choices.

Chris
08-14-2015, 12:08 PM
Then I don't vote.

http://i.snag.gy/cPFja.jpg

whatukno
08-14-2015, 12:08 PM
I'd pick Sanders over Trump, better to have a plan, than no plan or clue.

Howey
08-14-2015, 12:11 PM
Then I don't vote.

http://i.snag.gy/cPFja.jpg


Then why reply to the thread?

If you don't care to vote, you have no right to be part of the discussion. Might as well take your marbles and go home.

Chris
08-14-2015, 12:16 PM
Then why reply to the thread?

If you don't care to vote, you have no right to be part of the discussion. Might as well take your marbles and go home.


Because I wish to express my opinion I like neither candidate offered.

Were this a public forum, I'd have every right.

That's the point of not voting, if enough people walk away, with their marbles, the structure collapses.

Howey
08-14-2015, 12:26 PM
Because I wish to express my opinion I like neither candidate offered.

Were this a public forum, I'd have every right.

That's the point of not voting, if enough people walk away, with their marbles, the structure collapses.

So your goal is for the structure to collapse?

Telling....

Chris
08-14-2015, 12:50 PM
So your goal is for the structure to collapse?

Telling....

Anarchy. But don't worry, we will still have the existing social order to rely on.

del
08-14-2015, 02:27 PM
Anarchy. But don't worry, we will still have the existing social order to rely on.

http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002527681/1051573767_unicorn_demotivational_xlarge.jpeg

Peter1469
08-14-2015, 02:29 PM
Rand Paul.

Redrose
08-14-2015, 02:36 PM
I'm not fond of either, but to answer the question I'd take Trump over Sanders. I'm still leary of Trumps motivation, and he is saying some good stuff. Sanders is just too far off the rails for me.

Howey
08-14-2015, 02:39 PM
Rand Paul.


Given the lack of any other viable political party these are your only choices.

Howey
08-14-2015, 02:46 PM
Rand Paul.


Anarchy. But don't worry, we will still have the existing social order to rely on.

Gawd, I miss Alyosha.

While I understand there's a thin line dividing anarchy and libertarians, I thought you at one time said you weren't a libertarian?

Next question: How do we maintain the current social order following your revolution? An intelligent person would realize that's not possible.

Chris
08-14-2015, 03:06 PM
Gawd, I miss Alyosha.

While I understand there's a thin line dividing anarchy and libertarians, I thought you at one time said you weren't a libertarian?

Next question: How do we maintain the current social order following your revolution? An intelligent person would realize that's not possible.

I'm not a Libertarian. I am libertarian. This has been explained to you too many times to bother trying again.

The social order existed prior to the State. Perhaps for 99.99999999999...% of man's existence. How did it ever exist that long and continue to today? So much for well-poisoned impossibilities.