Like debt? Vote Trump!

[Bo-4]

An analysis from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget came out last night. It takes into account all of the candidates proposals to date in order to asses how they might alter the federal budget and affect the amount of debt that the public holds.

Of course, if you take Donald at his word, he'll just offer pennies on the dollar like he does with his own creditors. Nobody knows debt like Trump ...

Full faith and credit of the US government? Bah!

http://crfb.org/papers/promises-and-price-tags-fiscal-guide-2016-election

[Cigar]

Brilliant :laugh:

If Hillary Clinton loses to this moron, then America deserves Trump

[Peter1469]

Quantitative easing was a partial government default.

[Chris]

This is so much better: Clinton plan: $1 trillion in new spending, $1 trillion in new taxes (http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article51084285.html#storylink=cpy)

[Chris]

Brilliant :laugh:

If Hillary Clinton loses to this moron, then America deserves Trump

And vice versa, if Trump loses to that moron, then America deserves Clinton.

Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard. H. L. Mencken

[zelmo1234]

An analysis from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget came out last night. It takes into account all of the candidates proposals to date in order to asses how they might alter the federal budget and affect the amount of debt that the public holds.

Of course, if you take Donald at his word, he'll just offer pennies on the dollar like he does with his own creditors. Nobody knows debt like Trump ...

Full faith and credit of the US government? Bah!

http://crfb.org/papers/promises-and-price-tags-fiscal-guide-2016-election

Says the person that is going to vote for Hillary, who was part of the administration that doubled the national debt of all other Presidents combined, in 8 years?

Democrats, Please make this election about the Debt, YOUR only answer is fire up the printing press.

[zelmo1234]

This is so much better: Clinton plan: $1 trillion in new spending, $1 trillion in new taxes (http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article51084285.html#storylink=cpy)

But what they won't tell you is that 1 trillion in taxes, will never come to pass, as business will shelter rather than invest and revenue is likely to drop, instead of go up. Not to mention all of the spending to cover the job loss because of new taxes.

[Bo-4]

Says the person that is going to vote for Hillary, who was part of the administration that doubled the national debt of all other Presidents combined, in 8 years?

Democrats, Please make this election about the Debt, YOUR only answer is fire up the printing press.

Nope, i MIGHT vote for Hillary if she picks Warren or Castro as her running mate.

Yeah, all that Dem debt which is largely Bushie's unfunded two trillion dollar war, unfunded trillion dollar Medicare D, ginormous government (Homeland Security) and the resulting interest.

[zelmo1234]

Nope, i MIGHT vote for Hillary if she picks Warren or Castro as her running mate.

Yeah, all that Dem debt which is largely Bushie's unfunded two trillion dollar war, unfunded trillion dollar Medicare D, ginormous government (Homeland Security) and the resulting interest.

NO you can't blame Bush because Obama had all the votes he needed to change everything the first 2 years off his presidency. The republicans did not have a say in anything.

If he had wanted anything other than what happened, he could have made it happen. Stop blaming Bush that was 8 years ago.

[Bo-4]

NO you can't blame Bush because Obama had all the votes he needed to change everything the first 2 years off his presidency. The republicans did not have a say in anything.

If he had wanted anything other than what happened, he could have made it happen. Stop blaming Bush that was 8 years ago.

So Obama is responsible for Junior's horrible choices and debt?

What could have he done to change those?

And enough of the nonsense that Obama could have done anything he wanted first two years. He NEVER had 60 reliable votes.

https://connecticutpolitics.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/blue-dog-democrats-make-the-perfect-corporate-pets.jpg

[Ransom]

So Obama is responsible for Junior's horrible choices and debt?

What could have he done to change those?

And enough of the nonsense that Obama could have done anything he wanted first two years. He NEVER had 60 reliable votes.

https://connecticutpolitics.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/blue-dog-democrats-make-the-perfect-corporate-pets.jpg

Stimulus, omnibus spending, earmarks, Obamacare, Summer of recovery(shovel ready), added no less than 10 trillion and Trump is the debt candidate.

