PDA

View Full Version : Debate Rigged?



patrickt
10-10-2012, 07:51 AM
The liberal media/politician/bureaucrat revolving door spins so rapidly, sometimes it's hard to keep pace. Today we learn via the Daily Caller that the moderator for tomorrow's vice presidential debate, ABC News reporter Martha Raddatz, hosted President Obama as a guest at her 1991 wedding to the man who would later become Obama's FCC commissioner, Julius Genachowski. That's shocking enough in its own right but things are further compounded by the fact that ABC News, home of veteran Democratic adviser George Stephanopolous, has long known about this conflict of interest and did nothing about it. Even worse, the network has actively tried to prevent the public from learning of it.
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/#ixzz28tqsKKab

"ABC News took the unusual step of releasing a statement blasting the Caller before its new story had even been published. An ABC News spokesperson called the "conflict of interest" claim "absurd":"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/09/abc-news-daily-caller-martha-raddatz-bias-accusation_n_1951652.html

Is corruption so endemic it's hopeless?

Cigar
10-10-2012, 07:54 AM
OH GOD ...The Fix is in ... :f_doh::f_doh::f_doh:

Akula
10-10-2012, 07:56 AM
OH GOD ...The Fix is in ... :f_doh::f_doh::f_doh:

Would you complain if david duke were the moderator?

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 08:19 AM
then why are you not concerned with the wife of a Scotus memeber having clear political motivations and still that scotus member never recuses himself in any case?

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 08:20 AM
One desides for our country


One merely reports news

patrickt
10-10-2012, 08:24 AM
Wow! In four responses we get three typical liberal responses. One is simply a stupid Cigar comment that's meaningless. The other is two posts that are totally off-topic and non-responsive from Truthdoesn'tmatter.

One post was, sadly, someone actually responding to Cigar. Why bother?

I realize liberals see election fraud as a right but do they also see staffing the debate moderators with partisan liberals as a right, too?

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 08:30 AM
your party is the one who has done election fraud for decades

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 08:31 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBAsFwPglw


this is the founder of the heritage foundation

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 08:31 AM
http://articles.latimes.com/1986-10-25/news/mn-7435_1_republican-national-committee


his ideas resulted in republican action




In an Aug. 13 memo the court made public Friday, Kris Wolfe, the Republican National Committee Midwest political director, wrote Lanny Griffith, the committee's Southern political director, and said of the Louisiana campaigning:
"I know this race is really important to you. I would guess that this program will eliminate at least 60-80,000 folks from the rolls. . . . If it's a close race . . . which I'm assuming it is, this could keep the black vote down considerably."
Unseals Document
She said in the memorandum that the program had been approved by Gregory Graves, deputy political director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
The document, called Exhibit 13, was unsealed by U.S. District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise when lawyers for the Democratic National Committee said it was needed to question Wolfe.
Wolfe testified that she wrote about the possibility of keeping the black vote down to remind Griffith that there "might be a political situation he might want to consider. . . . I wanted him to be aware of the political considerations."
The Democrats are suing the Republican Party for $10 million, charging that the Republican National Committee ballot security programs--a method of assuring that voters reside at their listed addresses--violated a 1981 consent agreement signed by both parties.
Under the agreement, the Republican committee would "refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial composition of such districts is a factor."

Agravan
10-10-2012, 08:33 AM
your party is the one who has done election fraud for decades

Wait, but isn't it your side that has been trying to convince us for decades that election fraud does not exist? Which is it? Does it only exist when the right is caught but not when the left engages in it???

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 08:33 AM
those names you see there are the TOP RNC people who werew involved

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 08:34 AM
voter fraud and election fraud are NOT the same things

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 08:35 AM
http://personalliberty.com/2009/12/09/judge-denies-republicans-effort-to-end-voter-intimidation-consent-decree-19493836/


Judge Denies Republicans' Effort To End Voter Intimidation Consent DecreeDecember 9, 2009 by Personal Liberty News Desk (http://personalliberty.com/author/personallibertynewsdeskpl/)

http://pictures.directnews.co.uk/liveimages/voting_1961_19493836_0_0_7021094_300.jpgLast week, a federal judge in New Jersey rejected an attempt by the Republican National Committee (RNC) to dissolve a 27-year-old court order that is intended to prevent the intimidation of minority voters

Agravan
10-10-2012, 08:35 AM
then why are you not concerned with the wife of a Scotus memeber having clear political motivations and still that scotus member never recuses himself in any case?

