Should this President be impeached?

[JohnAdams]

Um yes, he should.

http://extras.wnd.com/polling/10057_Should_Barack_Obama_be_impeached_thanks.php? promocode=wd-101232


Poll - 10057 - Should Barack Obama be impeached?

Should Barack Obama be impeached?
1. Yes, if Obama isn’t guilty of “high crimes and misdemeanors” then the phrase has no meaning (93.6%)
2. No, he has done nothing that rises to the level of an impeachable offense ( 3.96%)
Not Answered ( 2.34%)

How would you describe your political opinion?
1. Conservative ( 64.6%)
2. Liberal ( 1.95%)
3. Independent ( 25.3%)
4. other ( 5.77%)
Not Answered ( 2.29%)

Now watch as the liberals scramble to tell us all how this net poll is skewed blah blah blah, all the while out the other sides of their mouths telling us that phone polling where auto-calls answered by a machine or voicemail that then count that call as one for THE OBAMA and over sampling of Dems is accurate. ;)

93.6 believe he should be impeached, does anyone really believe the MSM when it claims this man will be re-elected? After all why re-elect him if you think he should already be fired and kicked out of the job.

Surely these liberals and the MSM don't think Americans are so stupid as to re- hire a man to do a job, that they already think should be fired from that job as it is.

[Captain Obvious]

For what?

[Captain Obvious]

And yes, that poll is grossly skewed.

And baseless, unless there is more in the link which I didn't read.

[Calypso Jones]

I think he should be for gross incompetence and negligence but at this late date it is not gonna happen. Best and cheapest and least time consuming way is to vote that suckah outta office as quickly as possible.

[URF8]

..............................

[URF8]

Obama's offenses are rhetorical and judgmental, not criminal.

[Calypso Jones]

Is oral sex criminal? don't answer that.

seems there are civil and criminal grounds.

[Trinnity]

I think he should be for gross incompetence and negligence but at this late date it is not gonna happen. Best and cheapest and least time consuming way is to vote that suckah outta office as quickly as possible.What she said. ^

[IGetItAlready]

I'm more about his being shot for treason, but as I found this site after being banned from another political forum for posting something similar, I'll decline to comment. :wink20:

[Cigar]

Sure, go ahead and let us know how it goes.

[IGetItAlready]

Definition of TREASON1
: the betrayal of a trust : treachery (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/treachery)

2
: the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family

http://www.merriam-webster.com/styles/default/images/reference/external.jpg See treason defined for English-language learners » (http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search/treason)

See treason defined for kids » (http://www.wordcentral.com/cgi-bin/student?book=Student&va=treason)

[Captain Obvious]

Great.

Now link definition to reality.

[Calypso Jones]

I'm more about his being shot for treason, but as I found this site after being banned from another political forum for posting something similar, I'll decline to comment. :wink20:

I'd be careful about that. it could get you a visit from the guys in the black suits and white shirts.

[Cigar]

I'm more about his being shot for treason, but as I found this site after being banned from another political forum for posting something similar, I'll decline to comment. :wink20:

In General; that's usually an idiotic thing to say, but it's truly confirmed when it's documented on an Internet Forum. :wink20:

But since this is mostly a Conservative Forum, you're safe.

[Carygrant]

If he wants to say , " I'm a peach " , he has every good reason . A Nobel prize winner .And an honourable man .

[Libhater]

I'm more about his being shot for treason, but as I found this site after being banned from another political forum for posting something similar, I'll decline to comment. :wink20:

Hey, I'm with you, and if your gun happens to misfire, I'll be there with mine as a backup.

[Mainecoons]

If he wants to say , " I'm a peach " , he has every good reason . A Nobel prize winner .And an honourable man .

Yeah, so was Yasser Arafat. The leftists have turned the Nobel Prize into a joke. No doubt you're proud of that too.

[Calypso Jones]

Yeah, so was Yasser Arafat. The leftists have turned the Nobel Prize into a joke. No doubt you're proud of that too.

The left manages to do that with any award that previously had some degree of honor attached to that. There's a reason i'm sure. make that, I'm positive.

