LibertyThunder
08-12-2016, 07:37 PM
How Gary Johnson is being disadvantaged by psychological influence without “Top Line” polling
Social proof is one of the most powerful methods of marketing. Hootsuite, the most popular platform for managing social media, stated that around 80% of people “trusted online reviews as much as personal recommendations” in their blog post (https://blog.hootsuite.com/what-is-social-proof/). The graph they posted suggested more people than not make a trustworthy decision based on reviews. When Gary Johnson is not being shown to even be reviewed in top line polling, wouldn’t that influence the polling responses as well as public opinion once that poll is aired? Couldn’t that also be a major factor in explaining why so many people personally recommend him, yet often get told he’s appealing but a vote for him is a “wasted vote?”
http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/gary-johnson-top-line-polling/ (http://bit.ly/2blA4uM)
Social proof is one of the most powerful methods of marketing. Hootsuite, the most popular platform for managing social media, stated that around 80% of people “trusted online reviews as much as personal recommendations” in their blog post (https://blog.hootsuite.com/what-is-social-proof/). The graph they posted suggested more people than not make a trustworthy decision based on reviews. When Gary Johnson is not being shown to even be reviewed in top line polling, wouldn’t that influence the polling responses as well as public opinion once that poll is aired? Couldn’t that also be a major factor in explaining why so many people personally recommend him, yet often get told he’s appealing but a vote for him is a “wasted vote?”
http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/gary-johnson-top-line-polling/ (http://bit.ly/2blA4uM)