State Dept. Benghazi Doc Dump

[hanger4]

"The State Department turned over 1,600 pages of previously undisclosed documents related to Hillary Clinton and Libya to the House Benghazi committee on Friday, a month after it revealed the existence of the documents in an unrelated court case."

"The House Select Committee on Benghazi announced it received the records on Friday, adding that the State Department has yet to fully comply with document requests the committee made nearly a year ago."

"The records come from the Office of the Secretary, which would likely include Clinton’s Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, top aide Huma Abedin, and Clinton’s deputy chief of staff and scheduler."

http://freebeacon.com/issues/state-department-turns-over-1600-newly-discovered-clinton-documents-to-benghazi-committee/

And one wonders why it's been hearing after hearing.

Can you say obstruction and failure to comply ??

[JVV]

What a bummer we won't have time to review the final dump before super Tuesday.


And what a bummer we don't have a media who is interested in it.

[Mark III]

What a bummer we have to listen to this dreck so regularly.

[Peter1469]

What a bummer we have to listen to this dreck so regularly.

You shouldn't talk so negative about yourself.

Be more positive in life.

[Peter1469]

This is only one of around 10 ongoing federal FOIA cases. I wonder when a judge is going to go off on the State Department and Hillary for violations of court orders, delays, and falsely certifying that all discoverable material has been released.

[zelmo1234]

This is only one of around 10 ongoing federal FOIA cases. I wonder when a judge is going to go off on the State Department and Hillary for violations of court orders, delays, and falsely certifying that all discoverable material has been released.

The funny part is the Democrats just keep sending her toward that nomination?

The more that comes out the more serious this all becomes and the Democrats have fewer and fewer options. When it is down to 2, the GOP will start to bring all of this to light. And for a Candidate that the people don't like and don't trust, this is really bad.

I really don't know what the democrats are thinking. putting their fingers in their ears and screaming la, la, la, la, la, is not a good plan, in my opinion.

[PNW]

Rightwing conservative wet dreams, they never seem to end and they are willing to say, do and spend anything to keep them going.

[Peter1469]

Rightwing conservative wet dreams, they never seem to end and they are willing to say, do and spend anything to keep them going.


You convinced me with your compelling argument. :wink:

[zelmo1234]

Rightwing conservative wet dreams, they never seem to end and they are willing to say, do and spend anything to keep them going.

So Lets say that Trump is the nominee. As you can see the establishment is starting to get behind him.

And the conservatives will vote for him because of the supreme court. The will likely get the Gun rights people because of the court opening as well. And he appeals to 20% of the Democrats now because they don't like Hillary and they don't trust her.

Sanders and the Media are brushing this off. What do you think the people are going to think about it when Trump is bashing her every day?

[MisterVeritis]

This is only one of around 10 ongoing federal FOIA cases. I wonder when a judge is going to go off on the State Department and Hillary for violations of court orders, delays, and falsely certifying that all discoverable material has been released.
Prison time would be good.

[Peter1469]

Prison time would be good.

In civil cases more like sanctions and evidence being deemed contrary to your position in the case.

[hanger4]

Rightwing conservative wet dreams, they never seem to end and they are willing to say, do and spend anything to keep them going.
You mean to say HC's secret unsecured email server is a figment of our imagination ?? And All those redacted emails are forgeries ?? Who knew ??

[MisterVeritis]

In civil cases more like sanctions and evidence being deemed contrary to your position in the case.
Hillary has been stonewalling a criminal investigation as well as the FOIA requests. I was blurring the lines.

[Peter1469]

Hillary has been stonewalling a criminal investigation as well as the FOIA requests. I was blurring the lines.

If there is ever an indictment Hillary will be well served to not piss that judge off.

[PNW]

And the wet dreams continue.
Amazing

[MisterVeritis]

And the wet dreams continue.
Amazing
For what she did with intel only a state conviction and execution is good enough. The damage she caused, while hidden from view, is enormous. It may take 40-50 years to recover.

[hanger4]

And the wet dreams continue.
Amazing

And you continue to run from any sort of substantive discussion.

[PNW]

And you continue to run from any sort of substantive discussion.