So what was that nobel for, cary? honorable?? I guess using your criteria you could say that without chocking on your own prevarication.

[Stuck_In_California]

Should this President be impeached?

Um yes, he should.

For what?

For one thing, giving aid and comfort to our enemies.

[Carygrant]

chocking on your own prevarication.


I thought that you were bringing a more passionate dimension to your posts until I noticed the verb .Or do you see me as a mental aeroplane ?

[IGetItAlready]

In General; that's usually an idiotic thing to say, but it's truly confirmed when it's documented on an Internet Forum. :wink20:

But since this is mostly a Conservative Forum, you're safe.

It's only idiotic if you have no clue as to the meaning of treason.
As I've already posted the definition for you, you have no excuse for your continued ignorance.

[patrickt]

No. He should be voted out of office and forgotten as quickly as possible. Of course, as President Carter II, he will run his mouth for the next 40 years. Fortunately, I won't hear him.

[JohnAdams]

Obama's offenses are rhetorical and judgmental, not criminal.

Yes they are in fact criminal.

[JohnAdams]

I predicted a certain response from the left, and well as we can see we got it.

As for grounds for this President's impeachment, well lets just take a looksie shall we libs. Since your side says none exist.

The reasons for impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama.

Number one: He self admittedly in his book "dreams of my father" committed a federal felony, when he states that he possessed and used cocaine, whether powder or rock IE: crack. The federal statute against possession of this substance is a statute which ladies and gents has no statute of limitations on it. In stating he'd possessed and used the substance in his book, he surrendered his fifth amendment right against self incrimination and made public admission of the crime.

Number two: President Obama violated the federal Inspector General Reform act of 2008, (a law he was well aware of, as while still a senator he co-wrote and co-sponsored it's passage into law) by failing to notify the Congress within 30 days, either prior or after, of his reasons for firing a federal inspector general.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ409/html/PLAW-110publ409.htm

Number three: President Obama violated the federal ADEA http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/age.cfm

When once it became known he had dismissed a Federal Inspector General, again failing to notify the Congress, as required by the above mentioned law, that his reasons for firing an inspector general (which as it also turns out just happened to be investigating alleged other criminal activity's by the President and his office, which is in and of itself not only a gross abuse of Presidential power, but quite possibly criminal as well) that he had done so due to the age of the Federal employee.

Number four: President Obama ordered the military forces of the United States to engage in warfare without first notifying, and or obtaining the consent of the Congress of the United States. In violation of the Constitution itself and the war powers act.

Number Five: President Obama committed perjury before the state bar of Illinois. When under oath he stated he had never used another name or alias, which school records, among other documents, including his own book, prove he had in fact done using the name "Barry Soetoro".

Perjury is a felony as well ladies and gents.

Number six: When questioned about taking the nation off to war in Libya, publicly the President stated "Well I had international support", and when his official representative was questioned during official senatorial hearings on the matter, Obama's Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, the top man responsible for military policy save for the President himself stated that it is the view of this President and administration the following (what I find to be shocking, and frankly very very dangerously and closely treasonous) statement

FORBES: You’d have to take steps to get that approval, but would the approval be required before you would take military action against Syria?
PANETTA: As I understand the Constitution and the power of the president, the president could in fact deploy forces if he had to under — if our vital interests were at stake, but that ultimately, then, under the War Powers Act, we would have to come here for your support.
FORBES: So you’d get the support of Congress after you began military operations.
PANETTA: In that — in that particular situation, yes.
FORBES: And then just one last thing, and make sure I’m stating this correctly, it’s your position that the administration’s position would be that we’d have to get a consensus of permission from the international community before we’d act, but that we wouldn’t have to get specific statutory authority from Congress before we would act?
PANETTA: Well, I think in that situation, if the international action is taken pursuant to a Security Council resolution or under our treaty obligations with regards to NATO, that obviously we would participate with the international community. But then ultimately, the Congress of the United States, pursuant to its powers of the purse, would be able to determine whether or not that action is appropriate or not.”