Disingenuous bullsh!t will be called out, Bo's here not quite passing the smell test.

Full of sh!t no way to start a thread on this forum.

[Chris]

But what they won't tell you is that 1 trillion in taxes, will never come to pass, as business will shelter rather than invest and revenue is likely to drop, instead of go up. Not to mention all of the spending to cover the job loss because of new taxes.

Right, which will lead to even greater debt. --Now we're on topic!!

[Ransom]

By the way......the US constituencies sending record tax revenues to Washington.....and going deeper into debt.

He took over GM, the student loan program, and Freddie Mac.......but someone here thinks Donald Trump....to date not responsible for a penny of our debt.....is the debt candidate.

You cannot teach stupid.....you just cannot. It's innate.

Huh Bo?

[Mac-7]

An analysis from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget came out last night. It takes into account all of the candidates proposals to date in order to asses how they might alter the federal budget and affect the amount of debt that the public holds.

Of course, if you take Donald at his word, he'll just offer pennies on the dollar like he does with his own creditors. Nobody knows debt like Trump ...

Full faith and credit of the US government? Bah!

http://crfb.org/papers/promises-and-price-tags-fiscal-guide-2016-election

Who are the people who put out this pro hillary report?

[Bo-4]

Stimulus, omnibus spending, earmarks, Obamacare, Summer of recovery(shovel ready), added no less than 10 trillion and Trump is the debt candidate.

Disingenuous bullsh!t will be called out, Bo's here not quite passing the smell test.

Full of sh!t no way to start a thread on this forum.

Take it up with these guys and spare me the drama eh?

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) is an independent, non-profit, bipartisan public policy organization based in Washington, D.C. that addresses federal budget and fiscal issues. It was founded in 1981 by former United States Representatives (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._House_of_Representatives) Robert Giaimo (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Giaimo) (D-CT) and Henry Bellmon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Bellmon) (R-OK), and its board of directors includes former Members of Congress (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congress) and directors of the Office of Management and Budget (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Management_and_Budget), the Congressional Budget Office (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Budget_Office) and the Federal Reserve (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve).[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_a_Responsible_Federal_Budget#cite_no te-1) CRFB was also host of the Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform (http://budgetreform.org/), which released its initial report, Red Ink Rising (http://budgetreform.org/document/red-ink-rising), in December 2009 and its second report, Getting Back in the Black (http://budgetreform.org/document/getting-back-black), in November 2010.[2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_a_Responsible_Federal_Budget#cite_no te-2)

[Bo-4]

Who are the people who put out this pro hillary report?

Et tu Brute?

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) is an independent, non-profit, bipartisan public policy organization based in Washington, D.C. that addresses federal budget and fiscal issues. It was founded in 1981 by former United States Representatives (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._House_of_Representatives) Robert Giaimo (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Giaimo) (D-CT) and Henry Bellmon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Bellmon) (R-OK), and its board of directors includes former Members of Congress (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congress) and directors of the Office of Management and Budget (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Management_and_Budget), the Congressional Budget Office (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Budget_Office) and the Federal Reserve (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve).[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_a_Responsible_Federal_Budget#cite_no te-1) CRFB was also host of the Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform (http://budgetreform.org/), which released its initial report, Red Ink Rising (http://budgetreform.org/document/red-ink-rising), in December 2009 and its second report, Getting Back in the Black (http://budgetreform.org/document/getting-back-black), in November 2010.[2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_a_Responsible_Federal_Budget#cite_no te-2)

[Truth Detector]

An analysis from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget came out last night. It takes into account all of the candidates proposals to date in order to asses how they might alter the federal budget and affect the amount of debt that the public holds.

Of course, if you take Donald at his word, he'll just offer pennies on the dollar like he does with his own creditors. Nobody knows debt like Trump ...

