Kurmugeon
10-12-2015, 03:15 PM
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/Democrats-can-choose-sanders-momentum
September 02, 2015, 06:30 am
Dems can choose either Sanders's momentum or Clinton's FBI investigation
By H.A. Goodman, contributor
Imagine in 2012, after President Obama defeated Republican nominee Mitt Romney, that Democrats would have another chance at winning the White House in 2016. This time, however, one Democratic challenger would endure headlines like this one from Politico: "Judge says Hillary Clinton's private emails violated policy." The other Democratic candidate would create enough enthusiasm for The Washington Post to write: "100,000 people have come to recent Bernie Sanders rallies. How does he do it?" Democrats today have two choices, and the future of the Democratic Party, as well as the nation, is at stake.
Will Democrats roll the dice on Election Day with a candidate at the heart of an FBI investigation (pertaining to emails and a private server) and who accepted $100,000 in donations from Donald Trump for the Clinton Foundation? Or, will the Democratic Party rally around a genuine progressive who just received the Congressional Award from the Veterans of Foreign Wars and a man with the most comprehensive racial justice platform in 2016? After all, a future with Republican contender Trump leading this country could be the result of Democrats picking the wrong nominee. Therefore, it's important to analyze the two choices for Democratic nominee, especially since a battle for the soul of the Democratic Party is currently taking place. In reality, there are only two choices that progressives have in 2016.
1. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) isn't only drawing enormous crowds; he's within 7 percentage points of Clinton in Iowa, he's surpassed Clinton in New Hampshire, he beats Trump in a general election and people around the country him.
Sanders is energizing a base of Democrats and progressives around the country who've longed for a clear distinction between both parties. His momentum is only beginning, and with greater name recognition, the Vermont senator can duplicate what he's done in Iowa and New Hampshire throughout the country. Although naysayers believe that progressives in Iowa and New Hampshire aren't representative of a more diverse group of Democrats in places like South Carolina, such thinking is flawed. A prime example of why Sanders will continue to surge throughout the nation is found in...
I would add, the likelihood is that Hillary will meltdown and collapse of a stroke under the pressures of the campaign, particularly in a debate with Trump.
Trump will be the "Death of Her", both figuratively, and possibly literally.
The only reasonable, realistic, and good candidate the Democrats have, is Jim Webb, .... but he is being ignored by the establishment MSM and Democratic Party Machinery.
The Establishment controllers of the Democratic Party can now see that Hillary is a lost cause. So they've doubled down on their "Shift to the Left", in placing their hopes behind the Socialist Candidate Bernie Sanders.
I am a decades long Registered Democrat who is Horrified and Astounded at what Obama and Crew have managed to transform the once egalitarian and common man centered Democratic Party into.
J.F. Kennedy would be tossed out of today's Democratic Party as a "Right Wing Racists and Extremist!".
As someone who wants to see the corrupt power of the anti-white RACIST Democratic Party broken and discarded, I am actually glad to see Jim Webb ignored, even though he is the only Democratic Presidential Candidate I'd be even remotely interested in voting for.
If Jim Webb had the slightest of chances to win the 2016 election, I might be tempted to give the Democrats another chance.
I do NOT want to live under the yoke of Sander's Socialism.
Why on earth did the Democratic Party double down on their "Shift to the Left"?
-
September 02, 2015, 06:30 am
Dems can choose either Sanders's momentum or Clinton's FBI investigation
By H.A. Goodman, contributor
Imagine in 2012, after President Obama defeated Republican nominee Mitt Romney, that Democrats would have another chance at winning the White House in 2016. This time, however, one Democratic challenger would endure headlines like this one from Politico: "Judge says Hillary Clinton's private emails violated policy." The other Democratic candidate would create enough enthusiasm for The Washington Post to write: "100,000 people have come to recent Bernie Sanders rallies. How does he do it?" Democrats today have two choices, and the future of the Democratic Party, as well as the nation, is at stake.
Will Democrats roll the dice on Election Day with a candidate at the heart of an FBI investigation (pertaining to emails and a private server) and who accepted $100,000 in donations from Donald Trump for the Clinton Foundation? Or, will the Democratic Party rally around a genuine progressive who just received the Congressional Award from the Veterans of Foreign Wars and a man with the most comprehensive racial justice platform in 2016? After all, a future with Republican contender Trump leading this country could be the result of Democrats picking the wrong nominee. Therefore, it's important to analyze the two choices for Democratic nominee, especially since a battle for the soul of the Democratic Party is currently taking place. In reality, there are only two choices that progressives have in 2016.
1. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) isn't only drawing enormous crowds; he's within 7 percentage points of Clinton in Iowa, he's surpassed Clinton in New Hampshire, he beats Trump in a general election and people around the country him.
Sanders is energizing a base of Democrats and progressives around the country who've longed for a clear distinction between both parties. His momentum is only beginning, and with greater name recognition, the Vermont senator can duplicate what he's done in Iowa and New Hampshire throughout the country. Although naysayers believe that progressives in Iowa and New Hampshire aren't representative of a more diverse group of Democrats in places like South Carolina, such thinking is flawed. A prime example of why Sanders will continue to surge throughout the nation is found in...
I would add, the likelihood is that Hillary will meltdown and collapse of a stroke under the pressures of the campaign, particularly in a debate with Trump.
Trump will be the "Death of Her", both figuratively, and possibly literally.
The only reasonable, realistic, and good candidate the Democrats have, is Jim Webb, .... but he is being ignored by the establishment MSM and Democratic Party Machinery.
The Establishment controllers of the Democratic Party can now see that Hillary is a lost cause. So they've doubled down on their "Shift to the Left", in placing their hopes behind the Socialist Candidate Bernie Sanders.
I am a decades long Registered Democrat who is Horrified and Astounded at what Obama and Crew have managed to transform the once egalitarian and common man centered Democratic Party into.
J.F. Kennedy would be tossed out of today's Democratic Party as a "Right Wing Racists and Extremist!".
As someone who wants to see the corrupt power of the anti-white RACIST Democratic Party broken and discarded, I am actually glad to see Jim Webb ignored, even though he is the only Democratic Presidential Candidate I'd be even remotely interested in voting for.
If Jim Webb had the slightest of chances to win the 2016 election, I might be tempted to give the Democrats another chance.
I do NOT want to live under the yoke of Sander's Socialism.
Why on earth did the Democratic Party double down on their "Shift to the Left"?
-