The Constitution and war powers acts are very clear on that matter, ONLY the Congress of the United States has the power and authority to commit this nations military to war, not U.N. and not the President on a whim either.

http://teapartyeconomist.com/2012/05/18/obama-will-start-a-war-if-he-wants-to-panetta/

http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-regime-to-congress-we-ll-tell-you-what-we-re-doing-with-military-force

Number Seven: President Obama signed into law, an act called the NDAA which unconstitutionally, and illegally strips American Citizens of Constitutionally enumerated legal rights, and protections.

Which the Constitution itself says may only be limited through the amendment process, which requires two thirds state ratification. Not an act of the President or even a law passed by the Congress itself.

So there we have it, not one high crime (felony) or misdemeanor which the Constitution requires for impeachment, but four to six crimes, which in some instances this President, publicly, self incriminates himself by making public admission of having committed such crimes.

Oh and one more little tid bit, for the Constitutionally illiterate liberals around, the Constitution does not require or state that the High Crimes and Misdemeanors a President may be impeached for, must take place while that President is a sitting President in office. If such High Crimes and Misdemeanors do come to light while that President is in office, even though they were actually committed prior, he/she may still be impeached by the House of Representatives for those offenses per the Constitution should they come to light while sitting in the office of the President of the United States.

But oh that's right, instead of such grave matters facing our republic, such as a rogue out of control, criminal and yes negligent President, we should instead be worried about Kim Kardashians boob job instead right Dems?

[GrassrootsConservative]

Impeached or Imprisoned.
One of those 2 for the Imp in the White House.

[Chris]

Should he? Yes. And I'm with IGetItAlready post #9.

[JohnAdams]

In General; that's usually an idiotic thing to say, but it's truly confirmed when it's documented on an Internet Forum. :wink20:

But since this is mostly a Conservative Forum, you're safe.

If this forum is conservative, why are you here, and allowed to post the liberal drivel we see day in and day out from you? Oh we weren't supposed to realize or ask that question were we. :rolleyes:

Nothing disgusts me more, than such an intellectually stunted and dishonest argument from a leftist who because they cannot formulate coherent, rationale, defensible arguments to persuade others to their political views. Instead attacks the administration of a web forum, and boohoo's that it's too conservative.

Particularly when that forum administration is as fair handed and free speech conscious as this one seems to be, when compared to the treatment say a conservative would receive at a forum such as the DNCsewer errr I mean underground.

[Captain Obvious]

It wouldn't be unreasonable to suggest that a number of the anti-Obama GOP legislators would mount a campaign to impeach the O'bama based on this overwhelming and absolutely valid evidence that you present, no?

Surely that battle cry echoes in the chambers of Congress as conservative legislators produce and mount this unquestionable evidence to what is no doubt a slam dunk impeachment.

One would think that, considering the posse of enemies that Obama has created, there would be a few of them out there smart enough to take your advice?

... or maybe they just don't peruse this political forum.

Yeah, that's the ticket.

http://thumbnails.hulu.com/131/40030131/40030131_384x288_generated.jpg

[JohnAdams]

It wouldn't be unreasonable to suggest that a number of the anti-Obama GOP legislators would mount a campaign to impeach the O'bama based on this overwhelming and absolutely valid evidence that you present, no?

Surely that battle cry echoes in the chambers of Congress as conservative legislators produce and mount this unquestionable evidence to what is no doubt a slam dunk impeachment.

One would think that, considering the posse of enemies that Obama has created, there would be a few of them out there smart enough to take your advice?

... or maybe they just don't peruse this political forum.

Yeah, that's the ticket.

http://thumbnails.hulu.com/131/40030131/40030131_384x288_generated.jpg

In the House of Representatives where impeachment begins they already are Obvious. The articles have been introduced, and the hearings have begun.

The fact that the MSM is refusing to report on those articles of impeachment, or the fact that even now the House of Representatives is holding hearings on those articles of impeachment, is obviously doing you and many others like you a dis-service obvious.

Given that if the pro Obama MSM were actually doing their jobs as journalists and reporting on the facts and the news, instead of always trying to distract the American people with boob jobs, and other such asinine drivel as we see on MSNBC nightly.