Full faith and credit of the US government? Bah!

http://crfb.org/papers/promises-and-price-tags-fiscal-guide-2016-election

Nothing can define irony more than Liberuls, who cheer lead the Obama Presidency that has ran up the highest rate of debt in the history of the office, whining about someone who might run up more debt.

It's hard to take such Liberul hypocrisy and nonsense seriously.

[Truth Detector]

Brilliant :laugh:

If Hillary Clinton loses to this moron, then America deserves Trump

It's not "if", but rather, "when." I hope a Trump presidency leads to Liberuls complete meltdown and running for the Southern border. :biglaugh:

[Truth Detector]

Nope, i MIGHT vote for Hillary if she picks Warren or Castro as her running mate.

Yeah, all that Dem debt which is largely Bushie's unfunded two trillion dollar war, unfunded trillion dollar Medicare D, ginormous government (Homeland Security) and the resulting interest.

There you go again; pretending Obama hasn't been President for the last eight years. DUMB. :rollseyes:

[Truth Detector]

So Obama is responsible for Junior's horrible choices and debt?

What could have he done to change those?

And enough of the nonsense that Obama could have done anything he wanted first two years. He NEVER had 60 reliable votes.

There you go again; stupidly pretending that Obama hasn't been President the last eight years. DUMB. :rollseyes:

Remember when Liberuls told us the Obama was going to FIX everything? DERP

[Truth Detector]

Take it up with these guys and spare me the drama eh?

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) is an independent, non-profit, bipartisan public policy organization based in Washington, D.C. that addresses federal budget and fiscal issues. It was founded in 1981 by former United States Representatives (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._House_of_Representatives) Robert Giaimo (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Giaimo) (D-CT) and Henry Bellmon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Bellmon) (R-OK), and its board of directors includes former Members of Congress (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congress) and directors of the Office of Management and Budget (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Management_and_Budget), the Congressional Budget Office (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Budget_Office) and the Federal Reserve (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve).[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_a_Responsible_Federal_Budget#cite_no te-1) CRFB was also host of the Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform (http://budgetreform.org/), which released its initial report, Red Ink Rising (http://budgetreform.org/document/red-ink-rising), in December 2009 and its second report, Getting Back in the Black (http://budgetreform.org/document/getting-back-black), in November 2010.[2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_a_Responsible_Federal_Budget#cite_no te-2)

:biglaugh: Yep; they support the Hitlery right? You just can't make up this level of ignorance.

[Bo-4]

Nothing can define irony more than Liberuls, who cheer lead the Obama Presidency that has ran up the highest rate of debt in the history of the office, whining about someone who might run up more debt.

It's hard to take such Liberul hypocrisy and nonsense seriously.

Trust me - it's much harder to take you seriously. ;-)

[Mac-7]

Et tu Brute?

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) is an independent, non-profit, bipartisan public policy organization based in Washington, D.C. that addresses federal budget and fiscal issues. It was founded in 1981 by former United States Representatives (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._House_of_Representatives) Robert Giaimo (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Giaimo) (D-CT) and Henry Bellmon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Bellmon) (R-OK), and its board of directors includes former Members of Congress (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congress) and directors of the Office of Management and Budget (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Management_and_Budget), the Congressional Budget Office (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Budget_Office) and the Federal Reserve (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve).[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_a_Responsible_Federal_Budget#cite_no te-1) CRFB was also host of the Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform (http://budgetreform.org/), which released its initial report, Red Ink Rising (http://budgetreform.org/document/red-ink-rising), in December 2009 and its second report, Getting Back in the Black (http://budgetreform.org/document/getting-back-black), in November 2010.[2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_a_Responsible_Federal_Budget#cite_no te-2)

Non partisan you say?

they dont tell us who is funding them

that makes a big diffeence

I dont think any are over 40 from their pictures.

and looking at their resumes they all appear to be public sector welfare babies with degrees in public policy and governmet.

meaning no real world experiece to flavor their vast knowledge gained from books they read in the ivory towers of academia.