On this topic?
Let me know when you clean off your chins, zip up and want to have a substantive discussion!
Until then your wet dreams are all you have.

[zelmo1234]

On this topic?
Let me know when you clean off your chins, zip up and want to have a substantive discussion!
Until then your wet dreams are all you have.

Are you in 5th Grade? You sound like Trump for God Sake anyone that does not believe like you, all you can do is call them names.

[PNW]

Are you in 5th Grade? You sound like Trump for God Sake anyone that does not believe like you, all you can do is call them names.

Seriously? You have room to talk?

Besides, you know I'm correct.

And if you don't like it you are invited to ignore anything I post......like the adult you think you are.

[zelmo1234]

Seriously? You have room to talk?

Besides, you know I'm correct.

And if you don't like it you are invited to ignore anything I post......like the adult you think you are.

What in your post could you be right about? there was nothing of substance? Just insults?

[Peter1469]

On this topic?
Let me know when you clean off your chins, zip up and want to have a substantive discussion!
Until then your wet dreams are all you have.


Warning: vulgarity is against the rules. So is trolling.

[hanger4]

On this topic?
Let me know when you clean off your chins, zip up and want to have a substantive discussion!
Until then your wet dreams are all you have.

And still nothing.

Is the secret server a lie ??

Did or did not Hillary hide her server from the numerous Benghazi hearings ??

Are the classified emails forgeries ??

Did the State Dept lie about these previously undisclosed Benghazi documents ??

[PNW]

Show us the evidence of any wrong doing.
The witch hunt has produced nothing but mounting debt that the tax payer has to cover.
Until then you have your wet dreams and nothing else.

[Matty]

Show us the evidence of any wrong doing.
The witch hunt has produced nothing but mounting debt that the tax payer has to cover.
Until then you have your wet dreams and nothing else.



She is a witch. I'll grant you that.

[PNW]

What in your post could you be right about? there was nothing of substance? Just insults?

Substance please.

[PNW]

She is a witch. I'll grant you that.

Substance please.

[hanger4]

Show us the evidence of any wrong doing.

The FBI and DOJ are still investigating. Other than that you have a lot of catching up to do.



The witch hunt has produced nothing but mounting debt that the tax payer has to cover.

The debt is on Hillary. Secret server, failing to comply with document requests, failing to comply with FOIA requests.

[hanger4]

Substance please.

Wow, how hypocritical of you. :grin:

[PNW]

The FBI and DOJ are still investigating. Other than that you have a lot of catching up to do.



The debt is on Hillary. Secret server, failing to comply with document requests, failing to comply with FOIA requests.

So you have nothing. No evidence other then speculation (wet dreams).
At least you admit it.

Your party spent 50 million on the first Clinton witch hunt, how much are you going to spend this time to find nothing?

[PNW]

Wow, how hypocritical of you. :grin:

Substance please, certain stalking mods don't like tolling posts like yours.

[hanger4]

Substance please, certain stalking mods don't like tolling posts like yours.

Pot meet Kettle

[Ravens Fan]

Show us the evidence of any wrong doing.
The witch hunt has produced nothing but mounting debt that the tax payer has to cover.
Until then you have your wet dreams and nothing else.

14238

[hanger4]

So you have nothing. No evidence other then speculation (wet dreams).
At least you admit it.

Hillary Clinton used a private email account to conduct official government business while she was secretary of state, and made no effort to turn over any of those messages for the government to archive unti asked.


Under federal law, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. Six years those email records were hidden from FOIA requests plus the Benghazi hearings.


Classified emails to the tune of 1800 plus. Sure they weren't marked but some need no markings such as conversations with or about forign diplomates. Not to mention 23 (?) Top Secret SAP that the State Dept. won't even release as part of the court order.


Your party spent 50 million on the first Clinton witch hunt, how much are you going to spend this time to find nothing?

What part of failing to comply with with doc requests didn't you understand ?? Hillary obstructed to the tune of your 50 million whine.

[hanger4]

So you have nothing. No evidence other then speculation (wet dreams).
At least you admit it.

18 U.S.C. Section 793(f)



Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document. . .relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer, Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.