You'd have known that this was going on in your Congress and wouldn't be looking quite so foolish now with your comments about political forums....http://www.sott.net/articles/show/242798-Impeachment-Resolution-Filed-Against-Obama-for-Illegal-War-in-Libya

http://weeklyworldnews.com/politics/45122/obama-impeachment-hearings-begin/ Oh and yes impeachment of this President is a slam dunk as you put it in the House of Representatives. And frankly his removal from office would be as well in the Senate too, if instead of always playing party politics, liberals in the Senate would for once do their jobs, and what is right, legal and just.

But I wouldn't hold my breath to see that one happening anytime soon.

Lastly I would put this to you, it didn't go without notice that not a single liberal has been able to refute even one of the few points and facts about this President which are impeachable offenses this President has comitted.

Not one...instead as usual the left instead of attempting to refute, rebut, or provide some sort of legally upheld defense of Obama's actions.

Resort to name calling and playground arguments instead. That in and of itself alone, tells us all precisely how justified impeachment of Barack Obama is/would be.

[WalterSobchak]

In the House of Representatives where impeachment begins they already are Obvious. The articles have been introduced, and the hearings have begun.

The fact that the MSM is refusing to report on those articles of impeachment, or the fact that even now the House of Representatives is holding hearings on those articles of impeachment, is obviously doing you and many others like you a dis-service obvious.

Given that if the pro Obama MSM were actually doing their jobs as journalists and reporting on the facts and the news, instead of always trying to distract the American people with boob jobs, and other such asinine drivel as we see on MSNBC nightly.

You'd have known that this was going on in your Congress and wouldn't be looking quite so foolish now with your comments about political forums....http://www.sott.net/articles/show/242798-Impeachment-Resolution-Filed-Against-Obama-for-Illegal-War-in-Libya

http://weeklyworldnews.com/politics/45122/obama-impeachment-hearings-begin/ Oh and yes impeachment of this President is a slam dunk as you put it in the House of Representatives. And frankly his removal from office would be as well in the Senate too, if instead of always playing party politics, liberals in the Senate would for once do their jobs, and what is right, legal and just.

But I wouldn't hold my breath to see that one happening anytime soon.

Lastly I would put this to you, it didn't go without notice that not a single liberal has been able to refute even one of the few points and facts about this President which are impeachable offenses this President has comitted.

Not one...instead as usual the left instead of attempting to refute, rebut, or provide some sort of legally upheld defense of Obama's actions.

Resort to name calling and playground arguments instead. That in and of itself alone, tells us all precisely how justified impeachment of Barack Obama is/would be.


http://assets.diylol.com/hfs/1f0/30c/715/resized/jesus-says-meme-generator-jesus-says-you-re-an-idiot-99bca8.jpg

[Captain Obvious]

Lastly I would put this to you, it didn't go without notice that not a single liberal has been able to refute even one of the few points and facts about this President which are impeachable offenses this President has comitted.

Why would anyone want to debate nonsense?

[coolwalker]

By: -- Michael Connelly, retired constitutional lawyer

1. President Obama Has Appointed Numerous People To Cabinet Level Positions Without The Advice And Consent Of The U.S. Senate, As Is Required By The Constitution. These Individuals Are Given Extraordinary Power And Independent Funding, And Are Not Under The Scrutiny Of Congress. The Fact That Obama Calls Them Czars Does Not Make Them Legal. He Has Also Made Illegal Recess Appointments Of Other Members Of His Cabinet That Required Senate Approval. He Simply Declared That The U.S. Senate Was In Recess Despite The Fact That No Such Declaration Had Been Made By The Senate. The President Has No Constitutional Authority To Do This.

2. The Push By Pres. Obama To Pass Healthcare Legislation In The Congress Of The United States That He Was Fully Aware Was Unconstitutional. He Has Continued To Use His Powers And Executive Branch Of Government To Implement This Legislation Despite The Fact That A Federal Judge Had Declared The Entire Law Unconstitutional, And Ordered That It Not Be Implemented. In Addition, Obama Has Directed Members Of His Administration To Violate The Right To Freedom Of Religion Protected By The 1st Amendment To The Constitution.
Religious Institutions Such As Churches And Schools Have Been Ordered To Provide Contraceptives And Abortion Inducing Morning After Pills To Employees As Part Of The Health Care Bill Requirements. The Fact That This Is A Direct Violation Of Their Religious Teaching Is Of No Concern To Obama.