[Bo-4]

An eerie silence envelopes the room. :D


Non partisan you say?

they dont tell us who is funding them

that makes a big diffeence

I dont think any are over 40 from their pictures.

and looking at their resumes they all appear to be public sector welfare babies with degrees in public policy and governmet.

meaning no real world experiece to flavor their vast knowledge gained from books they read in the ivory towers of academia.

As a non-profit donations are tax deductible. Most of their funding comes from those:

http://crfb.org/support

No real world experience? Please -- wonder how YOUR real world experience stacks up? :rolleyes:

http://crfb.org/board-members

Btw .. have a good look at their site - they support what Republicans are doing OFTEN:

http://crfb.org/papers/prescriptions-controlling-health-care-costs-statement-maya-macguineas-house-republican-health

[AZ Jim]

An analysis from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget came out last night. It takes into account all of the candidates proposals to date in order to asses how they might alter the federal budget and affect the amount of debt that the public holds.

Of course, if you take Donald at his word, he'll just offer pennies on the dollar like he does with his own creditors. Nobody knows debt like Trump ...

Full faith and credit of the US government? Bah!

http://crfb.org/papers/promises-and-price-tags-fiscal-guide-2016-electionMan! After reading the report all I can say is manchild Trump is expensive.

[Bo-4]

Man! After reading thee report all I can say is manchild Trump is expensive.

I don't even think they counted the trillion or so cost for the yuuuge, beautiful wall or deporting 11 million people.

Of course, he's backtracked on the deportation thing.

[Mac-7]

An eerie silence envelopes the room. :D



As a non-profit donations are tax deductible. Most of their funding comes from those:

http://crfb.org/support

No real world experience? Please -- wonder how YOUR real world experience stacks up? :rolleyes:

http://crfb.org/board-members

Btw .. have a good look at their site - they support what Republicans are doing OFTEN:

http://crfb.org/papers/prescriptions-controlling-health-care-costs-statement-maya-macguineas-house-republican-health

I understand they accept small donations but that is not a financisl report.

as for the other maybe its ok with you that they have limited to non existant experience beyond the ivory towers of academia and government but it does not impress me.

[Ransom]

Man! After reading the report all I can say is manchild Trump is expensive.

Read this report...and tell me who is expensive.

www.usdebtclock.org (http://www.usdebtclock.org)

[Ransom]

I don't even think they counted the trillion or so cost for the yuuuge, beautiful wall or deporting 11 million people.

Of course, he's backtracked on the deportation thing.

www.usdebtclock.org (http://www.usdebtclock.org)

[Bo-4]

Read this report...and tell me who is expensive.

www.usdebtclock.org (http://www.usdebtclock.org)

Read my report - Trump will seriously spin those dials until the entire board explodes in a supernova. :D

[Truth Detector]

Trust me - it's much harder to take you seriously. ;-)

Irony. No one here but a mental midget takes any of the dimwitted crap you post here seriously. :biglaugh:

[birddog]

The OP is both funny and ironic. Hillary would govern much like Obama, who allowed the national debt to double under his watch! :laugh:

[Ransom]

Read my report - Trump will seriously spin those dials until the entire board explodes in a supernova. :D

Look at the staggering debt using the link I just provided Bo.....and look to the massive debts Obama has incurred....not one dime of it is Donald Trump responsible for......and you want to speak to Trumps Presidency being "expensive."

You have any idea what a nincompoop you sound like?

[Truth Detector]

Read this report...and tell me who is expensive.

www.usdebtclock.org (http://www.usdebtclock.org)

Nothing more comedic and dumber than a Liberul Obama supporter whining about debt. It really is hard not to look at them as mentally retarded people on steroids. Or, they are just sociopathic liars.