At least I admit it PNW

[PNW]

18 U.S.C. Section 793(f)


At least I admit it @PNW (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1896)

Duh, thats what I said, at least you admit you have nothing but your wet dream speculation.
And that is ALL you have even after what....9 investigations?

At what point will you be satisfied? Or will you whine about this for the next 8 years of the Clinton administration?

[Peter1469]

lol

public school education.

[Matty]

Duh, thats what I said, at least you admit you have nothing but your wet dream speculation.
And that is ALL you have even after what....9 investigations?

At what point will you be satisfied? Or will you whine about this for the next 8 years of the Clinton administration?


Why don't you wait and see what the FBI finds.

[PNW]

14238

No evidence than?
Just more wet dream speculation.
Face it, that is all you've got and all you ever will have.

[PNW]

Why don't you wait and see what the FBI finds.

After 9 investigations just what do you expect them to find?
You've got nothing, face it.

If bush the loser and darth cheney, saint roinnie and the rest were not found guilty of their crimes, which there IS plenty of evidence of, then nothing is going to happen to Hillary.
Get over it.
If you all are hanging your hopes on this for the election....get ready to start using the words "Madam President" and President Clinton".

[hanger4]

After 9 investigations just what do you expect them to find?
You've got nothing, face it.

If bush the loser and darth cheney, saint roinnie and the rest were not found guilty of their crimes, which there IS plenty of evidence of, then nothing is going to happen to Hillary.
Get over it.
If you all are hanging your hopes on this for the election....get ready to start using the words "Madam President" and President Clinton".

Your deflection looks foolish not to mention the 'but but but they did it too defense' is soooooo 3rd grade.

[hanger4]

Duh, thats what I said, at least you admit you have nothing but your wet dream speculation.
And that is ALL you have even after what....9 investigations?

At what point will you be satisfied? Or will you whine about this for the next 8 years of the Clinton administration?

What part "gross negligence" paragraph 6 of 18 U.S.C. Section 793 didn't you understand ??

BTW PNW here is a link to Hillary's NDI. pay special attention to paragraph 6. Notice it lists section 793.

https://cei.org/sites/default/files/CEI%20FOIA%20-%20Hillary%20Clinton%20Email%20Security%20NDA%20-%2011062015_0.pdf

[hanger4]

No evidence than?
Just more wet dream speculation.
Face it, that is all you've got and all you ever will have.

I gotta admit you attempts at denial are top rate.

Just ignore/deny facts without any sort of rebuttal.

[PNW]

Your deflection looks foolish not to mention the 'but but but they did it too defense' is soooooo 3rd grade.

It's none of those things, I would explain it to you but you have no intentions of having an adult conversation so I won't bother.

Face it, you have nothing and you never will no matter how strongly you attempt to believe other wise.

[PNW]

I gotta admit you attempts at denial are top rate.

Just ignore/deny facts without any sort of rebuttal.

Where is the evidence?

How is not having any evidence a "denial" on MY part?
LOL!
I don't think you understand what you are whining about here!
I do get a kick out of you though, I will say that.

[PNW]

What part "gross negligence" paragraph 6 of 18 U.S.C. Section 793 didn't you understand ??

BTW PNW here is a link to Hillary's NDI. pay special attention to paragraph 6. Notice it lists section 793.

https://cei.org/sites/default/files/CEI FOIA - Hillary Clinton Email Security NDA - 11062015_0.pdf

CEI??
Thanks for making my point, wet dreams.

[Matty]

It's none of those things, I would explain it to you but you have no intentions of having an adult conversation so I won't bother.

Face it, you have nothing and you never will no matter how strongly you attempt to believe other wise.



Yeah, like all adult conversations involve wet dreams!

[Mark III]

Another Groundhog Day thread.

They are not going to indict Hillary Clinton without evidence of her INTENT to put national security secrets in jeopardy.

There is no evidence of such intent.

Hanger 4 and some of these others have basically based their entire forum credibility on the claim that she will be indicted, or at the least that the FBI will recommend her indictment and the attorney general will disregard the recommendation. When that doesn't happen these individuals will be shattered.

