PDA

View Full Version : Against Voting? The GOP Wants to Help



IMPress Polly
08-16-2012, 01:33 PM
Dear Fellow Progressives (...provided there are others here...),

Do you think American leftists should stay home this November? So do American rightists. In fact, they don't even want you to be PERMITTED to vote. They have accordingly passed new voter suppression laws in a dozen states of late. The most important of these, however, is the new voter ID law in Pennsylvania, which is discussed at the link below. The Pennsylvania voter ID law, upheld in court yesterday, will now become the only voter ID law to be applied in a swing state this November. It will disenfranchise upwards of a million or more perfectly legitimate U.S. citizen voters...who conveniently belong to demographic groups with a history of voting for Democrats. (I'm sure that's purely a coincidence.) In case you don't grasp the significance, as you'll see at this link, that's enough of a difference to effectively grant Mitt Romney victory there (along with all the state's electoral votes, since we don't have a system of proportional representation), whereas otherwise the state would likely have gone to Obama. (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#48683676) Anyhow, I thought I'd provide the info in case anyone would be interested in more formally joining up with the Republican Party's voter suppression agenda rather than just trying to enforce it individually. (Yes, I'm mocking my own previous anti-voting position, which continues to be upheld by too many radical leftists.)

Cigar
08-16-2012, 01:36 PM
It's just going to make it that much sweeter knowing they when to all these lengths and spent all that money ... and still lost! :)

Mainecoons
08-16-2012, 01:39 PM
Congratulations on you two joining together for a really dumb thread. Next time someone asks you for your ID, make sure you give them a rant about how they are trying to suppress your whatever.

Mister D
08-16-2012, 01:40 PM
Can Republicans count on black people being too lazy to get photo IDs? That seems to be the implication.

Cigar
08-16-2012, 01:41 PM
Congratulations on you two joining together for a really dumb thread. Next time someone asks you for your ID, make sure you give them a rant about how they are trying to suppress your whatever.

I think this is the spot where I get to say "Bite Me" :finger:

Cigar
08-16-2012, 01:43 PM
Can Republicans count on black people being too lazy to get photo IDs? That seems to be the implication.

The best way to find out is to ask one ... if you're interested and have the Balls.

Chances are ... you have little use for a zipper anyway. :)

Mister D
08-16-2012, 01:47 PM
The best way to find out is to ask one ... if you're interested and have the Balls.

Chances are ... you have little use for a zipper anyway. :)

Cigar, are you too lazy to get a photo ID?

IMPress Polly
08-16-2012, 01:51 PM
Why should anybody need these new IDs? Independent studies continually find that there exists no voter fraud problem. This is a solution in search of a problem. Unfortunately, said solution will conveniently disenfranchise millions of perfectly legitimate...mostly Democratic...voters.

Mister D
08-16-2012, 01:52 PM
I have a photo ID. I bet every member of this website has a photo ID. Seriously, are you saying that black people are just too lazy?

Cigar
08-16-2012, 01:56 PM
Why should anybody need these new IDs? Independent studies continually find that there exists no voter fraud problem. This is a solution in search of a problem. Unfortunately, said solution will conveniently disenfranchise millions of perfectly legitimate...mostly Democratic...voters.

Don't bother ... I'm sure they know a lot of 90 year old's who don't have expired Drivers Licenses.

It's not about voter fraud, it's about demographics.

They are running out of options. ... fast. :)

Mister D
08-16-2012, 01:57 PM
Nonsense! According to you, they can count on black people being too lazy to get a photo ID.

MMC
08-16-2012, 01:57 PM
Why should anybody need these new IDs? Independent studies continually find that there exists no voter fraud problem. This is a solution in search of a problem. Unfortunately, said solution will conveniently disenfranchise millions of perfectly legitimate...mostly Democratic...voters.

Did you know back when Hillary Clinton, well she wasn't a Clinton back then. Did you know that she brought forth Charges of Voter Fraud against Richard J Daley in Chicago. That goes back how far. Oh back to when Hillary was a Republican. You can google up all of Chicago's juicy pieces of some of the most known people speaking out on knowing of this voter Fraud.....always taking place Right here in one of the Libs Bastions of Complete Governmental Failure. :wink:

Cigar
08-16-2012, 02:02 PM
And you still ended up with Richard J Daley :)

So ...

MMC
08-16-2012, 02:04 PM
And you still ended up with Richard J Daley :)

So ...

So.....the point was, Hillary proved there was Voter Fraud in the Democratic Party. :Doh!: :biglaugh:

Cigar
08-16-2012, 02:06 PM
So.....the point was, Hillary proved there was Voter Fraud in the Democratic Party. :Doh!: :biglaugh:

... and how old where you then? :)

Mister D
08-16-2012, 02:07 PM
So.....the point was, Hillary proved there was Voter Fraud in the Democratic Party. :Doh!: :biglaugh:

Cigar got bitch slapped again! :afro: Pimp that lil' bitch out, MMC!