[Truth Detector]

The OP is both funny and ironic. Hillary would govern much like Obama, who allowed the national debt to double under his watch! :laugh:

BUT, in Liberal loony land, that was "good" debt. :biglaugh: Yes, Liberuls really are that stupid, that full of it and that big of hypocrites.

[Truth Detector]

Look at the staggering debt using the link I just provided Bo.....and look to the massive debts Obama has incurred....not one dime of it is Donald Trump responsible for......and you want to speak to Trumps Presidency being "expensive."

You have any idea what a nincompoop you sound like?

If he had a clue, he wouldn't erupt like a retard all the time. ;)

He's almost a ceeegar on steroids.

[Peter1469]

Obama is responsible for almost $10T of debt.... Who in their right mind thinks that Hillary would cut spending?

[Bo-4]

Look at the staggering debt using the link I just provided Bo.....and look to the massive debts Obama has incurred....not one dime of it is Donald Trump responsible for......and you want to speak to Trumps Presidency being "expensive."

You have any idea what a nincompoop you sound like?

Coming from you, "nincompoop" is the ultimate complement.

I will stick with my nonpartisan study from an impressive organization that is just as worried about the debt as you.

[Truth Detector]

Obama is responsible for almost $10T of debt.... How in their right mind thinks that Hillary would cut spending?

Their minds aren't right and most seldom think. ;)

[Truth Detector]

Coming from you, "nincompoop" is the ultimate complement.

I will stick with my nonpartisan study from an impressive organization that is just as worried about the debt as you.

You think it is non-partisan? :biglaugh: DUMB.

[donttread]

An analysis from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget came out last night. It takes into account all of the candidates proposals to date in order to asses how they might alter the federal budget and affect the amount of debt that the public holds.

Of course, if you take Donald at his word, he'll just offer pennies on the dollar like he does with his own creditors. Nobody knows debt like Trump ...

Full faith and credit of the US government? Bah!

http://crfb.org/papers/promises-and-price-tags-fiscal-guide-2016-election

Think of it , the possibility of a president that could outsepned Hilary who will wage wars and upgrade welfare.

[Bo-4]

You think it is non-partisan? :biglaugh: DUMB.

No, i KNOW that it is.

http://crfb.org/board-members

[Bo-4]

Think of it , the possibility of a president that could outsepned Hilary who will wage wars and upgrade welfare.

Hillary is more of a neocon but Trump is scarier. First time a foreign leader offends him, he's may lose his cool and do something stupid.

[Mac-7]

Read my report - Trump will seriously spin those dials until the entire board explodes in a supernova. :D

The report is just the collective opinion of academics who have very limited private sector experience

[Truth Detector]

No, i KNOW that it is.

http://crfb.org/board-members

You still believe in the tooth fairy don't you? :biglaugh:

[Bo-4]

The report is just the collective opinion of academics who have very limited private sector experience

Nonsense - there are minimally 20 Republicans involved with a plethora of both political AND private sector experience.

[Truth Detector]

Hillary is more of a neocon but Trump is scarier. First time a foreign leader offends him, he's may lose his cool and do something stupid.

You lefty's said the same stupid stuff about Reagan too. Let's face it; Barack has been a failure and an embarrassment and you lefty's are trying to project that onto Trump knowing what a weak pathetic candidate you're presenting to the American public in the fall.

Heck, I don't blame you lefty's for being scared and posting all these lies and distortions. :biglaugh:

[Truth Detector]

The report is just the collective opinion of academics who have very limited private sector experience

Correction: The report is just the collective opinion of leftist academics who have very limited private sector experience

[Truth Detector]

Nonsense - there are minimally 20 Republicans involved with a plethora of both political AND private sector experience.

:biglaugh:

[Bo-4]

Correction: The report is just the collective opinion of leftist academics who have very limited private sector experience

You didn't read up on the board. I find that sad.

