PDA

View Full Version : Hillary Clinton Should Concede to Bernie Sanders Before The FBI Reveals Its Findings.



MMC
05-04-2016, 12:29 PM
Uh oh.....Huff Po just dropped a bomb on Hillary. What say ye?



Millions of Democrats are voting for a presidential candidate linked to an FBI criminal investigation (http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-email-probe-enters-tricky-phase-as-election-intensifies-1457740880#:PvvaFCwiDRBwyA). These voters either don’t know there’s been a year-long FBI investigation of Clinton’s emails, don’t care, or would vote for Clinton even she faced Espionage Act indictments. Potentially our next Commander in Chief will be interviewed (http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/274840-report-clinton-could-be-interviewed-by-fbi-within-days) by the FBI soon, as will her top aides. This state of affairs would never take place in any other leading democracy, but American politics is unique.

Don’t be certain Trump can’t defeat Clinton in a general election, even if the FBI doesn’t recommend indictments. Once he pivots towards being a semi-normal human being, and distances himself from the bigoted stances he utilized to gain power within the GOP, Clinton would face a more “likable” Trump. In a battle of two individuals with negative favorability ratings, the person who might have jeopardized national security with a private server could easily lose.

In the best case scenario, Clinton doesn’t face indictments, but the FBI confirms that she jeopardized national security. Thus, Republicans would make even the best case scenario for Clinton’s campaign a major political liability. America isn’t a closed Democratic primary, and Clinton would be on the defensive during every televised debate against Trump.

If the FBI recommends indictments, and the DOJ indicts Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Party would be handing Donald Trump the White House by nominating the former Secretary of State. I explain in this YouTube Segment why Clinton should concede the Democratic nomination to Bernie Sanders, before the political ramifications of a contested convention, and before the FBI discloses its findings.

First, there used to be a time in American history when Bernie Sanders would be the only choice for Democratic nominee. Not long ago, an FBI investigation meant the end of a presidential campaign. Clinton would have been forced to conceded at any point in U.S. history before 2016, linked to a criminal FBI investigation.

Second, millions of loyal Hillary supporters would still vote for Clinton, even if the FBI recommended Espionage Act indictments. Since “gross negligence” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#e)can be used to prosecute Clinton under the Espionage Act, and since convenience wasn’t the reason for owning a private server, indictments are likely. Also, if indictments become a reality, the fracture within the Democratic Party, caused by people who’d still vote for a candidate facing criminal indictment, would be irreparable. The rest of the world would either be laughing, or in disbelief, that Clinton decided to continue her campaign for the presidency (with supporters still loyal), even with the threat of jail time. Rest assured, even more Bernie supporters would refuse to vote for Clinton, if her campaign continued its quest for the White House, alongside criminal indictments.

The FBI will eventually disclose its findings. To pretend like this will never happen, or that these revelations won’t have an impact, is ludicrous. Democrats will need Bernie Sanders, when Clinton faces the political ramifications of this scandal. If criminal indictments hit, rest assured that many of her supporters will argue that she should still be Commander in Chief, even risking possible jail time. This depressing state of affairs could be on the horizon, which is why Clinton should concede to Bernie sooner, rather than later. Finally, I explain here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMbsWtPbwRA) why the FBI’s reputation is at stake, and how the Clinton campaign views the FBI, in the following YouTube segment.....snip~

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/clinton-should-concede-to-sanders-before-fbi-reveals-findings_b_9836720.html?ref=yfp

Quicksilver
05-04-2016, 12:41 PM
Yeah right... based on an op-ed...

AZ Jim
05-04-2016, 12:44 PM
The FBI probe should be concluded. They have had plenty of time to come to a conclusion.

Mac-7
05-04-2016, 12:46 PM
I dont think obumer will allow his dictatorship to indict hillary

PolWatch
05-04-2016, 12:46 PM
Hillary Clinton has been under investigation for the last 20 years. Start with Whitewater & follow until you hit e-mails. How many indictments? I'm not saying she is innocent but I am saying that when the repubs cried WOLF so many times they wore out their credibility. No one is listening to them or believes them. THAT is how Clinton will end up with the dem nomination and, possibly, the presidency. Be sure to send a thank you note to all those repub representatives who were so eager to open another Benghazi (or insert anything here) investigation.

hanger4
05-04-2016, 12:48 PM
The FBI probe should be concluded. They have had plenty of time to come to a conclusion.