[hanger4]

Where is the evidence?

How is not having any evidence a "denial" on MY part?
LOL!
I don't think you understand what you are whining about here!
I do get a kick out of you though, I will say that.

1800 plus classified emails on her personal off the .gov grid email server.

18 U.S.C. Section 793(f)

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document. . .relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer, Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

What part of "gross negligence" can't you wrap your head around ??

BTW do you really believe the classified emails "proper place of custody" is on HC's personal secret email server ??

[hanger4]

CEI??
Thanks for making my point, wet dreams.

Oh so now the pdf of Hillary's non disclosure agreement is a forgery.

You're a hoot PNW.

[hanger4]

Another Groundhog Day thread.

They are not going to indict Hillary Clinton without evidence of her INTENT to put national security secrets in jeopardy.

There is no evidence of such intent.

Hanger 4 and some of these others have basically based their entire forum credibility on the claim that she will be indicted, or at the least that the FBI will recommend her indictment and the attorney general will disregard the recommendation. When that doesn't happen these individuals will be shattered.

What part of "gross negligence" as stated in 18 U.S.C. Section 793 paragraph 6 don't you understand ??

[PNW]

Yeah, like all adult conversations involve wet dreams!

When you have an adult conversation you will find out, won't you?

[PNW]

Another Groundhog Day thread.

They are not going to indict Hillary Clinton without evidence of her INTENT to put national security secrets in jeopardy.

There is no evidence of such intent.

Hanger 4 and some of these others have basically based their entire forum credibility on the claim that she will be indicted, or at the least that the FBI will recommend her indictment and the attorney general will disregard the recommendation. When that doesn't happen these individuals will be shattered.

It's amazing how shallow some can be, as well as desperate.
I think everyone knows no matter what happens, it will never satisfy them, ever.

[PNW]

1800 plus classified emails on her personal off the .gov grid email server.

18 U.S.C. Section 793(f)

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document. . .relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer, Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

What part of "gross negligence" can't you wrap your head around ??

BTW do you really believe the classified emails "proper place of custody" is on HC's personal secret email server ??


Where is the evidence?
I keep asking and you keep denying.

[hanger4]

Where is the evidence?
I keep asking and you keep denying.

I've posted it several times, you ignore.


1800 plus classified emails on her personal off the .gov grid email server.

18 U.S.C. Section 793(f)

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document. . .relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer, Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

What part of "gross negligence" can't you wrap your head around ??

BTW do you really believe the classified emails "proper place of custody" is on HC's personal secret email server ??

[PNW]

I've posted it several times, you ignore.

And you know as well as anyone does, that is not evidence.

Or do you even know what evidence is?
Your grand hopes and wishes don't cut it man, you need some real evidence and it simply does not exist.

[Matty]

When you have an adult conversation you will find out, won't you?


Honey! You think yourself so clever and original, we've seen them like you here before, a dime a dozen! Get over yourself.

[Matty]

I've posted it several times, you ignore.


He might be referring to the evidence she destroyed.

[hanger4]

And you know as well as anyone does, that is not evidence.

Or do you even know what evidence is?
Your grand hopes and wishes don't cut it man, you need some real evidence and it simply does not exist.

Classified emails on a personal email server is not "gross negligence"??

For you to deny that can only mean HC's personal off the .gov grid is there "proper place".

I submit tis you that is clueless as to what evidence is in this case.

[Mark III]

What part of "gross negligence" as stated in 18 U.S.C. Section 793 paragraph 6 don't you understand ??

We could write a book about what you don't understand about this.

[hanger4]

We could write a book about what you don't understand about this.

Tell me Mark III what is I don't know ??

I do know that you and others ignore any semblance of truth concerning this matter.

[domer76]

lol

public school education.

Stupid response the first hundred times you used it. Now, just wearisome on top of the stupid.

Find new material.

[domer76]

Classified emails on a personal email server is not "gross negligence"??

For you to deny that can only mean HC's personal off the .gov grid is there "proper place".

I submit tis you that is clueless as to what evidence is in this case.

When exactly did it become classified?

