PDA

View Full Version : Oops: Benghazi committee Democrats say they'll release witness transcripts



Cigar
10-05-2015, 07:40 PM
The Democratic minority on a U.S. congressional committee investigating the attack in Benghazi, Libya, intend to defy the committee's Republican leaders by releasing the transcript of a closed-door interview with a former senior aide to Hillary Clinton, they said on Monday.

The announcement came six days after Kevin McCarthy, the leader of U.S. House Republicans, went on television to boast that the federally funded investigation had successfully dented Clinton's poll numbers as she runs for the Democratic presidential nomination.

McCarthy, who is seeking to become the next House speaker, later clarified that he had not meant to suggest that harming the Democratic front-runner's chances at winning the November 2016 election was the committee's purpose.

This has not stopped Democrats, including Clinton herself, from seizing on his comments as confirmation of what they have believed all along.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/05/us-usa-clinton-benghazi-idUSKCN0RZ1YS20151005

http://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ruhroh-100336862-orig.jpg

Peter1469
10-05-2015, 07:41 PM
His statements don't affect the investigation at all.

Cigar
10-05-2015, 08:10 PM
His statements don't affect the investigation at all.

The investigation is officially a Joke ...

The Bi-Partition, mostly Republican Commission over a year ago cleared Clinton.

... go ahead, spend some more Tax Payer money on nothing.

hanger4
10-05-2015, 08:24 PM
The investigation is officially a Joke ...

The Bi-Partition, mostly Republican Commission over a year ago cleared Clinton.

... go ahead, spend some more Tax Payer money on nothing.

And then ...... oops ....... A secert email server came to light. What is that 2 years, 1 1/2 years HC was hiding documents ??

Cigar
10-05-2015, 08:26 PM
And then ...... oops ....... A secert email server came to light. What is that 2 years, 1 1/2 years HC was hiding documents ??

Stick with it sport ... :f_cheers:

Careful Mrs D-Spell-Checker has nothing better to do :laugh:

valley ranch
10-05-2015, 08:33 PM
Would you vote for Clinton's wife? For President of The United States?

Cigar
10-05-2015, 08:35 PM
Would you vote for wife? For President of The United States?

If I had a choice, Bernie ... or even Joe

But if it's Hillary against a GOP Candidate ... I'm holding my nose and Voting for Hillary.

hanger4
10-05-2015, 08:40 PM
Stick with it sport ... :f_cheers:

Careful Mrs D-Spell-Checker has nothing better to do :laugh:

Are you going to actually look the other way and ignore a secret email server ?? that had "Top Secret" materials on it and an attempt hack 5 times ??

TrueBlue
10-05-2015, 08:40 PM
It is incumbent upon the Democrats to release the witness transcripts so that all the goings-on can be as transparent and crystal clear as it can be. All must be brought out at this point.

TrueBlue
10-05-2015, 08:42 PM
If I had a choice, Bernie ... or even Joe

But if it's Hillary against a GOP Candidate ... I'm holding my nose and Voting for Hillary.

Good thing! You can't go wrong voting for Hillary!

Tahuyaman
10-05-2015, 08:47 PM
Good thing! You can't go wrong voting for Hillary!

who would be more wrong? Her or Sanders?

maineman
10-05-2015, 08:49 PM
who would be more wrong? Her or Sanders?

either one is a better option that The Donald, imho.

hanger4
10-05-2015, 09:07 PM
It is incumbent upon the Democrats to release the witness transcripts so that all the goings-on can be as transparent and crystal clear as it can be. All must be brought out at this point.

You call for transparency and ignore HC's secret mail server. Transparency for thee but not for HC. Is that how it works TrueBlue ??

Tahuyaman
10-05-2015, 10:30 PM
either one is a better option that The Donald, imho.

shut up. People who may agree with you don't listen to you.

Professor Peabody
10-06-2015, 01:47 AM
The Democratic minority on a U.S. congressional committee investigating the attack in Benghazi, Libya, intend to defy the committee's Republican leaders by releasing the transcript of a closed-door interview with a former senior aide to Hillary Clinton, they said on Monday.

The announcement came six days after Kevin McCarthy, the leader of U.S. House Republicans, went on television to boast that the federally funded investigation had successfully dented Clinton's poll numbers as she runs for the Democratic presidential nomination.

McCarthy, who is seeking to become the next House speaker, later clarified that he had not meant to suggest that harming the Democratic front-runner's chances at winning the November 2016 election was the committee's purpose.

This has not stopped Democrats, including Clinton herself, from seizing on his comments as confirmation of what they have believed all along.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/05/us-usa-clinton-benghazi-idUSKCN0RZ1YS20151005

http://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ruhroh-100336862-orig.jpg

Are they going to allow ALL the witnesses to talk?

Professor Peabody
10-06-2015, 01:49 AM
Good thing! You can't go wrong voting for Hillary!

Really? The person who kept classified information in her basement goes free and Gen. Patraeus has to take a plea bargain for doing the same thing? Stalin can do no wrong.