Actually it probably would have been by now but they seem to have found some shenanigans concerning the Clinton Foundation.

Bo-4
05-04-2016, 12:49 PM
This is precisely why Bernie needs to hang in there until the convention.

I can't imagine anything worse than Sanders pulling the plug and a month from now the indictments hit.

TrueBlue
05-04-2016, 12:51 PM
One more time Republicans: Benghazi! Benghazi!!

hanger4
05-04-2016, 12:53 PM
One more time Republicans: Benghazi! Benghazi!!


One more time Hill-bots

Secret Email Server

Quicksilver
05-04-2016, 12:55 PM
one more time republicans: benghazi! Benghazi!!




gesundheit!!!

MMC
05-04-2016, 12:59 PM
One more time Republicans: Benghazi! Benghazi!!



Yeah the Final Report will be out soon.....and this time Hillary and the Democrats won't be laughing. Gowdy is still chuckling on how he proved Hillary didn't turn over all her emails like she said she did. Then busting her out using a Private server off grid.

Not to mention she has no excuse as to why she didn't turn over her records to the other 7 Benghazi Committees covering 3 years.

Quicksilver
05-04-2016, 01:01 PM
Yeah the Final Report will be out soon.....and this time Hillary and the Democrats won't be laughing. Gowdy is still chuckling on how he proved Hillary didn't turn over all her emails like she said she did. Then busting her out using a Private server off grid.

Not to mention she has no excuse as to why she didn't turn over her records to the other 7 Benghazi Committees covering 3 years.

Promise to hold your breathe until the indictment comes? Pretty please..

MMC
05-04-2016, 01:01 PM
One more time Hill-bots

Secret Email Server

Trump is just beginning on that.

Trump said the ongoing investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state should disqualify her candidacy.

“She’s only being protected by the Democrats,” he said. “She should not be allowed to run in the election.”.....snip~

maineman
05-04-2016, 01:03 PM
it seems as if the GOP has forgotten the story about the little boy who cried wolf.

MMC
05-04-2016, 01:04 PM
Yeah right... based on an op-ed...

Unfortunately not by someone on the Right. But one of the left's own. Headlining on Huff Po and on Yahoo.

Quicksilver
05-04-2016, 01:04 PM
Trump is just beginning on that.

Trump said the ongoing investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state should disqualify her candidacy.

“She’s only being protected by the Democrats,” he said. “She should not be allowed to run in the election.”.....snip~

You mean like the "guys" he sent to Hawaii to investigate Obama's birth certificate?... like THAT kind of "beginning on that'?

MMC
05-04-2016, 01:06 PM
Promise to hold your breathe until the indictment comes? Pretty please..

Reading is Fun and Mental. http://politirant.com/Smileys/oldrant/pointlaugh.gif

In the best case scenario, Clinton doesn’t face indictments, but the FBI confirms that she jeopardized national security. Thus, Republicans would make even the best case scenario for Clinton’s campaign a major political liability. America isn’t a closed Democratic primary, and Clinton would be on the defensive during every televised debate against Trump......snip~ Same link.

MMC
05-04-2016, 01:09 PM
You mean like the "guys" he sent to Hawaii to investigate Obama's birth certificate?... like THAT kind of "beginning on that'?

Nooooo......Like on TV with Free Air time and all that kind of publicity. http://politirant.com/Smileys/oldrant/geez.gif

FindersKeepers
05-04-2016, 01:10 PM
You mean like the "guys" he sent to Hawaii to investigate Obama's birth certificate?... like THAT kind of "beginning on that'?

He might have investigated it but it was Hillary supporters that pushed it in the first place.

MMC
05-04-2016, 01:28 PM
Oh noooos.....it just keeps getting worse and worse for Hillary, aaaaaaaaaaand her cult followers.



Judge OKs deposition plan in Hillary Clinton email case

A federal judge has approved a plan to take sworn testimony from former aides to Hillary Clinton about her use of a private e-mail server during her tenure as secretary of state.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order Wednesday approving the discovery plan, which was agreed to by the State Department and a conservative group that demanded Clinton's emails under the Freedom of Information Act, Judicial Watch.

