New Hillary Emails Same Ol Same Ol

[hanger4]

325 classified emails in this batch. That brings the total to 999. ........ http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/30/clinton-email-classification-rate-rises/ ......... http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/hillary-clinton-email-intelligence-216264 .........

[Subdermal]

Liberals don't care about such laws. They care only about party and agenda.

[Captain Obvious]

Liberals don't care about such laws. They care only about party and agenda.

Kinda like Cruz and Huckabee and their theories of constitutionality?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btPJPFnesV4

[hanger4]

March 10, 2015“There is no classified material. So I’m certainly well aware of the classification requirements.” — Hillary Rodham Clinton. ........ 999 classified emails on her private server so far. She lied or she's incompetent.

[Professor Peabody]

18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071


18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material (a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both. (c) In this section, the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924

The silence from Lynch on this speaks volumes.

[Beevee]

Liberals don't care about such laws. They care only about party and agenda.

Isn't that what Mitch McConnell said when he decided that the GOP would not work with Obama, even before he put his first step into the White House?

Conservatives have such selective memories.

[texan]

Kinda like Cruz and Huckabee and their theories of constitutionality?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btPJPFnesV4

What specifically are you referring to?

I will go ahead and say breaking the law and an opinion on the constitutionality is slightly different.

[texan]

Isn't that what Mitch McConnell said when he decided that the GOP would not work with Obama, even before he put his first step into the White House?

Conservatives have such selective memories.

Huh? WTF are babbling about? Oh yeah its the same thing.

[domer76]

March 10, 2015“There is no classified material. So I’m certainly well aware of the classification requirements.” — Hillary Rodham Clinton. ........ 999 classified emails on her private server so far. She lied or she's incompetent.

Were they classified at the time? If so, how many and which ones?

[zelmo1234]

Isn't that what Mitch McConnell said when he decided that the GOP would not work with Obama, even before he put his first step into the White House?

Conservatives have such selective memories.

That was all talk? What policy did McConnell or Boehner prevent from happening?

[zelmo1234]

Were they classified at the time? If so, how many and which ones?

So you are willing to vote for a person the does not have the ability to determine what information should be classified and what information is harmless?

That is actually worse in my opinion than being careless with classified documents

[hanger4]

Were they classified at the time? If so, how many and which ones?
What part of "So I’m certainly well aware of the classification requirements". didn't you understand ?? HC's emails contain discussions of conversations with foreign diplomats, issues with embassy security, and relations with countries from Russia to China. All of which are classified from the get go.

[texan]

Were they classified at the time? If so, how many and which ones?

Oh my a little sheep action.......You might want to read up on this bro. You appear to be a little (conveniently?)behind.

[domer76]

So you are willing to vote for a person the does not have the ability to determine what information should be classified and what information is harmless?

That is actually worse in my opinion than being careless with classified documents

When you don't know, just say so.

[domer76]

What part of "So I’m certainly well aware of the classification requirements". didn't you understand ?? HC's emails contain discussions of conversations with foreign diplomats, issues with embassy security, and relations with countries from Russia to China. All of which are classified from the get go.

So far, I've just seen your opinion. Like Zelmo, if you don't know the answer, just fess up.

[domer76]

Oh my a little sheep action.......You might want to read up on this bro. You appear to be a little (conveniently?)behind.

Three non-answers in a row. At least you frantics are consistent

[hanger4]

So far, I've just seen your opinion. Like Zelmo, if you don't know the answer, just fess up.
Do your own research as you require of others. And before you start understand this; ......
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

[domer76]

Do your own research as you require of others. And before you start understand this; ......
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

Not even a good cut-and-paste. You made the claim. Back it up or STFU. How many and which ones were classified at the time?

[hanger4]

Not even a good cut-and-paste. You made the claim. Back it up or STFU. How many and which ones were classified at the time?
Doesn't work that way domer, you reap what you sow. You require others to do their own research so have at it or as you say STFU. :grin:

[Cletus]

So far, I've just seen your opinion. Like Zelmo, if you don't know the answer, just fess up.

Apparently he DOES know the answer, because he is correct.

[Beevee]

Huh? WTF are babbling about? Oh yeah its the same thing.

Conservatives have a short memory where history is concerned and you are obviously one of them. If you don't know what I am babbling about, have a private conversation with any conservative here. They will put you right without having to make a public utterance, which is usually in their nature when they are wrong.

[Professor Peabody]

Were they classified at the time? If so, how many and which ones?

That doesn't matter. It's the contents, not the rubber stamp. The fact that Hillary couldn't tell the difference between Classified material and unclassified material should have dis-qualified her from being Secretary of state as a major security risk. being president is surely out of the question.

[domer76]

Doesn't work that way domer, you reap what you sow. You require others to do their own research so have at it or as you say STFU. :grin:

I tell them I have posted my research many times before. As I have. I have yet to see you post the specific ones that were classified at the time she sent them. Not a single one. I am not interested in doing your "homework" because I believe it to be a fabrication.

[domer76]

Apparently he DOES know the answer, because he is correct.

Show me.