[MisterVeritis]

When exactly did it become classified?
From my limited experience, the information is classified as soon as it is created. If it is not clear it is treated as classified, at the appropriate level, until an original classification authority (Clinton would have been one) can evaluate it and assess it.

The state needs to convict Hillary and execute her.

[domer76]

From my limited experience, the information is classified as soon as it is created. If it is not clear it is treated as classified, at the appropriate level, until an original classification authority (Clinton would have been one) can evaluate it and assess it.

The state needs to convict Hillary and execute her.

The correct answer, and it's very clear on this, that none of the documents were classified at the time. Only after the fact.

[MisterVeritis]

The correct answer, and it's very clear on this, that none of the documents were classified at the time. Only after the fact.
Wrong. Her lies will not save her.

Not marking classified material does not make it unclassified.

[PNW]

Tell me Mark III what is I don't know ??

I do know that you and others ignore any semblance of truth concerning this matter.

How can you not ignore speculation, fantasy and wishful thinking?

[hanger4]

The correct answer, and it's very clear on this, that none of the documents were classified at the time. Only after the fact.
Conversations with or about foreign diplomats are born classified and need no markings. Besides "gross negligence" needs no markings either.

[PNW]

What part of "gross negligence" as stated in 18 U.S.C. Section 793 paragraph 6 don't you understand ??
My gawd, haven't you figured out that repeating the same thing over and over is not 'substance' or debate?
Grow up man.

[PNW]

Classified emails on a personal email server is not "gross negligence"??

For you to deny that can only mean HC's personal off the .gov grid is there "proper place".

I submit tis you that is clueless as to what evidence is in this case.

This is the last time,

"Where is the evidence?"

Do you not understand that question, or do you not understand what evidence is?

[PNW]

Conversations with or about foreign diplomats are born classified and need no markings. Besides "gross negligence" needs no markings either.

Again with the gross negligence?

And what do you have to back up your nonsense about something being 'born' classified?
Making stuff up again?

[PNW]

The correct answer, and it's very clear on this, that none of the documents were classified at the time. Only after the fact.

And they know that but is tosses cold water on the wet dream.

[MisterVeritis]

And they know that but is tosses cold water on the wet dream.
Hillary will die in prison. Trump will have a Justice Department. And Hilly will go to prison. I am looking forward to discussing how long she will last in prison sometime next year.

[hanger4]

My gawd, haven't you figured out that repeating the same thing over and over is not 'substance' or debate?
Grow up man.
Some people are more hard headed than others.

You've offered no rebuttal, just snark and or snide remarks such as telling posters to grow up or they're having met dreams.

I suggest it's you that needs to grow up.

[Matty]

Some people are more hard headed than others.

You've offered no rebuttal, just snark and or snide remarks such as telling posters to grow up or they're having met dreams.

I suggest it's you that needs to grow up.


Tiresome innit?

[hanger4]

This is the last time,

"Where is the evidence?"

Do you not understand that question, or do you not understand what evidence is?

Been posted. You continue to ignore.

[domer76]

Conversations with or about foreign diplomats are born classified and need no markings. Besides "gross negligence" needs no markings either.

You need to find another cause such as saving baby whales. This one is going nowhere for you.

[domer76]

Hillary will die in prison. Trump will have a Justice Department. And Hilly will go to prison. I am looking forward to discussing how long she will last in prison sometime next year.

What are the next winning lottery numbers, Nostradamus?

[hanger4]

When exactly did it become classified?

I suggest you read section 793(f) of espionage act which has already been posted in this thread.

[hanger4]

You need to find another cause such as saving baby whales. This one is going nowhere for you.

Sure, must be why the FBI and DOJ are investigating HC's server and all State Dept. persons connected to it.

[MisterVeritis]

What are the next winning lottery numbers, Nostradamus?
Unless there is cheating lottery numbers are random. Hillary going to prison for the rest of her life must occur given the gravity of her crimes against all of the people of the US. The damage she did was extraordinary and very long lived. I will be long dead before the nation recovers from her crimes. Fortunately she will be long dead as well. I only wish the nation would extract the death penalty for her.