As you were not concerned that a solicitor general who worked on obamacare refused to recuse herself from voting on it when she became a member of SCOTUS.

In your example, it was his wife, not the judge that was active politically. In mine, it was actually the judge. Which one had the more active role???

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 08:36 AM
You full well knew her history when she took the position.


The scotus wife mentioned STILL to this day is a poltical activist

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 08:38 AM
http://www.brennancenter.org/content/section/category/voter_purges_and_challenges

Agravan
10-10-2012, 08:41 AM
You full well knew her history when she took the position.
Yes, which is why she should have recused herself. Anyone, with any sense of honor, would have recused themselves. But Dems have no honor.



The scotus wife mentioned STILL to this day is a poltical activist
And so is Kagin. By the way, moochelle o is an activist as well, should she stop?

So what you are saying is that when you get selected to SCOTUS, you should tell your family that, from that day forward, they can no longer engage in any political activities? Maybe he should have told his wife when they got married that someday he would be a Supreme court justice so she should stop her political activities just so that some dumb-shit liberal would not constantly bring it up and use it against him.

patrickt
10-10-2012, 08:45 AM
Congratulations. Truthdoesn'tmatter hijacks another thread by an incredible amount of nonsense.

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 09:00 AM
this is right on topic you were talking about rigging elections

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 09:01 AM
Prove kagen is involved in partisan poltics right now

birddog
10-10-2012, 09:18 AM
your party is the one who has done election fraud for decades

P-K-B alert!

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 09:19 AM
you dont like the court documented facts on the issue?

truthmatters
10-10-2012, 09:20 AM
those things I gave you are undenable facts about the republican party.

you dont like history?

Cigar
10-10-2012, 09:20 AM
Would you complain if david duke were the moderator?

I would crack up laughing, especially without the hoodie ... but at least David Duke isn't afraid of Sun Light :)

Agravan
10-10-2012, 09:51 AM
Prove kagen is involved in partisan poltics right now
She voted on obamacare.

Akula
10-10-2012, 10:02 AM
I would crack up laughing, especially without the hoodie ... but at least David Duke isn't afraid of Sun Light :)

Sure..sure...

patrickt
10-10-2012, 11:34 AM
Ah, a new directive from the White House. If you can legitimately refute a comment then you make two or three inane responses to wear the bastards down. Congratulations Truthdoesn'tmatter even if Cigar occasionally has to help.

bladimz
10-10-2012, 04:08 PM
Yes. This debate is already over.

If Biden takes Ryan down, which in all probability he will, the "Excuse" has already been constructed. Well-played, right-wingers. Well-played.

Hey, wait a minute. Wasn't Jim Lehrer the mod last week? Isn't he associated with PBS, a leftie organization? Was he paid off? I think he was. It makes sense... That debate was rigged, too!!

coolwalker
10-10-2012, 04:12 PM
Yes. This debate is already over.

If Biden takes Ryan down, which in all probability he will, the "Excuse" has already been constructed. Well-played, right-wingers. Well-played.

Hey, wait a minute. Wasn't Jim Lehrer the mod last week? Isn't he associated with PBS, a leftie organization? Was he paid off? I think he was. It makes sense... That debate was rigged, too!!

When Biden goes down in the flames of facts and figures, will you admit defeat?

Akula
10-10-2012, 04:27 PM
Yes. This debate is already over.

If Biden takes Ryan down, which in all probability he will, the "Excuse" has already been constructed. Well-played, right-wingers. Well-played.

Hey, wait a minute. Wasn't Jim Lehrer the mod last week? Isn't he associated with PBS, a leftie organization? Was he paid off? I think he was. It makes sense... That debate was rigged, too!!

Save all the melodramatic hypotheticals and fantasy. It looks silly.

So you don't see any potential conflict of interest/bias because obama was a guest at the moderator's wedding?..and her husband works for obama?...You don't see anything unusual about that, right?

Agravan
10-10-2012, 04:29 PM
If Ryan had been a guest at the moderator's wedding, would she still be moderating??