[domer76]

That doesn't matter. It's the contents, not the rubber stamp. The fact that Hillary couldn't tell the difference between Classified material and unclassified material should have dis-qualified her from being Secretary of state as a major security risk. being president is surely out of the question.

"That doesn't matter"? Priceless!

[hanger4]

I tell them I have posted my research many times before. As I have. I have yet to see you post the specific ones that were classified at the time she sent them. Not a single one. I am not interested in doing your "homework" because I believe it to be a fabrication.
I did my homework a long time ago. It's not I playing 'see no evil hear no evil'. There have been numerous links and C&P's explaining what is classified from the get go. ...... "U.S. government regulations examined by Reuters say this sort of information, whether written or spoken, must be classified from the start, and handled through secure, government-controlled channels. In all the 87 email threads examined by Reuters, the State Department has blanked out the confidential information in the public copies, adding the classification code "1.4(B)", denoting foreign government information.

This is the only kind of information that presidential executive orders say is "presumed" to likely harm national security if wrongly disclosed. State Department regulations describe it as the "most important category of national security information" its officials encounter. ...... http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0R22C120150902

[domer76]

I did my homework a long time ago. It's not I playing 'see no evil hear no evil'. There have been numerous links and C&P's explaining what is classified from the get go. ...... "U.S. government regulations examined by Reuters say this sort of information, whether written or spoken, must be classified from the start, and handled through secure, government-controlled channels. In all the 87 email threads examined by Reuters, the State Department has blanked out the confidential information in the public copies, adding the classification code "1.4(B)", denoting foreign government information.

This is the only kind of information that presidential executive orders say is "presumed" to likely harm national security if wrongly disclosed. State Department regulations describe it as the "most important category of national security information" its officials encounter. ...... http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0R22C120150902

You remind me of that GE commercial where the dad says to his son about grampa's hammer: "You can't pick it up, can you?"

[hanger4]

You remind me of that GE commercial where the dad says to his son about grampa's hammer: "You can't pick it up, can you?"
And you remind me of the kid claiming plausible deniability by ignoring the truth. You asked and you recieved and you deny.

[domer76]

And you remind me of the kid claiming plausible deniability by ignoring the truth. You asked and you recieved and you deny.

You haven't shown me shit yet on your claims. Which specific ones were classified when they were sent?

[hanger4]

You haven't shown me shit yet on your claims. Which specific ones were classified when they were sent?
If you had read the link or understood what you read you'd know that all communications with diplomats and foreign officials are automatically classified. HC's email records contain numerous instances of such communications, therefore she lied or she's incompetent.

[Cigar]

325 classified emails in this batch. That brings the total to 999. ........ http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/30/clinton-email-classification-rate-rises/ ......... http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/hillary-clinton-email-intelligence-216264 .........


If the Right is looking for really good conspiracy to exploit, they could check Rahm Emanuel and The Chicago Police Departments Email over the last year.

[hanger4]

If the Right is looking for really good conspiracy to exploit, they could check Rahm Emanuel and The Chicago Police Departments Email over the last year.
Maybe so, but wrong thread.

[Cigar]

Maybe so, but wrong thread.

Just trying to help The Right find that illusive conspiracy, it has to be difficult always coming short.

[hanger4]

Just trying to help The Right find that illusive conspiracy, it has to be difficult always coming short.
Then start your own thread. Deflecting from HC's lies and or incompetence in this thread makes you look foolish.

[Professor Peabody]

"That doesn't matter"? Priceless!

Really? The fact that Hillary couldn't tell the difference between Classified material and unclassified material should have dis-qualified her from being Secretary of state as a major security risk. being president is surely out of the question.

[Subdermal]

Kinda like Cruz and Huckabee and their theories of constitutionality?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btPJPFnesV4

Not sure about Huckabee, but I'm fully educated on Cruz and his positions. What are you talking about? I need specifics.

[Subdermal]

Isn't that what Mitch McConnell said when he decided that the GOP would not work with Obama, even before he put his first step into the White House?

Conservatives have such selective memories.

If you think that Mitch McConnell hasn't worked with Obama, you must be a lib - because everyone else thinks that McConnell is part of the same Establishment as is Obama.

That's the whole reason that Cruz and the other non-establishment candidates are popular, capisce?

[Beevee]

If you think that Mitch McConnell hasn't worked with Obama, you must be a lib - because everyone else thinks that McConnell is part of the same Establishment as is Obama.

That's the whole reason that Cruz and the other non-establishment candidates are popular, capisce?

Popular? Huh!

Which brings me to the first part of your remarks. McConnell is just another conservative liar? Do you contend then that he is a different type of conservative liar, compared to the remaining conservative liars?

[Subdermal]

Popular? Huh!

Yes. As in leading the polls, meaningless socialist canadian non-voter.


Which brings me to the first part of your remarks. McConnell is just another conservative liar? Do you contend then that he is a different type of conservative liar, compared to the remaining conservative liars?

To you, everyone looks like a conservative. Use some discernment. McConnell is no more a conservative than you are intellectually rigorous.