"The circumstances surrounding approval of Mrs. Clinton’s use of clintonemail.com for official government business, as well as the manner in which it was operated, are issues that need to be explored in discovery to enable the Court to resolve, as a matter of law, the adequacy of the State Department’s search of relevant records in response to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request," Sullivan wrote in his 15-page order (http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000154-7ce6-d502-a957-fde660ba0000).
Sullivan's order explicitly left open the question of whether Clinton should be subject to a deposition about the private email arrangement. The order calls for depositions over the next eight weeks of former Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin and information technology specialist Bryan Pagliano. Also slated to be deposed under the plan are Undersecretary of State for Management Patrick Kennedy, former Executive Secretary Stephen Mull, former Executive Secretariat Executive Director Lewis Lukens.

The State Department objected to any depositions in the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, but Sullivan ruled earlier this year that they were appropriate given questions about why Clinton's private email server was set up.

State eventually agreed to the discovery plan Sullivan approved Wednesday. However, it is unclear whether the former Clinton aides who aren't State employees any longer will agree to the depositions. Attorneys for the ex-officials have not responded to inquiries about whether they will seek to quash any subpoenas in the case......snip~

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/hillary-clinton-email-deposition-plan-222801#ixzz47iG4Acem
Follow us: @politico on Twitter (http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bKDyiUp9mr3OhNab7jrHcU&u=politico) | Politico on Facebook (http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=bKDyiUp9mr3OhNab7jrHcU&u=Politico)


LMAO.....the State Dept agreed. Yeah they will agree to a Judges Order. Its not like they can disagree after its been ordered. This is great. Sullivan knows the State Dept has been trying to give cover to Hillary. They have ticked him off to the point of threatening to have Hillary produce ALL of her emails. Included those Deleted.

birddog
05-04-2016, 01:33 PM
Crazy Joe is probably warming up in the bullpen!

MMC
05-04-2016, 01:41 PM
Crazy Joe is probably warming up in the bullpen!

First they will hook her aides up, then they go after the Hill-Dog. Just like with the RICO LAWS. Her aides were also caught sending classified email out to others.

Mills and Abedin.

Don't forget.....any of her aides go down. That will also cost Hillary the election and maybe even worse.

Currently they can hook her up for attempting to destroy work related emails. Which are not hers but that of the people. Plus mishandling classified material.

Anyone else at this point would have been charged already.

Another piece of good news.....Hillary can't validate who gave her permission to use her private server off the grid. As the State Dept confirmed it was not them. Plus the IC field says they didn't give her any permission.

Common
05-04-2016, 01:57 PM
concede to bernie, yeah right that wont happen in 10 lifetimes

MMC
05-04-2016, 02:04 PM
concede to bernie, yeah right that wont happen in 10 lifetimes

Salon, and MoveOver.Organisms, both have been going after Hillary lately. Both are supporting Sanders.

texan
05-04-2016, 02:36 PM
Billary didn't drop out until 6/7 and Bernie is still raising lots of money why would he ever drop out?

Cigar
05-04-2016, 02:40 PM
Yeah right... based on an op-ed...


It's not even June and the Right is losing it Big Time :laugh:

MMC
05-04-2016, 03:16 PM
Billary didn't drop out until 6/7 and Bernie is still raising lots of money why would he ever drop out?

Yeah and considering he has like 28% of Hillary's own people that think he should stay in the race. He knows he is starting to get under Hillary's skin.

He just needs to keep up with the bit about her speeches and then bring up her Clinton Donors.

Peter1469
05-04-2016, 05:02 PM
The FBI probe should be concluded. They have had plenty of time to come to a conclusion.

They have expanded to political corruption. Nations that could not get past our strict requirements for foreign military sales pass after donating to the Clinton Foundation.... :shocked:

MMC
05-04-2016, 05:50 PM
They have expanded to political corruption. Nations that could not get past our strict requirements for foreign military sales pass after donating to the Clinton Foundation.... :shocked:

What they aren't catching onto.....its the left now saying this. Not those on the Right. Even Mother Jones says the Demos are deceiving themselves. As the whole issue with Hillary and that Private Server, now deleted emails recovered that weren't personal, mishandling classified material, and giving up breaches of National Security. Is a no win situation. She is damned if she isn't indicted and she is damned if she does get indicted.

