Hillary’s women problem- most women don't like her

[Peter1469]

Hillary’s women problem- most women don't like her (http://www.nationalreview.com/article/433596/hillary-clintons-low-ratings-among-women)

National Review looks at lots of poll numbers and provides the data. Large percentages of women don't like Hillary. From all demographic groups.


Steven Shepard of Politico wrote an important article last week about Donald Trump’s “rock bottom” ratings with women. And his low standing with women has certainly become a much-discussed topic among pundits analyzing the Donald Trump candidacy. An overlooked story, however, is that Hillary Clinton, who might become the first female president in the history of the United States, isn’t far behind in her unfavorability ratings among women. Our just-released poll shows that Donald Trump has a 68 percent unfavorable rating among women. But 58 percent of women say they view Hillary Clinton unfavorably. In fact, Hillary’s unfavorable rating was two points higher among women than it was among men.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/433596/hillary-clintons-low-ratings-among-women


But Hillary Clinton’s negatives among women voters are broad and deep. Our poll results, which mirror those of many other recent media polls, show that Hillary Clinton’s unfavorable ratings outweigh here favorability ratings in these areas:

In every region: In the East, 39 percent view her favorably; 53 percent view her unfavorably; in the Midwest, her ratings are 36 percent favorable to 62 percent unfavorable; in the South, 36 percent favorable to 60 percent unfavorable; in the West, 38 percent favorable to 54 percent unfavorable.

Among women on the right and in the center: Her ratings among Republican women are 9 percent favorable to 90 percent unfavorable; among independent women, they are 24 percent favorable to 65 percent unfavorable; among conservative women, 10 percent favorable to 88 percent unfavorable; among moderate women, 42 percent favorable to 50 percent unfavorable.


Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/433596/hillary-clintons-low-ratings-among-women

and there is more. A lot more.

[FindersKeepers]

Hillary really does put women off.

A lot see her as an opportunist for refusing to leave a philandering husband, just because of his position. Others see her as a power-hungry shrew who would happily use military force nearly anywhere in the world where she doesn't get her way.

Hell hath no fury as a woman scorned -- and not only did Bill scorn poor Hillary, the citizens scorned her when they chose Obama over her.

Hillary, should she win this time around, is a danger to us all.

[Quicksilver]

Not sure which women you are talking to.. I don't know any that are..

[PolWatch]

I don't have an excess of affection for Hillary Clinton but it is unrelated to her marriage or her gender. Her past record is the negative for me. I suspect there are few females that would vote for a presidential candidate just because it is a woman. Most of us are able to function using the brain instead of the ovaries to make decisions. How many men would vote for Trump just because he brags about the size of his hands?

[iolo]

I fear that there are a fair few women who will not vote for a woman because she is not a man. There are some very backward areas over there, to judge from what we hear.

[PolWatch]

I fear that there are a fair few women who will not vote for a woman because she is not a man. There are some very backward areas over there, to judge from what we hear.

True....there are idiots in every group. We have some here who think the appearance of the candidate's wife is a vital factor in deciding who should be president.....go figure.

[Quicksilver]

True....there are idiots in every group. We have some here who think the appearance of the candidate's wife is a vital factor in deciding who should be president.....go figure.

Not to mention penis size...

[michiganFats]

In fact, Hillary’s unfavorable rating was two points higher among women than it was among men.

So what the story is really saying is she's widely despised.

[Quicksilver]

So what the story is really saying is she's widely despised.

NO... I would say be careful of taking the NATIONAL REVIEW poll seriously... Probably only polled Conservative women..

National Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review#mw-head), search (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review#p-search)
This article is about the American magazine. For other uses, see National Review (disambiguation) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review_(disambiguation)).