3. Despite The Fact That The United States Senate Refused To Pass The Cap And Trade Bill, The President Has Ordered The Environmental Protection Agency To Use Regulations To Implement Key Portions Of The Bill, Including Those Regulating So-Called Greenhouse Gases. Obama Himself Has Acknowledged That This Will Force Energy Prices In This Country To Skyrocket. He Is Taking These Actions In Direct Defiance Of The Will Of The People Of The United States, The Will Of Congress, And The Constitution. The Actions Of The EPA Include Regulations That Will Force Many Coal Burning Power Plants To Close.

4. Through The Department Of The Interior (DOI) Obama Has Placed A Moratorium On Offshore Oil Drilling Or Exploration Off Both The Atlantic And Pacific Coasts Of The United States And In Parts Of The Gulf Of Mexico. He Has Also Prohibited New Drilling Exploration On Federal Land In Any State Within The United States. These Actions By The DOI Have Continued In Direct Defiance Of Several Court Orders Issued By Federal Judge Martin Feldman In New Orleans, Louisiana Declaring That The Department Had No Authority To Issue Such A Moratorium On Drilling In The Gulf. In Fact, The Secretary Of The Department Of The Interior (DOI) Has Been Held In Contempt By The Same Judge. The Administration Has Claimed To Be Complying, But Has Tied Up The Drilling Permits In So Much Red Tape That The Effect Is The Same.

5. Instead Of Allowing American Companies To Drill For Oil Domestically, Obama Has Betrayed The American People And Authorized Loans Of Billions Of Dollars To Countries Like Brazil And Mexico So That They Can Drill For Oil, And Then Sell That Oil To The United States. This Will Dramatically Increase Our Dependence On Foreign Nations Including Venezuela, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, And Even Libya That Do Not Serve The Interest Of America Or The American People.
Obama Has Also Refused To Approve The Keystone Pipeline From Canada To The United States That Would Not Only Lessen Our Dependence On Oil From Countries Like Venezuela And Saudi Arabia, But Create Thousands Of New Jobs In The United States. The Decision On The Pipeline Is One That Belongs In The Hands Of The Members Of Congress, Not The President.

[coolwalker]

6. President Obama Has Abdicated His Responsibility To Enforce The Laws Of The United States Against Illegal Immigration. He Has Virtually Declared Our Southern Border An Open Border By Declaring Certain Areas Of Federal Land In States Like Arizona As Off-Limits To Federal, State, And Local Authorities. This Is Despite The Fact That These Areas Are Being Used To Bring In Thousands Of Illegal Immigrants, Massive Amounts Of Drugs, And Also Being Used By Foreign Terrorists To Infiltrate The United States. He Has Also Ordered The Border Patrol Not To Arrest Most Illegal Immigrants Entering The Country, And Has Stopped Deportation Proceedings Against Thousands Of People In This Country Illegally. He Is In Effect Instituting The So-Called “Dream Act” Bypassing The Congress Of The United States Which Has Sole Authority Over Immigration Matters.

7. The President And His Attorney General Eric Holder Have Clearly Violated Their Oath Of Office By Joining With Foreign Countries Such As Mexico, Bolivia, And Columbia, In Lawsuits Against The Sovereign States Of Arizona, Georgia, And Alabama To Stop Them From Enforcing The Federal Immigration Laws.