[Tahuyaman]

"The State Department turned over 1,600 pages of previously undisclosed documents related to Hillary Clinton and Libya to the House Benghazi committee on Friday, a month after it revealed the existence of the documents in an unrelated court case."

"The House Select Committee on Benghazi announced it received the records on Friday, adding that the State Department has yet to fully comply with document requests the committee made nearly a year ago."

"The records come from the Office of the Secretary, which would likely include Clinton’s Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, top aide Huma Abedin, and Clinton’s deputy chief of staff and scheduler."

http://freebeacon.com/issues/state-department-turns-over-1600-newly-discovered-clinton-documents-to-benghazi-committee/

And one wonders why it's been hearing after hearing.

Can you say obstruction and failure to comply ??

People in power can avoid hiding their incompetence and corruption by letting information trickle out at a snails pace.

[hanger4]

Again with the gross negligence?

And what do you have to back up your nonsense about something being 'born' classified?
Making stuff up again?

some of Clinton's emails from her time as the nation's most senior diplomat are filled with a type of information the U.S. government and the department's own regulations automatically deems classified from the get-go — regardless of whether it is already marked that way or not.

In the small fraction of emails made public so far, Reuters has found at least 30 email threads from 2009, representing scores of individual emails, that include what the State Department's own "Classified" stamps now identify as so-called 'foreign government information.' The U.S. government defines this as any information, written or spoken, provided in confidence to U.S. officials by their foreign counterparts.

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0QQ0BW20150821

Executive Order 13526, entitled “Classified National Security Information

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-classified-national-security-information

Pay close attention to Section 1.1(d)

[domer76]

Unless there is cheating lottery numbers are random. Hillary going to prison for the rest of her life must occur given the gravity of her crimes against all of the people of the US. The damage she did was extraordinary and very long lived. I will be long dead before the nation recovers from her crimes. Fortunately she will be long dead as well. I only wish the nation would extract the death penalty for her.

My pick for the next lottery: 4-14-31-35-38.

Take those numbers, because they have a better chance of being correct than your post.

[Peter1469]

My pick for the next lottery: 4-14-31-35-38.

Take those numbers, because they have a better chance of being correct than your post.

boot lick

[PNW]

Some people are more hard headed than others.

You've offered no rebuttal, just snark and or snide remarks such as telling posters to grow up or they're having met dreams.

I suggest it's you that needs to grow up.

And all you have offered, over and over and over again is the nonsense about 'gross negligence' as if it means something.
Your wet dream continues.

[PNW]

Been posted. You continue to ignore.

Never been posted because you know as well as I do that it doesn't exist.
Keep trying.

Romney in a landslide!

[PNW]

I suggest you read section 793(f) of espionage act which has already been posted in this thread.

A million times and it means NOTHING.
But it just keeps getting posted again and again and again.

[PNW]

some of Clinton's emails from her time as the nation's most senior diplomat are filled with a type of information the U.S. government and the department's own regulations automatically deems classified from the get-go — regardless of whether it is already marked that way or not.

In the small fraction of emails made public so far, Reuters has found at least 30 email threads from 2009, representing scores of individual emails, that include what the State Department's own "Classified" stamps now identify as so-called 'foreign government information.' The U.S. government defines this as any information, written or spoken, provided in confidence to U.S. officials by their foreign counterparts.

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0QQ0BW20150821

Executive Order 13526, entitled “Classified National Security Information

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-classified-national-security-information

Pay close attention to Section 1.1(d)

That and 5 bucks will get you coffee any where in America, buts all you will get.
Keep trying man, at some point maybe it will work.

[hanger4]

And all you have offered, over and over and over again is the nonsense about 'gross negligence' as if it means something.
Your wet dream continues.


Never been posted because you know as well as I do that it doesn't exist.
Keep trying.

Romney in a landslide!



A million times and it means NOTHING.
But it just keeps getting posted again and again and again.

So it's true !! You do believe HC's personal unsecured off the .gov grid server is a figment of our imagination. And you do believe all those classified emails are forgeries. Amazing.

[hanger4]

That and 5 bucks will get you coffee any where in America, buts all you will get.
Keep trying man, at some point maybe it will work.