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/af/Natreview.jpg/220px-Natreview.jpg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Natreview.jpg) National Review cover for August 30, 2010


Editor
Rich Lowry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Lowry)


Categories
Editorial magazine


Frequency
Biweekly


Publisher
Jack Fowler (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jack_Fowler_(publisher)&action=edit&redlink=1)[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review#cite_note-1)


Total circulation
(2012)
166,755[2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review#cite_note-2)


First issue
November 19, 1955


Company
National Review, Inc.


Language
English (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_language)


Website
nationalreview.com (http://www.nationalreview.com/)


ISSN (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Serial_Number)
0028-0038 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0028-0038)


National Review (N.R.) is a semi-monthly magazine founded by author William F. Buckley, Jr. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Buckley,_Jr.) in 1955.
It describes itself as "America's most widely read and influential magazine and web site for conservative (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatism_in_the_United_States) news, commentary, and opinion."[3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review#cite_note-3) Although the print version of the magazine is available online to subscribers, the free content on the website is essentially a separate publication under different editorial direction.

[michiganFats]

I'm careful about taking every poll seriously.

[Chris]

Let's remember Trump has the lowest favorability rating among women.

Will women stay home, vote third party, if it's Trump v Clinton?

[Tahuyaman]

Not sure which women you are talking to.. I don't know any that are..

Women I know do not like or respect Hillary Clinton.

The only person I know who supports her is a black male and he admits that it's only because he's a Democrat and always goes with the party line. What's odd about this guy is that he's very conservative, but still votes a straight Democratic ticket. I asked him why and he told me "I'm black".

[PolWatch]

Let's remember Trump has the lowest favorability rating among women.

Will women stay home, vote third party, if it's Trump v Clinton?

I think this election will set a new record in low voter turnout.

[Chris]

I think this election will set a new record in low voter turnout.

And yet the caucuses are overflowing. It's strange.

[Peter1469]

Not sure which women you are talking to.. I don't know any that are..

Read the article.

Then think about the question you just ask. :wink:

Hint. I didn't conduct the poll.

[Peter1469]

I fear that there are a fair few women who will not vote for a woman because she is not a man. There are some very backward areas over there, to judge from what we hear.

I hope the article didn't leave that impression. Or rather that readers got that impression from the article.

[Peter1469]

So what the story is really saying is she's widely despised.

The poll numbers are in the OP for many different demographics.

[michiganFats]

The poll numbers are in the OP for many different demographics.

Yeah, I saw those. 90% unfavorable for republican women. That's incredible, even for GOP chicks.

[Peter1469]

Yeah, I saw those. 90% unfavorable for republican women. That's incredible, even for GOP chicks.

What was it for democratic women?

[Quicksilver]

Read the article.

Then think about the question you just ask. :wink:

Hint. I didn't conduct the poll.

The National Review is a Conservative opinion rag... Their interpretation and opinions do not matter when talking about Clinton.. It's ALWAYS going to be negative.. so why bother.

[michiganFats]

What was it for democratic women?

Only 26% for Dem women but 82% for undecided women.

[Peter1469]

The National Review is a Conservative opinion rag... Their interpretation and opinions do not matter when talking about Clinton.. It's ALWAYS going to be negative.. so why bother.

OK

lol

[Tahuyaman]

Not sure which women you are talking to.. I don't know any that are..


You must not get out much.

[Tahuyaman]

The National Review is a Conservative opinion rag... Their interpretation and opinions do not matter when talking about Clinton.. It's ALWAYS going to be negative.. so why bother.


Actually, National Review is not a conservative publication. Since William F Buckley passed away, they have drifted to the left. I suggest you give it read.

[Peter1469]

Actually, National Review is not a conservative publication. Since William F Buckley passed away, they have drifted to the left. I suggest you give it read.

Don't ask too much of some people.

[michiganFats]

The National Review is a Conservative opinion rag... Their interpretation and opinions do not matter when talking about Clinton.. It's ALWAYS going to be negative.. so why bother.

How's this:

http://www.duffelblog.com/2016/01/opsec-doesnt-apply-to-everyone/


More to your liking?