As all of it is a direct reflection of what her judgement is about, and why it cannot be trusted.

maineman
05-04-2016, 05:53 PM
who wants to bet me a thousand dollars, right now? I say Hillary beats Trump in the general election. All you benghazi freaks and email freaks are so sure that this will blow up in her face.... it seems like easy money. Any takers?

Peter1469
05-04-2016, 05:58 PM
She is going to be trying out jump suit orange before November.

Ethereal
05-04-2016, 05:58 PM
I'm not saying she is innocent...

What reasonable person would?

MMC
05-04-2016, 06:30 PM
Looks like Huff Po was Right.


http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/62293-Romanian-hacker-Guccifer-I-breached-Clinton-server-it-was-easy

maineman
05-04-2016, 06:34 PM
nobody wanna put their money where their mouth is?


who wants to bet me a thousand dollars, right now? I say Hillary beats Trump in the general election. All you benghazi freaks and email freaks are so sure that this will blow up in her face.... it seems like easy money. Any takers?

MisterVeritis
05-04-2016, 06:37 PM
nobody wanna put their money where their mouth is?
LOL.

President Trump will re-open Hillary's investigation if Obama-Lynch (Lynch-Obama?) fails to indict her.

Green Arrow
05-04-2016, 06:51 PM
The FBI probe should be concluded. They have had plenty of time to come to a conclusion.

I have a strong feeling that the FBI knows what they are doing and don't take orders from a hack on the internet.

maineman
05-04-2016, 07:58 PM
LOL.

President Trump will re-open Hillary's investigation if Obama-Lynch (Lynch-Obama?) fails to indict her.

so... if you're so confident, why are you purposely avoiding my wager?

birddog
05-04-2016, 08:15 PM
so... if you're so confident, why are you purposely avoiding my wager?

Perhaps he does not want take advantage of grandstanding fools!

MisterVeritis
05-04-2016, 08:21 PM
so... if you're so confident, why are you purposely avoiding my wager?
Money wagers have never been my style. I am confident.

MisterVeritis
05-04-2016, 08:23 PM
Perhaps he does not want take advantage of grandstanding fools!
It is not that. I would happily take his money. I suspect it is something deep in my childhood background. I have always had an aversion to betting for money.

maineman
05-04-2016, 08:29 PM
Perhaps he does not want take advantage of grandstanding fools!

grandstanding? Actually, I happen to believe that it is an easy way for me to pick up a few grand.

birddog
05-04-2016, 08:47 PM
grandstanding? Actually, I happen to believe that it is an easy way for me to pick up a few grand.

I respect your right to be wrong!

maineman
05-04-2016, 09:06 PM
I respect your right to be wrong!

if you're so sure, you're welcome to take the bet.

Mark III
05-04-2016, 10:18 PM
Uh oh.....Huff Po just dropped a bomb on Hillary. What say ye?



Millions of Democrats are voting for a presidential candidate linked to an FBI criminal investigation (http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-email-probe-enters-tricky-phase-as-election-intensifies-1457740880#:PvvaFCwiDRBwyA). These voters either don’t know there’s been a year-long FBI investigation of Clinton’s emails, don’t care, or would vote for Clinton even she faced Espionage Act indictments. Potentially our next Commander in Chief will be interviewed (http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/274840-report-clinton-could-be-interviewed-by-fbi-within-days) by the FBI soon, as will her top aides. This state of affairs would never take place in any other leading democracy, but American politics is unique.

Don’t be certain Trump can’t defeat Clinton in a general election, even if the FBI doesn’t recommend indictments. Once he pivots towards being a semi-normal human being, and distances himself from the bigoted stances he utilized to gain power within the GOP, Clinton would face a more “likable” Trump. In a battle of two individuals with negative favorability ratings, the person who might have jeopardized national security with a private server could easily lose.

In the best case scenario, Clinton doesn’t face indictments, but the FBI confirms that she jeopardized national security. Thus, Republicans would make even the best case scenario for Clinton’s campaign a major political liability. America isn’t a closed Democratic primary, and Clinton would be on the defensive during every televised debate against Trump.