8. President Obama Has Ordered The Federal Communications Commission To Adopt Regulations Giving The Federal Government Control Of The Internet And Its Contents, Including Providing Obama With A Kill Switch That Gives Him Authority To Shut Down The Internet If He Sees Fit. This Is In Direct Violation Of A Decision By The United States Supreme Court That The FCC Has No Constitutional Authority To Control The Internet.
There Were Two Bill Pending In Congress To Effectively Give Obama The Kill Switch He Wants Over The Internet. When These Two Proposals, The Stop Internet Piracy Act (SOPA) And The Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA) Were Withdrawn Amid Public Outcry Obama Announced He Will Sign An International Treaty That Purports To Give Him The Same Authority. He Has Signaled His Intention To Do This As An “Executive Act” And Not Bring The Treaty To The Senate For Ratification As Required By Article 2, Section 2 Of The Constitution. I Believe He Intends To Take The Same Action In Regard To The United Nations Small Arms Treaty And The UN Law Of The Sea Treaty That Are Both Unlikely To Get Senate Approval.

9. One Of The Paramount Responsibilities Of The President Of The United States And His Executive Branch Of Government Is To Enforce And Defend Laws Adopted By Congress Unless They Are Declared Unconstitutional By The United States Supreme Court. Obama Has Decided That He Should Ignore This Constitutional Mandate, And That As President He Is More Powerful Than Either The Congress Of The United States Or The Supreme Court. He Has Unilaterally Declared That The Defense Of Marriage Act Passed By The Congress Is Unconstitutional, And Further Declared That He Will Not Have The Justice Department Defend It Against Lawsuits.
His Administration Has Also Refused To Enforce Laws Against Voter Intimidation And Federal Law That Requires States To Purge Their Voter Registration Lists Of Deceased Individuals And Those That Are Registered Illegally. In Addition, The Justice Department Is Refusing To Allow States To Enforce Laws Requiring Proof Of Identity By Voters At The Polls. Obama Has Essentially Said That He Is The Supreme Ruler Of The United States, And That The Congress And The Federal Judiciary Are Irrelevant.

10. It Has Been Widely Reported That Acting Through The Bureau Of Alcohol, Tobacco, And Firearms The Obama Administration Was Involved For Months In Getting Legitimate And Law-Abiding Gun Store Owners Along Our Southern Border To Supply Weapons To Straw Buyers Who The Government Knew Would Deliver Them To The Drug Cartels In Mexico. This Was Billed As A Sting Operation Against The Cartels When In Fact It Was Designed To Produce Fraudulent Data Showing That Large Numbers Of Weapons Were Going From The United States To The Mexican Drug Dealers.
This Data Was Then To Be Used, And Is Being Used, To Try To Justify New Gun Control Regulations To Limit The Rights Of American Citizens To Keep And Bear Arms. It Has Nothing To Do With Arresting Members Of The Drug Operations. The Administration Has, In Effect, Armed Our Enemies, And One Border Patrol Agent Has Already Been Killed By One Of These Weapons. Now, Obama Continues To Impose Gun Control Laws By Executive Order So He Will Not Have To Deal With Congress. The Administration Is Also Refusing To Cooperate With The Committees In The House Of Representatives That Are Investigating The Entire Operation. It Is Even Defying Congressional Subpoenas.

11. The President Of The United States Is Not Authorized By The Constitution To Take Our Nation To War Without The Consent Of The Congress Of The United States. The Only Exception To This Is The Authority Granted To The President By Congress Under The War Powers Act. This Law Allows The President To Take Immediate Action Without The Consent Of Congress If There Is An Imminent Threat To The Security Of The United States, Or Its Citizens. Although There Was Clearly No Such Imminent Threat Caused By The Civil War In Libya, The President Committed Members Of The United States Military To Combat Missions In A Foreign Country Without The Consent Of Congress. He Based His Authority On A United Nations Resolution, And A Resolution By The Arab League.
Now, The President Has Carried It One Step Further. During Testimony Before The Senate Armed Services Committee On March 7, 2012, Secretary Of Defense Leon Panetta Told Senators That The President Has Authority To Take Our Country To War Without The Congressional Approval Required By Article 1, Section 8, Of The Constitution. The Administration Is Taking The Position That It Can Ignore Congress As Long As It Has United Nations Approval Or NATO Approval.
However, These Actions May Be The Least Of The Worries Facing The American People. The White House Insisted That Language Be Included In The Recently Passed National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) That Gives The President Sole Authority To Order The Military To Arrest And Indefinite Detain American Citizens On U.S. Soil If The President Suspects Them Of Terrorist Ties. This Was Amazingly Passed Overwhelmingly By Congress. It Appears To Be Another Situation Where Few Members Read The Bill Before Voting On It.
This Was Almost Immediately Followed By Another Unconstitutional Executive Order Titled The National Defense Resources Preparation Order. It Is Similar To Orders Signed By Past Presidents, But This One Includes Language That Appears To Give Obama The Authority To Declare Martial Law In Peacetime, And Take Over The Allocation Of Everything From Food And Fuel To Transportation And Health Care. This Violates The Constitution In A Number Of Different Ways.