Chris
08-16-2012, 02:20 PM
Dear Fellow Progressives (...provided there are others here...),

Do you think American leftists should stay home this November? So do American rightists. In fact, they don't even want you to be PERMITTED to vote. They have accordingly passed new voter suppression laws in a dozen states of late. The most important of these, however, is the new voter ID law in Pennsylvania, which is discussed at the link below. The Pennsylvania voter ID law, upheld in court yesterday, will now become the only voter ID law to be applied in a swing state this November. It will disenfranchise upwards of a million or more perfectly legitimate U.S. citizen voters...who conveniently belong to demographic groups with a history of voting for Democrats. (I'm sure that's purely a coincidence.) In case you don't grasp the significance, as you'll see at this link, that's enough of a difference to effectively grant Mitt Romney victory there (along with all the state's electoral votes, since we don't have a system of proportional representation), whereas otherwise the state would likely have gone to Obama. (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#48683676) Anyhow, I thought I'd provide the info in case anyone would be interested in more formally joining up with the Republican Party's voter suppression agenda rather than just trying to enforce it individually. (Yes, I'm mocking my own previous anti-voting position, which continues to be upheld by too many radical leftists.)


Yes, I'm mocking my own previous anti-voting position, which continues to be upheld by too many radical leftists.

And doing it with a parody of leftists talking points. Brilliant!! Assuming you actually intended it.

Goldie Locks
08-16-2012, 02:22 PM
Why does the democratic progressive liberal socialist Marxist commie party insist that only minorities will be disenfranchised by voter ID laws when more white folk don't have them?

Mister D
08-16-2012, 02:24 PM
Why does the democratic progressive liberal socialist Marxist commie party insist that only minorities will be disenfranchised by voter ID laws when more white folk don't have them?

Honestly, they may very well believe these voters really are too damn lazy and uninterested in voting to bother. And they call the GOP racist. It's incredible.

Peter1469
08-16-2012, 05:38 PM
Why did Obama require all the illegal aliens who wanted to get the loophole for a green card show all sorts of ID including a notarized birth certificate? That seems like a lot of work when your birth certificate is in another country....

No people in modern America are lacking in photo IDs. There is voter fraud, it is just rarely prosecuted.

IDs will make it harder for dead people to vote and for people to vote several times. That is the reason that the left is against IDs for voting.

The Clown, Al Franken won because of voter fraud. That extra dem seat ensured Obamacare's passage.

http://townhall.com/columnists/byronyork/2012/08/13/when_1099_felons_vote_in_a_race_won_by_312_ballots

patrickt
08-16-2012, 05:56 PM
Why should anybody need these new IDs? Independent studies continually find that there exists no voter fraud problem. This is a solution in search of a problem. Unfortunately, said solution will conveniently disenfranchise millions of perfectly legitimate...mostly Democratic...voters.

No one needs a new ID, Polly. I've had my ID for fifty years. There have been zero "independent" studes showing no voter fraud. That's either an insanely stupid comment or an outright lie. "Studies" from progressives aren't independent. Every election has dead people voting but progressives/liberals/socialists/communists continue to insist it doesn't happen.


So, once again progressives/liberals/socialists/communists--whatever title is current--are demanding their right to commit fraud and get away with it.

Have you signed up, Polly, to go to nursing homes with already complete absentee ballots to coerce elderly people into signing them?

Frogger
08-16-2012, 06:35 PM
What a crock. Anyone can get a photo ID. I'll bet those who CAN'T get a photo ID could get one if they needed it to buy beer. The only reason Democrats are against photo IDs is because they will cut down on illeligible people voting Democrat.

Frogger
08-16-2012, 06:39 PM
John Kennedy won Chicago due to voter fraud in Chicago. That fraud gave him Cook County which gave him Illinois which gave him the election so yes, having proper voter ID is very important.

patrickt
08-17-2012, 09:34 AM
Why should anybody need these new IDs? Independent studies continually find that there exists no voter fraud problem. This is a solution in search of a problem. Unfortunately, said solution will conveniently disenfranchise millions of perfectly legitimate...mostly Democratic...voters.

I've seen no independent studies showing no fraud. I've seen a lot of studies from liberals saying no one is being prosecuted. That's cute and totally dishonest. Actually, fraud is common. ACORN made millions on fraud. What hasn't been found are the millions, or even dozens, who will be disenfranchised.

If you're opposed to being voting repeatedly, if you're opposed to people being bused in to swing states to pretend to be residents and vote, if you're opposed to dead people voting, if you're opposed to foreign nationals voting then you have to start with Voter ID. Then the other laws that liberals have passed to facilitate their fraud need to be repealed.

Liberals dissing the poor constituents as being too irresponsible, lazy, and stupid to get IDs is simply how the racist and elitist liberals think of their supporters.

Liberals were already caught providing foreign nationals with counterfeit vote registration cards so I don't think they'll have any problem cranking out bogus IDs. I hope that will be a felony, though.