Never too late my clueless friend.

http://crfb.org/board-members

[Bo-4]

You lefty's said the same stupid stuff about Reagan too. Let's face it; Barack has been a failure and an embarrassment and you lefty's are trying to project that onto Trump knowing what a weak pathetic candidate you're presenting to the American public in the fall.

Heck, I don't blame you lefty's for being scared and posting all these lies and distortions.

O has a 56% approval rating. Contrast that with Gee Flub $hrub's 22% approval rating when he mercifully left the building.

Sucks to be you.
:biglaugh:

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/06/26/obama-approval-rating-skyrockets-56-gop-faces-trump-led-collapse.html

Hey look - another 10 points and Obama will TRIPLE Juniors final approval rating!

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bushs-final-approval-rating-22-percent/

[Truth Detector]

You didn't read up on the board. I find that sad.

Never too late my clueless friend.

http://crfb.org/board-members

I most certainly did; I could list them all out and their LIBERAL credentials but the only predictable response from you would be "Nuh Uh." DERP

[Truth Detector]

O has a 56% approval rating. Contrast that with Gee Flub $hrub's 22% approval rating when he mercifully left the building.

Sucks to be you.
:biglaugh:

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/06/26/obama-approval-rating-skyrockets-56-gop-faces-trump-led-collapse.html

Hey look - another 10 points and Obama will TRIPLE Juniors final approval rating!

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bushs-final-approval-rating-22-percent/

When you lefty's get desperate, there is no telling how gullible and stupid you all will get! :biglaugh:

Nothing dumber than the premise that this race is in the bag for Hitlery. BUT it is fun watching lefty's who cheered the massive overspending of Barrack Hussein Obama now opine about someone who might spend a lot; truly the hypocrisy is so glaring that only a complete imbecile cannot see it.

[Bo-4]

When you lefty's get desperate, there is no telling how gullible and stupid you all will get! :biglaugh:

Nothing dumber than the premise that this race is in the bag for Hitlery.

You're wasting my time with your entirely vacuous NON-responses.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-kUQ7s3aFAVE/UFv911g4TMI/AAAAAAAABdQ/0BL7FztlMLA/s1600/fly.png

[Truth Detector]

You're wasting my time with your entirely vacuous NON-responses.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-kUQ7s3aFAVE/UFv911g4TMI/AAAAAAAABdQ/0BL7FztlMLA/s1600/fly.png

I accept your concession and realization that your bloviating is just that; a bunch of nonsensical and desperate hot air.

[Bo-4]

I accept your concession and realization that your bloviating is just that; a bunch of nonsensical and desperate hot air.

FIFTY SIX PERCENT!!

:rofl:

Poll: US President Obama's approval rating hits 56%, its highest level in Washington Post polling since May 2011, after killing of Osama bin Laden

[Ransom]

Coming from you, "nincompoop" is the ultimate complement.

I will stick with my nonpartisan study from an impressive organization that is just as worried about the debt as you.

here is nothing partisan about the number of people out of work, those on the gov't dole, nor the staggering debt per household number there...Bo.....you don' have to be f'n Copernicus to do the math. Wake the fck up.

[Ransom]

This thread will be closed due to its' author being officially full of sh!t.

[Truth Detector]

FIFTY SIX PERCENT!!

:rofl:

Poll: US President Obama's approval rating hits 56%, its highest level in Washington Post polling since May 2011, after killing of Osama bin Laden


Yep; to willful and gleeful idiots, this is a sign of Obama's success. :biglaugh:

[Bo-4]

This thread will be closed due to its' author being officially full of sh!t.

GOOD!

Mods: Since there has not been a single intelligent response to this non-partisan study from a highly respected source?

Shut it down!!!

[Truth Detector]

GOOD!

Mods: Since there has not been a single intelligent response to this non-partisan study from a highly respected source?

Shut it down!!!

I am amused that you think the thread topic had an ounce of intelligence in it. :biglaugh: