PDA

View Full Version : Gary Johnson Gets ANGRY Over Foreign Policy And Exclusion From Debates (You Will Too)



Chris
09-28-2016, 04:25 PM
Gary gets angry at beginning and at end so stick to it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnARyWQWnkg

AZ Jim
09-28-2016, 04:46 PM
Gary gets angry at beginning and at end so stick to it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnARyWQWnkgJust more excuses for his ignorance and crying about his exclusion from the debates. It is so stupid to think the stage at that debate should be crowded by people who have no chance of winning. Hell, I want to be in the debate too, don't you?

Chris
09-28-2016, 04:50 PM
Just more excuses for his ignorance and crying about his exclusion from the debates. It is so stupid to think the stage at that debate should be crowded by people who have no chance of winning. Hell, I want to be in the debate too, don't you?

No.

Did you miss the part where he said he heard Hillary is spending $18M to discredit them who have no chance of winning?

Tahuyaman
09-28-2016, 04:50 PM
Only the partisans who support the status quo want to keep him out of the debates. His inclusion would not be accepted well by the political establishment. He would be a threat to their hold on power.

del
09-28-2016, 04:52 PM
No.

Did you miss the part where he said he heard Hillary is spending $18M to discredit them who have no chance of winning?


i'm sure he hears lots of things that make no sense at all.

i'm voting for him because there really aren't any other choices, but someone should tell him whining doesn't play well.

AZ Jim
09-28-2016, 04:54 PM
Only the partisans who support the status quo want to keep him out of the debates. His inclusion would not be accepted well by the political establishment. He would be a threat to their hold on power.Look, maybe this will shock you but (hold onto your hat) ALL candidates are partisans!!!! Get it? Have someone near help you understand that.

Tahuyaman
09-28-2016, 04:58 PM
Look, maybe this will shock you but (hold onto your hat) ALL candidates are partisans!!!! Get it? Have someone near help you understand that.


When I say partisans, I mean simple minded people who base their support only on party affiliation. People like ........... You.


Got it?

Chris
09-28-2016, 05:00 PM
i'm sure he hears lots of things that make no sense at all.

i'm voting for him because there really aren't any other choices, but someone should tell him whining doesn't play well.

He wasn't whining, he was yelling. He wasn't sad, he was angry.

Mark III
09-28-2016, 05:00 PM
The problem with Gary Johnson is not that he didn't know what Aleppo is, the problem is that proved that he does not follow day to day news. Someone who reads a newspaper every day or reads news online every day would have known what Aleppo is.

He's out.

del
09-28-2016, 05:02 PM
He wasn't whining, he was yelling. He wasn't sad, he was angry.

whatever

if hew thinks anyone needs to spend $18mm to marginalize him, he's brain dead.

Chris
09-28-2016, 05:02 PM
Look, maybe this will shock you but (hold onto your hat) ALL candidates are partisans!!!! Get it? Have someone near help you understand that.

Tah was talking about partisan voters, those who vote along party lines, not those who choose the best candidate according to their values and principles.

Chris
09-28-2016, 05:05 PM
whatever

if hew thinks anyone needs to spend $18mm to marginalize him, he's brain dead.



There's reason to believe he's taking more votes from Clinton than Trump: http://hotair.com/archives/2016/08/02/polls-show-gary-johnson-taking-more-support-from-clinton-not-trump/, http://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2016/08/gary_johnson_taking_more_voter.html, http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-is-gary-johnson-taking-more-support-from-clinton-or-trump/

del
09-28-2016, 05:10 PM
There's reason to believe he's taking more votes from Clinton than Trump: http://hotair.com/archives/2016/08/02/polls-show-gary-johnson-taking-more-support-from-clinton-not-trump/, http://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2016/08/gary_johnson_taking_more_voter.html, http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-is-gary-johnson-taking-more-support-from-clinton-or-trump/

that's nice, honey.


but it isn't worth $18mm

AZ Jim
09-28-2016, 05:34 PM
When I say partisans, I mean simple minded people who base their support only on party affiliation. People like ........... You.


Got it?Most likely unlike you I have been both a registered republican and democrat. I even once registered Independent so unless you know what cards someone holds, smart folks don't bet. Get it?

Tahuyaman
09-28-2016, 05:38 PM
Tah was talking about partisan voters, those who vote along party lines, not those who choose the best candidate according to their values and principles.

and I wasn't talking about the candidates offered up by the parties.

You know exactly what I was talking about because I was quite clear about it.

Tahuyaman
09-28-2016, 05:41 PM
Most likely unlike you I have been both a registered republican and democrat. I even once registered Independent so unless you know what cards someone holds, smart folks don't bet. Get it?


I have never registered as anything. I have never declared allegiance to a political party. I'm not a "card carrying" member of any partisan political organization.

Unlike you, I think for myself.

Now follow up with another sophomoric comment. It's kind of funny watching you unknowingly embarrass yourself.

del
09-28-2016, 05:44 PM
I have never registered as anything. I have never declared allegiance to a political party. I'm not a "card carrying" member of any partisan political organization.

Unlike you, I think for myself.

Now follow up with another sophomoric comment.

it shows

GHOST
09-28-2016, 05:45 PM
It's hard to get angry for a guy who sticks his tongue out at female reporters.

Chris
09-28-2016, 05:52 PM
that's nice, honey.


but it isn't worth $18mm

Are you Hillary's financial advisor now? I have no idea what her campaign thinks or values or spends. Though I'm fairly sure she wants to win at any cost.

Green Arrow
09-28-2016, 06:26 PM
The problem with Gary Johnson is not that he didn't know what Aleppo is, the problem is that proved that he does not follow day to day news. Someone who reads a newspaper every day or reads news online every day would have known what Aleppo is.