12. Last But Not The Least Of My Dirty Dozen Of Impeachable Offenses, Is The Fact That Since Taking Office The President Has Used Executive Orders, Laws Pushed Through Congress In The Dark Of Night, And Administrative Actions By His Departments To Nationalize And Control Automobile Manufacturers, Banks, Insurance Companies, And Portions Of The Healthcare Industry. This Is Designed To Take Our Country From A Free Enterprise Economy To A Socialist Economy. There Is Absolutely No Authority In The Constitution Of The United States That Allows The President To Do This.

Article II, Section 4 Of The Constitution Provides As Follows:
“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
I contend that among those high crimes and misdemeanors is the intentional violation of the oath of office administered to the President and all other federal officials. In fact, federal law at 5 U.S.C. 7311 specifically provides that violation of the oath of office includes advocating the overthrowing of our constitutional form of government. This is specifically declared a criminal offense in 18 U.S.C. 1918 and is punishable by both a fine and imprisonment.

In the 12 areas I mentioned in the paragraphs above I firmly believe that Obama, Eric Holder, and numerous other members of his administration have gone beyond just advocating the overthrow of our constitutional form of government. They are actually engaged in making it happen, and as a result should be impeached and convicted. There are also the emerging issues of corruption such as the Solyndra scandal caused by Obama using stimulus money to pay off campaign contributors.

Will there be an impeachment and conviction in the current Congress? Probably not, since it takes a two thirds vote in the House of Representatives to impeach, and a two thirds vote in the Senate to convict. With Harry Reid and the progressives still in control of the Senate, and many of them guilty of some of the same impeachable offenses, they will resist it.

However, we are the American people and we still have a right to control our government, and the people elected to represent us. Therefore, I am personally calling on the conservative members the House of Representatives to bring this action based on the grounds I have enumerated so that the American people can understand what is really at stake here. Then “we the people,” can make our voices heard.

http://redflagnews.com/opinion/obamas-impeachable-offenses-updated-by-michael-connelly-jd-carrollton-tx
There is a petition on this site to sign if you so desire.

[shaarona]

By: -- Michael Connelly, retired constitutional lawyer

1. President Obama Has Appointed Numerous People To Cabinet Level Positions Without The Advice And Consent Of The U.S. Senate, As Is Required By The Constitution. These Individuals Are Given Extraordinary Power And Independent Funding, And Are Not Under The Scrutiny Of Congress. The Fact That Obama Calls Them Czars Does Not Make Them Legal. He Has Also Made Illegal Recess Appointments Of Other Members Of His Cabinet That Required Senate Approval. He Simply Declared That The U.S. Senate Was In Recess Despite The Fact That No Such Declaration Had Been Made By The Senate. The President Has No Constitutional Authority To Do This.

2. The Push By Pres. Obama To Pass Healthcare Legislation In The Congress Of The United States That He Was Fully Aware Was Unconstitutional. He Has Continued To Use His Powers And Executive Branch Of Government To Implement This Legislation Despite The Fact That A Federal Judge Had Declared The Entire Law Unconstitutional, And Ordered That It Not Be Implemented. In Addition, Obama Has Directed Members Of His Administration To Violate The Right To Freedom Of Religion Protected By The 1st Amendment To The Constitution.
Religious Institutions Such As Churches And Schools Have Been Ordered To Provide Contraceptives And Abortion Inducing Morning After Pills To Employees As Part Of The Health Care Bill Requirements. The Fact That This Is A Direct Violation Of Their Religious Teaching Is Of No Concern To Obama.

3. Despite The Fact That The United States Senate Refused To Pass The Cap And Trade Bill, The President Has Ordered The Environmental Protection Agency To Use Regulations To Implement Key Portions Of The Bill, Including Those Regulating So-Called Greenhouse Gases. Obama Himself Has Acknowledged That This Will Force Energy Prices In This Country To Skyrocket. He Is Taking These Actions In Direct Defiance Of The Will Of The People Of The United States, The Will Of Congress, And The Constitution. The Actions Of The EPA Include Regulations That Will Force Many Coal Burning Power Plants To Close.

4. Through The Department Of The Interior (DOI) Obama Has Placed A Moratorium On Offshore Oil Drilling Or Exploration Off Both The Atlantic And Pacific Coasts Of The United States And In Parts Of The Gulf Of Mexico. He Has Also Prohibited New Drilling Exploration On Federal Land In Any State Within The United States. These Actions By The DOI Have Continued In Direct Defiance Of Several Court Orders Issued By Federal Judge Martin Feldman In New Orleans, Louisiana Declaring That The Department Had No Authority To Issue Such A Moratorium On Drilling In The Gulf. In Fact, The Secretary Of The Department Of The Interior (DOI) Has Been Held In Contempt By The Same Judge. The Administration Has Claimed To Be Complying, But Has Tied Up The Drilling Permits In So Much Red Tape That The Effect Is The Same.

5. Instead Of Allowing American Companies To Drill For Oil Domestically, Obama Has Betrayed The American People And Authorized Loans Of Billions Of Dollars To Countries Like Brazil And Mexico So That They Can Drill For Oil, And Then Sell That Oil To The United States. This Will Dramatically Increase Our Dependence On Foreign Nations Including Venezuela, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, And Even Libya That Do Not Serve The Interest Of America Or The American People.
Obama Has Also Refused To Approve The Keystone Pipeline From Canada To The United States That Would Not Only Lessen Our Dependence On Oil From Countries Like Venezuela And Saudi Arabia, But Create Thousands Of New Jobs In The United States. The Decision On The Pipeline Is One That Belongs In The Hands Of The Members Of Congress, Not The President.

Obviously the author was born yesterday since he didn't know about other Czars appointed by other presidents.. and he doesn't even know the basics about Keystone.

It gets better.. the idiot dosn't know about the line of credit to Brazil that can ONLY be spent with US oil services companies. LOLOL :danceshout:

[Cigar]

Good Luck ... and you expect who to pay for this? :grin:

[coolwalker]

Obviously the author was born yesterday since he didn't know about other Czars appointed by other presidents.. and he doesn't even know the basics about Keystone.

It gets better.. the idiot dosn't know about the line of credit to Brazil that can ONLY be spent with US oil services companies. LOLOL :danceshout:

A retired constitutional lawyer is hardly an idiot; and I mean a real one, not one like Obama.

[JohnAdams]

http://assets.diylol.com/hfs/1f0/30c/715/resized/jesus-says-meme-generator-jesus-says-you-re-an-idiot-99bca8.jpg


And I say troll post. ;) By the way since you have chosen to mock the God of billions, can we now burn down embassies, loot, and cause overall general mayhem here in the states too?

After all THE OBAMA says it's just A Ok to do so if someone dares mock his false prophet.

[JohnAdams]

Obviously the author was born yesterday since he didn't know about other Czars appointed by other presidents.. and he doesn't even know the basics about Keystone.

It gets better.. the idiot dosn't know about the line of credit to Brazil that can ONLY be spent with US oil services companies. LOLOL :danceshout:

Once again it does not matter what other Presidents have or have not done. We aren't dealing with them anylonger we are dealing with the high crimes and misdemeanors of this President.

Once again the rebuttal from those who support this President are that two wrongs make a right. :rolleyes:

[coolwalker]

Strip him, whip him and run him naked through the tall weeds with only a communist flag on the other side of the weeds to cover his nakedness.