why hillary took $675k from goldman sachs

[del]

During Wednesday night’s Democratic forum, Anderson Cooper asked Clinton whether she shouldn’t have taken $675,000 to give three speeches to Goldman Sachs. “Well, I don't know. That’s what they offered,” she replied (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-progressive-attacks-218721).

puts me in mind of the famous churchill line

"madame, we've already established what kind of woman you are, now we're just haggling about the price."

http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/all/2015/09/gaffe-track/403855/#note-459936

[Mac-7]

puts me in mind of the famous churchill line

"madame, we've already established what kind of woman you are, now we're just haggling about the price."

http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/all/2015/09/gaffe-track/403855/#note-459936

Churchill was the greatest leader of the 20th Century.

Far greater than the half african jerk in the white house who insulted him.

[Truth Detector]

puts me in mind of the famous churchill line

"madame, we've already established what kind of woman you are, now we're just haggling about the price."

http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/all/2015/09/gaffe-track/403855/#note-459936

Democrats hate people with money; unless they happen to be Dempcrats.

Nothing more ironic than quoting Churchill on a thread about Shrillary.

[Cigar]

I got to admit ... $675 isn't something I'd say no to, just to do some talking ...

I ain't no Hater :laugh:

[Crepitus]

I got to admit ... $675 isn't something I'd say no to, just to do some talking ...

I ain't no Hater :laugh:
Yea, that's kinda where I was gonna go.

Why did she take $675,000 for 3 speeches?

Wouldn't you?

[Truth Detector]

I got to admit ... $675 isn't something I'd say no to, just to do some talking ...

I ain't no Hater :laugh:


Yea, that's kinda where I was gonna go.

Why did she take $675,000 for 3 speeches?

Wouldn't you?

Two Liberals who cannot comprehend the disconnect between a partisan message impugning the wealthy as a societal problem that only Liberal politicians can fix while those same Liberal politicians take exorbitant fees to enrich themselves.

The irony is rich.

[Mark III]

Far greater than the half african jerk in the white house who insulted him.

Put that little racist in your small brain back in the box mac.

[MisterVeritis]

Yea, that's kinda where I was gonna go.

Why did she take $675,000 for 3 speeches?

Wouldn't you?
It was a bribe. Nothing more.

[Crepitus]

Two Liberals who cannot comprehend the disconnect between a partisan message impugning the wealthy as a societal problem that only Liberal politicians can fix while those same Liberal politicians take exorbitant fees to enrich themselves.

The irony is rich.
I ain't votin' for her.

[donttread]

Democrats hate people with money; unless they happen to be Dempcrats.

Nothing more ironic than quoting Churchill on a thread about Shrillary.

Wall Street gave more to Obama than McCain. They hedge their bets very well

[Bo-4]

Say what she will, it's a problem for her.

This issue will likely be front and center in tonight's debate.

Should be fun!

http://www.smiley-lol.com/smiley/manger/grignoter/pocorn.gif

[Professor Peabody]

Clinton struggles to answer question about paid speeches to Wall Street firms

By Abby Phillip February 3 at 11:59 PM

MANCHESTER — Just as Hillary Clinton was preparing to close out a surefooted performance at the CNN Town Hall in New Hampshire, she got a question about those paid speeches to Wall Street firms.

"Was that a bad error in judgement?" moderator Anderson Cooper asked. "Did you have to be paid $675,000?"

"Well, I don't know, that's what they offered, so..." Clinton said after noting that she made speeches to "lots of groups."

Copper noted that those people weren't running for political office after leaving their post at the State Department, as she eventually did.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/02/03/clinton-struggles-to-answer-question-about-paid-speeches-to-wall-street-firms/

Duck....Dodge....Hide...when all else seems to fail, convenient memory loss seem to work. It appears Hillary learned well from Bill's Paula Jones deposition. During that deposition Bill said "I don't know" (http://prorev.com/legacy.htm) 62 times and lost his memory of things 267 times. I'm sorry, but "Well, I don't know, that's what they offered, so..." that is an unacceptable answer. Does she really think folks will believe she will get paid $675,000 to speak only and they won't expect anything in return? I think one would have to believe in the tooth fairy and Leprechaun's to actually believe anyone would pay anyone else that much money just to talk. I realize all politicians "bend" the truth. But I believe, Hillary actually "cracking down" on Wall St is the biggest Whopper of this election so far.

[Peter1469]

That was a great response! “Well, I don't know. That’s what they offered.” :smiley:


puts me in mind of the famous churchill line

"madame, we've already established what kind of woman you are, now we're just haggling about the price."

http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/all/2015/09/gaffe-track/403855/#note-459936

[Bo-4]

That was a great response! “Well, I don't know. That’s what they offered.” :smiley:

I agree, however when you are attempting to pretend to be with Bernie on Wall Street malfeasance, yet accept that kind of money right around the same time we bailed them out to the tune of BILLIONS?

PROBLEM

[texan]

Opened a thread on this last night within seconds of her comments. My comment was LOL that she didn't know she was gonna run. All we saw for years was "I am ready for Hillary" bumper stickers all over the road.

The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy answer (not to mention a weird question) answer was priceless.........Ever heard where there is smoke there is fire? Way to much smoke around those people.

[del]

That was a great response! “Well, I don't know. That’s what they offered.” :smiley:

she is so completely disconnected from reality that i'm surprised she doesn't require an interpreter

[Bo-4]

she is so completely disconnected from reality that i'm surprised she doesn't require an interpreter

For me?

Hillary is ALMOST as dislikable as Ted Cruz.

But nobody will ever cross that threshold .. Joe McCarthy is dead.

