Mark III
07-30-2016, 06:38 PM
The Houston Chronicle Has Supported The Republican Candidate In All But One Of The Last 12 Presidential Elections. Now Two.
These are unsettling times that require a steady hand: That's not Donald Trump.
Houston Chronicle Editorial Board endorses Hillary Clinton
On Nov. 8, 2016, the American people will decide between two presidential contenders who represent the starkest political choice in living memory. They will choose between one candidate with vast experience and a lifelong dedication to public service and another totally lacking in qualifications to be president. They will decide whether they prefer someone deeply familiar with the issues that are important to this nation or a person whose paper-thin, bumper-sticker proposals would be dangerous to the nation and the world if somehow they were enacted.
Her opponent
The Chronicle editorial page does not typically endorse early in an election cycle; we prefer waiting for the campaign to play out and for issues to emerge and be addressed. We make an exception in the 2016 presidential race, because the choice between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump (http://www.chron.com/search/?action=search&channel=opinion%2Frecommendations&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=) is not merely political. It is something much more basic than party preference.An election between the Democrat Clinton (http://www.chron.com/search/?action=search&channel=opinion%2Frecommendations&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=) and, let's say, the Republican Jeb Bush (http://www.chron.com/search/?action=search&channel=opinion%2Frecommendations&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=) or John Kasich (http://www.chron.com/search/?action=search&channel=opinion%2Frecommendations&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=) or Marco Rubio (http://www.chron.com/search/?action=search&channel=opinion%2Frecommendations&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=), even the hyper-ideological Ted Cruz (http://www.chron.com/search/?action=search&channel=opinion%2Frecommendations&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=), would spark a much-needed debate about the role of government and the nation's future, about each candidate's experience and abilities. But those Republican hopefuls have been vanquished. To choose the candidate who defeated them - fairly and decisively, we should point out - is to repudiate the most basic notions of competence and capability.
Any one of Trump's less-than-sterling qualities - his erratic temperament, his dodgy business practices, his racism, his Putin-like strongman inclinations and faux-populist demagoguery, his contempt for the rule of law, his ignorance - is enough to be disqualifying. His convention-speech comment, "I alone can fix it," should make every American shudder. He is, we believe, a danger to the Republic.
http://www.chron.com/opinion/recommendations/article/For-Hillary-Clinton-8650345.php
These are unsettling times that require a steady hand: That's not Donald Trump.
Houston Chronicle Editorial Board endorses Hillary Clinton
On Nov. 8, 2016, the American people will decide between two presidential contenders who represent the starkest political choice in living memory. They will choose between one candidate with vast experience and a lifelong dedication to public service and another totally lacking in qualifications to be president. They will decide whether they prefer someone deeply familiar with the issues that are important to this nation or a person whose paper-thin, bumper-sticker proposals would be dangerous to the nation and the world if somehow they were enacted.
Her opponent
The Chronicle editorial page does not typically endorse early in an election cycle; we prefer waiting for the campaign to play out and for issues to emerge and be addressed. We make an exception in the 2016 presidential race, because the choice between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump (http://www.chron.com/search/?action=search&channel=opinion%2Frecommendations&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=) is not merely political. It is something much more basic than party preference.An election between the Democrat Clinton (http://www.chron.com/search/?action=search&channel=opinion%2Frecommendations&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=) and, let's say, the Republican Jeb Bush (http://www.chron.com/search/?action=search&channel=opinion%2Frecommendations&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=) or John Kasich (http://www.chron.com/search/?action=search&channel=opinion%2Frecommendations&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=) or Marco Rubio (http://www.chron.com/search/?action=search&channel=opinion%2Frecommendations&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=), even the hyper-ideological Ted Cruz (http://www.chron.com/search/?action=search&channel=opinion%2Frecommendations&inlineLink=1&searchindex=gsa&query=), would spark a much-needed debate about the role of government and the nation's future, about each candidate's experience and abilities. But those Republican hopefuls have been vanquished. To choose the candidate who defeated them - fairly and decisively, we should point out - is to repudiate the most basic notions of competence and capability.
Any one of Trump's less-than-sterling qualities - his erratic temperament, his dodgy business practices, his racism, his Putin-like strongman inclinations and faux-populist demagoguery, his contempt for the rule of law, his ignorance - is enough to be disqualifying. His convention-speech comment, "I alone can fix it," should make every American shudder. He is, we believe, a danger to the Republic.
http://www.chron.com/opinion/recommendations/article/For-Hillary-Clinton-8650345.php