88 US Generals Stand Together Against Hillary Clinton In One Massive Act Of Defiance

[Peter1469]

88 US Generals Stand Together Against Hillary Clinton In One Massive Act Of Defiance (http://endingthefed.com/88-us-generals-stand-together-against-hillary-clinton-in-one-massive-act-of-defiance.html)

A lot of experienced military talent know that Hillary should never be commander in chief.


According to recent reports, 88 retired U.S. Generals and Admirals wrote an open letter, claiming they support Trump and his “commitment to rebuild our military, to secure our borders, to defeat our Islamic supremacist adversaries and restore law and order domestically.”

“As retired senior leaders of America’s military, we believe that such a change can only be made by someone who has not been deeply involved with, and substantially responsible for, the hollowing out of our military and the burgeoning threats facing our country around the world,” the letter reads.

“For this reason, we support Donald Trump’s candidacy to be our next Commander-in-Chief.”

Trump was quick to respond to the glowing endorsement. From the beginning, he has thrown his support behind our men and women in uniform.“It is a great honor to have such amazing support from so many distinguished retired military leaders,” Trump commented. “I thank each of them for their service and their confidence in me to serve as commander-in-chief.”




“We can only Make America Great Again if we ensure our military remains the finest fighting force in the world, and that’s exactly what I will do as president,” Trump concluded.

The letter was reportedly organized by Major General Sidney Shachnow, the only survivor of the Holocaust that went on to become a U.S. General. He partnered with Rear Admiral Charles Williams, who received the Legion of Merit.

In his statement, Williams suggested the letter demonstrates that military leaders belive “Donald Trump is more trusted to be commander-in-chief than Hillary Clinton.”

“Hillary Clinton has made clear she is running as a staunch defender of the status quo when it comes to the issues facing our military, and she has shown through her foreign policy decisions and her mishandling of classified information that she lacks the judgment to do the job,” Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn added in the press release.

“Mr.Trump’s deep and growing support in the military community and his thoughtful proposals show he’s the right person to lead our men and women in uniform.”

[FindersKeepers]

88 US Generals Stand Together Against Hillary Clinton In One Massive Act Of Defiance (http://endingthefed.com/88-us-generals-stand-together-against-hillary-clinton-in-one-massive-act-of-defiance.html)

A lot of experienced military talent know that Hillary should never be commander in chief.

This is a HUGE endorsement for Trump but I have to wonder, given the media's slant toward Hillary, whether the average citizen will ever hear it.

[Beevee]

Since Generals will allways support military action to justify their positions and considering that the US is engrossed in losing positions practically everywhere worldwide, the sane will realize that such endorsements are worthless.

[Peter1469]

Since Generals will allways support military action to justify their positions and considering that the US is engrossed in losing positions practically everywhere worldwide, the sane will realize that such endorsements are worthless.

That is not a rational response. Although I do agree that endorsements are largely worthless.

[exploited]

For a bit of perspective, there are about 5000 retired generals and admirals right now, so this represents about 1.76%.

[Bethere]

This is a HUGE endorsement for Trump but I have to wonder, given the media's slant toward Hillary, whether the average citizen will ever hear it.

It's an OLD endorsement, eclipsed by a lengthier list of generals who support the president elect, Hillary Clinton.

[Beevee]

That is not a rational response. Although I do agree that endorsements are largely worthless.

If you agree that the endorsements are practically worthless, why did you OP in the first place?

[Peter1469]

If you agree that the endorsements are practically worthless, why did you OP in the first place?

It is a discussion forum. I found it interesting and posted it.

Do you suggest not posting?

[Subdermal]

If you agree that the endorsements are practically worthless, why did you OP in the first place?

:facepalm:

[stjames1_53]

If you agree that the endorsements are practically worthless, why did you OP in the first place?

he was fishing for azzhats...looky, he got one!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=OIP.Mc374fe3c5855d4b4e0a0227a6a3bd365o0&w=300&h=225&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0&r=0

[JDubya]

If you agree that the endorsements are practically worthless, why did you OP in the first place?

Because he thought it was a big deal until you rationally pointed out how worthless it is.

Then he was forced to claim he posted it because he "found it interesting" :facepalm:

Zero integrity.

[JDubya]

It is a discussion forum. I found it interesting and posted it.

Do you suggest not posting?

For you, yes.

You'd look a lot better if you just never said anything.

[donttread]

88 US Generals Stand Together Against Hillary Clinton In One Massive Act Of Defiance (http://endingthefed.com/88-us-generals-stand-together-against-hillary-clinton-in-one-massive-act-of-defiance.html)

A lot of experienced military talent know that Hillary should never be commander in chief.


Generals support war?

[Peter1469]

For you, yes.

You'd look a lot better if you just never said anything.

Why should I listen to trash?

[Peter1469]

Generals support war?

In general, or case by case?

[JDubya]

Why should I listen to trash?

The real question is... why DO you listen to trash?

[Peter1469]

The real question is... why DO you listen to trash?Are you asking me to put you on ignore?

[Crepitus]

88 US Generals Stand Together Against Hillary Clinton In One Massive Act Of Defiance (http://endingthefed.com/88-us-generals-stand-together-against-hillary-clinton-in-one-massive-act-of-defiance.html)

A lot of experienced military talent know that Hillary should never be commander in chief.

A. Smallest number of endorsements for a Republican candidate in recent memory.

B. More endorsements for Clinton than for Trump. (http://https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/updates/2016/09/07/ninety-five-retired-generals-and-admirals-endorse-hillary-clinton/) Also highest number of endorsements for democratic candidate in recent memory.


Total thread failure

[Peter1469]

A. Smallest number of endorsements for a Republican candidate in recent memory.

B. More endorsements for Clinton than for Trump. (http://https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/updates/2016/09/07/ninety-five-retired-generals-and-admirals-endorse-hillary-clinton/) Also highest number of endorsements for democratic candidate in recent memory.


Total thread failure

It is not a thread failure. Funny to see the attacks though.

[Crepitus]

It is not a thread failure. Funny to see the attacks though.

Well, your definition of success must be different than mine.


Lol
.

[Cletus]

Since Generals will allways support military action to justify their positions and considering that the US is engrossed in losing positions practically everywhere worldwide, the sane will realize that such endorsements are worthless.

Most of the time, the Generals are the most reluctant to take military action. They understand what it means.

[Peter1469]

Well, your definition of success must be different than mine.


Lol
.

Wow.

Sue your teachers. They failed you.

[Beevee]

Most of the time, the Generals are the most reluctant to take military action. They understand what it means.

Which is probably why they haven't succeeded in many conflicts since 1946

[Crepitus]

Wow.

Sue your teachers. They failed you.

Lol, says the lawyer who can't tell the difference between a fact and an opinion.


Nice try Pete but that's two fails in a row by my count.

[Cletus]

Which is probably why they haven't succeeded in many conflicts since 1946

Beevee, everyone knows you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer. You don't have to go out of your way to prove it.

[del]

he was fishing for azzhats...looky, he got one!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=OIP.Mc374fe3c5855d4b4e0a0227a6a3bd365o0&w=300&h=225&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0&r=0

don't feel badly, you're not the only one

[AZ Jim]

Take one good look at that "source" and you'll discount any of it's content. It is crammed with stories made up to lure the mentally fragile into believing it's "Trumped" up lies. The OP should be ashamed for posting such trash in his fanatic desire to support Trump.

AZ Jim has been threadbanned by request of the OP Peter1469

[Beevee]

Beevee, everyone knows you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer. You don't have to go out of your way to prove it.

Yes. I do. It bothers me that other conservatives don't claim it as regularly as you do, so let me thank you for reminding them.

[Dr. Who]

https://s15.postimg.org/jg3h4chgb/gavel.gif Crepitus has been thread banned at the request of the OP, please do not respond to this member's posts.

If you have questions about this action, please direct them to the OP in a PM. Thank you.

[Beevee]

I didn't notice this was a tPF thread until now, so I won't be posting in it from here on.

[Chris]

I didn't notice this was a tPF thread until now, so I won't be posting in it from here on.


Beevee Peter1469 Beevee has been TBed at the request of the OP. Please direct any questions to Peter.

[stjames1_53]

don't feel badly, you're not the only one
nope. You and BV make two