^^^^ Eyes Wide Shut ^^^^

[hanger4]

So it's true !! You do believe HC's personal unsecured off the .gov grid server is a figment of our imagination. And you do believe all those classified emails are forgeries. Amazing.

And that's too bad. Was hoping the new left of center poster would offer discussion instead of the standard leftist memes. Oh well, memes and denial are so much easier aren't they ??

[domer76]

boot lick

lol

Whatsamatta', pal? The truth tough for you to deal with sometimes?

[domer76]

I suggest you read section 793(f) of espionage act which has already been posted in this thread.

I think I'll take that time to alphabetize my spices, instead.

[MisterVeritis]

My pick for the next lottery: 4-14-31-35-38.

Take those numbers, because they have a better chance of being correct than your post.
Your numbers are as random as you are.

If Hillary does not die in prison it is through grace or corruption.

[domer76]

Your numbers are as random as you are.

If Hillary does not die in prison it is through grace or corruption.

Take the lottery route. It's more of a sure thing.

[MisterVeritis]

Take the lottery route. It's more of a sure thing.
I understand why leftists flock. I will still look forward to a Trump presidency with a real Justice Department who can indict Hillary.

[hanger4]

I think I'll take that time to alphabetize my spices, instead.

That's on you domer76 Your refusal to be informed was to be expected.

[domer76]

That's on you @domer76 (http://thepoliticalforums.com/member.php?u=1355) Your refusal to be informed was to be expected.

No, pally. It's that I don't have a frikkin' obsession with it like some of you do. Jesus, pall, get a life!

[hanger4]

No, pally. It's that I don't have a frikkin' obsession with it like some of you do. Jesus, pall, get a life!

Whatsamatta', pal ?? The truth tough for you to deal with sometimes ??

[PNW]

The delusions of some of the righties is simply astounding.
To pin so much emotional hopes and dreams on something that is never going to happen......amazing.

[hanger4]

:rollseyes:

You have yet to explain away HC's secret unsecured server.

You have yet to explain away HC's classified emails.

As a matter of you've added nothing what so ever to the conversation.

[Peter1469]

:rollseyes:

You have yet to explain away HC's secret unsecured server.

You have yet to explain away HC's classified emails.

As a matter of you've added nothing what so ever to the conversation.


It can stop. We don't need to continually respond to the boot-licks. That is what they want.

https://lygsbtd.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/bootlick.jpg

[Mark III]

The Benghazi/e-mailers are basically gluttons for punishment. It is so similar to birtherism, and all the other trumped up scandals of the past 7 years.

It's not that Clinton is perfect, or even good, it's that she isn't a monster or master criminal. Y'all let your imaginations run away with you and you don't know how to stop.

[Peter1469]

Boot-licks. Will lick boots.

Why?

[domer76]

Whatsamatta', pal ?? The truth tough for you to deal with sometimes ??

The truth is, pally, ain't nuthin' gonna happen.

[hanger4]

The truth is, pally, ain't nuthin' gonna happen.

Says the poster that refuses to read 18 U.S.C. Section 793(f)

[PNW]

:rollseyes:

You have yet to explain away HC's secret unsecured server.

You have yet to explain away HC's classified emails.

As a matter of you've added nothing what so ever to the conversation.

And all you've done is repeat the same nonsense in some effort to give it credence maybe?
I don't know why, but my statement stands, the delusions are astounding.

[PNW]

It can stop. We don't need to continually respond to the boot-licks. That is what they want.

https://lygsbtd.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/bootlick.jpg

LOL!
Public school failure.
LOL

Hold my pocket.

[PNW]

Says the poster that refuses to read 18 U.S.C. Section 793(f)

Which means nothing sense there is no evidence.

[hanger4]

Which means nothing sense there is no evidence.
Reading comprehension is not one of your skills I see. Stick to the distraction and deflection you're better at that than the discussion of point counter point.

[PNW]

Still no evidence?
Enjoy your wet dream.

[hanger4]

Still no evidence?
Enjoy your wet dream.

You're still ignoring. Enjoy your denial.