He's out.

He knows what Aleppo is. He's talked about it in the past. He had a brain fart in one interview. He's human.

Green Arrow
09-28-2016, 06:28 PM
It's hard to get angry for a guy who sticks his tongue out at female reporters.

1) It was one female reporter.
2) It was a joke.
3) As opposed to these clowns?

https://66.media.tumblr.com/746f7380ac0e9dc67a6657ea74ddbc99/tumblr_ob4ty47Kln1r0b4wzo1_400.gif

http://i.makeagif.com/media/11-26-2015/m_JWqS.gif

Chris
09-28-2016, 06:34 PM
He knows what Aleppo is. He's talked about it in the past. He had a brain fart in one interview. He's human.

Aleppo is one of the things he was angry about in the video. That criticism of him misses the point.

Don
09-28-2016, 06:35 PM
They let debate moderators interject themselves into the debates. Johnson has more right to be in them than they do. If the moderators want to debate they should run for president.

Green Arrow
09-28-2016, 06:36 PM
They let debate moderators interject themselves into the debates. Johnson has more right to be in them than they do. If the moderators want to debate they should run for president.

Interjecting in the debate is literally the job of moderators. They don't exist to just sit there and ask questions.

Chris
09-28-2016, 06:37 PM
1) It was one female reporter.
2) It was a joke.
3) As opposed to these clowns?

https://66.media.tumblr.com/746f7380ac0e9dc67a6657ea74ddbc99/tumblr_ob4ty47Kln1r0b4wzo1_400.gif

http://i.makeagif.com/media/11-26-2015/m_JWqS.gif



Titled "two clowns from the same circus" @ http://archinect.com/forum/thread/149953404/two-clowns-from-the-same-circus

https://i.snag.gy/nDUHbp.jpg

Don
09-28-2016, 06:38 PM
Interjecting in the debate is literally the job of moderators. They don't exist to just sit there and ask questions.

Moderating is their job, not interjecting themselves into the debate.

Green Arrow
09-28-2016, 06:41 PM
Moderating is their job, not interjecting themselves into the debate.

Yes...moderating requires interjecting from time to time.

del
09-28-2016, 06:42 PM
Are you Hillary's financial advisor now? I have no idea what her campaign thinks or values or spends. Though I'm fairly sure she wants to win at any cost.

yes, you have no idea.

thanks for sharing

Chris
09-28-2016, 06:48 PM
yes, you have no idea.

thanks for sharing

Nor do you.

Thanks for, well, not sharing. Oh, wait, you told us you're voting for Johnson.

del
09-28-2016, 06:52 PM
Nor do you.

Thanks for, well, not sharing. Oh, wait, you told us you're voting for Johnson.

i am

he has no chance, never had a chance, never will have a chance

he's the perfect libertarian

Chris
09-28-2016, 06:56 PM
BTW, For Hillary Clinton, Gary Johnson Is a Juicier Target Than Jill Stein (http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/09/hillary-clinton-gary-johnson-juicier-target-jill-stein) offers a reasonable explanation why Clinton would go after Johnson for the youth vote.


Patrick Caldwell summarizes the effect of third-party candidates on Hillary Clinton's standing among millennials:

In a Quinnipiac poll from last week, when Stein and Johnson were included, Clinton received just 31 percent support from likely voters 18-34. Johnson came in second with 29 percent, while Trump garnered 26 percent and Stein 15 percent. When Stein and Johnson weren't offered as options, that age cohort sided with Clinton over Trump by a 55-34 margin.

Oof. She loses 24 percent of the millennial vote to Gary Johnson and Jill Stein. But wait....

He considers Johnson likely also takes away from Trump whereas Stein likely doesn't. Then goes on...


...Among people who are left of center, Jill Stein is a pretty obvious choice if Hillary Clinton isn't your cup of tea. That's especially true among former Bernie Sanders supporters who are far to Clinton's left. But Gary Johnson doesn't make any sense at all. At a policy level, he's a left-wing disaster. Bernie Sanders would rather cut off his big toe than put Gary Johnson in the White House. So why is Johnson getting any love from voters on the left?

From an electoral point of view, my guess is that it's a waste of effort for Clinton to try to peel off young Stein voters. Stein makes sense for them. But peeling off Johnson voters should be pretty easy. Just point out that he wants to repeal Obamacare, slash Social Security, supports Citizens United, and doesn't want to do anything about climate change. He's a pretty ripe target.


Millenials favor Clinton over Trump by a wide margin: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pr/2016/08/15/poll-finds-millennials-favor-clinton-over-trump-wide-margin/88757778/

Chris
09-28-2016, 06:58 PM
i am

he has no chance, never had a chance, never will have a chance

he's the perfect libertarian


Not a snowball's chance in hell.

He's not my perfect libertarian, won't vote for him, but I do like to see third parties gaining momentum.

Green Arrow
09-28-2016, 07:38 PM
Not a snowball's chance in hell.

He's not my perfect libertarian, won't vote for him, but I do like to see third parties gaining momentum.

No thanks to you.

Green Arrow
09-28-2016, 10:37 PM
Hal Jordan

AZ Jim
09-28-2016, 11:26 PM
Tah was talking about partisan voters, those who vote along party lines, not those who choose the best candidate according to their values and principles.When I need a translation, I'll go to google. At ease Chris.

Bethere
09-29-2016, 02:12 AM
He knows what Aleppo is. He's talked about it in the past. He had a brain fart in one interview. He's human.

Right.

Tonight, when asked to name a world leader, any world leader, he couldn't name one.

He called it, "another Aleppo moment. "