If the FBI recommends indictments, and the DOJ indicts Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Party would be handing Donald Trump the White House by nominating the former Secretary of State. I explain in this YouTube Segment why Clinton should concede the Democratic nomination to Bernie Sanders, before the political ramifications of a contested convention, and before the FBI discloses its findings.

First, there used to be a time in American history when Bernie Sanders would be the only choice for Democratic nominee. Not long ago, an FBI investigation meant the end of a presidential campaign. Clinton would have been forced to conceded at any point in U.S. history before 2016, linked to a criminal FBI investigation.

Second, millions of loyal Hillary supporters would still vote for Clinton, even if the FBI recommended Espionage Act indictments. Since “gross negligence” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#e)can be used to prosecute Clinton under the Espionage Act, and since convenience wasn’t the reason for owning a private server, indictments are likely. Also, if indictments become a reality, the fracture within the Democratic Party, caused by people who’d still vote for a candidate facing criminal indictment, would be irreparable. The rest of the world would either be laughing, or in disbelief, that Clinton decided to continue her campaign for the presidency (with supporters still loyal), even with the threat of jail time. Rest assured, even more Bernie supporters would refuse to vote for Clinton, if her campaign continued its quest for the White House, alongside criminal indictments.

The FBI will eventually disclose its findings. To pretend like this will never happen, or that these revelations won’t have an impact, is ludicrous. Democrats will need Bernie Sanders, when Clinton faces the political ramifications of this scandal. If criminal indictments hit, rest assured that many of her supporters will argue that she should still be Commander in Chief, even risking possible jail time. This depressing state of affairs could be on the horizon, which is why Clinton should concede to Bernie sooner, rather than later. Finally, I explain here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMbsWtPbwRA) why the FBI’s reputation is at stake, and how the Clinton campaign views the FBI, in the following YouTube segment.....snip~

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/clinton-should-concede-to-sanders-before-fbi-reveals-findings_b_9836720.html?ref=yfp


The author of that article is obsessed with discrediting Hillary Clinton. His name is H.A. Goodman and he is considered by much of the liberal blogosphere to be a crackpot.

Captain Obvious
05-04-2016, 10:21 PM
The author of that article is obsessed with discrediting Hillary Clinton. His name is H.A. Goodman and he is considered by much of the liberal blogosphere to be a crackpot.

Kinda like you're obsessed with discrediting Trump, and considered by much of tPF to be a crackpot.

(crack)pot, meet kettle.

Mark III
05-04-2016, 10:31 PM
Kinda like you're obsessed with discrediting Trump, and considered by much of tPF to be a crackpot.

(crack)pot, meet kettle.

As you are obsessed with pretending you are funny. It takes all kinds.

Captain Obvious
05-04-2016, 10:32 PM
As you are obsessed with pretending you are funny. It takes all kinds.

Rub some salve on it.

Green Arrow
05-05-2016, 12:17 AM
The author of that article is obsessed with discrediting Hillary Clinton. His name is H.A. Goodman and he is considered by much of the liberal blogosphere to be a crackpot.

Yes, anyone who dares criticize Hillary Clinton is immediately excommunicated from the Church of Democratic Partisanship, we know.

MMC
05-05-2016, 06:34 AM
The author of that article is obsessed with discrediting Hillary Clinton. His name is H.A. Goodman and he is considered by much of the liberal blogosphere to be a crackpot.

Yet such a crackpot that Huff Po would be headlining a trending issue over Hillary, huh?

You should check out what Salon, Mother Jones, and MoveOver.Dot organisms are saying about Hillary. Again.....this all coming from the left. Not the Right.

So crying and whining about sources which the leftness always.....always tries to invalidate Right leaning sources. (Even though half of the left doesn't know those light blue words are links to the original sources. Can't think on their own to google up whats carried by the MS) Is one thing.....but to now cry and whine about left wing rags and what they are saying. Is a bit redundant.

The other point would be.....now both left an Ring wing rags are dumping on Hillary. Which is poetic justice. A fitting reward for a dishonest lying, incompetent, and inept woman. Who has no business being in Politics......Exclamation Point.