[domer76]

puts me in mind of the famous churchill line

"madame, we've already established what kind of woman you are, now we're just haggling about the price."

http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/all/2015/09/gaffe-track/403855/#note-459936

She was supposed to haggle them down to a few hundred bucks? Free?

[Peter1469]

I agree, however when you are attempting to pretend to be with Bernie on Wall Street malfeasance, yet accept that kind of money right around the same time we bailed them out to the tune of BILLIONS?

PROBLEM

She already took the money. Nothing she says will make it better.

[Bo-4]

She already took the money. Nothing she says will make it better.

Nope, she's a phony.

Hope she Feels the Bern in about two hours! :)

[del]

She was supposed to haggle them down to a few hundred bucks? Free?

do you really think she has anything to say that's worth $675k?

why, then, do you suppose they paid her $675k?

this ain't rocket surgery

[Peter1469]

do you really think she has anything to say that's worth $675k?

why, then, do you suppose they paid her $675k?

this ain't rocket surgery

It isn't for sex with her, that is for sure.

[domer76]

do you really think she has anything to say that's worth $675k?

why, then, do you suppose they paid her $675k?

this ain't rocket surgery

Nobody's words are worth that. I'm asking why she would turn down that kind of money?

[del]

Nobody's words are worth that. I'm asking why she would turn down that kind of money?

because not turning it down leads people like me to believe she's for sale

and by believe, i mean know

[Ransom]

puts me in mind of the famous churchill line

"madame, we've already established what kind of woman you are, now we're just haggling about the price."

http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/all/2015/09/gaffe-track/403855/#note-459936

Tough stuff

[del]

Tough stuff

what time does your flight leave for damascus?

[Ransom]

Nobody's words are worth that. I'm asking why she would turn down that kind of money?

And try to pull off the 'progressive' or non-establishment scheme?

[sachem]

Yea, that's kinda where I was gonna go.

Why did she take $675,000 for 3 speeches?

Wouldn't you?I understand the temptation but she knew she wanted to run again. Stupid on her part.

[sachem]

It isn't for sex with her, that is for sure.Peter!!!!!!!

[domer76]

because not turning it down leads people like me to believe she's for sale

and by believe, i mean know

Well then, when she is President, keep a close eye on her

[del]

Well then, when she is President, keep a close eye on her

you'll be president before she is, but i'll keep it in mind

[domer76]

you'll be president before she is, but i'll keep it in mind

Laughing. Sanders has no pathway and which Republican will beat her?

[Bo-4]

what time does your flight leave for damascus?

I'll pay half, but only for a one-way.

Feeling generous, lets include Tahu and TD in said offer!

:D

[del]

Laughing. Sanders has no pathway and which Republican will beat her?

obama had no chance either

how'd that work out for her?

[domer76]

obama had no chance either

how'd that work out for her?

You didn't answer the question. After NH, Sanders has no path.

[del]

You didn't answer the question. After NH, Sanders has no path.

keep telling yourself that

also keep telling yourself no one cares about the emails

things will work out just fine

[Ransom]

what time does your flight leave for damascus?

Surprised you'd bring up Syria given your record on the matter. Don't hate the player, Walnut, hate the game you're losing.

[Truth Detector]

She was supposed to haggle them down to a few hundred bucks? Free?

Another Hillary defender who doesn't comprehend irony. It's a little hard for her to compare herself to populist Bernie Sanders and his rage against Wall Street while she accepts HUGE fees to talk to them.

Get it now?

[Truth Detector]

It isn't for sex with her, that is for sure.

O M G!! We didn't need to go there and put that image in our minds did we? :rofl:

[del]

Surprised you'd bring up Syria given your record on the matter. Don't hate the player, Walnut, hate the game you're losing.

i'm surprised you can find your ass with both hands and a flashlight.

i don't hate my dog when he takes a dump, why would i hate you for doing the same?

[Truth Detector]

I understand the temptation but she knew she wanted to run again. Stupid on her part.

So she was lying AGAIN when she claimed she had NO idea she would be running for President at the time? :biglaugh:

[Ransom]

You didn't answer the question. After NH, Sanders has no path.

We will know by March 1. Or 2. I'm hearing Sanders is an unknown south of DC. We shall see.

[Truth Detector]

i'm surprised you can find your ass with both hands and a flashlight.

i don't hate my dog when he takes a dump, why would i hate you for doing the same?

Trolling, trolling, trolling.....get your rocks off trolling....(to the tune of Rawhide)

[Ransom]

i'm surprised you can find your ass with both hands and a flashlight.

Schoolin the sh!t out of you though.


i don't hate my dog when he takes a dump, why would i hate you for doing the same?

No, I've only seen your hate for Catholicism, mere anger at Teach for schooling you where Syria was concerned. You don't like losing is all.

[Ransom]

We can bring up your record on the matter should you like. Start a Where's Walnut thread.

[del]

Schoolin the sh!t out of you though.



No, I've only seen your hate for Catholicism, mere anger at Teach for schooling you where Syria was concerned. You don't like losing is all.


you see things that don't exist

isn't it time for you to write an angry letter to the editor of wnd?

[Tahuyaman]

Why dones Hillary accept 600+k from anyone? The same reason she does anything else..... Political convenience.

[Tahuyaman]

Hillary actually claims that she was not considering running for POTUS when she accepted the 675k. This is obviously a bald faced lie. She had her mind made up to run for president when she was the First Lady.

[Professor Peabody]

I got to admit ... $675 isn't something I'd say no to, just to do some talking ...

I ain't no Hater :laugh:

Especially if she's telling them to ignore her campaign promises to crack down on Wall St, it's not gonna happen.:shocked: